Loading…

Effect of Radiotransmitters on Northern Bobwhite Annual Survival

Radiotelemetry has been widely used in northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) research to estimate survival rates and other demographic parameters. Biologists have used this knowledge to study bobwhite ecology, develop management theory, and base management actions. We tested the assumption that ra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of wildlife management 2007-06, Vol.71 (4), p.1281-1287
Main Authors: PALMER, WILLIAM E, WELLENDORF, SHANE D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b4464-20f5736c98a634d199e20312bd41c8cfc43fd892e9598aff9e011c2b98fd86ea3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b4464-20f5736c98a634d199e20312bd41c8cfc43fd892e9598aff9e011c2b98fd86ea3
container_end_page 1287
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1281
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 71
creator PALMER, WILLIAM E
WELLENDORF, SHANE D
description Radiotelemetry has been widely used in northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) research to estimate survival rates and other demographic parameters. Biologists have used this knowledge to study bobwhite ecology, develop management theory, and base management actions. We tested the assumption that radiotransmitters do not bias survival rates of bobwhites by comparing survival rates of banded bobwhites with and without radiotransmitters on Tall Timbers Research Station (TTRS) from 1999 to 2004. We used Burnham's model in Program MARK and model-selection procedures to determine relative importance of year, gender, and radiotagged status on annual survival rates and recovery processes. Three plausible models (relative quasi-likelihood Akaike's Information Criterion [ΔQAICc] < 3) included year dependence in survival and an additive effect of gender but no radiotransmitter effect. Models including a radiotransmitter effect in survival were >8 ΔQAICc from the top models, had low Akaike model weights (wi < 0.007), and low importance weight (∑wi(radio)= 0.01). We also compared band–recapture survival estimates from the QAICc minimizing model to staggered entry Kaplan–Meier (KM) survival estimates from 2000 to 2003. Annual KM survival estimates of male and female bobwhites were within the 95% confidence interval of band–recapture estimates in 7 of 8 comparisons. We conclude that radiotelemetry is a reliable technique for determining bobwhite survival. Managers should view information from properly conducted telemetry research as reliable and useful for management.
doi_str_mv 10.2193/2005-639
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20446381</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4496192</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4496192</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4464-20f5736c98a634d199e20312bd41c8cfc43fd892e9598aff9e011c2b98fd86ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MlKLDEYBeAgCrYD-AAuChfipq6ZKsNObbx9r0MLDugupKoTTFtd0STl8PZGWmwQdBWSfJz8OQBsIfgHI0n2MYRVyYhcAoO85SUWiC-DAYQYlxVFd6tgLcYphAQhwQbg4Nha06TC2-JST5xPQXdx5lIyIRa-K8Y-pHsTuuLI1y_3LpnisOt63RZXfXh2z7rdACtWt9Fsfq7r4Obv8fXwX3l2Mfo_PDwra0oZLTG0FSeskUIzQidISoPzDLieUNSIxjaU2ImQ2MgqE2ulgQg1uJYiHzOjyTrYnec-Bv_Um5jUzMXGtK3ujO-jwjC_QwTKcO9XiIREgjPIqkx3vtGp70OXv6EwoajinItFXhN8jMFY9RjcTIc3haD6qFx9VK5y5ZmWc_riWvP2o1Mnt-cjiWn223M_jcmHL0-pZEjiRZyLybx-XevwoBgnvFK345EaXg7Z-JQTdb6oqHbed-bnOd8BdNajZw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234157778</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Radiotransmitters on Northern Bobwhite Annual Survival</title><source>Wiley</source><source>JSTOR Journals and Primary Sources</source><creator>PALMER, WILLIAM E ; WELLENDORF, SHANE D</creator><creatorcontrib>PALMER, WILLIAM E ; WELLENDORF, SHANE D</creatorcontrib><description>Radiotelemetry has been widely used in northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) research to estimate survival rates and other demographic parameters. Biologists have used this knowledge to study bobwhite ecology, develop management theory, and base management actions. We tested the assumption that radiotransmitters do not bias survival rates of bobwhites by comparing survival rates of banded bobwhites with and without radiotransmitters on Tall Timbers Research Station (TTRS) from 1999 to 2004. We used Burnham's model in Program MARK and model-selection procedures to determine relative importance of year, gender, and radiotagged status on annual survival rates and recovery processes. Three plausible models (relative quasi-likelihood Akaike's Information Criterion [ΔQAICc] &lt; 3) included year dependence in survival and an additive effect of gender but no radiotransmitter effect. Models including a radiotransmitter effect in survival were &gt;8 ΔQAICc from the top models, had low Akaike model weights (wi &lt; 0.007), and low importance weight (∑wi(radio)= 0.01). We also compared band–recapture survival estimates from the QAICc minimizing model to staggered entry Kaplan–Meier (KM) survival