Loading…
Development and psychometric pilot-testing of a questionnaire for the evaluation of satisfaction with continuing education in infection control nurses
Satisfaction with continuing education can be defined as positive attitudes towards educational programs, which has potential to strengthen learning outcomes. A multi-dimensional construct may enhance continuing education program evaluation processes. The objective is to describe the development and...
Saved in:
Published in: | Nurse education in practice 2018-07, Vol.31, p.77-82 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-550db1be7932920e201264b49a1fc17f2cb1b4d3057c22c1b4f13a76f5619f413 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-550db1be7932920e201264b49a1fc17f2cb1b4d3057c22c1b4f13a76f5619f413 |
container_end_page | 82 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 77 |
container_title | Nurse education in practice |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Meng, Michael Peter, Daniel Mattner, Frauke Igel, Christoph Kugler, Christiane |
description | Satisfaction with continuing education can be defined as positive attitudes towards educational programs, which has potential to strengthen learning outcomes. A multi-dimensional construct may enhance continuing education program evaluation processes. The objective is to describe the development and psychometric testing of the 'affective - behavioral - cognitive - satisfaction questionnaire' (ABC-SAT) for assessing participants' satisfaction with a continuing education program for nurses in infection control. The multi-staged development of a satisfaction questionnaire comprised of three subscales. The pilot tool was administered to a nationwide sample of 126 infection control nurses to assess satisfaction after participating in a continuing education program. Satisfaction scores were calculated and psychometric testing was performed to determine reliability, using Cronbach's alpha, face validity, objectivity, and economy. A principle component analysis using varimax rotation and Kaiser normalization was performed. The analysis led to a three-factor solution of the questionnaire with 11 items, explaining 61.4% of the variance. Internal consistency of three scales using Cronbach's alpha was 0.83, 0.60, and 0.66, respectively. Selectivity coefficients varied between 0.39 and 0.70. Participants needed approximately three minutes to complete the questionnaire. Initial findings refer to a satisfying scale structure and internal consistency of the 3-dimensional ABC-SAT questionnaire. Further research is required to confirm the questionnaires’ psychometric properties. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.05.003 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2045301018</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1471595317304420</els_id><sourcerecordid>2082047099</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-550db1be7932920e201264b49a1fc17f2cb1b4d3057c22c1b4f13a76f5619f413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcuKFTEQhhtRnHH0BVxIwI2bbnPp9AXcyHiFATe6DjnpiieH7qRN0kfmRXxeK9OjCxdCIH8lX_0k9VfVc0YbRln3-tR4WGPDKRsaKhtKxYPqkg29qCXn4iHqtme1HKW4qJ6kdKLYRPvucXXBx4GiEpfVr3dwhjmsC_hMtJ_Imm7NMSyQozNkdXPIdYaUnf9OgiWa_NhKFbzXLgKxIZJ8BAJnPW-6nBcqoUpWm7v6p8tHYoJHi624wLSZnXRlWdixQsQwE7_FBOlp9cjqOcGz-_2q-vbh_dfrT_XNl4-fr9_e1EYMba6lpNOBHaAfBR85BRwF79pDO2pmDestN3jbToLK3nBuUFsmdN9Z2bHRtkxcVa923zWGu5-pxSUD86w9hC0pTlspKE57QPTlP-gpbNHj65AaEOzpOCLFd8rEkFIEq9boFh1vFaOqpKZOqqSmSmqKSoWpYdOLe-vtsMD0t-VPTAi82QHAWZwdRJWMA29gwhBMVlNw__P_DUsPq7k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2082047099</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and psychometric pilot-testing of a questionnaire for the evaluation of satisfaction with continuing education in infection control nurses</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Meng, Michael ; Peter, Daniel ; Mattner, Frauke ; Igel, Christoph ; Kugler, Christiane</creator><creatorcontrib>Meng, Michael ; Peter, Daniel ; Mattner, Frauke ; Igel, Christoph ; Kugler, Christiane</creatorcontrib><description>Satisfaction with continuing education can be defined as positive attitudes towards educational programs, which has potential to strengthen learning outcomes. A multi-dimensional construct may enhance continuing education program evaluation processes. The objective is to describe the development and psychometric testing of the 'affective - behavioral - cognitive - satisfaction questionnaire' (ABC-SAT) for assessing participants' satisfaction with a continuing education program for nurses in infection control. The multi-staged development of a satisfaction questionnaire comprised of three subscales. The pilot tool was administered to a nationwide sample of 126 infection control nurses to assess satisfaction after participating in a continuing education