Loading…

Comparison Performances of Membrane Bioreactor and Conventional Activated Sludge Processes on Sludge Reduction Induced by Oligochaete

Pilot-scale experiments were carried out to compare sludge reduction induced by Oligochaete in a submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR) and a conventional activated sludge (CAS) reactor for 345 d. Worm growth in the CAS reactor was much better than in the MBR. The average worm density of the aeration t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental science & technology 2003-07, Vol.37 (14), p.3171-3180
Main Authors: Wei, Yuansong, van Houten, Renze T, Borger, Arjan R, Eikelboom, Dick H, Fan, Yaobo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a484t-58a02436686b0504d1e229b9231a131877374cc86bcb288a59428a52faf8afb93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a484t-58a02436686b0504d1e229b9231a131877374cc86bcb288a59428a52faf8afb93
container_end_page 3180
container_issue 14
container_start_page 3171
container_title Environmental science & technology
container_volume 37
creator Wei, Yuansong
van Houten, Renze T
Borger, Arjan R
Eikelboom, Dick H
Fan, Yaobo
description Pilot-scale experiments were carried out to compare sludge reduction induced by Oligochaete in a submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR) and a conventional activated sludge (CAS) reactor for 345 d. Worm growth in the CAS reactor was much better than in the MBR. The average worm density of the aeration tank in the CAS reactor was 71 total worms/mg of volatile suspended solids (VSS), much higher than that in the MBR (10 total worms/mg of VSS). Worms did not naturally produce in the MBR, and the dominant worm type in the MBR depended on sludge inoculation from the CAS reactor. Only two types of worms were found in the MBR, Aeolosoma hemprichicii and Nais elinguis. Worm presence and disappearance in the MBR alternated. Worms in the CAS reactor occurred nearly throughout the operating period and were continuously maintained at over 30 total worms/mg of VSS in the aeration tank for 172 d. Three types of worm were found in the CAS reactor, A. hemprichicii, Pristina aequiseta, and N. elinguis, but P. aequiseta was present only occasionally. The alternating dominance of worm types in both reactors changed between Aeolosoma and Nais, and the time of Aeolosoma dominance was longer than that of Nais dominance. Worm growth in the MBR contributed to neither sludge reduction nor improvement of sludge settling characteristics because of low density. But worm presence and bloom in the CAS reactor greatly decreased sludge yield and improved sludge settling characteristics at high density. Both the average sludge yield (0.17 kg of suspended solids (SS)/kg of chemical oxygen demand removed (CODremoved)) and sludge volume index (60 mL/g) in the CAS reactor were much lower than those in the MBR (0.40 kg of SS/kg of CODremoved and 133 mL/g). Nais had more potential for sludge reduction than Aeolosoma. Worm growth had little impact on effluent quality in the MBR but affected effluent quality very much in the CAS reactor.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/es026176d
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20247921</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20247921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a484t-58a02436686b0504d1e229b9231a131877374cc86bcb288a59428a52faf8afb93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkd9qFDEUxoMouFYvfIMgKHgxmn8zk1zWQdvCShfbwtKbcCaTqakzyTaZKfYB-t5m2dqF9iYJOb_vO_lyEHpPyRdKGP1qE2EVravuBVrQkpGilCV9iRaEUF4oXq1fozcpXRNCGCdyge6bMG4guhQ8XtnYhziCNzbh0OOfdmwjeIu_uRAtmClEDL7DTfC31k8ueBjwoZncLUy2w2fD3F1ZvIoh69PWwv-_-2W72WwF-MTnU4bbO3w6uKtgfoOd7Fv0qoch2XcP-wG6-PH9vDkulqdHJ83hsgAhxZSzAGGCV5WsWlIS0VHLmGoV4xQop7KueS2MyVXTMimhVILllfXQS-hbxQ_Qp53vJoab2aZJjy4ZOww5ZZiTZtm-Voxm8MMT8DrMMefNDCeU1VVJMvR5B5kYUoq215voRoh3mhK9nYZ-nEZmPz4YQjIw9PlfjUt7gVCiplJkrthxLk3272Md4h9d5XSlPl-daUWWl0fNWun13hdM2r_xef9_KgKlWQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230127650</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison Performances of Membrane Bioreactor and Conventional Activated Sludge Processes on Sludge Reduction Induced by Oligochaete</title><source>American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read &amp; Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)</source><creator>Wei, Yuansong ; van Houten, Renze T ; Borger, Arjan R ; Eikelboom, Dick H ; Fan, Yaobo</creator><creatorcontrib>Wei, Yuansong ; van Houten, Renze T ; Borger, Arjan R ; Eikelboom, Dick H ; Fan, Yaobo</creatorcontrib><description>Pilot-scale experiments were carried out to compare sludge reduction induced by Oligochaete in a submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR) and a conventional activated sludge (CAS) reactor for 345 d. Worm growth in the CAS reactor was much better than in the MBR. The average worm density of the aeration tank in the CAS reactor was 71 total worms/mg of volatile suspended solids (VSS), much higher than that in the MBR (10 total worms/mg of VSS). Worms did not naturally produce in the MBR, and the dominant worm type in the MBR depended on sludge inoculation from the CAS reactor. Only two types of worms were found in the MBR, Aeolosoma hemprichicii and Nais elinguis. Worm presence and disappearance in the MBR alternated. Worms in the CAS reactor occurred nearly throughout the operating period and were continuously maintained at over 30 total worms/mg of VSS in the aeration tank for 172 d. Three types of worm were found in the CAS reactor, A. hemprichicii, Pristina aequiseta, and N. elinguis, but P. aequiseta was present only occasionally. The alternating dominance of worm types in both reactors changed between Aeolosoma and Nais, and the time of Aeolosoma dominance was longer than that of Nais dominance. Worm growth in the MBR contributed to neither sludge reduction nor improvement of sludge settling characteristics because of low density. But worm presence and bloom in the CAS reactor greatly decreased sludge yield and improved sludge settling characteristics at high density. Both the average sludge yield (0.17 kg of suspended solids (SS)/kg of chemical oxygen demand removed (CODremoved)) and sludge volume index (60 mL/g) in the CAS reactor were much lower than those in the MBR (0.40 kg of SS/kg of CODremoved and 133 mL/g). Nais had more potential for sludge reduction than Aeolosoma. Worm growth had little impact on effluent quality in the MBR but affected effluent quality very much in the CAS reactor.