Loading…
Mental health consumer participation in undergraduate occupational therapy student assessment: No negative impact
Background/aim Australian accreditation standards for occupational therapy courses require consumer participation in the design, delivery and evaluation of programs. This study investigated whether a mental health consumer – as one of two assessors for an oral assessment in a mental health unit – im...
Saved in:
Published in: | Australian occupational therapy journal 2018-12, Vol.65 (6), p.494-502 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4124-8525089a987afbb0f79fd58886799d098136602b9f657d7fbba7be618669b0173 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4124-8525089a987afbb0f79fd58886799d098136602b9f657d7fbba7be618669b0173 |
container_end_page | 502 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 494 |
container_title | Australian occupational therapy journal |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Logan, Alexandra Yule, Elisa Taylor, Michael Imms, Christine |
description | Background/aim
Australian accreditation standards for occupational therapy courses require consumer participation in the design, delivery and evaluation of programs. This study investigated whether a mental health consumer – as one of two assessors for an oral assessment in a mental health unit – impacted engagement, anxiety states and academic performance of undergraduate occupational therapy students.
Methods
Students (n = 131 eligible) self‐selected into two groups but were blinded to the group differences (assessor panel composition) until shortly prior to the oral assessment. Control group assessors were two occupational therapy educators, while consumer group assessors included an occupational therapy educator and a mental health consumer.
Results
Pre‐ and post‐assessment data were successfully matched for 79 students (overall response rate = 73.1%). No evidence was found of significant differences between the two groups for engagement, anxiety or academic performance (all P values >0.05).
Conclusion
Including mental health consumers as assessors did not negatively impact student engagement and academic performance, nor increase student anxiety beyond that typically observed in oral assessment tasks. The findings provide support for expanding the role of mental health consumers in the education and assessment of occupational therapy students. Development of methods to determine the efficacy of consumer involvement remains an area for future research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1440-1630.12484 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2046014310</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2150297666</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4124-8525089a987afbb0f79fd58886799d098136602b9f657d7fbba7be618669b0173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkTlPxDAQRi0EguWo6ZAlGprAOBs7Nh1acUkcDdSWk0zYoFz4AO2_x0uAggY3vt48ab4h5JDBKYvrjGUZJEzM4zXNZLZBZr8vm2QGkPEEciF2yK5zrwCMK55uk51USRAKxIy83WPvTUuXaFq_pOXQu9ChpaOxvimb0fhm6GnT09BXaF-sqYLxSIeyDNNfrPVLtGZcUedDFW3UOIfOdfF4Th8G2uNLJN-RNt1oSr9PtmrTOjz43vfI89Xl0-ImuXu8vl1c3CVlFntJJE85SGWUzE1dFFDnqq64lFLkSlWgJJsLAWmhasHzKo-IyQsUTAqhCmD5fI-cTN7RDm8Bnddd40psW9PjEJxOIRPAsjmDiB7_QV-HYGNrkWIcUhUjFJE6m6jSDs5ZrPVom87YlWag19PQ6-z1Onv9NY1YcfTtDUWH1S__E38E-AR8NC2u_vPpi8enSfwJoSiUdw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2150297666</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mental health consumer participation in undergraduate occupational therapy student assessment: No negative impact</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley</source><creator>Logan, Alexandra ; Yule, Elisa ; Taylor, Michael ; Imms, Christine</creator><creatorcontrib>Logan, Alexandra ; Yule, Elisa ; Taylor, Michael ; Imms, Christine</creatorcontrib><description>Background/aim
Australian accreditation standards for occupational therapy courses require consumer participation in the design, delivery and evaluation of programs. This study investigated whether a mental health consumer – as one of two assessors for an oral assessment in a mental health unit – impacted engagement, anxiety states and academic performance of undergraduate occupational therapy students.
Methods
Students (n = 131 eligible) self‐selected into two groups but were blinded to the group differences (assessor panel composition) until shortly prior to the oral assessment. Control group assessors were two occupational therapy educators, while consumer group assessors included an occupational therapy educator and a mental health consumer.
Results
Pre‐ and post‐assessment data were successfully matched for 79 students (overall response rate = 73.1%). No evidence was found of significant differences between the two groups for engagement, anxiety or academic performance (all P values >0.05).
Conclusion
Including mental health consumers as assessors did not negatively impact student engagement and academic performance, nor increase student anxiety beyond that typically observed in oral assessment tasks. The findings provide support for expanding the role of mental health consumers in the education and assessment of occupational therapy students. Development of methods to determine the efficacy of consumer involvement remains an area for future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-0766</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12484</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29806906</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; accreditation ; Anxiety ; Assessors ; Consumer behavior ; consumer participation ; Consumers ; curriculum ; Efficacy ; Evaluation ; Group therapy ; Mental health ; Occupational therapy ; occupational therapy education ; Response rates ; Students</subject><ispartof>Australian occupational therapy journal, 2018-12, Vol.65 (6), p.494-502</ispartof><rights>2018 Occupational Therapy Australia</rights><rights>2018 Occupational Therapy Australia.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Occupational Therapy Australia</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4124-8525089a987afbb0f79fd58886799d098136602b9f657d7fbba7be618669b0173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4124-8525089a987afbb0f79fd58886799d098136602b9f657d7fbba7be618669b0173</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7332-379X ; 0000-0003-3238-3133 ; 0000-0001-9055-3554</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29806906$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Logan, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yule, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imms, Christine</creatorcontrib><title>Mental health consumer participation in undergraduate occupational therapy student assessment: No negative impact</title><title>Australian occupational therapy journal</title><addtitle>Aust Occup Ther J</addtitle><description>Background/aim
Australian accreditation standards for occupational therapy courses require consumer participation in the design, delivery and evaluation of programs. This study investigated whether a mental health consumer – as one of two assessors for an oral assessment in a mental health unit – impacted engagement, anxiety states and academic performance of undergraduate occupational therapy students.