program. Satisfaction scores were calculated and psychometric testing was performed to determine reliability, using Cronbach's alpha, face validity, objectivity, and economy. A principle component analysis using varimax rotation and Kaiser normalization was performed. The analysis led to a three-factor solution of the questionnaire with 11 items, explaining 61.4% of the variance. Internal consistency of three scales using Cronbach's alpha was 0.83, 0.60, and 0.66, respectively. Selectivity coefficients varied between 0.39 and 0.70. Participants needed approximately three minutes to complete the questionnaire. Initial findings refer to a satisfying scale structure and internal consistency of the 3-dimensional ABC-SAT questionnaire. Further research is required to confirm the questionnaires’ psychometric properties.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-5953</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5223</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.05.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29800763</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Behavior ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognitive-behavioral factors ; Communication Skills ; Continuing education ; Core Curriculum ; Cronbach's alpha ; Disease control ; Education ; Education, Continuing ; Educational Development ; Eigenvalues ; Factor Analysis ; Female ; Group Dynamics ; Guidelines ; Happiness ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Hygiene ; Infection control ; Infection Control - standards ; Infection control nurses ; Job Satisfaction ; Likert Scales ; Literature Reviews ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Normalization ; Nosocomial infections ; Nurse ; Nurse Clinicians - education ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Objectivity ; Patients ; Personal Satisfaction ; Pilot Projects ; Prevention ; Professionals ; Program evaluation ; Psychometrics ; Psychometrics - methods ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Rotation ; Satisfaction ; Social Psychology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Teaching Skills ; Training ; Usability</subject><ispartof>Nurse education in practice, 2018-07, Vol.31, p.77-82</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2018. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-550db1be7932920e201264b49a1fc17f2cb1b4d3057c22c1b4f13a76f5619f413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-550db1be7932920e201264b49a1fc17f2cb1b4d3057c22c1b4f13a76f5619f413</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9384-3303 ; 0000-0003-1382-7990</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2082047099/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2082047099?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,21378,21394,21395,27924,27925,30999,33611,33612,33877,33878,34530,34531,43733,43880,44115,74093,74269,74511</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29800763$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meng, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peter, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattner, Frauke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Igel, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kugler, Christiane</creatorcontrib><title>Development and psychometric pilot-testing of a questionnaire for the evaluation of satisfaction with continuing education in infection control nurses</title><title>Nurse education in practice</title><addtitle>Nurse Educ Pract</addtitle><description>Satisfaction with continuing education can be defined as positive attitudes towards educational programs, which has potential to strengthen learning outcomes. A multi-dimensional construct may enhance continuing education program evaluation processes. The objective is to describe the development and psychometric testing of the 'affective - behavioral - cognitive - satisfaction questionnaire' (ABC-SAT) for assessing participants' satisfaction with a continuing education program for nurses in infection control. The multi-staged development of a satisfaction questionnaire comprised of three subscales. The pilot tool was administered to a nationwide sample of 126 infection control nurses to assess satisfaction after participating in a continuing education program. Satisfaction scores were calculated and psychometric testing was performed to determine reliability, using Cronbach's alpha, face validity, objectivity, and economy. A principle component analysis using varimax rotation and Kaiser normalization was performed. The analysis led to a three-factor solution of the questionnaire with 11 items, explaining 61.4% of the variance. Internal consistency of three scales using Cronbach's alpha was 0.83, 0.60, and 0.66, respectively. Selectivity coefficients varied between 0.39 and 0.70. Participants needed approximately three minutes to complete the questionnaire. Initial findings refer to a satisfying scale structure and internal consistency of the 3-dimensional ABC-SAT questionnaire. Further research is required to confirm the questionnaires’ psychometric properties.