estimates from 2000 to 2003. Annual KM survival estimates of male and female bobwhites were within the 95% confidence interval of band–recapture estimates in 7 of 8 comparisons. We conclude that radiotelemetry is a reliable technique for determining bobwhite survival. Managers should view information from properly conducted telemetry research as reliable and useful for management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2193/2005-639</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: The Wildlife Society</publisher><subject>Animal traps ; band-recapture ; Behavior ; Birds ; Bobwhites ; Burnham's model ; Coastal plains ; Colinus virginianus ; Estimates ; Field study ; Florida ; Kaplan-Meier ; Males ; Management decisions ; Methods ; Modeling ; Mortality ; northern bobwhite ; Parametric models ; Population ; Radio ; radiotransmitters ; Ratings &amp; rankings ; Sample size ; Survival ; Survival rates ; Techniques and Technology ; Techniques and Technology Articles ; Telemetry ; Trapping ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2007-06, Vol.71 (4), p.1281-1287</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>2007 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>Copyright Alliance Communications Group, A Division of Allen Press, Inc. Jun 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4464-20f5736c98a634d199e20312bd41c8cfc43fd892e9598aff9e011c2b98fd86ea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4464-20f5736c98a634d199e20312bd41c8cfc43fd892e9598aff9e011c2b98fd86ea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4496192$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4496192$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,58237,58470</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>PALMER, WILLIAM E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WELLENDORF, SHANE D</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Radiotransmitters on Northern Bobwhite Annual Survival</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>Radiotelemetry has been widely used in northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) research to estimate survival rates and other demographic parameters. Biologists have used this knowledge to study bobwhite ecology, develop management theory, and base management actions. We tested the assumption that radiotransmitters do not bias survival rates of bobwhites by comparing survival rates of banded bobwhites with and without radiotransmitters on Tall Timbers Research Station (TTRS) from 1999 to 2004. We used Burnham's model in Program MARK and model-selection procedures to determine relative importance of year, gender, and radiotagged status on annual survival rates and recovery processes. Three plausible models (relative quasi-likelihood Akaike's Information Criterion [ΔQAICc] &lt; 3) included year dependence in survival and an additive effect of gender but no radiotransmitter effect. Models including a radiotransmitter effect in survival were &gt;8 ΔQAICc from the top models, had low Akaike model weights (wi &lt; 0.007), and low importance weight (∑wi(radio)= 0.01). We also compared band–recapture survival estimates from the QAICc minimizing model to staggered entry Kaplan–Meier (KM) survival estimates from 2000 to 2003. Annual KM survival estimates of male and female bobwhites were within the 95% confidence interval of band–recapture estimates in 7 of 8 comparisons. We conclude that radiotelemetry is a reliable technique for determining bobwhite survival. Managers should view information from properly conducted telemetry research as reliable and useful for management.</description><subject>Animal traps</subject><subject>band-recapture</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Bobwhites</subject><subject>Burnham's model</subject><subject>Coastal plains</subject><subject>Colinus virginianus</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Field study</subject><subject>Florida</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Management decisions</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>northern bobwhite</subject><subject>Parametric models</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Radio</subject><subject>radiotransmitters</subject><subject>Ratings &amp; rankings</subject><subject>Sample size</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival rates</subject><subject>Techniques and Technology</subject><subject>Techniques and Technology Articles</subject><subject>Telemetry</subject><subject>Trapping</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90MlKLDEYBeAgCrYD-AAuChfipq6ZKsNObbx9r0MLDugupKoTTFtd0STl8PZGWmwQdBWSfJz8OQBsIfgHI0n2MYRVyYhcAoO85SUWiC-DAYQYlxVFd6tgLcYphAQhwQbg4Nha06TC2-JST5xPQXdx5lIyIRa-K8Y-pHsTuuLI1y_3LpnisOt63RZXfXh2z7rdACtWt9Fsfq7r4Obv8fXwX3l2Mfo_PDwra0oZLTG0FSeskUIzQidISoPzDLieUNSIxjaU2ImQ2MgqE2ulgQg1uJYiHzOjyTrYnec-Bv_Um5jUzMXGtK3ujO-jwjC_QwTKcO9XiIREgjPIqkx3vtGp70OXv6EwoajinItFXhN8jMFY9RjcTIc3haD6qFx9VK5y5ZmWc_riWvP2o1Mnt-cjiWn223M_jcmHL0-pZEjiRZyLybx-XevwoBgnvFK345EaXg7Z-JQTdb6oqHbed-bnOd8BdNajZw</recordid><startdate>200706</startdate><enddate>200706</enddate><creator>PALMER, WILLIAM