Reversal of Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy Following Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

• Published in: JACC. Clinical electrophysiology 2018-02, Vol.4 (2), p.168-177
• Main Authors: Khurshid, Shaan, Obeng-Gyimah, Edmond, Supple, Gregory E., Schaller, Robert, Lin, David, Owens, Anjali T., Epstein, Andrew E., Dixit, Sanjay, Marchlinski, Francis E., Frankel, David S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: biventricular pacing; cardiac resynchronization therapy; heart failure; pacing; pacing-induced cardiomyopathy
• ISSN: 2405-500X; 2405-5018
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.10.002

This study sought to determine the extent, time course, and predictors of improvement following cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) upgrade among pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) patients. PICM is an important cause of heart failure in patients exposed to frequent right ventricular (RV) pacing. CRT may reverse PICM. We retrospectively studied 1,279 consecutive patients undergoing CRT procedures between 2003 and 2016. Patients undergoing CRT upgrade from a dual-chamber or single-chamber ventricular pacemaker for PICM were included. PICM was defined as decrease of ≥10% in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), resulting in LVEF 35% among those with severe PICM were identified. Of 69 PICM patients, LVEF improved from 29.3% to 45.3% over a median 7.0 months. Of 54 patients with severe PICM, 39 (72.2%) improved to LVEF >35% over a median 7.0 months. Most improvement occurred within the first 3 months, although improvement continued over the remainder of the first year. In linear regression, narrower native QRS was associated with greater LVEF improvement following CRT upgrade (+2.00% per 10-ms decrease; p = 0.05). CRT is highly efficacious in reversing PICM, with 72% of severe PICM patients achieving LVEF >35% and most of the improvement occurring within 1 year. These data support initial upgrade to a CRT pacemaker with consideration of further upgrade to CRT defibrillator after 1 year if LVEF remains ≤35%. [Display omitted]