Peri‐implant soft tissue status and crestal bone levels around adjacent implants placed in patients with and without type‐2 diabetes mellitus: 6 years follow‐up results

Background The long‐term success and survival of dental implants type‐2 diabetic subjects is debatable. Purpose The present 6 years' follow‐up prospective clinical study compared the peri‐implant soft tissue status and crestal bone loss (CBL) around adjacent implants placed among type‐2 diabeti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical implant dentistry and related research 2018-08, Vol.20 (4), p.562-568
Main Authors: Alasqah, Mohammed N., Alrabiah, Mohammed, Al‐Aali, Khulud Abdulrahman, Mokeem, Sameer A., Binmahfooz, Abdulelah M., ArRejaie, Aws S., Abduljabbar, Tariq
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aged
alveolar bone loss
Alveolar Bone Loss - etiology
Arches
Bleeding
Bone implants
Bone loss
Cross-Sectional Studies
Demographics
dental implant
Dental Implant-Abutment Design
Dental Implantation, Endosseous
Dental Implants
Dental materials
Dental Plaque Index
Dental prosthetics
Dental restorative materials
Dentistry
Diabetes
Diabetes mellitus
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - complications
Follow-Up Studies
Genetics
gingival bleeding
Glycated Hemoglobin A - analysis
Hemoglobin
Humans
Male
Mechanical loading
Middle Aged
Molars
Patients
Periodontal Index
Plaque index
Premolars
probing depth
Prospective Studies
Restoration
Saudi Arabia
Statistical analysis
Surgical implants
Teeth
Transplants & implants
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background The long‐term success and survival of dental implants type‐2 diabetic subjects is debatable. Purpose The present 6 years' follow‐up prospective clinical study compared the peri‐implant soft tissue status and crestal bone loss (CBL) around adjacent implants placed among type‐2 diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. Materials and Methods Type‐2 diabetic (Group‐1) and nondiabetic individuals (Group‐2) with adjacent dental implants were included. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels were recorded; and a questionnaire was used to collect demographic information. Information regarding implant dimensions, duration in function, loading protocol, and type of restoration was recorded. Peri‐implant bleeding‐on‐probing (BOP), plaque index (PI), probing depth (PD), and mesial and distal CBL were measured. P 
ISSN:1523-0899
1708-8208
DOI:10.1111/cid.12617