Wood Biofilm as a Food Resource for Stream Detritivores

Published assimilation efficiencies indicate that leaf detritus is a more nutritious food for stream invertebrates than wood. Some studies, however, suggest that wood and wood biofilms (epixylon) may be an important but overlooked resource. We measured assimilation efficiencies of three detritivores...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Limnology and oceanography 2007-05, Vol.52 (3), p.1239-1245
Main Authors: Eggert, S. L., Wallace, J. B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biofilms
Biological and medical sciences
Detritivores
Diptera
Food security
Fresh water ecosystems
Freshwater
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Fungal biomass
Ingestion
Invertebrates
Leaves
Physiological assimilation
Plecoptera
Pycnopsyche gentilis
Streams
Synecology
Tallaperla
Taxa
Tipula abdominalis
Trichoptera
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Published assimilation efficiencies indicate that leaf detritus is a more nutritious food for stream invertebrates than wood. Some studies, however, suggest that wood and wood biofilms (epixylon) may be an important but overlooked resource. We measured assimilation efficiencies of three detritivores for leaves and epixylon and compared attributes of grazed versus ungrazed wood epixylon to assess its use by detritivores. Pycnopsyche gentilis (Trichoptera), Tipula abdominalis (Diptera), and Tallaperla spp. (Plecoptera) assimilated epixylon more efficiently (26-36%) than leaf detritus (9-17%). Epixylon assimilation efficiencies were T. abdominalis > Tallaperla spp. > P. gentilis. Grazed wood had significantly lower microbial respiration rates, bacteria densities and biomass, fungal and chlorophyll a biomass, and biofilm ash-free dry mass than ungrazed wood, indicating that detritivores fed on epixylon. Detritivores ingested leaves at a higher rate ($0.09-0.47 g g^{-1} d^{-1}$) than epixylon ($0.04-0.07 g g^{-1} d^{-1}$). Assimilation rates, which incorporate both assimilation efficiency and ingestion rate, however, indicated that Tallaperla spp. and T. abdominalis were better able to use epixylon than leaves, whereas P. gentilis was more efficient at using leaves. Wood biofilm is readily ingested and assimilated by some stream detritivores and may serve as an important but overlooked food resource in stream food webs.
ISSN:0024-3590
1939-5590
DOI:10.4319/lo.2007.52.3.1239