Dynamical implications of bi-directional resource exchange within a meta-ecosystem

• Published in: Mathematical biosciences 2018-07, Vol.301, p.167-184
• Main Authors: Messan, Marisabel Rodriguez, Kopp, Darin, Allen, Daniel C., Kang, Yun
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Amensalistic interactions; Antagonistic interactions; Aquatic ecosystems; Bi-directional resource exchange; Competitive interactions; Meta-ecosystem; Multiple alternative stable states; Mutualistic interactions; Terrestrial ecosystems
• ISSN: 0025-5564; 1879-3134
• DOI: 10.1016/j.mbs.2018.05.006

•Propose and study dynamics of a meta-ecosystem with bi-directional resources exchange (BRE).•BRE generates complicated dynamical outcomes, including amensalistic, antagonistic, competitive, or mutualistic interactions, along with multiple alternative stable states.•The relative cost and benefit for resource exchange along with the local environment can increase or decrease the productions of meta-ecosystem. The exchange of resources across ecosystem boundaries can have large impacts on ecosystem structures and functions at local and regional scales. In this article, we develop a simple model to investigate dynamical implications of bi-directional resource exchanges between two local ecosystems in a meta-ecosystem framework. In our model, we assume that (1) Each local ecosystem acts as both a resource donor and recipient, such that one ecosystem donating resources to another results in a cost to the donating system and a benefit to the recipient; and (2) The costs and benefits of the bi-directional resource exchange between two ecosystems are correlated in a nonlinear fashion. Our model could apply to the resource interactions between terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems that are supported by the literature. Our theoretical results show that bi-directional resource exchange between two ecosystems can indeed generate complicated dynamical outcomes, including the coupled ecosystems having amensalistic, antagonistic, competitive, or mutualistic interactions, with multiple alternative stable states depending on the relative costs and benefits. In addition, if the relative cost for resource exchange for an ecosystem is decreased or the relative benefit for resource exchange for an ecosystem is increased, the production of that ecosystem would increase; however, depending on the local environment, the production of the other ecosystem may increase or decrease. We expect that our work, by evaluating the potential outcomes of resource exchange theoretically, can facilitate empirical evaluations and advance the understanding of spatial ecosystem ecology where resource exchanges occur in varied ecosystems through a complicated network.