Loading…

Trends in IPM and insecticide use in processing tomatoes in New Zealand

The ongoing development of an integrated pest management (IPM) programme for processing tomatoes has contributed in several ways to changes in insecticide use. This paper documents insecticide use in processing tomatoes in New Zealand from 1986 to 2005 using a range of data sources, including typica...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Crop protection 2009-05, Vol.28 (5), p.421-427
Main Authors: Cameron, P.J., Walker, G.P., Hodson, A.J., Kale, A.J., Herman, T.J.B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-b200dd27398b3db8bfb784625c7a9aeae704735852b24b15067a39d80d7b1da03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-b200dd27398b3db8bfb784625c7a9aeae704735852b24b15067a39d80d7b1da03
container_end_page 427
container_issue 5
container_start_page 421
container_title Crop protection
container_volume 28
creator Cameron, P.J.
Walker, G.P.
Hodson, A.J.
Kale, A.J.
Herman, T.J.B.
description The ongoing development of an integrated pest management (IPM) programme for processing tomatoes has contributed in several ways to changes in insecticide use. This paper documents insecticide use in processing tomatoes in New Zealand from 1986 to 2005 using a range of data sources, including typical use patterns, grower records, experimental comparisons and industry reports. Changes in use patterns were associated with the development of key IPM strategies that are reviewed in this paper. Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) is the key pest of processing tomatoes in New Zealand. The establishment of effective larval parasitoids for this pest, together with pheromone trapping, plant scouting and action thresholds produced the initial incentive for growers to reduce insecticide applications. Risks from other pests in tomatoes, including aphids and thrips that transmit viruses, were identified and avoided by reducing virus sources. The minor but increasing risk of resistance by H. armigera to pyrethroid insecticides was quantified and provided additional impetus for reductions in early season applications of pyrethroids. Reductions of approximately 60% in overall insecticide use were associated with adoption of monitoring and increased parasitism. Typical use patterns and records showed that insecticide applications declined from approximately 8 pyrethroid applications per tomato crop in 1988 to 1 application per crop in 1994. The availability and choice of insecticide also changed over time, with trends to the use of more selective insecticides such as Bacillus thuringiensis and spinosad as they became available. The effectiveness of parasitoids allowed an increase in recommended action thresholds for insecticidal control, and the use of an adjustable threshold based on levels of parasitism was implemented by crop monitors and the processing industry. Annual records of insecticide use from 1995 to 2005 on about 60 crops that observed an adjustable threshold for H. armigera showed that by 2005 insecticide use was about one application per four crops. Overall, the decline in insecticide use over 20 years was in the order of 95%, and this was accompanied by a change to the predominant use of insecticides in classes with lower toxicity profiles. The relative importance of IPM components is discussed and the value of pesticide use data for evaluating the impact of IPM and directing research is emphasised.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cropro.2009.01.002
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20218010</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0261219409000039</els_id><sourcerecordid>20218010</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-b200dd27398b3db8bfb784625c7a9aeae704735852b24b15067a39d80d7b1da03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwDzjkxC1hbSexc0FCFZRK5XEoFy6WH1vkqk2KnYL49ziEM6ddaWdGsx8hlxQKCrS-3hQ2dPvQFQygKYAWAOyITKgUPK8bKI_JBFhNc0ab8pScxbiBpOCcTch8FbB1MfNttnh5zHTr0hrR9t56h9kh4nBK2RZj9O171nc73Xf463jCr-wN9Ta5zsnJWm8jXvzNKXm9v1vNHvLl83wxu13mlnPR5yY1dI4J3kjDnZFmbYQsa1ZZoRuNGgWUgleyYoaVhlZQC80bJ8EJQ50GPiVXY26q9HHA2Kudjxa3qQN2h6gYMCqBDsJyFCY0MQZcq33wOx2-FQU1UFMbNVJTAzUFVA1MpuRmtGF64tNjUNF6bC06HxIV5Tr_f8APwup26g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20218010</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trends in IPM and insecticide use in processing tomatoes in New Zealand</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Cameron, P.J. ; Walker, G.P. ; Hodson, A.J. ; Kale, A.J. ; Herman, T.J.B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cameron, P.J. ; Walker, G.P. ; Hodson, A.J. ; Kale, A.J. ; Herman, T.J.B.</creatorcontrib><description>The ongoing development of an integrated pest management (IPM) programme for processing tomatoes has contributed in several ways to changes in insecticide use. This paper documents insecticide use in processing tomatoes in New Zealand from 1986 to 2005 using a range of data sources, including typical use patterns, grower records, experimental comparisons and industry reports. Changes in use patterns were associated with the development of key IPM strategies that are reviewed in this paper. Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) is the key pest of processing tomatoes in New Zealand. The establishment of effective larval parasitoids for this pest, together with pheromone trapping, plant scouting and action thresholds produced the initial incentive for growers to reduce insecticide applications. Risks from other pests in tomatoes, including aphids and thrips that transmit viruses, were identified and avoided by reducing virus sources. The minor but increasing risk of resistance by H. armigera to pyrethroid insecticides was quantified and provided additional impetus for reductions in early season applications of pyrethroids. Reductions of approximately 60% in overall insecticide use were associated with adoption of monitoring and increased parasitism. Typical use patterns and records showed that insecticide applications declined from approximately 8 pyrethroid applications per tomato crop in 1988 to 1 application per crop in 1994. The availability and choice of insecticide also changed over time, with trends to the use of more selective insecticides such as Bacillus thuringiensis and spinosad as they became available. The effectiveness of parasitoids allowed an increase in recommended action thresholds for insecticidal control, and the use of an adjustable threshold based on levels of parasitism was implemented by crop monitors and the processing industry. Annual records of insecticide use from 1995 to 2005 on about 60 crops that observed an adjustable threshold for H. armigera showed that by 2005 insecticide use was about one application per four crops. Overall, the decline in insecticide use over 20 years was in the order of 95%, and this was accompanied by a change to the predominant use of insecticides in classes with lower toxicity profiles. The relative importance of IPM components is discussed and the value of pesticide use data for evaluating the impact of IPM and directing research is emphasised.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0261-2194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6904</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2009.01.002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aphididae ; Bacillus thuringiensis ; Helicoverpa armigera ; Insecticide use ; IPM ; Lycopersicon esculentum ; Processing tomatoes</subject><ispartof>Crop protection, 2009-05, Vol.28 (5), p.421-427</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-b200dd27398b3db8bfb784625c7a9aeae704735852b24b15067a39d80d7b1da03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-b200dd27398b3db8bfb784625c7a9aeae704735852b24b15067a39d80d7b1da03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cameron, P.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, G.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodson, A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kale, A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herman, T.J.B.</creatorcontrib><title>Trends in IPM and insecticide use in processing tomatoes in New Zealand</title><title>Crop protection</title><description>The ongoing development of an integrated pest management (IPM) programme for processing tomatoes has contributed in several ways to changes in insecticide use. This paper documents insecticide use in processing tomatoes in New Zealand from 1986 to 2005 using a range of data sources, including typical use patterns, grower records, experimental comparisons and industry reports. Changes in use patterns were associated with the development of key IPM strategies that are reviewed in this paper. Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) is the key pest of processing tomatoes in New Zealand. The establishment of effective larval parasitoids for this pest, together with pheromone trapping, plant scouting and action thresholds produced the initial incentive for growers to reduce insecticide applications. Risks from other pests in tomatoes, including aphids and thrips that transmit viruses, were identified and avoided by reducing virus sources. The minor but increasing risk of resistance by H. armigera to pyrethroid insecticides was quantified and provided additional impetus for reductions in early season applications of pyrethroids. Reductions of approximately 60% in overall insecticide use were associated with adoption of monitoring and increased parasitism. Typical use patterns and records showed that insecticide applications declined from approximately 8 pyrethroid applications per tomato crop in 1988 to 1 application per crop in 1994. The availability and choice of insecticide also changed over time, with trends to the use of more selective insecticides such as Bacillus thuringiensis and spinosad as they became available. The effectiveness of parasitoids allowed an increase in recommended action thresholds for insecticidal control, and the use of an adjustable threshold based on levels of parasitism was implemented by crop monitors and the processing industry. Annual records of insecticide use from 1995 to 2005 on about 60 crops that observed an adjustable threshold for H. armigera showed that by 2005 insecticide use was about one application per four crops. Overall, the decline in insecticide use over 20 years was in the order of 95%, and this was accompanied by a change to the predominant use of insecticides in classes with lower toxicity profiles. The relative importance of IPM components is discussed and the value of pesticide use data for evaluating the impact of IPM and directing research is emphasised.</description><subject>Aphididae</subject><subject>Bacillus thuringiensis</subject><subject>Helicoverpa armigera</subject><subject>Insecticide use</subject><subject>IPM</subject><subject>Lycopersicon esculentum</subject><subject>Processing tomatoes</subject><issn>0261-2194</issn><issn>1873-6904</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwDzjkxC1hbSexc0FCFZRK5XEoFy6WH1vkqk2KnYL49ziEM6ddaWdGsx8hlxQKCrS-3hQ2dPvQFQygKYAWAOyITKgUPK8bKI_JBFhNc0ab8pScxbiBpOCcTch8FbB1MfNttnh5zHTr0hrR9t56h9kh4nBK2RZj9O171nc73Xf463jCr-wN9Ta5zsnJWm8jXvzNKXm9v1vNHvLl83wxu13mlnPR5yY1dI4J3kjDnZFmbYQsa1ZZoRuNGgWUgleyYoaVhlZQC80bJ8EJQ50GPiVXY26q9HHA2Kudjxa3qQN2h6gYMCqBDsJyFCY0MQZcq33wOx2-FQU1UFMbNVJTAzUFVA1MpuRmtGF64tNjUNF6bC06HxIV5Tr_f8APwup26g</recordid><startdate>20090501</startdate><enddate>20090501</enddate><creator>Cameron, P.J.