Loading…

A Prospective Study of Stingray Injury and Envenomation Outcomes

Stingray injuries result in thousands of emergency department visits annually. This study aimed to assess the complication rate and outcome of field treatment with hot water immersion. This was an on-site, prospective, observational study. Subjects were enrolled after having been stung by a stingray...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of emergency medicine 2018-08, Vol.55 (2), p.213-217
Main Authors: Myatt, Toby, Nguyen, Brian J., Clark, Richard F., Coffey, Christanne H., O'Connell, Charles W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-a8f25d33d0a3f1280ac47e403c50129d45060a734c0fd19458ea82e9c55ef7103
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-a8f25d33d0a3f1280ac47e403c50129d45060a734c0fd19458ea82e9c55ef7103
container_end_page 217
container_issue 2
container_start_page 213
container_title The Journal of emergency medicine
container_volume 55
creator Myatt, Toby
Nguyen, Brian J.
Clark, Richard F.
Coffey, Christanne H.
O'Connell, Charles W.
description Stingray injuries result in thousands of emergency department visits annually. This study aimed to assess the complication rate and outcome of field treatment with hot water immersion. This was an on-site, prospective, observational study. Subjects were enrolled after having been stung by a stingray. A trained researcher obtained the following information: age, sex, health conditions and medications, and wound description. The efficacy of hot water immersion on pain was recorded. Patients were contacted on postinjury days 3, 7, and 14 for follow up. Twenty-two subjects were included. No obvious foreign bodies were observed in wounds. Ten subjects were treated with hot water immersion and povidone-iodine, 12 with hot water immersion alone. Ongoing symptoms or complications were noted at the 3-day follow-up in 6 of 22 subjects (27.3%). One subject was diagnosed with cellulitis on post-sting day 8 and was treated with antibiotics. Ongoing symptoms or complications were reported more commonly in patients treated with hot water and povidone-iodine compared with those treated with hot water alone (p = 0.056). There was a significant difference in wound size between those with and without ongoing symptoms at the 3-day follow-up (p = 0.0102). No wounds
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.04.035
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2046019220</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0736467918303755</els_id><sourcerecordid>2046019220</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-a8f25d33d0a3f1280ac47e403c50129d45060a734c0fd19458ea82e9c55ef7103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtrwzAQhEVpadK0fyH42Ivd1cuPW0JIHxBIoe1ZqNK6yMR2KtkB__s6JDn3tAs7s8N8hMwpJBRo-lQlFdboa7QJA5onIBLg8opMGZcslsCKazKFjKexSLNiQu5CqABoBjm9JRNW5MBTzqdksYzefRv2aDp3wOij6-0QteW4uObH6yF6a6reD5FubLRuDti0te5c20TbvjNtjeGe3JR6F_DhPGfk63n9uXqNN9uXt9VyExuRsy7Wecmk5dyC5iVlOWgjMhTAjQTKCiskpKAzLgyUlhZC5qhzhoWREsuMAp-Rx9PfvW9_ewydql0wuNvpBts-KAYiBVowdpSmJ6kZmwWPpdp7V2s_KArqSE9V6kJPHekpEGqkNxrn54z--3i72C64RsHiJMCx6cGhV8E4bAxa50eCyrbuv4w_bKKC8w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2046019220</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Prospective Study of Stingray Injury and Envenomation Outcomes</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Myatt, Toby ; Nguyen, Brian J. ; Clark, Richard F. ; Coffey, Christanne H. ; O'Connell, Charles W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Myatt, Toby ; Nguyen, Brian J. ; Clark, Richard F. ; Coffey, Christanne H. ; O'Connell, Charles W.</creatorcontrib><description>Stingray injuries result in thousands of emergency department visits annually. This study aimed to assess the complication rate and outcome of field treatment with hot water immersion. This was an on-site, prospective, observational study. Subjects were enrolled after having been stung by a stingray. A trained researcher obtained the following information: age, sex, health conditions and medications, and wound description. The efficacy of hot water immersion on pain was recorded. Patients were contacted on postinjury days 3, 7, and 14 for follow up. Twenty-two subjects were included. No obvious foreign bodies were observed in wounds. Ten subjects were treated with hot water immersion and povidone-iodine, 12 with hot water immersion alone. Ongoing symptoms or complications were noted at the 3-day follow-up in 6 of 22 subjects (27.3%). One subject was diagnosed with cellulitis on post-sting day 8 and was treated with antibiotics. Ongoing symptoms or complications were reported more commonly in patients treated with hot water and povidone-iodine compared with those treated with hot water alone (p = 0.056). There was a significant difference in wound size between those with and without ongoing symptoms at the 3-day follow-up (p = 0.0102). No wounds &lt;1 cm developed any complications. Average duration of water immersion was 73.6 min (range 35–145 min). The mean pain score pretreatment was 7.36 and posttreatment was 2.18, with an average decrease of 5.18 (95% confidence interval 4.22–6.15). Stingray injuries responded well to hot water immersion for pain control. Skin and soft tissue infection was diagnosed in 1 of 22 patients (4.55%).