Loading…
Policy uncertainty and corporate performance in government-sponsored voluntary environmental programs
This study combines insights from the policy uncertainty literature and neo-institutional theory to examine corporate performance in implementing a government-sponsored voluntary environmental program (VEP) during 2004–2012 in Guangzhou, China. In this regulatory context, characterized by rapid poli...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of environmental management 2018-08, Vol.219, p.350-360 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-ff9baa9c5c455fdbe453cae3a1338b77abeaad216dd86b7effd9212a95eefdb13 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-ff9baa9c5c455fdbe453cae3a1338b77abeaad216dd86b7effd9212a95eefdb13 |
container_end_page | 360 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 350 |
container_title | Journal of environmental management |
container_volume | 219 |
creator | Liu, Ning Tang, Shui-Yan Zhan, Xueyong Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung |
description | This study combines insights from the policy uncertainty literature and neo-institutional theory to examine corporate performance in implementing a government-sponsored voluntary environmental program (VEP) during 2004–2012 in Guangzhou, China. In this regulatory context, characterized by rapid policy changes, corporate performance in VEPs is affected by government surveillance, policy uncertainty, and peer pressures. Specifically, if VEP participants have experienced more government surveillance, they tend to perform better in program implementation. Such positive influence of government surveillance is particularly evident among those joining under high and low, rather than moderate uncertainty. Participants also perform better if they belong to an industry with more certified VEP firms, but worse if they are located in a regulatory jurisdiction with more certified VEP firms. At a moderate level of policy uncertainty, within-industry imitation is most likely to occur but within-jurisdiction imitation is least likely to occur.
•Prior regulatory surveillance has a positive spill-over effect that induces firms to devote efforts to VEP implementation.•Participants perform better if they belong to an industry with more certified VEP firms.•They perform worse if they are located in a regulatory jurisdiction with more certified VEP firms.•Policy uncertainty affects the way participants interpret signals from institutional forces. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.110 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2038708565</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479718305012</els_id><sourcerecordid>2038708565</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-ff9baa9c5c455fdbe453cae3a1338b77abeaad216dd86b7effd9212a95eefdb13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi1URJfCT6DysZcEO47j-ISqqnxIleAAZ2tiTyqvEju1k5X23-N2F649zWGemXfmIeQTZzVnvPu8r_cYDjOEumG8r1lbc87ekB1nWlZ9J9gF2THBeNUqrS7J-5z3jDHRcPWOXDZaSaGV3hH8FSdvj3QLFtMKPqxHCsFRG9MSE6xIF0xjTCXIIvWBPsYDpjBjWKu8xJBjQkcPcdrCCulIy00-xZc-THRJ8THBnD-QtyNMGT-e6xX58_X-99336uHntx93tw-VbXmzVuOoBwBtpW2lHN2ArRQWUAAXoh-UggEBXMM75_puUDiOTje8AS0RC87FFbk57S3BTxvm1cw-W5wmCBi3bBomesV62cmCyhNqU8w54WiW5OfyguHMPBs2e3M2bJ4NG9aaYrjMXZ8jtmFG93_qn9ICfDkBWB49eEwmW4_FnvMJ7Wpc9K9E_AVPj5Sh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2038708565</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Policy uncertainty and corporate performance in government-sponsored voluntary environmental programs</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Liu, Ning ; Tang, Shui-Yan ; Zhan, Xueyong ; Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ning ; Tang, Shui-Yan ; Zhan, Xueyong ; Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung</creatorcontrib><description>This study combines insights from the policy uncertainty literature and neo-institutional theory to examine corporate performance in implementing a government-sponsored voluntary environmental program (VEP) during 2004–2012 in Guangzhou, China. In this regulatory context, characterized by rapid policy changes, corporate performance in VEPs is affected by government surveillance, policy uncertainty, and peer pressures. Specifically, if VEP participants have experienced more government surveillance, they tend to perform better in program implementation. Such positive influence of government surveillance is particularly evident among those joining under high and low, rather than moderate uncertainty. Participants also perform better if they belong to an industry with more certified VEP firms, but worse if they are located in a regulatory jurisdiction with more certified VEP firms. At a moderate level of policy uncertainty, within-industry imitation is most likely to occur but within-jurisdiction imitation is least likely to occur.
•Prior regulatory surveillance has a positive spill-over effect that induces firms to devote efforts to VEP implementation.•Participants perform better if they belong to an industry with more certified VEP firms.•They perform worse if they are located in a regulatory jurisdiction with more certified VEP firms.•Policy uncertainty affects the way participants interpret signals from institutional forces.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.110</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29753979</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Emerging economies ; Institutional pressure ; Policy uncertainty ; Voluntary environmental regulation</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2018-08, Vol.219, p.350-360</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-ff9baa9c5c455fdbe453cae3a1338b77abeaad216dd86b7effd9212a95eefdb13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-ff9baa9c5c455fdbe453cae3a1338b77abeaad216dd86b7effd9212a95eefdb13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29753979$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Shui-Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhan, Xueyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung</creatorcontrib><title>Policy uncertainty and corporate performance in government-sponsored voluntary environmental programs</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>This study combines insights from the policy uncertainty literature and neo-institutional theory to examine corporate performance in implementing a government-sponsored voluntary environmental program (VEP) during 2004–2012 in Guangzhou, China. In this regulatory context, characterized by rapid policy changes, corporate performance in VEPs is affected by government surveillance, policy uncertainty, and peer pressures. Specifically, if VEP participants have experienced more government surveillance, they tend to perform better in program implementation. Such positive influence of government surveillance is particularly evident among those joining under high and low, rather than moderate uncertainty. Participants also perform better if they belong to an industry with more certified VEP firms, but worse if they are located in a regulatory jurisdiction with more certified VEP firms. At a moderate level of policy uncertainty, within-industry imitation is most likely to occur but within-jurisdiction imitation is least likely to occur.