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/es026176d</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESTHAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Aeolosoma ; Applied sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological treatment of waters ; Biotechnology ; Chemical oxygen demand ; Comparative analysis ; Environment and pollution ; Environmental impact ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General purification processes ; Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects ; Membranes ; Nais ; Nais elinguis ; Oligochaeta ; Pollution ; Pristina aequiseta ; Sludge ; Wastewaters ; Water treatment and pollution ; Worms</subject><ispartof>Environmental science &amp; technology, 2003-07, Vol.37 (14), p.3171-3180</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2003 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Jul 15, 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a484t-58a02436686b0504d1e229b9231a131877374cc86bcb288a59428a52faf8afb93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a484t-58a02436686b0504d1e229b9231a131877374cc86bcb288a59428a52faf8afb93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14947184$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wei, Yuansong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Houten, Renze T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borger, Arjan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eikelboom, Dick H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Yaobo</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison Performances of Membrane Bioreactor and Conventional Activated Sludge Processes on Sludge Reduction Induced by Oligochaete</title><title>Environmental science &amp; technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>Pilot-scale experiments were carried out to compare sludge reduction induced by Oligochaete in a submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR) and a conventional activated sludge (CAS) reactor for 345 d. Worm growth in the CAS reactor was much better than in the MBR. The average worm density of the aeration tank in the CAS reactor was 71 total worms/mg of volatile suspended solids (VSS), much higher than that in the MBR (10 total worms/mg of VSS). Worms did not naturally produce in the MBR, and the dominant worm type in the MBR depended on sludge inoculation from the CAS reactor. Only two types of worms were found in the MBR, Aeolosoma hemprichicii and Nais elinguis. Worm presence and disappearance in the MBR alternated. Worms in the CAS reactor occurred nearly throughout the operating period and were continuously maintained at over 30 total worms/mg of VSS in the aeration tank for 172 d. Three types of worm were found in the CAS reactor, A. hemprichicii, Pristina aequiseta, and N. elinguis, but P. aequiseta was present only occasionally. The alternating dominance of worm types in both reactors changed between Aeolosoma and Nais, and the time of Aeolosoma dominance was longer than that of Nais dominance. Worm growth in the MBR contributed to neither sludge reduction nor improvement of sludge settling characteristics because of low density. But worm presence and bloom in the CAS reactor greatly decreased sludge yield and improved sludge settling characteristics at high density. Both the average sludge yield (0.17 kg of suspended solids (SS)/kg of chemical oxygen demand removed (CODremoved)) and sludge volume index (60 mL/g) in the CAS reactor were much lower than those in the MBR (0.40 kg of SS/kg of CODremoved and 133 mL/g). Nais had more potential for sludge reduction than Aeolosoma. Worm growth had little impact on effluent quality in the MBR but affected effluent quality very much in the CAS reactor.</description><subject>Aeolosoma</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological treatment of waters</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Chemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Environment and pollution</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General purification processes</subject><subject>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Nais</subject><subject>Nais elinguis</subject><subject>Oligochaeta</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pristina aequiseta</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Wastewaters</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><subject>Worms</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkd9qFDEUxoMouFYvfIMgKHgxmn8zk1zWQdvCShfbwtKbcCaTqakzyTaZKfYB-t5m2dqF9iYJOb_vO_lyEHpPyRdKGP1qE2EVravuBVrQkpGilCV9iRaEUF4oXq1fozcpXRNCGCdyge6bMG4guhQ8XtnYhziCNzbh0OOfdmwjeIu_uRAtmClEDL7DTfC31k8ueBjwoZncLUy2w2fD3F1ZvIoh69PWwv-_-2W72WwF-MTnU4bbO3w6uKtgfoOd7Fv0qoch2XcP-wG6-PH9vDkulqdHJ83hsgAhxZSzAGGCV5WsWlIS0VHLmGoV4xQop7KueS2MyVXTMimhVILllfXQS-hbxQ_Qp53vJoab2aZJjy4ZOww5ZZiTZtm-Voxm8MMT8DrMMefNDCeU1VVJMvR5B5kYUoq215voRoh3mhK9nYZ-nEZmPz4YQjIw9PlfjUt7gVCiplJkrthxLk3272Md4h9d5XSlPl-daUWWl0fNWun13hdM2r_xef9_KgKlWQ</recordid><startdate>20030715</startdate><enddate>20030715</enddate><creator>Wei, Yuansong</creator><creator>van Houten, Renze T</creator><creator>Borger, Arjan R</creator><creator>Eikelboom, Dick