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0736-4679</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2352-5029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.04.035</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29803633</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Animals ; Bites and Stings - complications ; Female ; Hot Temperature ; Humans ; Male ; marine envenomation ; Middle Aged ; Pain - etiology ; Pain Management - methods ; Prospective Studies ; Skates (Fish) ; stingray ; Treatment Outcome ; Venoms - adverse effects ; Water - administration &amp; dosage ; Water - pharmacology</subject><ispartof>The Journal of emergency medicine, 2018-08, Vol.55 (2), p.213-217</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-a8f25d33d0a3f1280ac47e403c50129d45060a734c0fd19458ea82e9c55ef7103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-a8f25d33d0a3f1280ac47e403c50129d45060a734c0fd19458ea82e9c55ef7103</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2772-8232</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29803633$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Myatt, Toby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Brian J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Richard F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coffey, Christanne H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connell, Charles W.</creatorcontrib><title>A Prospective Study of Stingray Injury and Envenomation Outcomes</title><title>The Journal of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>J Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Stingray injuries result in thousands of emergency department visits annually. This study aimed to assess the complication rate and outcome of field treatment with hot water immersion. This was an on-site, prospective, observational study. Subjects were enrolled after having been stung by a stingray. A trained researcher obtained the following information: age, sex, health conditions and medications, and wound description. The efficacy of hot water immersion on pain was recorded. Patients were contacted on postinjury days 3, 7, and 14 for follow up. Twenty-two subjects were included. No obvious foreign bodies were observed in wounds. Ten subjects were treated with hot water immersion and povidone-iodine, 12 with hot water immersion alone. Ongoing symptoms or complications were noted at the 3-day follow-up in 6 of 22 subjects (27.3%). One subject was diagnosed with cellulitis on post-sting day 8 and was treated with antibiotics. Ongoing symptoms or complications were reported more commonly in patients treated with hot water and povidone-iodine compared with those treated with hot water alone (p = 0.056). There was a significant difference in wound size between those with and without ongoing symptoms at the 3-day follow-up (p = 0.0102). No wounds &lt;1 cm developed any complications. Average duration of water immersion was 73.6 min (range 35–145 min). The mean pain score pretreatment was 7.36 and posttreatment was 2.18, with an average decrease of 5.18 (95% confidence interval 4.22–6.15). Stingray injuries responded well to hot water immersion for pain control. Skin and soft tissue infection was diagnosed in 1 of 22 patients (4.55%).</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bites and Stings - complications</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hot Temperature</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>marine envenomation</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Pain Management - methods</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Skates (Fish)</subject><subject>stingray</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Venoms - adverse effects</subject><subject>Water - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Water - pharmacology</subject><issn>0736-4679</issn><issn>2352-5029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtrwzAQhEVpadK0fyH42Ivd1cuPW0JIHxBIoe1ZqNK6yMR2KtkB__s6JDn3tAs7s8N8hMwpJBRo-lQlFdboa7QJA5onIBLg8opMGZcslsCKazKFjKexSLNiQu5CqABoBjm9JRNW5MBTzqdksYzefRv2aDp3wOij6-0QteW4uObH6yF6a6reD5FubLRuDti0te5c20TbvjNtjeGe3JR6F_DhPGfk63n9uXqNN9uXt9VyExuRsy7Wecmk5dyC5iVlOWgjMhTAjQTKCiskpKAzLgyUlhZC5qhzhoWREsuMAp-Rx9PfvW9_ewydql0wuNvpBts-KAYiBVowdpSmJ6kZmwWPpdp7V2s_KArqSE9V6kJPHekpEGqkNxrn54z--3i72C64RsHiJMCx6cGhV8E4bAxa50eCyrbuv4w_bKKC8w</recordid><startdate>201808</startdate><enddate>201808</enddate><creator>Myatt, Toby</creator><creator>Nguyen, Brian J.</creator><creator>Clark, Richard F.</creator><creator>Coffey, Christanne H.</creator><creator>O'Connell, Charles W.