Hydrology-oriented forest management trade-offs. A modeling framework coupling field data, simulation results and Bayesian Networks

• Published in: The Science of the total environment 2018-10, Vol.639, p.725-741
• Main Authors: Garcia-Prats, Alberto, González-Sanchis, María, Del Campo, Antonio D., Lull, Cristina
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bayesian Network modeling; Biome-BGCMuSo model; Hydrology-oriented forest management
• ISSN: 0048-9697; 1879-1026
• DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.134

Hydrology-oriented forest management sets water as key factor of the forest management for adaptation due to water is the most limiting factor in the Mediterranean forest ecosystems. The aim of this study was to apply Bayesian Network modeling to assess potential indirect effects and trade-offs when hydrology-oriented forest management is applied to a real Mediterranean forest ecosystem. Water, carbon and nitrogen cycles, and forest fire risk were included in the modeling framework. Field data from experimental plots were employed to calibrate and validate the mechanistic Biome-BGCMuSo model that simulates the storage and flux of water, carbon, and nitrogen between the ecosystem and the atmosphere. Many other 50-year long scenarios with different conditions to the ones measured in the field experiment were simulated and the outcomes employed to build the Bayesian Network in a linked chain of models. Hydrology-oriented forest management was very positive insofar as more water was made available to the stand because of an interception reduction. This resource was made available to the stand, which increased the evapotranspiration and its components, the soil water content and a slightly increase of deep percolation. Conversely, Stemflow was drastically reduced. No effect was observed on Runof due to the thinning treatment. The soil organic carbon content was also increased which in turn caused a greater respiration. The long-term effect of the thinning treatment on the LAI was very positive. This was undoubtedly due to the increased vigor generated by the greater availability of water and nutrients for the stand and the reduction of competence between trees. This greater activity resulted in an increase in GPP and vegetation carbon, and therefore, we would expect a higher carbon sequestration. It is worth emphasizing that this extra amount of water and nutrients was taken up by the stand and did not entail any loss of nutrients. [Display omitted] •We coupled field data, simulation results and BNs in a modeling framework.•Trade-offs of hydrology-oriented forest management were assessed.•A greater availability of water and nutrients for the stand was observed.•This extra water and nutrients were uptaked by the stand without loss of nutrients.