Loading…

Developing Student Evidence‐Based Practice Questionnaire (S‐EBPQ) for undergraduate nursing students: Reliability and validity of a Chinese adaptation

Rationale, aims, and objectives The assessment of evaluating undergraduate nursing students' evidence‐based practice engagement is an important issue, yet few tools have been developed specifically in Mainland China. The purpose of this study was to adapt the Student Evidence‐based Practice Que...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of evaluation in clinical practice 2019-08, Vol.25 (4), p.536-542
Main Authors: Zhang, Yin‐Ping, Liu, Wen‐Hui, Yan, Yi‐Tian, Zhang, Yao, Wei, Huan‐Huan, Porr, Caroline
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-463c3389192bfd5bad32cc9cd24dc50792dca69fbc251db0f12aec4541541d623
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-463c3389192bfd5bad32cc9cd24dc50792dca69fbc251db0f12aec4541541d623
container_end_page 542
container_issue 4
container_start_page 536
container_title Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
container_volume 25
creator Zhang, Yin‐Ping
Liu, Wen‐Hui
Yan, Yi‐Tian
Zhang, Yao
Wei, Huan‐Huan
Porr, Caroline
description Rationale, aims, and objectives The assessment of evaluating undergraduate nursing students' evidence‐based practice engagement is an important issue, yet few tools have been developed specifically in Mainland China. The purpose of this study was to adapt the Student Evidence‐based Practice Questionnaire (S‐EBPQ) to Mainland China's cultural context and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly adapted Chinese S‐EBPQ. Methods Cross‐cultural adaptation, including translation of the original S‐EBPQ into Mandarin Chinese language, was performed according to published guidelines. A pilot study was conducted in Mainland China with 25 Chinese undergraduate nursing students. A subsequent validation study was conducted with 400 undergraduate nursing students from Mainland China. Construct validity was assessed by exploratory factor analysis (n = 190) and confirmatory factor analysis (n = 210). Reliability was determined using internal consistency and test‐retest reliability. Results The split‐half coefficient for the overall Chinese S‐EBPQ was 0.858. A content validity index of 0.986 was achieved. Principal component analysis resulted in a 4‐factor structure explaining 68.285% of the total variance. The comparative fit index was 0.927, and the root mean squared error of approximation was 0.072 from the confirmatory factor analysis. Known‐group validity was supported by the significant differences according to various characteristics of participants. Internal consistency was high for the Chinese S‐EBPQ reaching a Cronbach α value of 0.934. Test‐retest reliability was 0.821. Conclusion The newly cross‐culturally adapted S‐EBPQ possesses adequate validity, test‐retest reliability, and internal consistency and therefore may be utilized in nursing education to assess EBP of undergraduate nursing students in Mainland China.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jep.12897
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2018030253</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2018030253</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-463c3389192bfd5bad32cc9cd24dc50792dca69fbc251db0f12aec4541541d623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhi0EoqWw4AWQJTbtIq0vcTJh1w7DTZWYUlhbJ_ZJ8SjjBDsZNLs-Qtc8Hk-CQwoLJCxLx5Y_fT5HPyHPOTvlaZ1tsD_lYlGVD8ghl4XKRKnkw-msioyLKj8gT2LcMMYlU-VjciAqVUpWiEPy4zXusO1652_o9TBa9ANd7VyqBn_e3l1AREvXAczgDNKrEePgOu_BBaTH14lYXayvTmjTBTp6i-EmgB1hQOrHECdpnKXxFf2ErYPatW7YU_CW7qB1drp0DQW6_Oo8RqRgoR9g-uQpedRAG_HZfT0iX96sPi_fZZcf375fnl9mRipZZnkhjZSLileibqyqwUphTGWsyK1RrKyENVBUTW2E4rZmDReAJlc5T9sWQh6R49nbh-7bNKDeumiwbcFjN0YtGF8wyYSSCX35D7rpxuBTd1qk96IUalEm6mSmTOhiDNjoPrgthL3mTE-B6RSY_h1YYl_cG8d6i_Yv-SehBJzNwHfX4v7_Jv1htZ6VvwBggqMN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2253672587</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Developing Student Evidence‐Based Practice Questionnaire (S‐EBPQ) for undergraduate nursing students: Reliability and validity of a Chinese adaptation</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Zhang, Yin‐Ping ; Liu, Wen‐Hui ; Yan, Yi‐Tian ; Zhang, Yao ; Wei, Huan‐Huan ; Porr, Caroline</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yin‐Ping ; Liu, Wen‐Hui ; Yan, Yi‐Tian ; Zhang, Yao ; Wei, Huan‐Huan ; Porr, Caroline</creatorcontrib><description>Rationale, aims, and