Loading…

Comparative analysis of two methods to detect donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies after kidney transplant

Preformed anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies may be present in the blood of kidney transplant candidates. The production of these antibodies may occur in the post-transplant period, with the possible development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Luminex-based tests, such as the single a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Transplant immunology 2018-08, Vol.49, p.7-11
Main Authors: Gil, Beatriz Chamun, Kulzer, Adriane Stefani Silva, de Moraes, Priscila, Toresan, Realdete, da Rosa Vicari, Alessandra, dos Santos Fagundes, Iara, Merzoni, Jóice, Ewald, Gisele Menezes, Cardone, Jacqueline Moraes, Silva, Fernanda Gamio, Manfro, Roberto Ceratti, Jobim, Luiz Fernando
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-acbf8094c6f640dad3603f402bfd9052373fc26cfea4212224f54b89511539563
container_end_page 11
container_issue
container_start_page 7
container_title Transplant immunology
container_volume 49
creator Gil, Beatriz Chamun
Kulzer, Adriane Stefani Silva
de Moraes, Priscila
Toresan, Realdete
da Rosa Vicari, Alessandra
dos Santos Fagundes, Iara
Merzoni, Jóice
Ewald, Gisele Menezes
Cardone, Jacqueline Moraes
Silva, Fernanda Gamio
Manfro, Roberto Ceratti
Jobim, Luiz Fernando
description Preformed anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies may be present in the blood of kidney transplant candidates. The production of these antibodies may occur in the post-transplant period, with the possible development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Luminex-based tests, such as the single antigen (SA) assay and the Luminex crossmatch (Xm-DSA) assay are the most commonly used tools to detect anti-HLA antibodies, due to their high sensitivity and specificity. This cross-sectional study aimed to compare the findings of two methods for the detection of DSAs after kidney transplant: SA and Xm-DSA. A total of 122 patients who underwent deceased donor kidney transplant at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre were included. The SA assay detected anti-class I HLA DSAs in 17 patients (13.9%) and anti-class II HLA DSAs in 22 patients (19.6%), whereas the Xm-DSA detected DSAs in 18 patients (14.8%) both against class I and class II antigens. There was agreement between the two methods for class I (kappa = 0.66, p = 0.001) and class II (kappa = 0.54, p = 0.025) antigens. The incidence of DSAs as obtained by the SA assay was 15.57%, and the most prevalent DSAs were those against HLA-DR antigens. Patient survival at 3 years was 92%. The two techniques assessed in this study provide important information on the presence of DSAs and may help in the post-transplant patient monitoring and in immunosuppressive strategy. •DSA prevalence in the 6th month after transplant was 26.2% (SA) and 22.1% (Xm-DSA).•Comparing SA and xm-DSA in DSA detection (kappa): class I (0.6) and class II (0.4)•Patient survival at 3 years was 95% without DSA and 63% with DSA class I and II.•Xm-DSA showed a higher correlation with CDC crossmatch and FCXM than those of SA.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.trim.2018.03.006
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2018669041</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0966327417301855</els_id><sourcerecordid>2018669041</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-acbf8094c6f640dad3603f402bfd9052373fc26cfea4212224f54b89511539563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFu1DAQhi0EotvCC3BAPnJJGNuJE0tcqhXQSitxgbPl2GPVyyYOtrdo3x5vt3Dk5JH8_b9mPkLeMWgZMPlx35YU5pYDG1sQLYB8QTZsHMam7xR_STagpGwEH7orcp3zHgB4r4bX5IqrfhiUHDbkYRvn1SRTwiNSs5jDKYdMo6fld6QzlofoMi2ROixoC3VxianJK9rgg62BEpq73e3TMEUXMFPjCyb6M7gFT7Qks-T1UL_fkFfeHDK-fX5vyI8vn79v75rdt6_329tdYwUMpTF28iOozkovO3DGCQnCd8An7xT0XAzCWy6tR9NxxjnvfN9No-oZ64XqpbghHy69a4q_jpiLnkO2eKg7YDxmfbYlpYKOVZRfUJtizgm9XqtPk06agT4b1nt9NvyU0SB0NVxD75_7j9OM7l_kr9IKfLoAWK98DJh0tgEXiy6kqlC7GP7X_wfoWo27</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2018669041</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative analysis of two methods to detect donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies after kidney transplant</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Gil, Beatriz Chamun ; Kulzer, Adriane Stefani Silva ; de Moraes, Priscila ; Toresan, Realdete ; da Rosa Vicari, Alessandra ; dos Santos Fagundes, Iara ; Merzoni, Jóice ; Ewald, Gisele Menezes ; Cardone, Jacqueline Moraes ; Silva, Fernanda Gamio ; Manfro, Roberto Ceratti ; Jobim, Luiz Fernando</creator><creatorcontrib>Gil, Beatriz Chamun ; Kulzer, Adriane Stefani Silva ; de Moraes, Priscila ; Toresan, Realdete ; da Rosa Vicari, Alessandra ; dos Santos Fagundes, Iara ; Merzoni, Jóice ; Ewald, Gisele Menezes ; Cardone, Jacqueline Moraes ; Silva, Fernanda Gamio ; Manfro, Roberto Ceratti ; Jobim, Luiz Fernando</creatorcontrib><description>Preformed anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies may be present in the blood of kidney transplant candidates. The production of these antibodies may occur in the post-transplant period, with the possible development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Luminex-based tests, such as the single antigen (SA) assay and the Luminex crossmatch (Xm-DSA) assay are the most commonly used tools to detect anti-HLA antibodies, due to their high sensitivity and specificity. This cross-sectional study aimed to compare the findings of two methods for the detection of DSAs after kidney transplant: SA and Xm-DSA. A total of 122 patients who underwent deceased donor kidney transplant at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre were included. The SA assay detected anti-class I HLA DSAs in 17 patients (13.9%) and anti-class II HLA DSAs in 22 patients (19.6%), whereas the Xm-DSA detected DSAs in 18 patients (14.8%) both against class I and class II antigens. There was agreement between the two methods for class I (kappa = 0.66, p = 0.001) and class II (kappa = 0.54, p = 0.025) antigens. The incidence of DSAs as obtained by the SA assay was 15.57%, and the most prevalent DSAs were those against HLA-DR antigens. Patient survival at 3 years was 92%. The two techniques assessed in this study provide important information on the presence of DSAs and may help in the post-transplant patient monitoring and in immunosuppressive strategy. •DSA prevalence in the 6th month after transplant was 26.2% (SA) and 22.1% (Xm-DSA).•Comparing SA and xm-DSA in DSA detection (kappa): class I (0.6) and class II (0.4)•Patient survival at 3 years was 95% without DSA and 63% with DSA class I and II.•Xm-DSA showed a higher correlation with CDC crossmatch and FCXM than those of SA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0966-3274</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5492</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2018.03.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29577967</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anti-HLA antibodies ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; DSA ; Female ; Graft Rejection - diagnosis ; Graft Rejection - mortality ; Histocompatibility Testing - methods ; HLA Antigens - immunology ; Humans ; Isoantibodies - blood ; Isoantigens - immunology ; Kidney Diseases - mortality ; Kidney Diseases - therapy ; Kidney transplant ; Kidney Transplantation ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Monitoring, Physiologic ; Serologic Tests ; Single antigen assay ; Survival Analysis ; Tissue Donors ; Transplantation, Homologous ; Xm-DSA assay</subject><ispartof>Transplant immunology, 2018-08, Vol.49, p.7-11</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-acbf8094c6f640dad3603f402bfd9052373fc26cfea4212224f54b89511539563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29577967$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gil, Beatriz Chamun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulzer, Adriane Stefani Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Moraes, Priscila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toresan, Realdete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Rosa Vicari, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>dos Santos Fagundes, Iara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merzoni, Jóice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewald, Gisele Menezes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardone, Jacqueline Moraes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Fernanda Gamio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manfro, Roberto Ceratti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jobim, Luiz Fernando</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative analysis of two methods to detect donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies after kidney transplant</title><title>Transplant immunology</title><addtitle>Transpl Immunol</addtitle><description>Preformed anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies may be present in the blood of kidney transplant candidates. The production of these antibodies may occur in the post-transplant period, with the possible development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Luminex-based tests, such as the single antigen (SA) assay and the Luminex crossmatch (Xm-DSA) assay are the most commonly used tools to detect anti-HLA antibodies, due to their high sensitivity and specificity. This cross-sectional study aimed to compare the findings of two methods for the detection of DSAs after kidney transplant: SA and Xm-DSA. A total of 122 patients who underwent deceased donor kidney transplant at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre were included. The SA assay detected anti-class I HLA DSAs in 17 patients (13.9%) and anti-class II HLA DSAs in 22 patients (19.6%), whereas the Xm-DSA detected DSAs in 18 patients (14.8%) both against class I and class II antigens. There was agreement between the two methods for class I (kappa = 0.66, p = 0.001) and class II (kappa = 0.54, p = 0.025) antigens. The incidence of DSAs as obtained by the SA assay was 15.57%, and the most prevalent DSAs were those against HLA-DR antigens. Patient survival at 3 years was 92%. The two techniques assessed in this study provide important information on the presence of DSAs and may help in the post-transplant patient monitoring and in immunosuppressive strategy. •DSA prevalence in the 6th month after transplant was 26.2% (SA) and 22.1% (Xm-DSA).