Neuromuscular fatigue after low‐ and medium‐frequency electrical stimulation in healthy adults

ABSTRACT Introduction: In this study we investigated fatigue origins induced by low‐frequency pulsed current (PC) and medium‐frequency current (MF) neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) after a clinical‐like session. Methods: Eleven healthy men randomly underwent 2 NMES sessions, PC and MF, on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Muscle & nerve 2018-08, Vol.58 (2), p.293-299
Main Authors: De Oliveira, Pedro Ferreira Alves, Durigan, João Luiz Quagliotti, Modesto, Karenina Arrais Guida, Bottaro, Martim, Babault, Nicolas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adults
central fatigue
Contraction
Discomfort
Electrical stimuli
Electromyography
evoked torque
Fatigue
Knee
Muscle contraction
Muscle strength
Muscular fatigue
neurostimulation
peripheral fatigue
Pulsed current
quadriceps
Quadriceps muscle
Stimulation
Torque
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3873-af04e5af9064333bbed000bc1019728d78dc37cd22a6d98831d683b8909e238f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3873-af04e5af9064333bbed000bc1019728d78dc37cd22a6d98831d683b8909e238f3
container_end_page 299
container_issue 2
container_start_page 293
container_title Muscle & nerve
container_volume 58
creator De Oliveira, Pedro Ferreira Alves
Durigan, João Luiz Quagliotti
Modesto, Karenina Arrais Guida
Bottaro, Martim
Babault, Nicolas
description ABSTRACT Introduction: In this study we investigated fatigue origins induced by low‐frequency pulsed current (PC) and medium‐frequency current (MF) neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) after a clinical‐like session. Methods: Eleven healthy men randomly underwent 2 NMES sessions, PC and MF, on quadriceps muscle (15‐minute duration, 6 seconds on and 18 seconds off). Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), central activation ratio (CAR), vastus lateralis electromyographic activity (EMG), and evoked contractile properties were determined before and after the sessions. Evoked torque and discomfort during the sessions were also measured. Results: Both currents produced decreases in MVC, EMG, and evoked contractile properties after the sessions. No difference was found between currents for all variables (P > 0.05). Evoked torque during sessions decreased (P  0.05). Discussion: Both currents induced similar neuromuscular fatigue. Clinicians can choose either PC or MF and expect similar treatment effects when the goal is to generate gains in muscle strength. Muscle Nerve 58: 293–299, 2018
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mus.26143
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2031027594</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2031027594</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3873-af04e5af9064333bbed000bc1019728d78dc37cd22a6d98831d683b8909e238f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKxDAUhoMoOl4WvoAE3OiiYy6dNlmKeINRFyq4K2lyqhnSdkwaZHY-gs_ok5hh1IXg5hwOfOfj50don5IxJYSdtDGMWUFzvoZGlMgyyydSrKMRobnICi6fttB2CDNCCBVFuYm2mCxEKaQYofoWou-TQEenPG7UYJ8jYNUM4LHr3z7fP7DqDG7B2Nimq_HwGqHTCwwO9OCtVg6Hwbbpf7B9h22HX0C54WWBlYluCLtoo1EuwN733kGPF-cPZ1fZ9O7y-ux0mmkuSp6phuQwUY0kRc45r2swKXCtKaGyZMKUwmheasOYKowUglNTCF4LSSQwLhq-g45W3rnvU8QwVK0NGpxTHfQxVIxwSlg5kXlCD_-gsz76LqVLlMhlngZJ1PGK0r4PwUNTzb1tlV9UlFTL4qt2qV0Wn9iDb2OsU1e_5E_TCThZAW_WweJ_U3XzeL9SfgF9YY96</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2084940840</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neuromuscular fatigue after low‐ and medium‐frequency electrical stimulation in healthy adults</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>De Oliveira, Pedro Ferreira Alves ; Durigan, João Luiz Quagliotti ; Modesto, Karenina Arrais Guida ; Bottaro, Martim ; Babault, Nicolas</creator><creatorcontrib>De Oliveira, Pedro Ferreira Alves ; Durigan, João Luiz Quagliotti ; Modesto, Karenina Arrais Guida ; Bottaro, Martim ; Babault, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Introduction: In this study we investigated fatigue origins induced by low‐frequency pulsed current (PC) and medium‐frequency current (MF) neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) after a clinical‐like session. Methods: Eleven healthy men randomly underwent 2 NMES sessions, PC and MF, on quadriceps muscle (15‐minute duration, 6 seconds on and 18 seconds off). Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), central activation ratio (CAR), vastus lateralis electromyographic activity (EMG), and evoked contractile properties were determined before and after the sessions. Evoked torque and discomfort during the sessions were also measured. Results: Both currents produced decreases in MVC, EMG, and evoked contractile properties after the sessions. No difference was found between currents for all variables (P &gt; 0.05). Evoked torque during sessions decreased (P &lt; 0.05). No difference was observed in mean evoked torque and discomfort (P &gt; 0.05). Discussion: Both currents induced similar neuromuscular fatigue. Clinicians can choose either PC or MF and expect similar treatment effects when the goal is to generate gains in muscle strength. Muscle Nerve 58: 293–299, 2018</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-639X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mus.26143</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29687898</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adults ; central fatigue ; Contraction ; Discomfort ; Electrical stimuli ; Electromyography ; evoked torque ; Fatigue ; Knee ; Muscle contraction ; Muscle strength ; Muscular fatigue ; neurostimulation ; peripheral fatigue ; Pulsed current ; quadriceps ; Quadriceps muscle ; Stimulation ; Torque</subject><ispartof>Muscle &amp; nerve, 2018-08, Vol.58 (2), p.293-299</ispartof><rights>2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3873-af04e5af9064333bbed000bc1019728d78dc37cd22a6d98831d683b8909e238f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3873-af04e5af9064333bbed000bc1019728d78dc37cd22a6d98831d683b8909e238f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8666-1285</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29687898$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Oliveira, Pedro Ferreira Alves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durigan, João Luiz Quagliotti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Modesto, Karenina Arrais Guida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottaro, Martim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babault, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><title>Neuromuscular fatigue after low‐ and medium‐frequency electrical stimulation in healthy adults</title><title>Muscle &amp; nerve</title><addtitle>Muscle Nerve</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Introduction: In this study we investigated fatigue origins induced by low‐frequency pulsed current (PC) and medium‐frequency current (MF) neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) after a clinical‐like session. Methods: Eleven healthy men randomly underwent 2 NMES sessions, PC and MF, on quadriceps muscle (15‐minute duration, 6 seconds on and 18 seconds off). Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), central activation ratio (CAR), vastus lateralis electromyographic activity (EMG), and evoked contractile properties were determined before and after the sessions. Evoked torque and discomfort during the sessions were also measured. Results: Both currents produced decreases in MVC, EMG, and evoked contractile properties after the sessions. No difference was found between currents for all variables (P &gt; 0.05). Evoked torque during sessions decreased (P &lt; 0.05). No difference was observed in mean evoked torque and discomfort (P &gt; 0.05). Discussion: Both currents induced similar neuromuscular fatigue. Clinicians can choose either PC or MF and expect similar treatment effects when the goal is to generate gains in muscle strength. Muscle Nerve 58: 293–299, 2018</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>central fatigue</subject><subject>Contraction</subject><subject>Discomfort</subject><subject>Electrical stimuli</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>evoked torque</subject><subject>Fatigue</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Muscle contraction</subject><subject>Muscle strength</subject><subject>Muscular fatigue</subject><subject>neurostimulation</subject><subject>peripheral fatigue</subject><subject>Pulsed current</subject><subject>quadriceps</subject><subject>Quadriceps muscle</subject><subject>Stimulation</subject><subject>Torque</subject><issn>0148-639X</issn><issn>1097-4598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtKxDAUhoMoOl4WvoAE3OiiYy6dNlmKeINRFyq4K2lyqhnSdkwaZHY-gs_ok5hh1IXg5hwOfOfj50don5IxJYSdtDGMWUFzvoZGlMgyyydSrKMRobnICi6fttB2CDNCCBVFuYm2mCxEKaQYofoWou-TQEenPG7UYJ8jYNUM4LHr3z7fP7DqDG7B2Nimq_HwGqHTCwwO9OCtVg6Hwbbpf7B9h22HX0C54WWBlYluCLtoo1EuwN733kGPF-cPZ1fZ9O7y-ux0mmkuSp6phuQwUY0kRc45r2swKXCtKaGyZMKUwmheasOYKowUglNTCF4LSSQwLhq-g45W3rnvU8QwVK0NGpxTHfQxVIxwSlg5kXlCD_-gsz76LqVLlMhlngZJ1PGK0r4PwUNTzb1tlV9UlFTL4qt2qV0Wn9iDb2OsU1e_5E_TCThZAW_WweJ_U3XzeL9SfgF9YY96</recordid><startdate>201808</startdate><enddate>201808</enddate><creator>De Oliveira, Pedro Ferreira Alves</creator><creator>Durigan, João Luiz Quagliotti</creator><creator>Modesto, Karenina Arrais Guida</creator><creator>Bottaro, Martim</creator><creator>Babault, Nicolas</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8666-1285</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201808</creationdate><title>Neuromuscular