Loading…

Does motor expertise facilitate amplitude differentiation of lower limb-movements in an asymmetrical bipedal coordination task?

•Motor expertise does not influence amplitude differentiation of lower-limb movements.•Dancers adopt a higher movement-frequency compared to non-dancers.•Under haptic guidance dancers adopt a more predictable coordination pattern.•Dancers show a more flexible coordination pattern when provided with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Human movement science 2018-06, Vol.59, p.201-211
Main Authors: Roelofsen, Eefje G.J., Brown, Derrick D., Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Maria W.G., Staal, J. Bart, Meulenbroek, Ruud G.J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Motor expertise does not influence amplitude differentiation of lower-limb movements.•Dancers adopt a higher movement-frequency compared to non-dancers.•Under haptic guidance dancers adopt a more predictable coordination pattern.•Dancers show a more flexible coordination pattern when provided with visual feedback. The motor system’s natural tendency is to move the limbs over equal amplitudes, for example in walking. However, in many situations in which people must perform complex movements, a certain degree of amplitude differentiation of the limbs is required. Visual and haptic feedback have recently been shown to facilitate such independence of limb movements. However, it is unknown whether motor expertise moderates the extent to which individuals are able to differentiate the amplitudes of their limb-movements while being supported with visual and haptic feedback. To answer this question 14 pre-professional dancers were compared to 14 non-dancers on simultaneously generating a small displacement with one foot, and a larger one with the other foot, in four different feedback conditions. In two conditions, haptic guidance was offered, either in a passive or active mode. In the other two conditions, veridical and enhanced visual feedback were provided. Surprisingly, no group differences were found regarding the degree to which the visual or haptic feedback assisted the generation of the different target amplitudes of the feet (mean amplitude difference between the feet). The correlation between the displacements of the feet and the standard deviation of the continuous relative phase between the feet, reflecting the degree of independence of the feet movements, also failed to show between-group differences. Sample entropy measures, indicating the predictability of the foot movements, did show a group difference. In the haptically-assisted conditions, the dancers demonstrated more predictable coordination patterns than the non-dancers as reflected by lower sample entropy values whereas the reverse was true in the visual-feedback conditions. The results demonstrate that motor expertise does not moderate the extent to which haptic tracking facilitates the differentiation of the amplitudes of the lower limb movements in an asymmetrical bipedal coordination task.
ISSN:0167-9457
1872-7646
DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2018.04.011