Loading…

Optimization of Liquid Swine Manure Sidedress Rate and Method for Grain Corn

Sidedressing may provide a better window of opportunity for land application of liquid swine (Sus scrofa) manure than early spring or fall application. Rates could be fine‐tuned to match crop N demand using the presidedress nitrate test (PSNT) if: (i) the yield response function to sidedress rate is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Agronomy journal 2005-09, Vol.97 (5), p.1322-1332
Main Authors: Ball Coelho, B. R., Roy, R. C., Bruin, A. J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3358-a28c05b44d7f3781c7b33bc7206c98b357aaf821da627a8de6c661bc6735b7763
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3358-a28c05b44d7f3781c7b33bc7206c98b357aaf821da627a8de6c661bc6735b7763
container_end_page 1332
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1322
container_title Agronomy journal
container_volume 97
creator Ball Coelho, B. R.
Roy, R. C.
Bruin, A. J.
description Sidedressing may provide a better window of opportunity for land application of liquid swine (Sus scrofa) manure than early spring or fall application. Rates could be fine‐tuned to match crop N demand using the presidedress nitrate test (PSNT) if: (i) the yield response function to sidedress rate is consistent and (ii) yield and PSNT are positively correlated. To optimize application rate and method, we measured corn (Zea mays L.) grain yield response to in‐row injection (INJ) and topdress (TD) of liquid swine manure (LSM) sidedressed at different rates on clay loam (51‐cm rows in 1999) and silt loam (75‐cm rows from 2000–2002). Yields exceeded local long‐term averages with INJ in all but the wettest year, were variable with TD, and were 2 Mg ha−1 greater with INJ than TD at 37.4 m3 LSM ha−1. From the quadratic yield response to sidedress injection rate, optimal rate (to achieve 95% maximum yield) ranged from 38 to 63 m3 ha−1 (plot‐scale data; four 6‐m sections per plot) and 37 to 49 m3 ha−1 (field‐scale data; 0.2‐ha plots). Yields were correlated with the PSNT (r = 0.75 for no LSM sidedress; r = 0.24 for all treatments). Given the consistent yield response to sidedress INJ rate and accurate (correct 88% of the time) PSNT‐based predictions of additional N requirements (from comparisons of N fertilizer recommendation and relative yield), sidedress injection of LSM using the PSNT to fine‐tune rates according to crop N requirements can be considered as a best management practice.
doi_str_mv 10.2134/agronj2005.0008
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20195161</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20195161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3358-a28c05b44d7f3781c7b33bc7206c98b357aaf821da627a8de6c661bc6735b7763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1rGzEQxUVoIK7bc6-ikNzW0cdK2j0VYxInwYkhac9iVqttZdaSLe1inL8-69gQyKWngcfvvZl5CP2gZMIoz6_hbwx-xQgRE0JIcYZGNOciIzIXX9BokFhGS8ku0NeUVoRQWuZ0hBbLTefW7hU6FzwODV64be9q_LJz3uJH8H20-MXVto42JfwMncXga_xou3-hxk2IeB7BeTwL0X9D5w20yX4_zTH6c3vze3aXLZbz-9l0kRnORZEBKwwRVZ7XquGqoEZVnFdGMSJNWVRcKICmYLQGyRQUtZVGSloZqbiolJJ8jK6OuZsYtr1NnV67ZGzbgrehT5oRWgoq6QD-_ASuQh_9cJse3hcsL8tygK6PkIkhpWgbvYluDXGvKdGHavVHtfpQ7eC4PMVCMtA2Ebxx6cOmqCrp0P4Y_TpyO9fa_f9i9XT-wKbz5-XTw0F73_QGItiLmg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194524999</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimization of Liquid Swine Manure Sidedress Rate and Method for Grain Corn</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Ball Coelho, B. R. ; Roy, R. C. ; Bruin, A. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ball Coelho, B. R. ; Roy, R. C. ; Bruin, A. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Sidedressing may provide a better window of opportunity for land application of liquid swine (Sus scrofa) manure than early spring or fall application. Rates could be fine‐tuned to match crop N demand using the presidedress nitrate test (PSNT) if: (i) the yield response function to sidedress rate is consistent and (ii) yield and PSNT are positively correlated. To optimize application rate and method, we measured corn (Zea mays L.) grain yield response to in‐row injection (INJ) and topdress (TD) of liquid swine manure (LSM) sidedressed at different rates on clay loam (51‐cm rows in 1999) and silt loam (75‐cm rows from 2000–2002). Yields exceeded local long‐term averages with INJ in all but the wettest year, were variable with TD, and were 2 Mg ha−1 greater with INJ than TD at 37.4 m3 LSM ha−1. From the quadratic yield response to sidedress injection rate, optimal rate (to achieve 95% maximum yield) ranged from 38 to 63 m3 ha−1 (plot‐scale data; four 6‐m sections per plot) and 37 to 49 m3 ha−1 (field‐scale data; 0.2‐ha plots). Yields were correlated with the PSNT (r = 0.75 for no LSM sidedress; r = 0.24 for all treatments). Given the consistent yield response to sidedress INJ rate and accurate (correct 88% of the time) PSNT‐based predictions of additional N requirements (from comparisons of N fertilizer recommendation and relative yield), sidedress injection of LSM using the PSNT to fine‐tune rates according to crop N requirements can be considered as a best management practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/agronj2005.0008</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGJOAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Pig manure ; Sus scrofa ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 2005-09, Vol.97 (5), p.1322-1332</ispartof><rights>American Society of Agronomy</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Sep/Oct 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3358-a28c05b44d7f3781c7b33bc7206c98b357aaf821da627a8de6c661bc6735b7763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3358-a28c05b44d7f3781c7b33bc7206c98b357aaf821da627a8de6c661bc6735b7763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17179114$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ball Coelho, B. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, R. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruin, A. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Optimization of Liquid Swine Manure Sidedress Rate and Method for Grain Corn</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>Sidedressing may provide a better window of opportunity for land application of liquid swine (Sus scrofa) manure than early spring or fall application. Rates could be fine‐tuned to match crop N demand using the presidedress nitrate test (PSNT) if: (i) the yield response function to sidedress rate is consistent and (ii) yield and PSNT are positively correlated. To optimize application rate and method, we measured corn (Zea mays L.) grain yield response to in‐row injection (INJ) and topdress (TD) of liquid swine manure (LSM) sidedressed at different rates on clay loam (51‐cm rows in 1999) and silt loam (75‐cm rows from 2000–2002). Yields exceeded local long‐term averages with INJ in all but the wettest year, were variable with TD, and were 2 Mg ha−1 greater with INJ than TD at 37.4 m3 LSM ha−1. From the quadratic yield response to sidedress injection rate, optimal rate (to achieve 95% maximum yield) ranged from 38 to 63 m3 ha−1 (plot‐scale data; four 6‐m sections per plot) and 37 to 49 m3 ha−1 (field‐scale data; 0.2‐ha plots). Yields were correlated with the PSNT (r = 0.75 for no LSM sidedress; r = 0.24 for all treatments). Given the consistent yield response to sidedress INJ rate and accurate (correct 88% of the time) PSNT‐based predictions of additional N requirements (from comparisons of N fertilizer recommendation and relative yield), sidedress injection of LSM using the PSNT to fine‐tune rates according to crop N requirements can be considered as a best management practice.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Pig manure</subject><subject>Sus scrofa</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1rGzEQxUVoIK7bc6-ikNzW0cdK2j0VYxInwYkhac9iVqttZdaSLe1inL8-69gQyKWngcfvvZl5CP2gZMIoz6_hbwx-xQgRE0JIcYZGNOciIzIXX9BokFhGS8ku0NeUVoRQWuZ0hBbLTefW7hU6FzwODV64be9q_LJz3uJH8H20-MXVto42JfwMncXga_xou3-hxk2IeB7BeTwL0X9D5w20yX4_zTH6c3vze3aXLZbz-9l0kRnORZEBKwwRVZ7XquGqoEZVnFdGMSJNWVRcKICmYLQGyRQUtZVGSloZqbiolJJ8jK6OuZsYtr1NnV67ZGzbgrehT5oRWgoq6QD-_ASuQh_9cJse3hcsL8tygK6PkIkhpWgbvYluDXGvKdGHavVHtfpQ7eC4PMVCMtA2Ebxx6cOmqCrp0P4Y_TpyO9fa_f9i9XT-wKbz5-XTw0F73_QGItiLmg</recordid><startdate>200509</startdate><enddate>200509</enddate><creator>Ball Coelho, B. R.