Loading…

Device-Related Thrombus After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes

BACKGROUND:In patients with atrial fibrillation, left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device prevents thromboembolism from the left atrial appendage; however, thrombus may form on the left atrial face of the device, and then potentially embolize. Herein, we studied the incidence, predicto...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2018-08, Vol.138 (9), p.874-885
Main Authors: Dukkipati, Srinivas R, Kar, Saibal, Holmes, David R, Doshi, Shephal K, Swarup, Vijendra, Gibson, Douglas N, Maini, Brijeshwar, Gordon, Nicole T, Main, Michael L, Reddy, Vivek Y
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3150-736deb19a0ca7f57c741030764c137012550831d5e776378893ec0470dcdcce93
container_end_page 885
container_issue 9
container_start_page 874
container_title Circulation (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 138
creator Dukkipati, Srinivas R
Kar, Saibal
Holmes, David R
Doshi, Shephal K
Swarup, Vijendra
Gibson, Douglas N
Maini, Brijeshwar
Gordon, Nicole T
Main, Michael L
Reddy, Vivek Y
description BACKGROUND:In patients with atrial fibrillation, left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device prevents thromboembolism from the left atrial appendage; however, thrombus may form on the left atrial face of the device, and then potentially embolize. Herein, we studied the incidence, predictors, and clinical outcome of device-related thrombus (DRT) using a large series of clinical trial cohorts of patients undergoing Watchman implantation. METHODS:We studied the device arms of 4 prospective Food and Drug Administration trialsPROTECT-AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) (n=463); PREVAIL (Evaluation of the Watchman LAA Closure Device in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Versus Long Term Warfarin Therapy) (n=269); CAP (Continued Access to PROTECT AF registry) (n=566); and CAP2 (Continued Access to PREVAIL registry) (n=578). Surveillance transesophageal echocardiographs were performed at 45 days and 12 months in all patients, and also at 6 months in the randomized control trials. We assessed both the incidence of DRT during these transesophageal echocardiographs (and other unscheduled transesophageal echocardiographs), and clinical outcomes of postprocedure stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) and adjusted for CHA2DS2-VASC and HAS-BLED scores. RESULTS:Of 1739 patients who received an implant (7159 patient-years follow-up; CHA2DS2-VASc=4.0), DRT was seen in 65 patients (3.74%). The rates of SSE with and without DRT were 7.46 and 1.78 per 100 patient-years (adjusted rate ratio, 3.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.18–5.79; P
doi_str_mv 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035090
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2038268494</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2038268494</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3150-736deb19a0ca7f57c741030764c137012550831d5e776378893ec0470dcdcce93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9P3DAQxa2KqizQr4DMjcOGjuM4jpE4RKGUlVZdhJZz6rUnbMBJFjsp6revq6WVuPU0mqf35s-PkDMGF4zl7Eu1uK8eluV6sfpe3pZRKy6AC1DwgcyYSLMkE1wdkBkAqETyND0kRyE8xTbnUnwih6mSIuWqmJEf1_izNZjco9MjWrre-qHbTIGWzYieLrEZaTn6Vjta7nbYW_2ItHJDmDxe0kVvWou9wTm982hbMw4-zKnuLV1Noxk6DCfkY6NdwM9v9Zg83HxdV7fJcvVtUZXLxHAmIF6ZW9wwpcFo2QhpZMaAg8wzw7gElgoBBWdWoJTxiaJQHA1kEqyxxqDix-R8P3fnh5cJw1h3bTDonO5xmEKdAi_SvMhUFq1qbzV-CMFjU-9822n_q2ZQ_wFcvwcctaLeA47Z07c106ZD-y_5l2g0XO0Nr4OLBMOzm17R11vUbtz-x4LfwDmKYQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2038268494</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Device-Related Thrombus After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Dukkipati, Srinivas R ; Kar, Saibal ; Holmes, David R ; Doshi, Shephal K ; Swarup, Vijendra ; Gibson, Douglas N ; Maini, Brijeshwar ; Gordon, Nicole T ; Main, Michael L ; Reddy, Vivek Y</creator><creatorcontrib>Dukkipati, Srinivas R ; Kar, Saibal ; Holmes, David R ; Doshi, Shephal K ; Swarup, Vijendra ; Gibson, Douglas N ; Maini, Brijeshwar ; Gordon, Nicole T ; Main, Michael L ; Reddy, Vivek Y</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:In patients with atrial fibrillation, left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device prevents thromboembolism from the left atrial appendage; however, thrombus may form on the left atrial face of the device, and then potentially embolize. Herein, we studied the incidence, predictors, and clinical outcome of device-related thrombus (DRT) using a large series of clinical trial cohorts of patients undergoing Watchman implantation. METHODS:We studied the device arms of 4 prospective Food and Drug Administration trialsPROTECT-AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) (n=463); PREVAIL (Evaluation of the Watchman LAA Closure Device in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Versus Long Term Warfarin Therapy) (n=269); CAP (Continued Access to PROTECT AF registry) (n=566); and CAP2 (Continued Access to PREVAIL registry) (n=578). Surveillance transesophageal echocardiographs were performed at 45 days and 12 months in all patients, and also at 6 months in the randomized control trials. We assessed both the incidence of DRT during these transesophageal echocardiographs (and other unscheduled transesophageal echocardiographs), and clinical outcomes of postprocedure stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) and adjusted for CHA2DS2-VASC and HAS-BLED scores. RESULTS:Of 1739 patients who received an implant (7159 patient-years follow-up; CHA2DS2-VASc=4.0), DRT was seen in 65 patients (3.74%). The rates of SSE with and without DRT were 7.46 and 1.78 per 100 patient-years (adjusted rate ratio, 3.