•Comparing SA and xm-DSA in DSA detection (kappa): class I (0.6) and class II (0.4)•Patient survival at 3 years was 95% without DSA and 63% with DSA class I and II.•Xm-DSA showed a higher correlation with CDC crossmatch and FCXM than those of SA.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anti-HLA antibodies</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>DSA</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - diagnosis</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - mortality</subject><subject>Histocompatibility Testing - methods</subject><subject>HLA Antigens - immunology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Isoantibodies - blood</subject><subject>Isoantigens - immunology</subject><subject>Kidney Diseases - mortality</subject><subject>Kidney Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Kidney transplant</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Monitoring, Physiologic</subject><subject>Serologic Tests</subject><subject>Single antigen assay</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Tissue Donors</subject><subject>Transplantation, Homologous</subject><subject>Xm-DSA assay</subject><issn>0966-3274</issn><issn>1878-5492</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFu1DAQhi0EotvCC3BAPnJJGNuJE0tcqhXQSitxgbPl2GPVyyYOtrdo3x5vt3Dk5JH8_b9mPkLeMWgZMPlx35YU5pYDG1sQLYB8QTZsHMam7xR_STagpGwEH7orcp3zHgB4r4bX5IqrfhiUHDbkYRvn1SRTwiNSs5jDKYdMo6fld6QzlofoMi2ROixoC3VxianJK9rgg62BEpq73e3TMEUXMFPjCyb6M7gFT7Qks-T1UL_fkFfeHDK-fX5vyI8vn79v75rdt6_329tdYwUMpTF28iOozkovO3DGCQnCd8An7xT0XAzCWy6tR9NxxjnvfN9No-oZ64XqpbghHy69a4q_jpiLnkO2eKg7YDxmfbYlpYKOVZRfUJtizgm9XqtPk06agT4b1nt9NvyU0SB0NVxD75_7j9OM7l_kr9IKfLoAWK98DJh0tgEXiy6kqlC7GP7X_wfoWo27</recordid><startdate>201808</startdate><enddate>201808</enddate><creator>Gil, Beatriz Chamun</creator><creator>Kulzer, Adriane Stefani Silva</creator><creator>de Moraes, Priscila</creator><creator>Toresan, Realdete</creator><creator>da Rosa Vicari, Alessandra</creator><creator>dos Santos Fagundes, Iara</creator><creator>Merzoni, Jóice</creator><creator>Ewald, Gisele Menezes</creator><creator>Cardone, Jacqueline Moraes</creator><creator>Silva, Fernanda Gamio</creator><creator>Manfro, Roberto Ceratti</creator><creator>Jobim, Luiz Fernando</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201808</creationdate><title>Comparative analysis of two methods to detect donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies after kidney transplant</title><author>Gil, Beatriz Chamun ; Kulzer, Adriane Stefani Silva ; de Moraes, Priscila ; Toresan, Realdete ; da Rosa Vicari, Alessandra ; dos Santos Fagundes, Iara ; Merzoni, Jóice ; Ewald, Gisele Menezes ; Cardone, Jacqueline Moraes ; Silva, Fernanda Gamio ; Manfro, Roberto Ceratti ; Jobim, Luiz Fernando</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-acbf8094c6f640dad3603f402bfd9052373fc26cfea4212224f54b89511539563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anti-HLA antibodies</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>DSA</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - diagnosis</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - mortality</topic><topic>Histocompatibility Testing - methods</topic><topic>HLA Antigens - immunology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Isoantibodies - blood</topic><topic>Isoantigens - immunology</topic><topic>Kidney Diseases - mortality</topic><topic>Kidney Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Kidney transplant</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Monitoring, Physiologic</topic><topic>Serologic Tests</topic><topic>Single antigen assay</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Tissue Donors</topic><topic>Transplantation, Homologous</topic><topic>Xm-DSA assay</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gil, Beatriz Chamun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulzer, Adriane Stefani Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Moraes, Priscila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toresan, Realdete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Rosa Vicari, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>dos Santos