Loading…

Enzymatic synthesis of ethyl esters from waste oil using mixtures of lipases in a plug‐flow packed‐bed continuous reactor

This work describes the continuous synthesis of ethyl esters via enzymatic catalysis on a packed‐bed continuous reactor, using mixtures of immobilized lipases (combi‐lipases) of Candida antarctica (CALB), Thermomyces lanuginosus (TLL), and Rhizomucor miehei (RML). The influence of the addition of gl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biotechnology progress 2018-07, Vol.34 (4), p.952-959
Main Authors: Poppe, Jakeline Kathiele, Matte, Carla Roberta, de Freitas, Vitória Olave, Fernandez‐Lafuente, Roberto, Rodrigues, Rafael C., Záchia Ayub, Marco Antônio
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This work describes the continuous synthesis of ethyl esters via enzymatic catalysis on a packed‐bed continuous reactor, using mixtures of immobilized lipases (combi‐lipases) of Candida antarctica (CALB), Thermomyces lanuginosus (TLL), and Rhizomucor miehei (RML). The influence of the addition of glass beads to the reactor bed, evaluation of the use of different solvents, and flow rate on reaction conditions was studied. All experiments were conducted using the best combination of lipases according to the fatty acid composition of the waste oil (combi‐lipase composition: 40% of TLL, 35% of CALB, and 25% of RML) and soybean oil (combi‐lipase composition: 22.5% of TLL, 50% of CALB, and 27.5% of RML). The best general reaction conditions were found to be using tert‐butanol as solvent, and the flow rate of 0.08 mL min−1. The combi‐lipase reactors operating at steady state for over 30 days (720 h), kept conversion yields of ∼50%, with average productivity of 1.94 gethyl esters gsubstrate−1 h−1, regardless of the type of oil in use. © 2018 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 34:952–959, 2018
ISSN:8756-7938
1520-6033
DOI:10.1002/btpr.2650