Loading…
Developing Student Evidence‐Based Practice Questionnaire (S‐EBPQ) for undergraduate nursing students: Reliability and validity of a Chinese adaptation
Rationale, aims, and objectives The assessment of evaluating undergraduate nursing students' evidence‐based practice engagement is an important issue, yet few tools have been developed specifically in Mainland China. The purpose of this study was to adapt the Student Evidence‐based Practice Que...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of evaluation in clinical practice 2019-08, Vol.25 (4), p.536-542 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-463c3389192bfd5bad32cc9cd24dc50792dca69fbc251db0f12aec4541541d623 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-463c3389192bfd5bad32cc9cd24dc50792dca69fbc251db0f12aec4541541d623 |
container_end_page | 542 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 536 |
container_title | Journal of evaluation in clinical practice |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Zhang, Yin‐Ping Liu, Wen‐Hui Yan, Yi‐Tian Zhang, Yao Wei, Huan‐Huan Porr, Caroline |
description | Rationale, aims, and objectives
The assessment of evaluating undergraduate nursing students' evidence‐based practice engagement is an important issue, yet few tools have been developed specifically in Mainland China. The purpose of this study was to adapt the Student Evidence‐based Practice Questionnaire (S‐EBPQ) to Mainland China's cultural context and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly adapted Chinese S‐EBPQ.
Methods
Cross‐cultural adaptation, including translation of the original S‐EBPQ into Mandarin Chinese language, was performed according to published guidelines. A pilot study was conducted in Mainland China with 25 Chinese undergraduate nursing students. A subsequent validation study was conducted with 400 undergraduate nursing students from Mainland China. Construct validity was assessed by exploratory factor analysis (n = 190) and confirmatory factor analysis (n = 210). Reliability was determined using internal consistency and test‐retest reliability.
Results
The split‐half coefficient for the overall Chinese S‐EBPQ was 0.858. A content validity index of 0.986 was achieved. Principal component analysis resulted in a 4‐factor structure explaining 68.285% of the total variance. The comparative fit index was 0.927, and the root mean squared error of approximation was 0.072 from the confirmatory factor analysis. Known‐group validity was supported by the significant differences according to various characteristics of participants. Internal consistency was high for the Chinese S‐EBPQ reaching a Cronbach α value of 0.934. Test‐retest reliability was 0.821.
Conclusion
The newly cross‐culturally adapted S‐EBPQ possesses adequate validity, test‐retest reliability, and internal consistency and therefore may be utilized in nursing education to assess EBP of undergraduate nursing students in Mainland China. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jep.12897 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2018030253</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2018030253</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-463c3389192bfd5bad32cc9cd24dc50792dca69fbc251db0f12aec4541541d623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhi0EoqWw4AWQJTbtIq0vcTJh1w7DTZWYUlhbJ_ZJ8SjjBDsZNLs-Qtc8Hk-CQwoLJCxLx5Y_fT5HPyHPOTvlaZ1tsD_lYlGVD8ghl4XKRKnkw-msioyLKj8gT2LcMMYlU-VjciAqVUpWiEPy4zXusO1652_o9TBa9ANd7VyqBn_e3l1AREvXAczgDNKrEePgOu_BBaTH14lYXayvTmjTBTp6i-EmgB1hQOrHECdpnKXxFf2ErYPatW7YU_CW7qB1drp0DQW6_Oo8RqRgoR9g-uQpedRAG_HZfT0iX96sPi_fZZcf375fnl9mRipZZnkhjZSLileibqyqwUphTGWsyK1RrKyENVBUTW2E4rZmDReAJlc5T9sWQh6R49nbh-7bNKDeumiwbcFjN0YtGF8wyYSSCX35D7rpxuBTd1qk96IUalEm6mSmTOhiDNjoPrgthL3mTE-B6RSY_h1YYl_cG8d6i_Yv-SehBJzNwHfX4v7_Jv1htZ6VvwBggqMN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2253672587</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Developing Student Evidence‐Based Practice Questionnaire (S‐EBPQ) for undergraduate nursing students: Reliability and validity of a Chinese adaptation</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Zhang, Yin‐Ping ; Liu, Wen‐Hui ; Yan, Yi‐Tian ; Zhang, Yao ; Wei, Huan‐Huan ; Porr, Caroline</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yin‐Ping ; Liu, Wen‐Hui ; Yan, Yi‐Tian ; Zhang, Yao ; Wei, Huan‐Huan ; Porr, Caroline</creatorcontrib><description>Rationale, aims, and objectives
The assessment of evaluating undergraduate nursing students' evidence‐based practice engagement is an important issue, yet few tools have been developed specifically in Mainland China. The purpose of this study was to adapt the Student Evidence‐based Practice Questionnaire (S‐EBPQ) to Mainland China's cultural context and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly adapted Chinese S‐EBPQ.
Methods
Cross‐cultural adaptation, including translation of the original S‐EBPQ into Mandarin Chinese language, was performed according to published guidelines. A pilot study was conducted in Mainland China with 25 Chinese undergraduate nursing students. A subsequent validation study was conducted with 400 undergraduate nursing students from Mainland China. Construct validity was assessed by exploratory factor analysis (n = 190) and confirmatory factor analysis (n = 210). Reliability was determined using internal consistency and test‐retest reliability.