H</creator><creator>Fan, Yaobo</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030715</creationdate><title>Comparison Performances of Membrane Bioreactor and Conventional Activated Sludge Processes on Sludge Reduction Induced by Oligochaete</title><author>Wei, Yuansong ; van Houten, Renze T ; Borger, Arjan R ; Eikelboom, Dick H ; Fan, Yaobo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a484t-58a02436686b0504d1e229b9231a131877374cc86bcb288a59428a52faf8afb93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Aeolosoma</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological treatment of waters</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Chemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Environment and pollution</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General purification processes</topic><topic>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Nais</topic><topic>Nais elinguis</topic><topic>Oligochaeta</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pristina aequiseta</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Wastewaters</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><topic>Worms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wei, Yuansong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Houten, Renze T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borger, Arjan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eikelboom, Dick H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Yaobo</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wei, Yuansong</au><au>van Houten, Renze T</au><au>Borger, Arjan R</au><au>Eikelboom, Dick H</au><au>Fan, Yaobo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison Performances of Membrane Bioreactor and Conventional Activated Sludge Processes on Sludge Reduction Induced by Oligochaete</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2003-07-15</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>3171</spage><epage>3180</epage><pages>3171-3180</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><coden>ESTHAG</coden><abstract>Pilot-scale experiments were carried out to compare sludge reduction induced by Oligochaete in a submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR) and a conventional activated sludge (CAS) reactor for 345 d. Worm growth in the CAS reactor was much better than in the MBR. The average worm density of the aeration tank in the CAS reactor was 71 total worms/mg of volatile suspended solids (VSS), much higher than that in the MBR (10 total worms/mg of VSS). Worms did not naturally produce in the MBR, and the dominant worm type in the MBR depended on sludge inoculation from the CAS reactor. Only two types of worms were found in the MBR, Aeolosoma hemprichicii and Nais elinguis. Worm presence and disappearance in the MBR alternated. Worms in the CAS reactor occurred nearly throughout the operating period and were continuously maintained at over 30 total worms/mg of VSS in the aeration tank for 172 d. Three types of worm were found in the CAS reactor, A. hemprichicii, Pristina aequiseta, and N. elinguis, but P. aequiseta was present only occasionally. The alternating dominance of worm types in both reactors changed between Aeolosoma and Nais, and the time of Aeolosoma dominance was longer than that of Nais dominance. Worm growth in the MBR contributed to neither sludge reduction nor improvement of sludge settling characteristics because of low density. But worm presence and bloom in the CAS reactor greatly decreased sludge yield and improved sludge settling characteristics at high density. Both the average sludge yield (0.17 kg of suspended solids (SS)/kg of chemical oxygen demand removed (CODremoved)) and sludge volume index (60 mL/g) in the CAS reactor were much lower than those in the MBR (0.40 kg of SS/kg of CODremoved and 133 mL/g). Nais had more potential for sludge reduction than Aeolosoma. Worm growth had little impact on effluent quality in the MBR but affected effluent quality very much in the CAS reactor.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><doi>10.1021/es026176d</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-936X
ispartof Environmental science & technology, 2003-07, Vol.37 (14), p.3171-3180
issn 0013-936X
1520-5851
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20247921
source American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)
subjects Aeolosoma
Applied sciences
Biological and medical sciences
Biological treatment of waters
Biotechnology
Chemical oxygen demand
Comparative analysis
Environment and pollution
Environmental impact
Exact sciences and technology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General purification processes
Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects
Membranes
Nais
Nais elinguis
Oligochaeta
Pollution
Pristina aequiseta
Sludge
Wastewaters
Water treatment and pollution
Worms
title Comparison Performances of Membrane Bioreactor and Conventional Activated Sludge Processes on Sludge Reduction Induced by Oligochaete
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T22%3A48%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20Performances%20of%20Membrane%20Bioreactor%20and%20Conventional%20Activated%20Sludge%20Processes%20on%20Sludge%20Reduction%20Induced%20by%20Oligochaete&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Wei,%20Yuansong&rft.date=2003-07-15&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=3171&rft.epage=3180&rft.pages=3171-3180&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft.coden=ESTHAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/es026176d&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20247921%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a484t-58a02436686b0504d1e229b9231a131877374cc86bcb288a59428a52faf8afb93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230127650&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true