Loading…

Development and psychometric pilot-testing of a questionnaire for the evaluation of satisfaction with continuing education in infection control nurses

Satisfaction with continuing education can be defined as positive attitudes towards educational programs, which has potential to strengthen learning outcomes. A multi-dimensional construct may enhance continuing education program evaluation processes. The objective is to describe the development and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nurse education in practice 2018-07, Vol.31, p.77-82
Main Authors: Meng, Michael, Peter, Daniel, Mattner, Frauke, Igel, Christoph, Kugler, Christiane
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-550db1be7932920e201264b49a1fc17f2cb1b4d3057c22c1b4f13a76f5619f413
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-550db1be7932920e201264b49a1fc17f2cb1b4d3057c22c1b4f13a76f5619f413
container_end_page 82
container_issue
container_start_page 77
container_title Nurse education in practice
container_volume 31
creator Meng, Michael
Peter, Daniel
Mattner, Frauke
Igel, Christoph
Kugler, Christiane
description Satisfaction with continuing education can be defined as positive attitudes towards educational programs, which has potential to strengthen learning outcomes. A multi-dimensional construct may enhance continuing education program evaluation processes. The objective is to describe the development and psychometric testing of the 'affective - behavioral - cognitive - satisfaction questionnaire' (ABC-SAT) for assessing participants' satisfaction with a continuing education program for nurses in infection control. The multi-staged development of a satisfaction questionnaire comprised of three subscales. The pilot tool was administered to a nationwide sample of 126 infection control nurses to assess satisfaction after participating in a continuing education program. Satisfaction scores were calculated and psychometric testing was performed to determine reliability, using Cronbach's alpha, face validity, objectivity, and economy. A principle component analysis using varimax rotation and Kaiser normalization was performed. The analysis led to a three-factor solution of the questionnaire with 11 items, explaining 61.4% of the variance. Internal consistency of three scales using Cronbach's alpha was 0.83, 0.60, and 0.66, respectively. Selectivity coefficients varied between 0.39 and 0.70. Participants needed approximately three minutes to complete the questionnaire. Initial findings refer to a satisfying scale structure and internal consistency of the 3-dimensional ABC-SAT questionnaire. Further research is required to confirm the questionnaires’ psychometric properties.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.05.003
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2045301018</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1471595317304420</els_id><sourcerecordid>2082047099</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-550db1be7932920e201264b49a1fc17f2cb1b4d3057c22c1b4f13a76f5619f413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcuKFTEQhhtRnHH0BVxIwI2bbnPp9AXcyHiFATe6DjnpiieH7qRN0kfmRXxeK9OjCxdCIH8lX_0k9VfVc0YbRln3-tR4WGPDKRsaKhtKxYPqkg29qCXn4iHqtme1HKW4qJ6kdKLYRPvucXXBx4GiEpfVr3dwhjmsC_hMtJ_Imm7NMSyQozNkdXPIdYaUnf9OgiWa_NhKFbzXLgKxIZJ8BAJnPW-6nBcqoUpWm7v6p8tHYoJHi624wLSZnXRlWdixQsQwE7_FBOlp9cjqOcGz-_2q-vbh_dfrT_XNl4-fr9_e1EYMba6lpNOBHaAfBR85BRwF79pDO2pmDestN3jbToLK3nBuUFsmdN9Z2bHRtkxcVa923zWGu5-pxSUD86w9hC0pTlspKE57QPTlP-gpbNHj65AaEOzpOCLFd8rEkFIEq9boFh1vFaOqpKZOqqSmSmqKSoWpYdOLe-vtsMD0t-VPTAi82QHAWZwdRJWMA29gwhBMVlNw__P_DUsPq7k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2082047099</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and psychometric pilot-testing of a questionnaire for the evaluation of satisfaction with continuing education in infection control nurses</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Meng, Michael ; Peter, Daniel ; Mattner, Frauke ; Igel, Christoph ; Kugler, Christiane</creator><creatorcontrib>Meng, Michael ; Peter, Daniel ; Mattner, Frauke ; Igel, Christoph ; Kugler, Christiane</creatorcontrib><description>Satisfaction with continuing education can be defined as positive attitudes towards educational programs, which has potential to strengthen learning outcomes. A multi-dimensional construct may enhance continuing education program evaluation processes. The objective is to describe the development and psychometric testing of the 'affective - behavioral - cognitive - satisfaction questionnaire' (ABC-SAT) for assessing participants' satisfaction with a continuing education program for nurses in infection control. The multi-staged development of a satisfaction questionnaire comprised of three subscales. The pilot tool was administered to a nationwide sample of 126 infection control nurses to assess satisfaction