The use of wearable devices for walking and running gait analysis outside of the lab: A systematic review

• Published in: Gait & posture 2018-06, Vol.63, p.124-138
• Main Authors: Benson, Lauren C., Clermont, Christian A., Bošnjak, Eva, Ferber, Reed
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Female; Gait; Gait - physiology; Humans; Male; Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation; Running; Running - physiology; Walking; Walking - physiology; Wearable devices; Wearable Electronic Devices
• ISSN: 0966-6362; 1879-2219
• DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.04.047

•Wearable devices have been used for out-of-lab walking and running gait analyses.•Long-term running analyses are scarce and could facilitate prospective studies.•Investigation of more participants could yield detection of functional subgroups.•While current wearable devices seem unobtrusive, evaluation of usability is needed.•Metrics specific to wearable devices reveal gait quality, but require validation. Quantitative gait analysis is essential for evaluating walking and running patterns for markers of pathology, injury, or other gait characteristics. It is expected that the portability, affordability, and applicability of wearable devices to many different populations will have contributed advancements in understanding the real-world gait patterns of walkers and runners. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to identify how wearable devices are being used for gait analysis in out-of-lab settings. A systematic search was conducted in the following scientific databases: PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, and SportDiscus. Each of the included articles was assessed using a custom quality assessment. Information was extracted from each included article regarding the participants, protocol, sensor(s), and analysis. A total of 61 articles were reviewed: 47 involved gait analysis during walking, 13 involved gait analysis during running, and one involved both walking and running. Most studies performed adequately on measures of reporting, and external and internal validity, but did not provide a sufficient description of power. Small, unobtrusive wearable devices have been used in retrospective studies, producing unique measures of gait quality. Walking, but not running, studies have begun to use wearable devices for gait analysis among large numbers of participants in their natural environment. Despite the advantages provided by the portability and accessibility of wearable devices, more studies monitoring gait over long periods of time, among large numbers of participants, and in natural walking and running environments are needed to analyze real-world gait patterns, and would facilitate prospective, subject-specific, and subgroup investigations. The development of wearables-specific metrics for gait analysis provide insights regarding the quality of gait that cannot be determined using traditional components of in-lab gait analyses. However, guidelines for the usability of wearable devices and the validity of wearables-based measurements of gait