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.18–5.79; P&lt;0.001), and ischemic SSE rates were 6.28 and 1.65 per 100 patient-years (adjusted rate ratio, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.90–5.45, P&lt;0.001). On multivariable modeling analysis, the predictors of DRT were as followshistory of transient ischemic attack or stroke (odds ratio [OR], 2.31; 95% CI, 1.26–4.25; P=0.007), permanent atrial fibrillation (OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.19–4.20; P=0.012); vascular disease (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.08–3.91; P=0.028); left atrial appendage diameter (OR, 1.06 per mm increase; 95% CI, 1.01–1.12; P=0.019); left ventricular ejection fraction (OR, 0.96 per 1% increase; 95% CI, 0.94–0.99; P=0.009). DRT and SSE both occurred in 17 of 65 patients (26.2%). Of the 19 SSE events in these patients with DRT, 9 of 19 (47.4%) and 12 of 19 (63.2%) occurred within 1 and 6 months of DRT detection. Conversely, after left atrial appendage closure, most SSEs (123/142, 86.62%) occurred in patients without DRT. CONCLUSIONS:After left atrial appendage closure with Watchman, DRT (≈3.7%) is not frequent but, when present, is associated with a higher rate of stroke and systemic embolism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-7322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035090</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29752398</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Atrial Appendage - diagnostic imaging ; Atrial Appendage - physiopathology ; Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis ; Atrial Fibrillation - epidemiology ; Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology ; Atrial Fibrillation - therapy ; Atrial Function, Left ; Cardiac Catheterization - adverse effects ; Cardiac Catheterization - instrumentation ; Echocardiography, Transesophageal ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence ; Intracranial Embolism - diagnostic imaging ; Intracranial Embolism - epidemiology ; Male ; Prosthesis Design ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Registries ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Stroke - diagnostic imaging ; Stroke - epidemiology ; Thrombosis - diagnostic imaging ; Thrombosis - epidemiology ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 2018-08, Vol.138 (9), p.874-885</ispartof><rights>2018 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3150-736deb19a0ca7f57c741030764c137012550831d5e776378893ec0470dcdcce93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29752398$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dukkipati, Srinivas R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kar, Saibal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doshi, Shephal K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swarup, Vijendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Douglas N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maini, Brijeshwar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Nicole T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Main, Michael L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Vivek Y</creatorcontrib><title>Device-Related Thrombus After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes</title><title>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:In patients with atrial fibrillation, left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device prevents thromboembolism from the left atrial appendage; however, thrombus may form on the left atrial face of the device, and then potentially embolize. Herein, we studied the incidence, predictors, and clinical outcome of device-related thrombus (DRT) using a large series of clinical trial cohorts of patients undergoing Watchman implantation. METHODS:We studied the device arms of 4 prospective Food and Drug Administration trialsPROTECT-AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) (n=463); PREVAIL (Evaluation of the Watchman LAA Closure Device in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Versus Long Term Warfarin Therapy) (n=269); CAP (Continued Access to PROTECT AF registry) (n=566); and CAP2 (Continued Access to PREVAIL registry) (n=578). Surveillance transesophageal echocardiographs were performed at 45 days and 12 months in all patients, and also at 6 months in the randomized control trials. We assessed both the incidence of DRT during these transesophageal echocardiographs (and other unscheduled transesophageal echocardiographs), and clinical outcomes of postprocedure stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) and adjusted for CHA2DS2-VASC and HAS-BLED scores. RESULTS:Of 1739 patients who received an implant (7159 patient-years follow-up; CHA2DS2-VASc=4.0), DRT was seen in 65 patients (3.74%). The rates of SSE with and without DRT were 7.46 and 1.78 per 100 patient-years (adjusted rate ratio, 3.