</creator><creator>Walker, G.P.</creator><creator>Hodson, A.J.</creator><creator>Kale, A.J.</creator><creator>Herman, T.J.B.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090501</creationdate><title>Trends in IPM and insecticide use in processing tomatoes in New Zealand</title><author>Cameron, P.J. ; Walker, G.P. ; Hodson, A.J. ; Kale, A.J. ; Herman, T.J.B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-b200dd27398b3db8bfb784625c7a9aeae704735852b24b15067a39d80d7b1da03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aphididae</topic><topic>Bacillus thuringiensis</topic><topic>Helicoverpa armigera</topic><topic>Insecticide use</topic><topic>IPM</topic><topic>Lycopersicon esculentum</topic><topic>Processing tomatoes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cameron, P.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, G.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodson, A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kale, A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herman, T.J.B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Crop protection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cameron, P.J.</au><au>Walker, G.P.</au><au>Hodson, A.J.</au><au>Kale, A.J.</au><au>Herman, T.J.B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trends in IPM and insecticide use in processing tomatoes in New Zealand</atitle><jtitle>Crop protection</jtitle><date>2009-05-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>421</spage><epage>427</epage><pages>421-427</pages><issn>0261-2194</issn><eissn>1873-6904</eissn><abstract>The ongoing development of an integrated pest management (IPM) programme for processing tomatoes has contributed in several ways to changes in insecticide use. This paper documents insecticide use in processing tomatoes in New Zealand from 1986 to 2005 using a range of data sources, including typical use patterns, grower records, experimental comparisons and industry reports. Changes in use patterns were associated with the development of key IPM strategies that are reviewed in this paper. Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) is the key pest of processing tomatoes in New Zealand. The establishment of effective larval parasitoids for this pest, together with pheromone trapping, plant scouting and action thresholds produced the initial incentive for growers to reduce insecticide applications. Risks from other pests in tomatoes, including aphids and thrips that transmit viruses, were identified and avoided by reducing virus sources. The minor but increasing risk of resistance by H. armigera to pyrethroid insecticides was quantified and provided additional impetus for reductions in early season applications of pyrethroids. Reductions of approximately 60% in overall insecticide use were associated with adoption of monitoring and increased parasitism. Typical use patterns and records showed that insecticide applications declined from approximately 8 pyrethroid applications per tomato crop in 1988 to 1 application per crop in 1994. The availability and choice of insecticide also changed over time, with trends to the use of more selective insecticides such as Bacillus thuringiensis and spinosad as they became available. The effectiveness of parasitoids allowed an increase in recommended action thresholds for insecticidal control, and the use of an adjustable threshold based on levels of parasitism was implemented by crop monitors and the processing industry. Annual records of insecticide use from 1995 to 2005 on about 60 crops that observed an adjustable threshold for H. armigera showed that by 2005 insecticide use was about one application per four crops. Overall, the decline in insecticide use over 20 years was in the order of 95%, and this was accompanied by a change to the predominant use of insecticides in classes with lower toxicity profiles. The relative importance of IPM components is discussed and the value of pesticide use data for evaluating the impact of IPM and directing research is emphasised.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.cropro.2009.01.002</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0261-2194
ispartof Crop protection, 2009-05, Vol.28 (5), p.421-427
issn 0261-2194
1873-6904
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20218010
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Aphididae
Bacillus thuringiensis
Helicoverpa armigera
Insecticide use
IPM
Lycopersicon esculentum
Processing tomatoes
title Trends in IPM and insecticide use in processing tomatoes in New Zealand
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T16%3A20%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trends%20in%20IPM%20and%20insecticide%20use%20in%20processing%20tomatoes%20in%20New%20Zealand&rft.jtitle=Crop%20protection&rft.au=Cameron,%20P.J.&rft.date=2009-05-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=421&rft.epage=427&rft.pages=421-427&rft.issn=0261-2194&rft.eissn=1873-6904&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cropro.2009.01.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20218010%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-b200dd27398b3db8bfb784625c7a9aeae704735852b24b15067a39d80d7b1da03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20218010&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true