fatigue after low‐ and medium‐frequency electrical stimulation in healthy adults</title><author>De Oliveira, Pedro Ferreira Alves ; Durigan, João Luiz Quagliotti ; Modesto, Karenina Arrais Guida ; Bottaro, Martim ; Babault, Nicolas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3873-af04e5af9064333bbed000bc1019728d78dc37cd22a6d98831d683b8909e238f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>central fatigue</topic><topic>Contraction</topic><topic>Discomfort</topic><topic>Electrical stimuli</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>evoked torque</topic><topic>Fatigue</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Muscle contraction</topic><topic>Muscle strength</topic><topic>Muscular fatigue</topic><topic>neurostimulation</topic><topic>peripheral fatigue</topic><topic>Pulsed current</topic><topic>quadriceps</topic><topic>Quadriceps muscle</topic><topic>Stimulation</topic><topic>Torque</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Oliveira, Pedro Ferreira Alves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durigan, João Luiz Quagliotti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Modesto, Karenina Arrais Guida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottaro, Martim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babault, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Muscle &amp; nerve</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Oliveira, Pedro Ferreira Alves</au><au>Durigan, João Luiz Quagliotti</au><au>Modesto, Karenina Arrais Guida</au><au>Bottaro, Martim</au><au>Babault, Nicolas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neuromuscular fatigue after low‐ and medium‐frequency electrical stimulation in healthy adults</atitle><jtitle>Muscle &amp; nerve</jtitle><addtitle>Muscle Nerve</addtitle><date>2018-08</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>293</spage><epage>299</epage><pages>293-299</pages><issn>0148-639X</issn><eissn>1097-4598</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Introduction: In this study we investigated fatigue origins induced by low‐frequency pulsed current (PC) and medium‐frequency current (MF) neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) after a clinical‐like session. Methods: Eleven healthy men randomly underwent 2 NMES sessions, PC and MF, on quadriceps muscle (15‐minute duration, 6 seconds on and 18 seconds off). Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), central activation ratio (CAR), vastus lateralis electromyographic activity (EMG), and evoked contractile properties were determined before and after the sessions. Evoked torque and discomfort during the sessions were also measured. Results: Both currents produced decreases in MVC, EMG, and evoked contractile properties after the sessions. No difference was found between currents for all variables (P &gt; 0.05). Evoked torque during sessions decreased (P &lt; 0.05). No difference was observed in mean evoked torque and discomfort (P &gt; 0.05). Discussion: Both currents induced similar neuromuscular fatigue. Clinicians can choose either PC or MF and expect similar treatment effects when the goal is to generate gains in muscle strength. Muscle Nerve 58: 293–299, 2018</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>29687898</pmid><doi>10.1002/mus.26143</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8666-1285</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-639X
ispartof Muscle & nerve, 2018-08, Vol.58 (2), p.293-299
issn 0148-639X
1097-4598
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2031027594
source Wiley
subjects Adults
central fatigue
Contraction
Discomfort
Electrical stimuli
Electromyography
evoked torque
Fatigue
Knee
Muscle contraction
Muscle strength
Muscular fatigue
neurostimulation
peripheral fatigue
Pulsed current
quadriceps
Quadriceps muscle
Stimulation
Torque
title Neuromuscular fatigue after low‐ and medium‐frequency electrical stimulation in healthy adults
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T13%3A08%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neuromuscular%20fatigue%20after%20low%E2%80%90%20and%20medium%E2%80%90frequency%20electrical%20stimulation%20in%20healthy%20adults&rft.jtitle=Muscle%20&%20nerve&rft.au=De%20Oliveira,%20Pedro%20Ferreira%20Alves&rft.date=2018-08&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=293&rft.epage=299&rft.pages=293-299&rft.issn=0148-639X&rft.eissn=1097-4598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mus.26143&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2031027594%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3873-af04e5af9064333bbed000bc1019728d78dc37cd22a6d98831d683b8909e238f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2084940840&rft_id=info:pmid/29687898&rfr_iscdi=true