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.18–5.79; P&lt;0.001), and ischemic SSE rates were 6.28 and 1.65 per 100 patient-years (adjusted rate ratio, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.90–5.45, P&lt;0.001). On multivariable modeling analysis, the predictors of DRT were as followshistory of transient ischemic attack or stroke (odds ratio [OR], 2.31; 95% CI, 1.26–4.25; P=0.007), permanent atrial fibrillation (OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.19–4.20; P=0.012); vascular disease (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.08–3.91; P=0.028); left atrial appendage diameter (OR, 1.06 per mm increase; 95% CI, 1.01–1.12; P=0.019); left ventricular ejection fraction (OR, 0.96 per 1% increase; 95% CI, 0.94–0.99; P=0.009). DRT and SSE both occurred in 17 of 65 patients (26.2%). Of the 19 SSE events in these patients with DRT, 9 of 19 (47.4%) and 12 of 19 (63.2%) occurred within 1 and 6 months of DRT detection. Conversely, after left atrial appendage closure, most SSEs (123/142, 86.62%) occurred in patients without DRT. CONCLUSIONS:After left atrial appendage closure with Watchman, DRT (≈3.7%) is not frequent but, when present, is associated with a higher rate of stroke and systemic embolism.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Atrial Appendage - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Atrial Appendage - physiopathology</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - epidemiology</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - therapy</subject><subject>Atrial Function, Left</subject><subject>Cardiac Catheterization - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cardiac Catheterization - instrumentation</subject><subject>Echocardiography, Transesophageal</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Intracranial Embolism - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Intracranial Embolism - epidemiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Stroke - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Stroke - epidemiology</subject><subject>Thrombosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Thrombosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0009-7322</issn><issn>1524-4539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE9P3DAQxa2KqizQr4DMjcOGjuM4jpE4RKGUlVZdhJZz6rUnbMBJFjsp6revq6WVuPU0mqf35s-PkDMGF4zl7Eu1uK8eluV6sfpe3pZRKy6AC1DwgcyYSLMkE1wdkBkAqETyND0kRyE8xTbnUnwih6mSIuWqmJEf1_izNZjco9MjWrre-qHbTIGWzYieLrEZaTn6Vjta7nbYW_2ItHJDmDxe0kVvWou9wTm982hbMw4-zKnuLV1Noxk6DCfkY6NdwM9v9Zg83HxdV7fJcvVtUZXLxHAmIF6ZW9wwpcFo2QhpZMaAg8wzw7gElgoBBWdWoJTxiaJQHA1kEqyxxqDix-R8P3fnh5cJw1h3bTDonO5xmEKdAi_SvMhUFq1qbzV-CMFjU-9822n_q2ZQ_wFcvwcctaLeA47Z07c106ZD-y_5l2g0XO0Nr4OLBMOzm17R11vUbtz-x4LfwDmKYQ</recordid><startdate>20180828</startdate><enddate>20180828</enddate><creator>Dukkipati, Srinivas R</creator><creator>Kar, Saibal</creator><creator>Holmes, David R</creator><creator>Doshi, Shephal K</creator><creator>Swarup, Vijendra</creator><creator>Gibson, Douglas N</creator><creator>Maini, Brijeshwar</creator><creator>Gordon, Nicole T</creator><creator>Main, Michael L</creator><creator>Reddy, Vivek Y</creator><general>by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180828</creationdate><title>Device-Related Thrombus After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes</title><author>Dukkipati, Srinivas R ; Kar, Saibal ; Holmes, David R ; Doshi, Shephal K ; Swarup, Vijendra ; Gibson, Douglas N ; Maini, Brijeshwar ; Gordon, Nicole T ; Main, Michael L ; Reddy, Vivek Y</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3150-736deb19a0ca7f57c741030764c137012550831d5e776378893ec0470dcdcce93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Atrial Appendage - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Atrial Appendage - physiopathology</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - epidemiology</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - therapy</topic><topic>Atrial Function, Left</topic><topic>Cardiac Catheterization - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cardiac Catheterization - instrumentation</topic><topic>Echocardiography, Transesophageal</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Intracranial Embolism - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Intracranial Embolism - epidemiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Stroke - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Stroke - epidemiology</topic><topic>Thrombosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Thrombosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dukkipati, Srinivas R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kar, Saibal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doshi, Shephal K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swarup, Vijendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Douglas N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maini, Brijeshwar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Nicole T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Main, Michael L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Vivek Y</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dukkipati, Srinivas R</au><au>Kar, Saibal</au><au>Holmes, David R</au><au>Doshi, Shephal K</au><au>Swarup, Vijendra</au><au>Gibson, Douglas N</au><au>Maini, Brijeshwar</au><au>Gordon, Nicole T</au><au>Main, Michael