objectives The assessment of evaluating undergraduate nursing students' evidence‐based practice engagement is an important issue, yet few tools have been developed specifically in Mainland China. The purpose of this study was to adapt the Student Evidence‐based Practice Questionnaire (S‐EBPQ) to Mainland China's cultural context and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly adapted Chinese S‐EBPQ. Methods Cross‐cultural adaptation, including translation of the original S‐EBPQ into Mandarin Chinese language, was performed according to published guidelines. A pilot study was conducted in Mainland China with 25 Chinese undergraduate nursing students. A subsequent validation study was conducted with 400 undergraduate nursing students from Mainland China. Construct validity was assessed by exploratory factor analysis (n = 190) and confirmatory factor analysis (n = 210). Reliability was determined using internal consistency and test‐retest reliability. Results The split‐half coefficient for the overall Chinese S‐EBPQ was 0.858. A content validity index of 0.986 was achieved. Principal component analysis resulted in a 4‐factor structure explaining 68.285% of the total variance. The comparative fit index was 0.927, and the root mean squared error of approximation was 0.072 from the confirmatory factor analysis. Known‐group validity was supported by the significant differences according to various characteristics of participants. Internal consistency was high for the Chinese S‐EBPQ reaching a Cronbach α value of 0.934. Test‐retest reliability was 0.821. Conclusion The newly cross‐culturally adapted S‐EBPQ possesses adequate validity, test‐retest reliability, and internal consistency and therefore may be utilized in nursing education to assess EBP of undergraduate nursing students in Mainland China.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1356-1294</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2753</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jep.12897</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29573062</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Adult ; China ; Cross-Cultural Comparison ; Discriminant analysis ; Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - methods ; Evidence-Based Practice - education ; evidence‐based practice ; Female ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Male ; nursing ; Nursing education ; Pilot Projects ; Principal components analysis ; Psychometrics - methods ; Psychometrics - standards ; questionnaire ; Questionnaires ; Reproducibility of Results ; Students ; Students, Nursing - psychology ; Students, Nursing - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Translations ; undergraduate ; validation ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2019-08, Vol.25 (4), p.536-542</ispartof><rights>2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-463c3389192bfd5bad32cc9cd24dc50792dca69fbc251db0f12aec4541541d623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-463c3389192bfd5bad32cc9cd24dc50792dca69fbc251db0f12aec4541541d623</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7595-0356</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29573062$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yin‐Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Wen‐Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Yi‐Tian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Huan‐Huan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porr, Caroline</creatorcontrib><title>Developing Student Evidence‐Based Practice Questionnaire (S‐EBPQ) for undergraduate nursing students: Reliability and validity of a Chinese adaptation</title><title>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</title><addtitle>J Eval Clin Pract</addtitle><description>Rationale, aims, and objectives The assessment of evaluating undergraduate nursing students' evidence‐based practice engagement is an important issue, yet few tools have been developed specifically in Mainland China. The purpose of this study was to adapt the Student Evidence‐based Practice Questionnaire (S‐EBPQ) to Mainland China's cultural context and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly adapted Chinese S‐EBPQ. Methods Cross‐cultural adaptation, including translation of the original S‐EBPQ into Mandarin Chinese language, was performed according to published guidelines. A pilot study was conducted