Comparisons of in situ measurements of cirrus cloud ice water content

Aircraft‐based in situ measurements of cirrus cloud ice water content (IWC) are important for cloud microphysical/radiative modeling and satellite validation studies, yet the measurements have proven challenging due, in part, to the large dynamic range of IWC values present in cirrus clouds. To date...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres 2007-05, Vol.112 (D10), p.n/a
Main Authors: Davis, Sean M., Avallone, Linnea M., Weinstock, Elliot M., Twohy, Cynthia H., Smith, Jessica B., Kok, Gregory L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aircraft‐based in situ measurements of cirrus cloud ice water content (IWC) are important for cloud microphysical/radiative modeling and satellite validation studies, yet the measurements have proven challenging due, in part, to the large dynamic range of IWC values present in cirrus clouds. To date, three instruments designed for the measurement of IWC have been flown aboard the NASA WB‐57F research aircraft: the University of Colorado closed‐path laser hygrometer, the Droplet Measurement Technologies Cloud Spectrometer and Impactor, and the Harvard University Lyman‐α total water photofragment‐fluorescence hygrometer. This paper compares IWC measurements from these three instruments taken during the Midlatitude Cirrus Experiment (MidCiX) in 2004. At larger values of IWC (IWC > 10 mg m−3), the three instruments agree, on average, to within 20%, which is of the order of their estimated instrumental uncertainties. At smaller IWC values ( 1), implying that IWC measurements in thicker clouds are of sufficient accuracy for validation studies.
ISSN:0148-0227
2156-2202
DOI:10.1029/2006JD008214