Results
The split‐half coefficient for the overall Chinese S‐EBPQ was 0.858. A content validity index of 0.986 was achieved. Principal component analysis resulted in a 4‐factor structure explaining 68.285% of the total variance. The comparative fit index was 0.927, and the root mean squared error of approximation was 0.072 from the confirmatory factor analysis. Known‐group validity was supported by the significant differences according to various characteristics of participants. Internal consistency was high for the Chinese S‐EBPQ reaching a Cronbach α value of 0.934. Test‐retest reliability was 0.821.
Conclusion
The newly cross‐culturally adapted S‐EBPQ possesses adequate validity, test‐retest reliability, and internal consistency and therefore may be utilized in nursing education to assess EBP of undergraduate nursing students in Mainland China.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1356-1294</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2753</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jep.12897</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29573062</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Adult ; China ; Cross-Cultural Comparison ; Discriminant analysis ; Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - methods ; Evidence-Based Practice - education ; evidence‐based practice ; Female ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Male ; nursing ; Nursing education ; Pilot Projects ; Principal components analysis ; Psychometrics - methods ; Psychometrics - standards ; questionnaire ; Questionnaires ; Reproducibility of Results ; Students ; Students, Nursing - psychology ; Students, Nursing - statistics & numerical data ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Translations ; undergraduate ; validation ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2019-08, Vol.25 (4), p.536-542</ispartof><rights>2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-463c3389192bfd5bad32cc9cd24dc50792dca69fbc251db0f12aec4541541d623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-463c3389192bfd5bad32cc9cd24dc50792dca69fbc251db0f12aec4541541d623</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7595-0356</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29573062$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yin‐Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Wen‐Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Yi‐Tian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Huan‐Huan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porr, Caroline</creatorcontrib><title>Developing Student Evidence‐Based Practice Questionnaire (S‐EBPQ) for undergraduate nursing students: Reliability and validity of a Chinese adaptation</title><title>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</title><addtitle>J Eval Clin Pract</addtitle><description>Rationale, aims, and objectives
The assessment of evaluating undergraduate nursing students' evidence‐based practice engagement is an important issue, yet few tools have been developed specifically in Mainland China. The purpose of this study was to adapt the Student Evidence‐based Practice Questionnaire (S‐EBPQ) to Mainland China's cultural context and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly adapted Chinese S‐EBPQ.
Methods
Cross‐cultural adaptation, including translation of the original S‐EBPQ into Mandarin Chinese language, was performed according to published guidelines. A pilot study was conducted in Mainland China with 25 Chinese undergraduate nursing students. A subsequent validation study was conducted with 400 undergraduate nursing students from Mainland China. Construct validity was assessed by exploratory factor analysis (n = 190) and confirmatory factor analysis (n = 210). Reliability was determined using internal consistency and test‐retest reliability.
Results
The split‐half coefficient for the overall Chinese S‐EBPQ was 0.858. A content validity index of 0.986 was achieved. Principal component analysis resulted in a 4‐factor structure explaining 68.285% of the total variance. The comparative fit index was 0.927, and the root mean squared error of approximation was 0.072 from the confirmatory factor analysis. Known‐group validity was supported by the significant differences according to various characteristics of participants. Internal consistency was high for the Chinese S‐EBPQ reaching a Cronbach α value of 0.934. Test‐retest reliability was 0.821.
Conclusion
The newly cross‐culturally adapted S‐EBPQ possesses adequate validity, test‐retest reliability, and internal consistency and therefore may be utilized in nursing education to assess EBP of undergraduate nursing students in Mainland China.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Cross-Cultural Comparison</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - methods</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Practice - education</subject><subject>evidence‐based practice</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>nursing</subject><subject>Nursing education</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Psychometrics - methods</subject><subject>Psychometrics - standards</subject><subject>questionnaire</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Students, Nursing - psychology</subject><subject>Students, Nursing - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Translations</subject><subject>undergraduate</subject><subject>validation</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1356-1294</issn><issn>1365-2753</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhi0EoqWw4AWQJTbtIq0vcTJh1w7DTZWYUlhbJ_ZJ8SjjBDsZNLs-Qtc8Hk-CQwoLJCxLx5Y_fT5HPyHPOTvlaZ1tsD_lYlGVD8ghl4XKRKnkw-msioyLKj8gT2LcMMYlU-VjciAqVUpWiEPy4zXusO1652_o9TBa9ANd7VyqBn_e3l1AREvXAczgDNKrEePgOu_BBaTH14lYXayvTmjTBTp6i-EmgB1hQOrHECdpnKXxFf2ErYPatW7YU_CW7qB1drp0DQW6_Oo8RqRgoR9g-uQpedRAG_HZfT0iX96sPi_fZZcf375fnl9mRipZZnkhjZSLileibqyqwUphTGWsyK1RrKyENVBUTW2E4rZmDReAJlc5T9sWQh6R49nbh-7bNKDeumiwbcFjN0YtGF8wyYSSCX35D7rpxuBTd1qk96IUalEm6mSmTOhiDNjoPrgthL3mTE-B6RSY_h1YYl_cG8d6i_Yv-SehBJzNwHfX4v7_Jv1htZ6VvwBggqMN</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Zhang, Yin‐Ping</creator><creator>Liu, Wen‐Hui</creator><creator>Yan, Yi‐Tian</creator><creator>Zhang, Yao</creator><creator>Wei, Huan‐Huan</creator><creator>Porr, Caroline</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7595-0356</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>Developing