Loading…

Water-equivalence of gel dosimeters for radiology medical imaging

International dosimetry protocols are based on determinations of absorbed dose to water. Ideally, the phantom material should be water equivalent; that is, it should have the same absorption and scatter properties as water. This study presents theoretical, experimental and Monte Carlo modeling of wa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied radiation and isotopes 2018-11, Vol.141, p.193-198
Main Authors: Valente, M., Vedelago, J., Chacón, D., Mattea, F., Velásquez, J., Pérez, P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:International dosimetry protocols are based on determinations of absorbed dose to water. Ideally, the phantom material should be water equivalent; that is, it should have the same absorption and scatter properties as water. This study presents theoretical, experimental and Monte Carlo modeling of water-equivalence of Fricke and polymer (NIPAM, PAGAT and itaconic acid ITABIS) gel dosimeters. Mass and electronic densities along with effective atomic number were calculated by means of theoretical approaches. Samples were scanned by standard computed tomography. Photon mass attenuation coefficients and electron stopping powers were examined. Theoretical, Monte Carlo and experimental results confirmed good water-equivalence for all gel dosimeters. Overall variations with respect to water in the low energy radiology range (up to 130 kVp) were found to be less than 3% in average. •Water-equivalence for radiology applications was evaluated for gel dosimeters.•Fricke and polymer (NIPAM, PAGAT and itaconic acid) gel dosimeters investigated.•Experimental, theory and Monte Carlo approaches were applied.•Variations less than 3% were found for radiology energy range (up to 130kVp).•Results suggest promising performance of gel dosimetry for radiology applications.
ISSN:0969-8043
1872-9800
DOI:10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.03.005