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive-behavioral factors</subject><subject>Communication Skills</subject><subject>Continuing education</subject><subject>Core Curriculum</subject><subject>Cronbach's alpha</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education, Continuing</subject><subject>Educational Development</subject><subject>Eigenvalues</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Group Dynamics</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Happiness</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hygiene</subject><subject>Infection control</subject><subject>Infection Control - standards</subject><subject>Infection control nurses</subject><subject>Job Satisfaction</subject><subject>Likert Scales</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Normalization</subject><subject>Nosocomial infections</subject><subject>Nurse</subject><subject>Nurse Clinicians - education</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Objectivity</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Personal Satisfaction</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Program evaluation</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychometrics - methods</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Satisfaction</subject><subject>Social Psychology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Teaching Skills</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Usability</subject><issn>1471-5953</issn><issn>1873-5223</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcuKFTEQhhtRnHH0BVxIwI2bbnPp9AXcyHiFATe6DjnpiieH7qRN0kfmRXxeK9OjCxdCIH8lX_0k9VfVc0YbRln3-tR4WGPDKRsaKhtKxYPqkg29qCXn4iHqtme1HKW4qJ6kdKLYRPvucXXBx4GiEpfVr3dwhjmsC_hMtJ_Imm7NMSyQozNkdXPIdYaUnf9OgiWa_NhKFbzXLgKxIZJ8BAJnPW-6nBcqoUpWm7v6p8tHYoJHi624wLSZnXRlWdixQsQwE7_FBOlp9cjqOcGz-_2q-vbh_dfrT_XNl4-fr9_e1EYMba6lpNOBHaAfBR85BRwF79pDO2pmDestN3jbToLK3nBuUFsmdN9Z2bHRtkxcVa923zWGu5-pxSUD86w9hC0pTlspKE57QPTlP-gpbNHj65AaEOzpOCLFd8rEkFIEq9boFh1vFaOqpKZOqqSmSmqKSoWpYdOLe-vtsMD0t-VPTAi82QHAWZwdRJWMA29gwhBMVlNw__P_DUsPq7k</recordid><startdate>201807</startdate><enddate>201807</enddate><creator>Meng, Michael</creator><creator>Peter, Daniel</creator><creator>Mattner, Frauke</creator><creator>Igel, Christoph</creator><creator>Kugler, Christiane</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9384-3303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1382-7990</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201807</creationdate><title>Development and psychometric pilot-testing of a questionnaire for the evaluation of satisfaction with continuing education in infection control nurses</title><author>Meng, Michael ; Peter, Daniel ; Mattner, Frauke ; Igel, Christoph ; Kugler, Christiane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-550db1be7932920e201264b49a1fc17f2cb1b4d3057c22c1b4f13a76f5619f413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive-behavioral factors</topic><topic>Communication Skills</topic><topic>Continuing education</topic><topic>Core Curriculum</topic><topic>Cronbach's alpha</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education, Continuing</topic><topic>Educational Development</topic><topic>Eigenvalues</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Group Dynamics</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Happiness</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hygiene</topic><topic>Infection control</topic><topic>Infection Control - standards</topic><topic>Infection control nurses</topic><topic>Job Satisfaction</topic><topic>Likert Scales</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Normalization</topic><topic>Nosocomial infections</topic><topic>Nurse</topic><topic>Nurse Clinicians - education</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Objectivity</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Personal Satisfaction</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Program evaluation</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychometrics - methods</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Satisfaction</topic><topic>Social Psychology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Teaching Skills</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Usability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meng, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peter, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattner, Frauke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Igel, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kugler, Christiane</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nurse