Loading…

Effects of Carpobrotus edulis invasion on soil gross N fluxes in rocky coastal habitats

•Gross N fluxes in C. edulis invaded and uninvaded soils were modelled with Ntrace.•Carpobrotus edulis invasion affected gross N fluxes in the 0–5 and 5–10cm layers.•Invasion reduced NO3− producing and consuming rates and raised NH4+ immobilization.•Invaded soils showed lower net nitrification, N mi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Science of the total environment 2018-04, Vol.619-620, p.966-976
Main Authors: Vieites-Blanco, Cristina, González-Prieto, Serafín J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Gross N fluxes in C. edulis invaded and uninvaded soils were modelled with Ntrace.•Carpobrotus edulis invasion affected gross N fluxes in the 0–5 and 5–10cm layers.•Invasion reduced NO3− producing and consuming rates and raised NH4+ immobilization.•Invaded soils showed lower net nitrification, N mineralization and N availability.•DNRA was usually the exclusive/dominant NO3− consumption rate in our C-rich soils. [Display omitted] The effects of alien plants on whole nutrient cycles have been scarcely studied, despite the increasing evidence on their impact on nutrient pools and fluxes. Carpobrotus edulis, a dangerous invasive plant in coastal areas worldwide, is considered an ecosystems engineer which, by changing many soil properties, benefits its own invasion and hampers the restoration of the invaded habitats. To study, for the first time, the ‘true’ impact of C. edulis on the soil N cycle, we used a paired 15N labelling experiment and a Ntrace compartment model to estimate the gross N fluxes in the 0–5cm and 5–10cm soil layers of non-invaded and C. edulis invaded areas of two temperate-humid coastal rocky locations. Carpobrotus edulis invasion generally increased NH4+ immobilization (INH4, 1.19–4.48×), presumably due to a lower N availability for the microbiota. The invasion also decreased autotrophic nitrification (ONH4, 0.20–0.79×), either by a direct effect over soil microbiota or by the acidification triggered by C. edulis. Unexpectedly, the dissimilatory nitrate reduction (DNRA) was the exclusive NO3− consuming process modelled on most of the studied soils, although the incubation was aerobic. Apparently, the high organic C content of these soils induced a higher O2 consumption and the formation of anaerobic microsites where the DNRA could have taken place. The lower NO3− availability of invaded soils could explain their lower DNRA rates (0.04–0.70×) compared to native soils. Both DNRA and ONH4 were more affected in the 0–5cm layer, but the invasion also significantly affected N rates in the 5–10cm layer. Overall, net nitrification and mineralization generally decreased in the invaded soils. This study shows that the invasion of C. edulis alters soil gross and net N fluxes in a 0–10cm depth through its effects on soil properties and microbiota.
ISSN:0048-9697
1879-1026
DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.154