Loading…

Policy uncertainty and corporate performance in government-sponsored voluntary environmental programs

This study combines insights from the policy uncertainty literature and neo-institutional theory to examine corporate performance in implementing a government-sponsored voluntary environmental program (VEP) during 2004–2012 in Guangzhou, China. In this regulatory context, characterized by rapid poli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of environmental management 2018-08, Vol.219, p.350-360
Main Authors: Liu, Ning, Tang, Shui-Yan, Zhan, Xueyong, Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-ff9baa9c5c455fdbe453cae3a1338b77abeaad216dd86b7effd9212a95eefdb13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-ff9baa9c5c455fdbe453cae3a1338b77abeaad216dd86b7effd9212a95eefdb13
container_end_page 360
container_issue
container_start_page 350
container_title Journal of environmental management
container_volume 219
creator Liu, Ning
Tang, Shui-Yan
Zhan, Xueyong
Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung
description This study combines insights from the policy uncertainty literature and neo-institutional theory to examine corporate performance in implementing a government-sponsored voluntary environmental program (VEP) during 2004–2012 in Guangzhou, China. In this regulatory context, characterized by rapid policy changes, corporate performance in VEPs is affected by government surveillance, policy uncertainty, and peer pressures. Specifically, if VEP participants have experienced more government surveillance, they tend to perform better in program implementation. Such positive influence of government surveillance is particularly evident among those joining under high and low, rather than moderate uncertainty. Participants also perform better if they belong to an industry with more certified VEP firms, but worse if they are located in a regulatory jurisdiction with more certified VEP firms. At a moderate level of policy uncertainty, within-industry imitation is most likely to occur but within-jurisdiction imitation is least likely to occur. •Prior regulatory surveillance has a positive spill-over effect that induces firms to devote efforts to VEP implementation.•Participants perform better if they belong to an industry with more certified VEP firms.•They perform worse if they are located in a regulatory jurisdiction with more certified VEP firms.•Policy uncertainty affects the way participants interpret signals from institutional forces.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.110
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2038708565</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479718305012</els_id><sourcerecordid>2038708565</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-ff9baa9c5c455fdbe453cae3a1338b77abeaad216dd86b7effd9212a95eefdb13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi1URJfCT6DysZcEO47j-ISqqnxIleAAZ2tiTyqvEju1k5X23-N2F649zWGemXfmIeQTZzVnvPu8r_cYDjOEumG8r1lbc87ekB1nWlZ9J9gF2THBeNUqrS7J-5z3jDHRcPWOXDZaSaGV3hH8FSdvj3QLFtMKPqxHCsFRG9MSE6xIF0xjTCXIIvWBPsYDpjBjWKu8xJBjQkcPcdrCCulIy00-xZc-THRJ8THBnD-QtyNMGT-e6xX58_X-99336uHntx93tw-VbXmzVuOoBwBtpW2lHN2ArRQWUAAXoh-UggEBXMM75_puUDiOTje8AS0RC87FFbk57S3BTxvm1cw-W5wmCBi3bBomesV62cmCyhNqU8w54WiW5OfyguHMPBs2e3M2bJ4NG9aaYrjMXZ8jtmFG93_qn9ICfDkBWB49eEwmW4_FnvMJ7Wpc9K9E_AVPj5Sh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2038708565</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Policy uncertainty and corporate performance in government-sponsored voluntary environmental programs</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Liu, Ning ; Tang, Shui-Yan ; Zhan, Xueyong ; Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ning ; Tang, Shui-Yan ; Zhan, Xueyong ; Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung</creatorcontrib><description>This study combines insights from the policy uncertainty literature and neo-institutional theory to examine corporate performance in implementing a government-sponsored voluntary environmental program (VEP) during 2004–2012 in Guangzhou, China. In this regulatory context, characterized by rapid policy changes, corporate performance in VEPs is affected by government surveillance, policy uncertainty, and peer pressures. Specifically, if VEP participants have experienced more government surveillance, they tend to perform better in program implementation. Such positive influence of government surveillance is particularly evident among those joining under high and low, rather than moderate uncertainty. Participants also perform better if they belong to an industry with more certified VEP firms, but worse if they are located in a regulatory jurisdiction with more certified VEP firms. At a moderate level of policy uncertainty, within-industry imitation is most likely to occur but within-jurisdiction imitation is least likely to occur. •Prior regulatory surveillance has a positive spill-over effect that induces firms to devote efforts to VEP implementation.•Participants perform better if they belong to an industry with more certified VEP firms.•They perform worse if they are located in a regulatory jurisdiction with more certified VEP firms.•Policy uncertainty affects the way participants interpret signals from institutional forces.