Fagundes, Iara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merzoni, Jóice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewald, Gisele Menezes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardone, Jacqueline Moraes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Fernanda Gamio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manfro, Roberto Ceratti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jobim, Luiz Fernando</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplant immunology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gil, Beatriz Chamun</au><au>Kulzer, Adriane Stefani Silva</au><au>de Moraes, Priscila</au><au>Toresan, Realdete</au><au>da Rosa Vicari, Alessandra</au><au>dos Santos Fagundes, Iara</au><au>Merzoni, Jóice</au><au>Ewald, Gisele Menezes</au><au>Cardone, Jacqueline Moraes</au><au>Silva, Fernanda Gamio</au><au>Manfro, Roberto Ceratti</au><au>Jobim, Luiz Fernando</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative analysis of two methods to detect donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies after kidney transplant</atitle><jtitle>Transplant immunology</jtitle><addtitle>Transpl Immunol</addtitle><date>2018-08</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>49</volume><spage>7</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>7-11</pages><issn>0966-3274</issn><eissn>1878-5492</eissn><abstract>Preformed anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies may be present in the blood of kidney transplant candidates. The production of these antibodies may occur in the post-transplant period, with the possible development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Luminex-based tests, such as the single antigen (SA) assay and the Luminex crossmatch (Xm-DSA) assay are the most commonly used tools to detect anti-HLA antibodies, due to their high sensitivity and specificity. This cross-sectional study aimed to compare the findings of two methods for the detection of DSAs after kidney transplant: SA and Xm-DSA. A total of 122 patients who underwent deceased donor kidney transplant at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre were included. The SA assay detected anti-class I HLA DSAs in 17 patients (13.9%) and anti-class II HLA DSAs in 22 patients (19.6%), whereas the Xm-DSA detected DSAs in 18 patients (14.8%) both against class I and class II antigens. There was agreement between the two methods for class I (kappa = 0.66, p = 0.001) and class II (kappa = 0.54, p = 0.025) antigens. The incidence of DSAs as obtained by the SA assay was 15.57%, and the most prevalent DSAs were those against HLA-DR antigens. Patient survival at 3 years was 92%. The two techniques assessed in this study provide important information on the presence of DSAs and may help in the post-transplant patient monitoring and in immunosuppressive strategy. •DSA prevalence in the 6th month after transplant was 26.2% (SA) and 22.1% (Xm-DSA).•Comparing SA and xm-DSA in DSA detection (kappa): class I (0.6) and class II (0.4)•Patient survival at 3 years was 95% without DSA and 63% with DSA class I and II.•Xm-DSA showed a higher correlation with CDC crossmatch and FCXM than those of SA.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>29577967</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.trim.2018.03.006</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0966-3274
ispartof Transplant immunology, 2018-08, Vol.49, p.7-11
issn 0966-3274
1878-5492
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2018669041
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Adult
Anti-HLA antibodies
Cross-Sectional Studies
DSA
Female
Graft Rejection - diagnosis
Graft Rejection - mortality
Histocompatibility Testing - methods
HLA Antigens - immunology
Humans
Isoantibodies - blood
Isoantigens - immunology
Kidney Diseases - mortality
Kidney Diseases - therapy
Kidney transplant
Kidney Transplantation
Male
Middle Aged
Monitoring, Physiologic
Serologic Tests
Single antigen assay
Survival Analysis
Tissue Donors
Transplantation, Homologous
Xm-DSA assay
title Comparative analysis of two methods to detect donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies after kidney transplant
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T20%3A16%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20analysis%20of%20two%20methods%20to%20detect%20donor-specific%20anti-HLA%20antibodies%20after%20kidney%20transplant&rft.jtitle=Transplant%20immunology&rft.au=Gil,%20Beatriz%20Chamun&rft.date=2018-08&rft.volume=49&rft.spage=7&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=7-11&rft.issn=0966-3274&rft.eissn=1878-5492&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.trim.2018.03.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2018669041%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-acbf8094c6f640dad3603f402bfd9052373fc26cfea4212224f54b89511539563%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2018669041&rft_id=info:pmid/29577967&rfr_iscdi=true