Loading…
The Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System: concurrent validity and reliability in children with cerebral palsy
Aim As there is little evidence for concurrent validity of the Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System (EDACS), this study aimed to determine its concurrent validity and reliability in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP). Method After an extensive translation procedure, we ap...
Saved in:
Published in: | Developmental medicine and child neurology 2018-06, Vol.60 (6), p.611-617 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Aim
As there is little evidence for concurrent validity of the Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System (EDACS), this study aimed to determine its concurrent validity and reliability in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP).
Method
After an extensive translation procedure, we applied the German language version to 52 participants with CP (30 males, 22 females, mean age 9y 7mo [SD 4y 2mo]). We correlated (Kendall's tau or Kτ) the EDACS levels with the Bogenhausener Dysphagiescore (BODS), and the EDACS level of assistance with the Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) and the item ‘eating’ of the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM). We further quantified the interrater reliability between speech and language therapists (SaLTs) and between SaLTs and parents with Kappa (κ).
Results
The EDACS levels correlated highly with the BODS (Kτ=0.79), and the EDACS level of assistance correlated highly with the MACS (Kτ=0.73) and WeeFIM eating item (Kτ=−0.80). Interrater reliability proved almost perfect between SaLTs (EDACS: κ=0.94; EDACS level of assistance: κ=0.89) and SaLTs and parents (EDACS: κ=0.82; EDACS level of assistance: κ=0.89).
Interpretation
The EDACS levels and level of assistance seem valid and showed almost perfect interrater reliability when classifying eating and drinking problems in children and adolescents with CP.
What this paper adds
The Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System (EDACS) correlates well with a dysphagia score.
The EDACS level of assistance proves valid.
The German version of EDACS is highly reliable.
EDACS correlates moderately to highly with other classification systems.
Resumen
Sistema de Clasificación de habilidades para comer y beber: validez concurrente y confiabilidad en niños con parálisis cerebral
Objetivo
Dado que existe poca evidencia sobre la validez concurrente del Sistema de Clasificación de Habilidades para Comer y Beber (EDACS), este estudio tiene como objetivo determinar su validez concurrente y confiabilidad en niños y adolescentes con parálisis cerebral (PC).
Método
Después de un exhaustivo procedimiento de traducción, aplicamos la versión en alemán a 52 participantes con PC (30 varones 22 mujeres, con una edad promedio de 9 años 7 meses [DS 4 años 2 meses]). Correlacionamos (tau de Kendall o Kτ ) ) los niveles de EDACS con puntaje para Disfagia de Bogenhausener (BODS) y el nivel de asistencia de EDACS con el Sistema de Clasificación de Habilidades Manuales (MACS |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0012-1622 1469-8749 |
DOI: | 10.1111/dmcn.13751 |