Predictors of sustained research involvement among MD/PhD programme graduates

• Published in: Medical education 2018-05, Vol.52 (5), p.536-545
• Main Authors: Skinnider, Michael A, Twa, David D W, Squair, Jordan W, Rosenblum, Norman D, Lukac, Christine D
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Medical education; Medical research; Pediatrics; Scholarships & fellowships
• ISSN: 0308-0110; 1365-2923
• DOI: 10.1111/medu.13513

Context MD/PhD programmes provide structured paths for physician‐scientist training. However, considerable proportions of graduates of these programmes do not pursue careers in research consistent with their training. Objectives We sought to identify factors associated with sustained involvement in research after completion of all postgraduate training. Methods Anonymised data from a national survey of Canadian MD/PhD programme graduates who had completed all physician‐scientist training (n = 70) were analysed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to measure the associations between characteristics of graduates and five indicators of sustained research involvement following postgraduate training: (i) protected research time in the current appointment; (ii) percentage of time dedicated to research; (iii) planned future involvement in research; (iv) role as a principal investigator on a recent funded project, and (v) receipt of funding from a federal granting agency since graduation. Results The majority of graduates were significantly involved in research on the basis of at least one outcome. Completion of a research fellowship, number of first‐authored or co‐authored manuscripts published during MD/PhD training, and duration of MD/PhD training were positively associated with continued research involvement. Completion of a Masters degree prior to MD/PhD training, female gender, debt greater than CAD$50 000 at completion of training, and pursuit of a clinical specialty other than internal medicine, paediatrics, neurology, pathology and the surgical specialties were negatively associated with sustained research involvement. Conclusions Most MD/PhD programme graduates remain significantly involved in research, but this involvement often does not correspond to traditional physician‐scientist roles, in which a majority of time is dedicated to research. To minimise loss of investment in physician‐scientist training, MD/PhD programmes should prioritise research productivity during training and the pursuit of additional research training during residency, and policymakers should establish stable sources of funding to reduce debt among graduates. Our data suggest further study is warranted to identify interventions to reduce attrition among female MD/PhD programme graduates. The authors report that MD/PhD program graduates remain significantly involved in research and identify factors associated with attrition from research intensive careers.