after participating in a continuing education program. Satisfaction scores were calculated and psychometric testing was performed to determine reliability, using Cronbach's alpha, face validity, objectivity, and economy. A principle component analysis using varimax rotation and Kaiser normalization was performed. The analysis led to a three-factor solution of the questionnaire with 11 items, explaining 61.4% of the variance. Internal consistency of three scales using Cronbach's alpha was 0.83, 0.60, and 0.66, respectively. Selectivity coefficients varied between 0.39 and 0.70. Participants needed approximately three minutes to complete the questionnaire. Initial findings refer to a satisfying scale structure and internal consistency of the 3-dimensional ABC-SAT questionnaire. Further research is required to confirm the questionnaires’ psychometric properties.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-5953</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5223</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.05.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29800763</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Behavior ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognitive-behavioral factors ; Communication Skills ; Continuing education ; Core Curriculum ; Cronbach's alpha ; Disease control ; Education ; Education, Continuing ; Educational Development ; Eigenvalues ; Factor Analysis ; Female ; Group Dynamics ; Guidelines ; Happiness ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Hygiene ; Infection control ; Infection Control - standards ; Infection control nurses ; Job Satisfaction ; Likert Scales ; Literature Reviews ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Normalization ; Nosocomial infections ; Nurse ; Nurse Clinicians - education ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Objectivity ; Patients ; Personal Satisfaction ; Pilot Projects ; Prevention ; Professionals ; Program evaluation ; Psychometrics ; Psychometrics - methods ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Rotation ; Satisfaction ; Social Psychology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Teaching Skills ; Training ; Usability</subject><ispartof>Nurse education in practice, 2018-07, Vol.31, p.77-82</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2018. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-550db1be7932920e201264b49a1fc17f2cb1b4d3057c22c1b4f13a76f5619f413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-550db1be7932920e201264b49a1fc17f2cb1b4d3057c22c1b4f13a76f5619f413</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9384-3303 ; 0000-0003-1382-7990</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2082047099/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2082047099?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,21378,21394,21395,27924,27925,30999,33611,33612,33877,33878,34530,34531,43733,43880,44115,74093,74269,74511</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29800763$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meng, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peter, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattner, Frauke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Igel, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kugler, Christiane</creatorcontrib><title>Development and psychometric pilot-testing of a questionnaire for the evaluation of satisfaction with continuing education in infection control nurses</title><title>Nurse education in practice</title><addtitle>Nurse Educ Pract</addtitle><description>Satisfaction with continuing education can be defined as positive attitudes towards educational programs, which has potential to strengthen learning outcomes. A multi-dimensional construct may enhance continuing education program evaluation processes. The objective is to describe the development and psychometric testing of the 'affective - behavioral - cognitive - satisfaction questionnaire' (ABC-SAT) for assessing participants' satisfaction with a continuing education program for nurses in infection control. The multi-staged development of a satisfaction questionnaire comprised of three subscales. The pilot tool was administered to a nationwide sample of 126 infection control nurses to assess satisfaction after participating in a continuing education program. Satisfaction scores were calculated and psychometric testing was performed to determine reliability, using Cronbach's alpha, face validity, objectivity, and economy. A principle component analysis using varimax rotation and Kaiser normalization was performed. The analysis led to a three-factor solution of the questionnaire with 11 items, explaining 61.4% of the variance. Internal consistency of three scales using Cronbach's alpha was 0.83, 0.60, and 0.66, respectively. Selectivity coefficients varied between 0.39 and 0.70. Participants needed approximately three minutes to complete the questionnaire. Initial findings refer to a satisfying scale structure and internal consistency of the 3-dimensional ABC-SAT questionnaire. Further research is required to confirm the questionnaires’ psychometric properties.