L</au><au>Reddy, Vivek Y</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Device-Related Thrombus After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><date>2018-08-28</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>138</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>874</spage><epage>885</epage><pages>874-885</pages><issn>0009-7322</issn><eissn>1524-4539</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND:In patients with atrial fibrillation, left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device prevents thromboembolism from the left atrial appendage; however, thrombus may form on the left atrial face of the device, and then potentially embolize. Herein, we studied the incidence, predictors, and clinical outcome of device-related thrombus (DRT) using a large series of clinical trial cohorts of patients undergoing Watchman implantation. METHODS:We studied the device arms of 4 prospective Food and Drug Administration trialsPROTECT-AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) (n=463); PREVAIL (Evaluation of the Watchman LAA Closure Device in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Versus Long Term Warfarin Therapy) (n=269); CAP (Continued Access to PROTECT AF registry) (n=566); and CAP2 (Continued Access to PREVAIL registry) (n=578). Surveillance transesophageal echocardiographs were performed at 45 days and 12 months in all patients, and also at 6 months in the randomized control trials. We assessed both the incidence of DRT during these transesophageal echocardiographs (and other unscheduled transesophageal echocardiographs), and clinical outcomes of postprocedure stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) and adjusted for CHA2DS2-VASC and HAS-BLED scores. RESULTS:Of 1739 patients who received an implant (7159 patient-years follow-up; CHA2DS2-VASc=4.0), DRT was seen in 65 patients (3.74%). The rates of SSE with and without DRT were 7.46 and 1.78 per 100 patient-years (adjusted rate ratio, 3.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.18–5.79; P&lt;0.001), and ischemic SSE rates were 6.28 and 1.65 per 100 patient-years (adjusted rate ratio, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.90–5.45, P&lt;0.001). On multivariable modeling analysis, the predictors of DRT were as followshistory of transient ischemic attack or stroke (odds ratio [OR], 2.31; 95% CI, 1.26–4.25; P=0.007), permanent atrial fibrillation (OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.19–4.20; P=0.012); vascular disease (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.08–3.91; P=0.028); left atrial appendage diameter (OR, 1.06 per mm increase; 95% CI, 1.01–1.12; P=0.019); left ventricular ejection fraction (OR, 0.96 per 1% increase; 95% CI, 0.94–0.99; P=0.009). DRT and SSE both occurred in 17 of 65 patients (26.2%). Of the 19 SSE events in these patients with DRT, 9 of 19 (47.4%) and 12 of 19 (63.2%) occurred within 1 and 6 months of DRT detection. Conversely, after left atrial appendage closure, most SSEs (123/142, 86.62%) occurred in patients without DRT. CONCLUSIONS:After left atrial appendage closure with Watchman, DRT (≈3.7%) is not frequent but, when present, is associated with a higher rate of stroke and systemic embolism.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc</pub><pmid>29752398</pmid><doi>10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035090</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-7322
ispartof Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 2018-08, Vol.138 (9), p.874-885
issn 0009-7322
1524-4539
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2038268494
source EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Atrial Appendage - diagnostic imaging
Atrial Appendage - physiopathology
Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis
Atrial Fibrillation - epidemiology
Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology
Atrial Fibrillation - therapy
Atrial Function, Left
Cardiac Catheterization - adverse effects
Cardiac Catheterization - instrumentation
Echocardiography, Transesophageal
Female
Humans
Incidence
Intracranial Embolism - diagnostic imaging
Intracranial Embolism - epidemiology
Male
Prosthesis Design
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Registries
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Stroke - diagnostic imaging
Stroke - epidemiology
Thrombosis - diagnostic imaging
Thrombosis - epidemiology
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
title Device-Related Thrombus After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T09%3A41%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Device-Related%20Thrombus%20After%20Left%20Atrial%20Appendage%20Closure:%20Incidence,%20Predictors,%20and%20Outcomes&rft.jtitle=Circulation%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Dukkipati,%20Srinivas%20R&rft.date=2018-08-28&rft.volume=138&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=874&rft.epage=885&rft.pages=874-885&rft.issn=0009-7322&rft.eissn=1524-4539&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035090&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2038268494%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3150-736deb19a0ca7f57c741030764c137012550831d5e776378893ec0470dcdcce93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2038268494&rft_id=info:pmid/29752398&rfr_iscdi=true