Loading…

Neuromuscular fatigue after low‐ and medium‐frequency electrical stimulation in healthy adults

ABSTRACT Introduction: In this study we investigated fatigue origins induced by low‐frequency pulsed current (PC) and medium‐frequency current (MF) neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) after a clinical‐like session. Methods: Eleven healthy men randomly underwent 2 NMES sessions, PC and MF, on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Muscle & nerve 2018-08, Vol.58 (2), p.293-299
Main Authors: De Oliveira, Pedro Ferreira Alves, Durigan, João Luiz Quagliotti, Modesto, Karenina Arrais Guida, Bottaro, Martim, Babault, Nicolas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT Introduction: In this study we investigated fatigue origins induced by low‐frequency pulsed current (PC) and medium‐frequency current (MF) neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) after a clinical‐like session. Methods: Eleven healthy men randomly underwent 2 NMES sessions, PC and MF, on quadriceps muscle (15‐minute duration, 6 seconds on and 18 seconds off). Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), central activation ratio (CAR), vastus lateralis electromyographic activity (EMG), and evoked contractile properties were determined before and after the sessions. Evoked torque and discomfort during the sessions were also measured. Results: Both currents produced decreases in MVC, EMG, and evoked contractile properties after the sessions. No difference was found between currents for all variables (P > 0.05). Evoked torque during sessions decreased (P  0.05). Discussion: Both currents induced similar neuromuscular fatigue. Clinicians can choose either PC or MF and expect similar treatment effects when the goal is to generate gains in muscle strength. Muscle Nerve 58: 293–299, 2018
ISSN:0148-639X
1097-4598
DOI:10.1002/mus.26143