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.110</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29753979</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Emerging economies ; Institutional pressure ; Policy uncertainty ; Voluntary environmental regulation</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2018-08, Vol.219, p.350-360</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-ff9baa9c5c455fdbe453cae3a1338b77abeaad216dd86b7effd9212a95eefdb13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-ff9baa9c5c455fdbe453cae3a1338b77abeaad216dd86b7effd9212a95eefdb13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29753979$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Shui-Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhan, Xueyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung</creatorcontrib><title>Policy uncertainty and corporate performance in government-sponsored voluntary environmental programs</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>This study combines insights from the policy uncertainty literature and neo-institutional theory to examine corporate performance in implementing a government-sponsored voluntary environmental program (VEP) during 2004–2012 in Guangzhou, China. In this regulatory context, characterized by rapid policy changes, corporate performance in VEPs is affected by government surveillance, policy uncertainty, and peer pressures. Specifically, if VEP participants have experienced more government surveillance, they tend to perform better in program implementation. Such positive influence of government surveillance is particularly evident among those joining under high and low, rather than moderate uncertainty. Participants also perform better if they belong to an industry with more certified VEP firms, but worse if they are located in a regulatory jurisdiction with more certified VEP firms. At a moderate level of policy uncertainty, within-industry imitation is most likely to occur but within-jurisdiction imitation is least likely to occur. •Prior regulatory surveillance has a positive spill-over effect that induces firms to devote efforts to VEP implementation.•Participants perform better if they belong to an industry with more certified VEP firms.•They perform worse if they are located in a regulatory jurisdiction with more certified VEP firms.•Policy uncertainty affects the way participants interpret signals from institutional forces.</description><subject>Emerging economies</subject><subject>Institutional pressure</subject><subject>Policy uncertainty</subject><subject>Voluntary environmental regulation</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi1URJfCT6DysZcEO47j-ISqqnxIleAAZ2tiTyqvEju1k5X23-N2F649zWGemXfmIeQTZzVnvPu8r_cYDjOEumG8r1lbc87ekB1nWlZ9J9gF2THBeNUqrS7J-5z3jDHRcPWOXDZaSaGV3hH8FSdvj3QLFtMKPqxHCsFRG9MSE6xIF0xjTCXIIvWBPsYDpjBjWKu8xJBjQkcPcdrCCulIy00-xZc-THRJ8THBnD-QtyNMGT-e6xX58_X-99336uHntx93tw-VbXmzVuOoBwBtpW2lHN2ArRQWUAAXoh-UggEBXMM75_puUDiOTje8AS0RC87FFbk57S3BTxvm1cw-W5wmCBi3bBomesV62cmCyhNqU8w54WiW5OfyguHMPBs2e3M2bJ4NG9aaYrjMXZ8jtmFG93_qn9ICfDkBWB49eEwmW4_FnvMJ7Wpc9K9E_AVPj5Sh</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Liu, Ning</creator><creator>Tang, Shui-Yan</creator><creator>Zhan, Xueyong</creator><creator>Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>Policy uncertainty and corporate performance in government-sponsored voluntary environmental programs</title><author>Liu, Ning ; Tang, Shui-Yan ; Zhan, Xueyong ; Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-ff9baa9c5c455fdbe453cae3a1338b77abeaad216dd86b7effd9212a95eefdb13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Emerging economies</topic><topic>Institutional pressure</topic><topic>Policy uncertainty</topic><topic>Voluntary environmental regulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Shui-Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhan, Xueyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Ning</au><au>Tang, Shui-Yan</au><au>Zhan, Xueyong</au><au>Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Policy uncertainty and corporate performance in government-sponsored voluntary environmental programs</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>219</volume><spage>350</spage><epage>360</epage><pages>350-360</pages><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><abstract>This study combines insights from the policy uncertainty literature and neo-institutional theory to examine corporate performance in implementing a government-sponsored voluntary environmental program (VEP) during 2004–2012 in Guangzhou, China. In this regulatory context, characterized by rapid policy changes, corporate performance in VEPs is affected by government surveillance, policy uncertainty, and peer pressures. Specifically, if VEP participants have experienced more government surveillance, they tend to perform better in program implementation. Such positive influence of government surveillance is particularly evident among those joining under high and low, rather than moderate uncertainty. Participants also perform better if they belong to an industry with more certified VEP firms, but worse if they are located in a regulatory jurisdiction with more certified VEP firms. At a moderate level of policy uncertainty, within-industry imitation is most likely to occur but within-jurisdiction imitation is least likely to occur. •Prior regulatory surveillance has a positive spill-over effect that induces firms to devote efforts to VEP implementation.•Participants perform better if they belong to an industry with more certified VEP firms.•They perform worse if they are located in a regulatory jurisdiction with more certified VEP firms.•Policy uncertainty affects the way participants interpret signals from institutional forces.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29753979</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.110</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4797
ispartof Journal of environmental management, 2018-08, Vol.219, p.350-360
issn 0301-4797
1095-8630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2038708565
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Emerging economies
Institutional pressure
Policy uncertainty
Voluntary environmental regulation
title Policy uncertainty and corporate performance in government-sponsored voluntary environmental programs
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T09%3A54%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Policy%20uncertainty%20and%20corporate%20performance%20in%20government-sponsored%20voluntary%20environmental%20programs&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Liu,%20Ning&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=219&rft.spage=350&rft.epage=360&rft.pages=350-360&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.110&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2038708565%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-ff9baa9c5c455fdbe453cae3a1338b77abeaad216dd86b7effd9212a95eefdb13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2038708565&rft_id=info:pmid/29753979&rfr_iscdi=true