Methods
Students (n = 131 eligible) self‐selected into two groups but were blinded to the group differences (assessor panel composition) until shortly prior to the oral assessment. Control group assessors were two occupational therapy educators, while consumer group assessors included an occupational therapy educator and a mental health consumer.
Results
Pre‐ and post‐assessment data were successfully matched for 79 students (overall response rate = 73.1%). No evidence was found of significant differences between the two groups for engagement, anxiety or academic performance (all P values >0.05).
Conclusion
Including mental health consumers as assessors did not negatively impact student engagement and academic performance, nor increase student anxiety beyond that typically observed in oral assessment tasks. The findings provide support for expanding the role of mental health consumers in the education and assessment of occupational therapy students. Development of methods to determine the efficacy of consumer involvement remains an area for future research.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>accreditation</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Assessors</subject><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>consumer participation</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>curriculum</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Group therapy</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Occupational therapy</subject><subject>occupational therapy education</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Students</subject><issn>0045-0766</issn><issn>1440-1630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkTlPxDAQRi0EguWo6ZAlGprAOBs7Nh1acUkcDdSWk0zYoFz4AO2_x0uAggY3vt48ab4h5JDBKYvrjGUZJEzM4zXNZLZBZr8vm2QGkPEEciF2yK5zrwCMK55uk51USRAKxIy83WPvTUuXaFq_pOXQu9ChpaOxvimb0fhm6GnT09BXaF-sqYLxSIeyDNNfrPVLtGZcUedDFW3UOIfOdfF4Th8G2uNLJN-RNt1oSr9PtmrTOjz43vfI89Xl0-ImuXu8vl1c3CVlFntJJE85SGWUzE1dFFDnqq64lFLkSlWgJJsLAWmhasHzKo-IyQsUTAqhCmD5fI-cTN7RDm8Bnddd40psW9PjEJxOIRPAsjmDiB7_QV-HYGNrkWIcUhUjFJE6m6jSDs5ZrPVom87YlWag19PQ6-z1Onv9NY1YcfTtDUWH1S__E38E-AR8NC2u_vPpi8enSfwJoSiUdw</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Logan, Alexandra</creator><creator>Yule, Elisa</creator><creator>Taylor, Michael</creator><creator>Imms, Christine</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7332-379X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3238-3133</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9055-3554</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>Mental health consumer participation in undergraduate occupational therapy student assessment: No negative impact</title><author>Logan, Alexandra ; Yule, Elisa ; Taylor, Michael ; Imms, Christine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4124-8525089a987afbb0f79fd58886799d098136602b9f657d7fbba7be618669b0173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>accreditation</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Assessors</topic><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>consumer participation</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>curriculum</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Group therapy</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Occupational therapy</topic><topic>occupational therapy education</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Logan, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yule, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imms, Christine</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Australian occupational therapy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Logan, Alexandra</au><au>Yule, Elisa</au><au>Taylor, Michael</au><au>Imms, Christine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mental health consumer participation in undergraduate occupational therapy student assessment: No negative impact</atitle><jtitle>Australian occupational therapy journal</jtitle><addtitle>Aust Occup Ther J</addtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>494</spage><epage>502</epage><pages>494-502</pages><issn>0045-0766</issn><eissn>1440-1630</eissn><abstract>Background/aim
Australian accreditation standards for occupational therapy courses require consumer participation in the design, delivery and evaluation of programs. This study investigated whether a mental health consumer – as one of two assessors for an oral assessment in a mental health unit – impacted engagement, anxiety states and academic performance of undergraduate occupational therapy students.
Methods
Students (n = 131 eligible) self‐selected into two groups but were blinded to the group differences (assessor panel composition) until shortly prior to the oral assessment. Control group assessors were two occupational therapy educators, while consumer group assessors included an occupational therapy educator and a mental health consumer.
Results
Pre‐ and post‐assessment data were successfully matched for 79 students (overall response rate = 73.1%). No evidence was found of significant differences between the two groups for engagement, anxiety or academic performance (all P values >0.05).
Conclusion
Including mental health consumers as assessors did not negatively impact student engagement and academic performance, nor increase student anxiety beyond that typically observed in oral assessment tasks. The findings provide support for expanding the role of mental health consumers in the education and assessment of occupational therapy students. Development of methods to determine the efficacy of consumer involvement remains an area for future research.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>29806906</pmid><doi>10.1111/1440-1630.12484</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7332-379X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3238-3133</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9055-3554</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0045-0766 |
ispartof | Australian occupational therapy journal, 2018-12, Vol.65 (6), p.494-502 |
issn | 0045-0766 1440-1630 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2046014310 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley |
subjects | Academic achievement accreditation Anxiety Assessors Consumer behavior consumer participation Consumers curriculum Efficacy Evaluation Group therapy Mental health Occupational therapy occupational therapy education Response rates Students |
title | Mental health consumer participation in undergraduate occupational therapy student assessment: No negative impact |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A15%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mental%20health%20consumer%20participation%20in%20undergraduate%20occupational%20therapy%20student%20assessment:%20No%20negative%20impact&rft.jtitle=Australian%20occupational%20therapy%20journal&rft.au=Logan,%20Alexandra&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=494&rft.epage=502&rft.pages=494-502&rft.issn=0045-0766&rft.eissn=1440-1630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1440-1630.12484&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2150297666%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4124-8525089a987afbb0f79fd58886799d098136602b9f657d7fbba7be618669b0173%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2150297666&rft_id=info:pmid/29806906&rfr_iscdi=true |