in Mainland China with 25 Chinese undergraduate nursing students. A subsequent validation study was conducted with 400 undergraduate nursing students from Mainland China. Construct validity was assessed by exploratory factor analysis (n = 190) and confirmatory factor analysis (n = 210). Reliability was determined using internal consistency and test‐retest reliability. Results The split‐half coefficient for the overall Chinese S‐EBPQ was 0.858. A content validity index of 0.986 was achieved. Principal component analysis resulted in a 4‐factor structure explaining 68.285% of the total variance. The comparative fit index was 0.927, and the root mean squared error of approximation was 0.072 from the confirmatory factor analysis. Known‐group validity was supported by the significant differences according to various characteristics of participants. Internal consistency was high for the Chinese S‐EBPQ reaching a Cronbach α value of 0.934. Test‐retest reliability was 0.821. Conclusion The newly cross‐culturally adapted S‐EBPQ possesses adequate validity, test‐retest reliability, and internal consistency and therefore may be utilized in nursing education to assess EBP of undergraduate nursing students in Mainland China.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Cross-Cultural Comparison</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - methods</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Practice - education</subject><subject>evidence‐based practice</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>nursing</subject><subject>Nursing education</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Psychometrics - methods</subject><subject>Psychometrics - standards</subject><subject>questionnaire</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Students, Nursing - psychology</subject><subject>Students, Nursing - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Translations</subject><subject>undergraduate</subject><subject>validation</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1356-1294</issn><issn>1365-2753</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhi0EoqWw4AWQJTbtIq0vcTJh1w7DTZWYUlhbJ_ZJ8SjjBDsZNLs-Qtc8Hk-CQwoLJCxLx5Y_fT5HPyHPOTvlaZ1tsD_lYlGVD8ghl4XKRKnkw-msioyLKj8gT2LcMMYlU-VjciAqVUpWiEPy4zXusO1652_o9TBa9ANd7VyqBn_e3l1AREvXAczgDNKrEePgOu_BBaTH14lYXayvTmjTBTp6i-EmgB1hQOrHECdpnKXxFf2ErYPatW7YU_CW7qB1drp0DQW6_Oo8RqRgoR9g-uQpedRAG_HZfT0iX96sPi_fZZcf375fnl9mRipZZnkhjZSLileibqyqwUphTGWsyK1RrKyENVBUTW2E4rZmDReAJlc5T9sWQh6R49nbh-7bNKDeumiwbcFjN0YtGF8wyYSSCX35D7rpxuBTd1qk96IUalEm6mSmTOhiDNjoPrgthL3mTE-B6RSY_h1YYl_cG8d6i_Yv-SehBJzNwHfX4v7_Jv1htZ6VvwBggqMN</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Zhang, Yin‐Ping</creator><creator>Liu, Wen‐Hui</creator><creator>Yan, Yi‐Tian</creator><creator>Zhang, Yao</creator><creator>Wei, Huan‐Huan</creator><creator>Porr, Caroline</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7595-0356</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>Developing Student Evidence‐Based Practice Questionnaire (S‐EBPQ) for undergraduate nursing students: Reliability and validity of a Chinese adaptation</title><author>Zhang, Yin‐Ping ; Liu, Wen‐Hui ; Yan, Yi‐Tian ; Zhang, Yao ; Wei, Huan‐Huan ; Porr, Caroline</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-463c3389192bfd5bad32cc9cd24dc50792dca69fbc251db0f12aec4541541d623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Cross-Cultural Comparison</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - methods</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Practice - education</topic><topic>evidence‐based practice</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>nursing</topic><topic>Nursing education</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Psychometrics - methods</topic><topic>Psychometrics - standards</topic><topic>questionnaire</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Students, Nursing - psychology</topic><topic>Students, Nursing - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Translations</topic><topic>undergraduate</topic><topic>validation</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yin‐Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Wen‐Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Yi‐Tian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Huan‐Huan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porr, Caroline</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Yin‐Ping</au><au>Liu, Wen‐Hui</au><au>Yan, Yi‐Tian</au><au>Zhang, Yao</au><au>Wei, Huan‐Huan</au><au>Porr, Caroline</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Developing