Impact of Alternative Jet Fuels on Engine Exhaust Composition During the 2015 ECLIF Ground-Based Measurements Campaign

• Published in: Environmental science & technology 2018-04, Vol.52 (8), p.4969-4978
• Main Authors: Schripp, Tobias, Anderson, Bruce, Crosbie, Ewan C, Moore, Richard H, Herrmann, Friederike, Oßwald, Patrick, Wahl, Claus, Kapernaum, Manfred, Köhler, Markus, Le Clercq, Patrick, Rauch, Bastian, Eichler, Philipp, Mikoviny, Tomas, Wisthaler, Armin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aircraft industry; Alternative energy sources; Alternative fuels; Anthropogenic factors; Aromatic compounds; Aviation; Aviation fuel; Burning; Carbon dioxide; Carbon dioxide emissions; Carbon monoxide; Composition; Emission measurements; Emissions control; Exhaust emissions; Fuel technology; Fuels; Gas turbine engines; Human influences; Jet engine fuels; Kerosene; Nitrogen oxides; Organic chemistry; Particle emission; Particle mass; Soot; Studies; Synthetic jets
• ISSN: 0013-936X; 1520-5851
• DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b06244

The application of fuels from renewable sources (“alternative fuels”) in aviation is important for the reduction of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions, but may also attribute to reduced release of particles from jet engines. The present experiment describes ground-based measurements in the framework of the ECLIF (Emission and Climate Impact of Alternative Fuels) campaign using an Airbus A320 (V2527-A5 engines) burning six fuels of chemically different composition. Two reference Jet A-1 with slightly different chemical parameters were applied and further used in combination with a Fischer–Tropsch synthetic paraffinic kerosene (FT-SPK) to prepare three semi synthetic jet fuels (SSJF) of different aromatic content. In addition, one commercially available fully synthetic jet fuel (FSJF) featured the lowest aromatic content of the fuel selection. Neither the release of nitrogen oxide or carbon monoxide was significantly affected by the different fuel composition. The measured particle emission indices showed a reduction up to 50% (number) and 70% (mass) for two alternative jet fuels (FSJF, SSJF2) at low power settings in comparison to the reference fuels. The reduction is less pronounced at higher operating conditions but the release of particle number and particle mass is still significantly lower for the alternative fuels than for both reference fuels. The observed correlation between emitted particle mass and fuel aromatics is not strict. Here, the H/C ratio is a better indicator for soot emission.