Loading…

The external obturator footprint as a landmark in total hip arthroplasty through a direct anterior approach: a CT-based analysis

Background: Anatomical landmarks for templating of total hip arthroplasty (THA) that are visible both during surgery and on radiographs are rare. If surgery is performed through a direct anterior approach the external obturator tendon (EO) is consistently visible. To use this point as a reference th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Hip international 2019-01, Vol.29 (1), p.96-101
Main Authors: Rüdiger, Hannes A, Fritz, Benjamin, Impellizzeri, Franco M, Leunig, Michael, Pfirrmann, Christian W, Sutter, Reto
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Anatomical landmarks for templating of total hip arthroplasty (THA) that are visible both during surgery and on radiographs are rare. If surgery is performed through a direct anterior approach the external obturator tendon (EO) is consistently visible. To use this point as a reference the exact position and dimensions of the footprint need to be known. Aim: To determine the location and dimension of the EO footprint on pelvic radiographs by correlating the EO anatomy in CT scans with conventional radiographs. Methods: CT scans and radiographs of 200 patients were analysed. The EO tendon was identified on CT scans; the height of its footprint, and its distance to the tip of the greater trochanter and to the anatomical axis of the femur was measured. The accuracy and inter-rater reliability in the identification of the EO footprint was determined. Results: The EO tendon was visible on all CT scans and it’s footprint was identifiable on all corresponding radiographs. It’s cranio-caudal dimension was 6.4 ± 1.4 mm. It’s distance to the tip of the greater trochanter was 16.0 ± 3.1 mm. The EO footprint was located 5.2 ± 3.7 mm lateral to the femoral anatomical axis. There was no significant difference regarding the accuracy of EO footprint localisation on radiographs among the 2 readers. Conclusion: The EO footprint on the greater trochanter is consistently visible on CT scans and radiographs. As the variability of the footprint dimension is small, this structure may serve as a useful landmark in THA, particularly when performed through a direct anterior approach.
ISSN:1120-7000
1724-6067
DOI:10.1177/1120700018761320