Student Evidence‐Based Practice Questionnaire (S‐EBPQ) for undergraduate nursing students: Reliability and validity of a Chinese adaptation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Eval Clin Pract</addtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>536</spage><epage>542</epage><pages>536-542</pages><issn>1356-1294</issn><eissn>1365-2753</eissn><abstract>Rationale, aims, and objectives The assessment of evaluating undergraduate nursing students' evidence‐based practice engagement is an important issue, yet few tools have been developed specifically in Mainland China. The purpose of this study was to adapt the Student Evidence‐based Practice Questionnaire (S‐EBPQ) to Mainland China's cultural context and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly adapted Chinese S‐EBPQ. Methods Cross‐cultural adaptation, including translation of the original S‐EBPQ into Mandarin Chinese language, was performed according to published guidelines. A pilot study was conducted in Mainland China with 25 Chinese undergraduate nursing students. A subsequent validation study was conducted with 400 undergraduate nursing students from Mainland China. Construct validity was assessed by exploratory factor analysis (n = 190) and confirmatory factor analysis (n = 210). Reliability was determined using internal consistency and test‐retest reliability. Results The split‐half coefficient for the overall Chinese S‐EBPQ was 0.858. A content validity index of 0.986 was achieved. Principal component analysis resulted in a 4‐factor structure explaining 68.285% of the total variance. The comparative fit index was 0.927, and the root mean squared error of approximation was 0.072 from the confirmatory factor analysis. Known‐group validity was supported by the significant differences according to various characteristics of participants. Internal consistency was high for the Chinese S‐EBPQ reaching a Cronbach α value of 0.934. Test‐retest reliability was 0.821. Conclusion The newly cross‐culturally adapted S‐EBPQ possesses adequate validity, test‐retest reliability, and internal consistency and therefore may be utilized in nursing education to assess EBP of undergraduate nursing students in Mainland China.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>29573062</pmid><doi>10.1111/jep.12897</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7595-0356</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1356-1294
ispartof Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2019-08, Vol.25 (4), p.536-542
issn 1356-1294
1365-2753
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2018030253
source Wiley
subjects Adaptation
Adult
China
Cross-Cultural Comparison
Discriminant analysis
Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - methods
Evidence-Based Practice - education
evidence‐based practice
Female
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Male
nursing
Nursing education
Pilot Projects
Principal components analysis
Psychometrics - methods
Psychometrics - standards
questionnaire
Questionnaires
Reproducibility of Results
Students
Students, Nursing - psychology
Students, Nursing - statistics & numerical data
Surveys and Questionnaires
Translations
undergraduate
validation
Validity
title Developing Student Evidence‐Based Practice Questionnaire (S‐EBPQ) for undergraduate nursing students: Reliability and validity of a Chinese adaptation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A07%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Developing%20Student%20Evidence%E2%80%90Based%20Practice%20Questionnaire%20(S%E2%80%90EBPQ)%20for%20undergraduate%20nursing%20students:%20Reliability%20and%20validity%20of%20a%20Chinese%20adaptation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20evaluation%20in%20clinical%20practice&rft.au=Zhang,%20Yin%E2%80%90Ping&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=536&rft.epage=542&rft.pages=536-542&rft.issn=1356-1294&rft.eissn=1365-2753&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jep.12897&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2018030253%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-463c3389192bfd5bad32cc9cd24dc50792dca69fbc251db0f12aec4541541d623%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2253672587&rft_id=info:pmid/29573062&rfr_iscdi=true