</creator><creator>Roy, R. C.</creator><creator>Bruin, A. J.</creator><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200509</creationdate><title>Optimization of Liquid Swine Manure Sidedress Rate and Method for Grain Corn</title><author>Ball Coelho, B. R. ; Roy, R. C. ; Bruin, A. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3358-a28c05b44d7f3781c7b33bc7206c98b357aaf821da627a8de6c661bc6735b7763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Pig manure</topic><topic>Sus scrofa</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ball Coelho, B. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, R. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruin, A. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ball Coelho, B. R.</au><au>Roy, R. C.</au><au>Bruin, A. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimization of Liquid Swine Manure Sidedress Rate and Method for Grain Corn</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>2005-09</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1322</spage><epage>1332</epage><pages>1322-1332</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><coden>AGJOAT</coden><abstract>Sidedressing may provide a better window of opportunity for land application of liquid swine (Sus scrofa) manure than early spring or fall application. Rates could be fine‐tuned to match crop N demand using the presidedress nitrate test (PSNT) if: (i) the yield response function to sidedress rate is consistent and (ii) yield and PSNT are positively correlated. To optimize application rate and method, we measured corn (Zea mays L.) grain yield response to in‐row injection (INJ) and topdress (TD) of liquid swine manure (LSM) sidedressed at different rates on clay loam (51‐cm rows in 1999) and silt loam (75‐cm rows from 2000–2002). Yields exceeded local long‐term averages with INJ in all but the wettest year, were variable with TD, and were 2 Mg ha−1 greater with INJ than TD at 37.4 m3 LSM ha−1. From the quadratic yield response to sidedress injection rate, optimal rate (to achieve 95% maximum yield) ranged from 38 to 63 m3 ha−1 (plot‐scale data; four 6‐m sections per plot) and 37 to 49 m3 ha−1 (field‐scale data; 0.2‐ha plots). Yields were correlated with the PSNT (r = 0.75 for no LSM sidedress; r = 0.24 for all treatments). Given the consistent yield response to sidedress INJ rate and accurate (correct 88% of the time) PSNT‐based predictions of additional N requirements (from comparisons of N fertilizer recommendation and relative yield), sidedress injection of LSM using the PSNT to fine‐tune rates according to crop N requirements can be considered as a best management practice.</abstract><cop>Madison, WI</cop><pub>American Society of Agronomy</pub><doi>10.2134/agronj2005.0008</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-1962
ispartof Agronomy journal, 2005-09, Vol.97 (5), p.1322-1332
issn 0002-1962
1435-0645
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20195161
source Wiley
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Biological and medical sciences
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Pig manure
Sus scrofa
Zea mays
title Optimization of Liquid Swine Manure Sidedress Rate and Method for Grain Corn
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T21%3A01%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimization%20of%20Liquid%20Swine%20Manure%20Sidedress%20Rate%20and%20Method%20for%20Grain%20Corn&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=Ball%20Coelho,%20B.%20R.&rft.date=2005-09&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1322&rft.epage=1332&rft.pages=1322-1332&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft.coden=AGJOAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/agronj2005.0008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20195161%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3358-a28c05b44d7f3781c7b33bc7206c98b357aaf821da627a8de6c661bc6735b7763%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194524999&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true