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2772-8232</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201808</creationdate><title>A Prospective Study of Stingray Injury and Envenomation Outcomes</title><author>Myatt, Toby ; Nguyen, Brian J. ; Clark, Richard F. ; Coffey, Christanne H. ; O'Connell, Charles W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-a8f25d33d0a3f1280ac47e403c50129d45060a734c0fd19458ea82e9c55ef7103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bites and Stings - complications</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hot Temperature</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>marine envenomation</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Pain Management - methods</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Skates (Fish)</topic><topic>stingray</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Venoms - adverse effects</topic><topic>Water - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Water - pharmacology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Myatt, Toby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Brian J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Richard F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coffey, Christanne H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connell, Charles W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Myatt, Toby</au><au>Nguyen, Brian J.</au><au>Clark, Richard F.</au><au>Coffey, Christanne H.</au><au>O'Connell, Charles W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Prospective Study of Stingray Injury and Envenomation Outcomes</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2018-08</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>213</spage><epage>217</epage><pages>213-217</pages><issn>0736-4679</issn><eissn>2352-5029</eissn><abstract>Stingray injuries result in thousands of emergency department visits annually. This study aimed to assess the complication rate and outcome of field treatment with hot water immersion. This was an on-site, prospective, observational study. Subjects were enrolled after having been stung by a stingray. A trained researcher obtained the following information: age, sex, health conditions and medications, and wound description. The efficacy of hot water immersion on pain was recorded. Patients were contacted on postinjury days 3, 7, and 14 for follow up. Twenty-two subjects were included. No obvious foreign bodies were observed in wounds. Ten subjects were treated with hot water immersion and povidone-iodine, 12 with hot water immersion alone. Ongoing symptoms or complications were noted at the 3-day follow-up in 6 of 22 subjects (27.3%). One subject was diagnosed with cellulitis on post-sting day 8 and was treated with antibiotics. Ongoing symptoms or complications were reported more commonly in patients treated with hot water and povidone-iodine compared with those treated with hot water alone (p = 0.056). There was a significant difference in wound size between those with and without ongoing symptoms at the 3-day follow-up (p = 0.0102). No wounds &lt;1 cm developed any complications. Average duration of water immersion was 73.6 min (range 35–145 min). The mean pain score pretreatment was 7.36 and posttreatment was 2.18, with an average decrease of 5.18 (95% confidence interval 4.22–6.15). Stingray injuries responded well to hot water immersion for pain control. Skin and soft tissue infection was diagnosed in 1 of 22 patients (4.55%).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29803633</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.04.035</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2772-8232</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0736-4679
ispartof The Journal of emergency medicine, 2018-08, Vol.55 (2), p.213-217
issn 0736-4679
2352-5029
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2046019220
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Animals
Bites and Stings - complications
Female
Hot Temperature
Humans
Male
marine envenomation
Middle Aged
Pain - etiology
Pain Management - methods
Prospective Studies
Skates (Fish)
stingray
Treatment Outcome
Venoms - adverse effects
Water - administration & dosage
Water - pharmacology
title A Prospective Study of Stingray Injury and Envenomation Outcomes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T09%3A37%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Prospective%20Study%20of%20Stingray%20Injury%20and%20Envenomation%20Outcomes&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Myatt,%20Toby&rft.date=2018-08&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=213&rft.epage=217&rft.pages=213-217&rft.issn=0736-4679&rft.eissn=2352-5029&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.04.035&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2046019220%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-a8f25d33d0a3f1280ac47e403c50129d45060a734c0fd19458ea82e9c55ef7103%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2046019220&rft_id=info:pmid/29803633&rfr_iscdi=true