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive-behavioral factors</subject><subject>Communication Skills</subject><subject>Continuing education</subject><subject>Core Curriculum</subject><subject>Cronbach's alpha</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education, Continuing</subject><subject>Educational Development</subject><subject>Eigenvalues</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Group Dynamics</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Happiness</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hygiene</subject><subject>Infection control</subject><subject>Infection Control - standards</subject><subject>Infection control nurses</subject><subject>Job Satisfaction</subject><subject>Likert Scales</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Normalization</subject><subject>Nosocomial infections</subject><subject>Nurse</subject><subject>Nurse Clinicians - education</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Objectivity</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Personal Satisfaction</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Program evaluation</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychometrics - methods</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Satisfaction</subject><subject>Social Psychology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Teaching Skills</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Usability</subject><issn>1471-5953</issn><issn>1873-5223</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcuKFTEQhhtRnHH0BVxIwI2bbnPp9AXcyHiFATe6DjnpiieH7qRN0kfmRXxeK9OjCxdCIH8lX_0k9VfVc0YbRln3-tR4WGPDKRsaKhtKxYPqkg29qCXn4iHqtme1HKW4qJ6kdKLYRPvucXXBx4GiEpfVr3dwhjmsC_hMtJ_Imm7NMSyQozNkdXPIdYaUnf9OgiWa_NhKFbzXLgKxIZJ8BAJnPW-6nBcqoUpWm7v6p8tHYoJHi624wLSZnXRlWdixQsQwE7_FBOlp9cjqOcGz-_2q-vbh_dfrT_XNl4-fr9_e1EYMba6lpNOBHaAfBR85BRwF79pDO2pmDestN3jbToLK3nBuUFsmdN9Z2bHRtkxcVa923zWGu5-pxSUD86w9hC0pTlspKE57QPTlP-gpbNHj65AaEOzpOCLFd8rEkFIEq9boFh1vFaOqpKZOqqSmSmqKSoWpYdOLe-vtsMD0t-VPTAi82QHAWZwdRJWMA29gwhBMVlNw__P_DUsPq7k</recordid><startdate>201807</startdate><enddate>201807</enddate><creator>Meng, Michael</creator><creator>Peter, Daniel</creator><creator>Mattner, Frauke</creator><creator>Igel, Christoph</creator><creator>Kugler, Christiane</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9384-3303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1382-7990</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201807</creationdate><title>Development and psychometric pilot-testing of a questionnaire for the evaluation of satisfaction with continuing education in infection control nurses</title><author>Meng, Michael ; Peter, Daniel ; Mattner, Frauke ; Igel, Christoph ; Kugler, Christiane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-550db1be7932920e201264b49a1fc17f2cb1b4d3057c22c1b4f13a76f5619f413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive-behavioral factors</topic><topic>Communication Skills</topic><topic>Continuing education</topic><topic>Core Curriculum</topic><topic>Cronbach's alpha</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education, Continuing</topic><topic>Educational Development</topic><topic>Eigenvalues</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Group Dynamics</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Happiness</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hygiene</topic><topic>Infection control</topic><topic>Infection Control - standards</topic><topic>Infection control nurses</topic><topic>Job Satisfaction</topic><topic>Likert Scales</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Normalization</topic><topic>Nosocomial infections</topic><topic>Nurse</topic><topic>Nurse Clinicians - education</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Objectivity</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Personal Satisfaction</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Program evaluation</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychometrics - methods</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Satisfaction</topic><topic>Social Psychology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Teaching Skills</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Usability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meng, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peter, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattner, Frauke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Igel, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kugler, Christiane</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nurse