education in practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meng, Michael</au><au>Peter, Daniel</au><au>Mattner, Frauke</au><au>Igel, Christoph</au><au>Kugler, Christiane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development and psychometric pilot-testing of a questionnaire for the evaluation of satisfaction with continuing education in infection control nurses</atitle><jtitle>Nurse education in practice</jtitle><addtitle>Nurse Educ Pract</addtitle><date>2018-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>31</volume><spage>77</spage><epage>82</epage><pages>77-82</pages><issn>1471-5953</issn><eissn>1873-5223</eissn><abstract>Satisfaction with continuing education can be defined as positive attitudes towards educational programs, which has potential to strengthen learning outcomes. A multi-dimensional construct may enhance continuing education program evaluation processes. The objective is to describe the development and psychometric testing of the 'affective - behavioral - cognitive - satisfaction questionnaire' (ABC-SAT) for assessing participants' satisfaction with a continuing education program for nurses in infection control. The multi-staged development of a satisfaction questionnaire comprised of three subscales. The pilot tool was administered to a nationwide sample of 126 infection control nurses to assess satisfaction after participating in a continuing education program. Satisfaction scores were calculated and psychometric testing was performed to determine reliability, using Cronbach's alpha, face validity, objectivity, and economy. A principle component analysis using varimax rotation and Kaiser normalization was performed. The analysis led to a three-factor solution of the questionnaire with 11 items, explaining 61.4% of the variance. Internal consistency of three scales using Cronbach's alpha was 0.83, 0.60, and 0.66, respectively. Selectivity coefficients varied between 0.39 and 0.70. Participants needed approximately three minutes to complete the questionnaire. Initial findings refer to a satisfying scale structure and internal consistency of the 3-dimensional ABC-SAT questionnaire. Further research is required to confirm the questionnaires’ psychometric properties.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29800763</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.nepr.2018.05.003</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9384-3303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1382-7990</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-5953 |
ispartof | Nurse education in practice, 2018-07, Vol.31, p.77-82 |
issn | 1471-5953 1873-5223 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2045301018 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024; Social Science Premium Collection; Sociology Collection; Education Collection |
subjects | Adult Behavior Cognition & reasoning Cognitive-behavioral factors Communication Skills Continuing education Core Curriculum Cronbach's alpha Disease control Education Education, Continuing Educational Development Eigenvalues Factor Analysis Female Group Dynamics Guidelines Happiness Hospitals Humans Hygiene Infection control Infection Control - standards Infection control nurses Job Satisfaction Likert Scales Literature Reviews Male Middle Aged Normalization Nosocomial infections Nurse Nurse Clinicians - education Nurses Nursing Objectivity Patients Personal Satisfaction Pilot Projects Prevention Professionals Program evaluation Psychometrics Psychometrics - methods Quantitative psychology Questionnaires Reliability Reproducibility of Results Resistance (Psychology) Rotation Satisfaction Social Psychology Surveys and Questionnaires Teaching Teaching Methods Teaching Skills Training Usability |
title | Development and psychometric pilot-testing of a questionnaire for the evaluation of satisfaction with continuing education in infection control nurses |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T05%3A04%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20psychometric%20pilot-testing%20of%20a%20questionnaire%20for%20the%20evaluation%20of%20satisfaction%20with%20continuing%20education%20in%20infection%20control%20nurses&rft.jtitle=Nurse%20education%20in%20practice&rft.au=Meng,%20Michael&rft.date=2018-07&rft.volume=31&rft.spage=77&rft.epage=82&rft.pages=77-82&rft.issn=1471-5953&rft.eissn=1873-5223&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.nepr.2018.05.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2082047099%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-550db1be7932920e201264b49a1fc17f2cb1b4d3057c22c1b4f13a76f5619f413%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2082047099&rft_id=info:pmid/29800763&rfr_iscdi=true |