E</creator><creator>WELLENDORF, SHANE D</creator><general>The Wildlife Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200706</creationdate><title>Effect of Radiotransmitters on Northern Bobwhite Annual Survival</title><author>PALMER, WILLIAM E ; WELLENDORF, SHANE D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b4464-20f5736c98a634d199e20312bd41c8cfc43fd892e9598aff9e011c2b98fd86ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Animal traps</topic><topic>band-recapture</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Bobwhites</topic><topic>Burnham's model</topic><topic>Coastal plains</topic><topic>Colinus virginianus</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Field study</topic><topic>Florida</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Management decisions</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>northern bobwhite</topic><topic>Parametric models</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Radio</topic><topic>radiotransmitters</topic><topic>Ratings &amp; rankings</topic><topic>Sample size</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival rates</topic><topic>Techniques and Technology</topic><topic>Techniques and Technology Articles</topic><topic>Telemetry</topic><topic>Trapping</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PALMER, WILLIAM E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WELLENDORF, SHANE D</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PALMER, WILLIAM E</au><au>WELLENDORF, SHANE D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Radiotransmitters on Northern Bobwhite Annual Survival</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2007-06</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1281</spage><epage>1287</epage><pages>1281-1287</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>Radiotelemetry has been widely used in northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) research to estimate survival rates and other demographic parameters. Biologists have used this knowledge to study bobwhite ecology, develop management theory, and base management actions. We tested the assumption that radiotransmitters do not bias survival rates of bobwhites by comparing survival rates of banded bobwhites with and without radiotransmitters on Tall Timbers Research Station (TTRS) from 1999 to 2004. We used Burnham's model in Program MARK and model-selection procedures to determine relative importance of year, gender, and radiotagged status on annual survival rates and recovery processes. Three plausible models (relative quasi-likelihood Akaike's Information Criterion [ΔQAICc] &lt; 3) included year dependence in survival and an additive effect of gender but no radiotransmitter effect. Models including a radiotransmitter effect in survival were &gt;8 ΔQAICc from the top models, had low Akaike model weights (wi &lt; 0.007), and low importance weight (∑wi(radio)= 0.01). We also compared band–recapture survival estimates from the QAICc minimizing model to staggered entry Kaplan–Meier (KM) survival estimates from 2000 to 2003. Annual KM survival estimates of male and female bobwhites were within the 95% confidence interval of band–recapture estimates in 7 of 8 comparisons. We conclude that radiotelemetry is a reliable technique for determining bobwhite survival. Managers should view information from properly conducted telemetry research as reliable and useful for management.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>The Wildlife Society</pub><doi>10.2193/2005-639</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 2007-06, Vol.71 (4), p.1281-1287
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20446381
source Wiley; JSTOR Journals and Primary Sources
subjects Animal traps
band-recapture
Behavior
Birds
Bobwhites
Burnham's model
Coastal plains
Colinus virginianus
Estimates
Field study
Florida
Kaplan-Meier
Males
Management decisions
Methods
Modeling
Mortality
northern bobwhite
Parametric models
Population
Radio
radiotransmitters
Ratings & rankings
Sample size
Survival
Survival rates
Techniques and Technology
Techniques and Technology Articles
Telemetry
Trapping
Wildlife management
title Effect of Radiotransmitters on Northern Bobwhite Annual Survival
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T06%3A39%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Radiotransmitters%20on%20Northern%20Bobwhite%20Annual%20Survival&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=PALMER,%20WILLIAM%20E&rft.date=2007-06&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1281&rft.epage=1287&rft.pages=1281-1287&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.2193/2005-639&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4496192%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b4464-20f5736c98a634d199e20312bd41c8cfc43fd892e9598aff9e011c2b98fd86ea3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234157778&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4496192&rfr_iscdi=true