Student Evidence‐Based Practice Questionnaire (S‐EBPQ) for undergraduate nursing students: Reliability and validity of a Chinese adaptation</title><author>Zhang, Yin‐Ping ; Liu, Wen‐Hui ; Yan, Yi‐Tian ; Zhang, Yao ; Wei, Huan‐Huan ; Porr, Caroline</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-463c3389192bfd5bad32cc9cd24dc50792dca69fbc251db0f12aec4541541d623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Cross-Cultural Comparison</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - methods</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Practice - education</topic><topic>evidence‐based practice</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>nursing</topic><topic>Nursing education</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Psychometrics - methods</topic><topic>Psychometrics - standards</topic><topic>questionnaire</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Students, Nursing - psychology</topic><topic>Students, Nursing - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Translations</topic><topic>undergraduate</topic><topic>validation</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yin‐Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Wen‐Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Yi‐Tian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Huan‐Huan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porr, Caroline</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Yin‐Ping</au><au>Liu, Wen‐Hui</au><au>Yan, Yi‐Tian</au><au>Zhang, Yao</au><au>Wei, Huan‐Huan</au><au>Porr, Caroline</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Developing Student Evidence‐Based Practice Questionnaire (S‐EBPQ) for undergraduate nursing students: Reliability and validity of a Chinese adaptation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Eval Clin Pract</addtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>536</spage><epage>542</epage><pages>536-542</pages><issn>1356-1294</issn><eissn>1365-2753</eissn><abstract>Rationale, aims, and objectives
The assessment of evaluating undergraduate nursing students' evidence‐based practice engagement is an important issue, yet few tools have been developed specifically in Mainland China. The purpose of this study was to adapt the Student Evidence‐based Practice Questionnaire (S‐EBPQ) to Mainland China's cultural context and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly adapted Chinese S‐EBPQ.
Methods
Cross‐cultural adaptation, including translation of the original S‐EBPQ into Mandarin Chinese language, was performed according to published guidelines. A pilot study was conducted in Mainland China with 25 Chinese undergraduate nursing students. A subsequent validation study was conducted with 400 undergraduate nursing students from Mainland China. Construct validity was assessed by exploratory factor analysis (n = 190) and confirmatory factor analysis (n = 210). Reliability was determined using internal consistency and test‐retest reliability.
Results
The split‐half coefficient for the overall Chinese S‐EBPQ was 0.858. A content validity index of 0.986 was achieved. Principal component analysis resulted in a 4‐factor structure explaining 68.285% of the total variance. The comparative fit index was 0.927, and the root mean squared error of approximation was 0.072 from the confirmatory factor analysis. Known‐group validity was supported by the significant differences according to various characteristics of participants. Internal consistency was high for the Chinese S‐EBPQ reaching a Cronbach α value of 0.934. Test‐retest reliability was 0.821.
Conclusion
The newly cross‐culturally adapted S‐EBPQ possesses adequate validity, test‐retest reliability, and internal consistency and therefore may be utilized in nursing education to assess EBP of undergraduate nursing students in Mainland China.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>29573062</pmid><doi>10.1111/jep.12897</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7595-0356</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1356-1294 |
ispartof | Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2019-08, Vol.25 (4), p.536-542 |
issn | 1356-1294 1365-2753 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2018030253 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Adaptation Adult China Cross-Cultural Comparison Discriminant analysis Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - methods Evidence-Based Practice - education evidence‐based practice Female Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Humans Male nursing Nursing education Pilot Projects Principal components analysis Psychometrics - methods Psychometrics - standards questionnaire Questionnaires Reproducibility of Results Students Students, Nursing - psychology Students, Nursing - statistics & numerical data Surveys and Questionnaires Translations undergraduate validation Validity |
title | Developing Student Evidence‐Based Practice Questionnaire (S‐EBPQ) for undergraduate nursing students: Reliability and validity of a Chinese adaptation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A07%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Developing%20Student%20Evidence%E2%80%90Based%20Practice%20Questionnaire%20(S%E2%80%90EBPQ)%20for%20undergraduate%20nursing%20students:%20Reliability%20and%20validity%20of%20a%20Chinese%20adaptation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20evaluation%20in%20clinical%20practice&rft.au=Zhang,%20Yin%E2%80%90Ping&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=536&rft.epage=542&rft.pages=536-542&rft.issn=1356-1294&rft.eissn=1365-2753&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jep.12897&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2018030253%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-463c3389192bfd5bad32cc9cd24dc50792dca69fbc251db0f12aec4541541d623%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2253672587&rft_id=info:pmid/29573062&rfr_iscdi=true |