•Prior regulatory surveillance has a positive spill-over effect that induces firms to devote efforts to VEP implementation.•Participants perform better if they belong to an industry with more certified VEP firms.•They perform worse if they are located in a regulatory jurisdiction with more certified VEP firms.•Policy uncertainty affects the way participants interpret signals from institutional forces.</description><subject>Emerging economies</subject><subject>Institutional pressure</subject><subject>Policy uncertainty</subject><subject>Voluntary environmental regulation</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi1URJfCT6DysZcEO47j-ISqqnxIleAAZ2tiTyqvEju1k5X23-N2F649zWGemXfmIeQTZzVnvPu8r_cYDjOEumG8r1lbc87ekB1nWlZ9J9gF2THBeNUqrS7J-5z3jDHRcPWOXDZaSaGV3hH8FSdvj3QLFtMKPqxHCsFRG9MSE6xIF0xjTCXIIvWBPsYDpjBjWKu8xJBjQkcPcdrCCulIy00-xZc-THRJ8THBnD-QtyNMGT-e6xX58_X-99336uHntx93tw-VbXmzVuOoBwBtpW2lHN2ArRQWUAAXoh-UggEBXMM75_puUDiOTje8AS0RC87FFbk57S3BTxvm1cw-W5wmCBi3bBomesV62cmCyhNqU8w54WiW5OfyguHMPBs2e3M2bJ4NG9aaYrjMXZ8jtmFG93_qn9ICfDkBWB49eEwmW4_FnvMJ7Wpc9K9E_AVPj5Sh</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Liu, Ning</creator><creator>Tang, Shui-Yan</creator><creator>Zhan, Xueyong</creator><creator>Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>Policy uncertainty and corporate performance in government-sponsored voluntary environmental programs</title><author>Liu, Ning ; Tang, Shui-Yan ; Zhan, Xueyong ; Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-ff9baa9c5c455fdbe453cae3a1338b77abeaad216dd86b7effd9212a95eefdb13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Emerging economies</topic><topic>Institutional pressure</topic><topic>Policy uncertainty</topic><topic>Voluntary environmental regulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Shui-Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhan, Xueyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Ning</au><au>Tang, Shui-Yan</au><au>Zhan, Xueyong</au><au>Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Policy uncertainty and corporate performance in government-sponsored voluntary environmental programs</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>219</volume><spage>350</spage><epage>360</epage><pages>350-360</pages><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><abstract>This study combines insights from the policy uncertainty literature and neo-institutional theory to examine corporate performance in implementing a government-sponsored voluntary environmental program (VEP) during 2004–2012 in Guangzhou, China. In this regulatory context, characterized by rapid policy changes, corporate performance in VEPs is affected by government surveillance, policy uncertainty, and peer pressures. Specifically, if VEP participants have experienced more government surveillance, they tend to perform better in program implementation. Such positive influence of government surveillance is particularly evident among those joining under high and low, rather than moderate uncertainty. Participants also perform better if they belong to an industry with more certified VEP firms, but worse if they are located in a regulatory jurisdiction with more certified VEP firms. At a moderate level of policy uncertainty, within-industry imitation is most likely to occur but within-jurisdiction imitation is least likely to occur.
•Prior regulatory surveillance has a positive spill-over effect that induces firms to devote efforts to VEP implementation.•Participants perform better if they belong to an industry with more certified VEP firms.•They perform worse if they are located in a regulatory jurisdiction with more certified VEP firms.•Policy uncertainty affects the way participants interpret signals from institutional forces.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29753979</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.110</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4797 |
ispartof | Journal of environmental management, 2018-08, Vol.219, p.350-360 |
issn | 0301-4797 1095-8630 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2038708565 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Emerging economies Institutional pressure Policy uncertainty Voluntary environmental regulation |
title | Policy uncertainty and corporate performance in government-sponsored voluntary environmental programs |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T09%3A54%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Policy%20uncertainty%20and%20corporate%20performance%20in%20government-sponsored%20voluntary%20environmental%20programs&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Liu,%20Ning&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=219&rft.spage=350&rft.epage=360&rft.pages=350-360&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.110&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2038708565%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-ff9baa9c5c455fdbe453cae3a1338b77abeaad216dd86b7effd9212a95eefdb13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2038708565&rft_id=info:pmid/29753979&rfr_iscdi=true |