education in practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meng, Michael</au><au>Peter, Daniel</au><au>Mattner, Frauke</au><au>Igel, Christoph</au><au>Kugler, Christiane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development and psychometric pilot-testing of a questionnaire for the evaluation of satisfaction with continuing education in infection control nurses</atitle><jtitle>Nurse education in practice</jtitle><addtitle>Nurse Educ Pract</addtitle><date>2018-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>31</volume><spage>77</spage><epage>82</epage><pages>77-82</pages><issn>1471-5953</issn><eissn>1873-5223</eissn><abstract>Satisfaction with continuing education can be defined as positive attitudes towards educational programs, which has potential to strengthen learning outcomes. A multi-dimensional construct may enhance continuing education program evaluation processes. The objective is to describe the development and psychometric testing of the 'affective - behavioral - cognitive - satisfaction questionnaire' (ABC-SAT) for assessing participants' satisfaction with a continuing education program for nurses in infection control. The multi-staged development of a satisfaction questionnaire comprised of three subscales. The pilot tool was administered to a nationwide sample of 126 infection control nurses to assess satisfaction after participating in a continuing education program. Satisfaction scores were calculated and psychometric testing was performed to determine reliability, using Cronbach's alpha, face validity, objectivity, and economy. A principle component analysis using varimax rotation and Kaiser normalization was performed. The analysis led to a three-factor solution of the questionnaire with 11 items, explaining 61.4% of the variance. Internal consistency of three scales using Cronbach's alpha was 0.83, 0.60, and 0.66, respectively. Selectivity coefficients varied between 0.39 and 0.70. Participants needed approximately three minutes to complete the questionnaire. Initial findings refer to a satisfying scale structure and internal consistency of the 3-dimensional ABC-SAT questionnaire. Further research is required to confirm the questionnaires’ psychometric properties.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29800763</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.nepr.2018.05.003</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9384-3303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1382-7990</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-5953
ispartof Nurse education in practice, 2018-07, Vol.31, p.77-82
issn 1471-5953
1873-5223
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2045301018
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024; Social Science Premium Collection; Sociology Collection; Education Collection
subjects Adult
Behavior
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive-behavioral factors
Communication Skills
Continuing education
Core Curriculum
Cronbach's alpha
Disease control
Education
Education, Continuing
Educational Development
Eigenvalues
Factor Analysis
Female
Group Dynamics
Guidelines
Happiness
Hospitals
Humans
Hygiene
Infection control
Infection Control - standards
Infection control nurses
Job Satisfaction
Likert Scales
Literature Reviews
Male
Middle Aged
Normalization
Nosocomial infections
Nurse
Nurse Clinicians - education
Nurses
Nursing
Objectivity
Patients
Personal Satisfaction
Pilot Projects
Prevention
Professionals
Program evaluation
Psychometrics
Psychometrics - methods
Quantitative psychology
Questionnaires
Reliability
Reproducibility of Results
Resistance (Psychology)
Rotation
Satisfaction
Social Psychology
Surveys and Questionnaires
Teaching
Teaching Methods
Teaching Skills
Training
Usability
title Development and psychometric pilot-testing of a questionnaire for the evaluation of satisfaction with continuing education in infection control nurses
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T05%3A04%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20psychometric%20pilot-testing%20of%20a%20questionnaire%20for%20the%20evaluation%20of%20satisfaction%20with%20continuing%20education%20in%20infection%20control%20nurses&rft.jtitle=Nurse%20education%20in%20practice&rft.au=Meng,%20Michael&rft.date=2018-07&rft.volume=31&rft.spage=77&rft.epage=82&rft.pages=77-82&rft.issn=1471-5953&rft.eissn=1873-5223&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.nepr.2018.05.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2082047099%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-550db1be7932920e201264b49a1fc17f2cb1b4d3057c22c1b4f13a76f5619f413%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2082047099&rft_id=info:pmid/29800763&rfr_iscdi=true