Loading…
A Prospective Study of Stingray Injury and Envenomation Outcomes
Stingray injuries result in thousands of emergency department visits annually. This study aimed to assess the complication rate and outcome of field treatment with hot water immersion. This was an on-site, prospective, observational study. Subjects were enrolled after having been stung by a stingray...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of emergency medicine 2018-08, Vol.55 (2), p.213-217 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-a8f25d33d0a3f1280ac47e403c50129d45060a734c0fd19458ea82e9c55ef7103 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-a8f25d33d0a3f1280ac47e403c50129d45060a734c0fd19458ea82e9c55ef7103 |
container_end_page | 217 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 213 |
container_title | The Journal of emergency medicine |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Myatt, Toby Nguyen, Brian J. Clark, Richard F. Coffey, Christanne H. O'Connell, Charles W. |
description | Stingray injuries result in thousands of emergency department visits annually.
This study aimed to assess the complication rate and outcome of field treatment with hot water immersion.
This was an on-site, prospective, observational study. Subjects were enrolled after having been stung by a stingray. A trained researcher obtained the following information: age, sex, health conditions and medications, and wound description. The efficacy of hot water immersion on pain was recorded. Patients were contacted on postinjury days 3, 7, and 14 for follow up.
Twenty-two subjects were included. No obvious foreign bodies were observed in wounds. Ten subjects were treated with hot water immersion and povidone-iodine, 12 with hot water immersion alone. Ongoing symptoms or complications were noted at the 3-day follow-up in 6 of 22 subjects (27.3%). One subject was diagnosed with cellulitis on post-sting day 8 and was treated with antibiotics. Ongoing symptoms or complications were reported more commonly in patients treated with hot water and povidone-iodine compared with those treated with hot water alone (p = 0.056). There was a significant difference in wound size between those with and without ongoing symptoms at the 3-day follow-up (p = 0.0102). No wounds |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.04.035 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2046019220</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0736467918303755</els_id><sourcerecordid>2046019220</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-a8f25d33d0a3f1280ac47e403c50129d45060a734c0fd19458ea82e9c55ef7103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtrwzAQhEVpadK0fyH42Ivd1cuPW0JIHxBIoe1ZqNK6yMR2KtkB__s6JDn3tAs7s8N8hMwpJBRo-lQlFdboa7QJA5onIBLg8opMGZcslsCKazKFjKexSLNiQu5CqABoBjm9JRNW5MBTzqdksYzefRv2aDp3wOij6-0QteW4uObH6yF6a6reD5FubLRuDti0te5c20TbvjNtjeGe3JR6F_DhPGfk63n9uXqNN9uXt9VyExuRsy7Wecmk5dyC5iVlOWgjMhTAjQTKCiskpKAzLgyUlhZC5qhzhoWREsuMAp-Rx9PfvW9_ewydql0wuNvpBts-KAYiBVowdpSmJ6kZmwWPpdp7V2s_KArqSE9V6kJPHekpEGqkNxrn54z--3i72C64RsHiJMCx6cGhV8E4bAxa50eCyrbuv4w_bKKC8w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2046019220</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Prospective Study of Stingray Injury and Envenomation Outcomes</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Myatt, Toby ; Nguyen, Brian J. ; Clark, Richard F. ; Coffey, Christanne H. ; O'Connell, Charles W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Myatt, Toby ; Nguyen, Brian J. ; Clark, Richard F. ; Coffey, Christanne H. ; O'Connell, Charles W.</creatorcontrib><description>Stingray injuries result in thousands of emergency department visits annually.
This study aimed to assess the complication rate and outcome of field treatment with hot water immersion.
This was an on-site, prospective, observational study. Subjects were enrolled after having been stung by a stingray. A trained researcher obtained the following information: age, sex, health conditions and medications, and wound description. The efficacy of hot water immersion on pain was recorded. Patients were contacted on postinjury days 3, 7, and 14 for follow up.
Twenty-two subjects were included. No obvious foreign bodies were observed in wounds. Ten subjects were treated with hot water immersion and povidone-iodine, 12 with hot water immersion alone. Ongoing symptoms or complications were noted at the 3-day follow-up in 6 of 22 subjects (27.3%). One subject was diagnosed with cellulitis on post-sting day 8 and was treated with antibiotics. Ongoing symptoms or complications were reported more commonly in patients treated with hot water and povidone-iodine compared with those treated with hot water alone (p = 0.056). There was a significant difference in wound size between those with and without ongoing symptoms at the 3-day follow-up (p = 0.0102). No wounds <1 cm developed any complications. Average duration of water immersion was 73.6 min (range 35–145 min). The mean pain score pretreatment was 7.36 and posttreatment was 2.18, with an average decrease of 5.18 (95% confidence interval 4.22–6.15).
Stingray injuries responded well to hot water immersion for pain control. Skin and soft tissue infection was diagnosed in 1 of 22 patients (4.55%).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0736-4679</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2352-5029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.04.035</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29803633</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Animals ; Bites and Stings - complications ; Female ; Hot Temperature ; Humans ; Male ; marine envenomation ; Middle Aged ; Pain - etiology ; Pain Management - methods ; Prospective Studies ; Skates (Fish) ; stingray ; Treatment Outcome ; Venoms - adverse effects ; Water - administration & dosage ; Water - pharmacology</subject><ispartof>The Journal of emergency medicine, 2018-08, Vol.55 (2), p.213-217</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-a8f25d33d0a3f1280ac47e403c50129d45060a734c0fd19458ea82e9c55ef7103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-a8f25d33d0a3f1280ac47e403c50129d45060a734c0fd19458ea82e9c55ef7103</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2772-8232</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29803633$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Myatt, Toby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Brian J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Richard F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coffey, Christanne H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connell, Charles W.</creatorcontrib><title>A Prospective Study of Stingray Injury and Envenomation Outcomes</title><title>The Journal of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>J Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Stingray injuries result in thousands of emergency department visits annually.
This study aimed to assess the complication rate and outcome of field treatment with hot water immersion.
This was an on-site, prospective, observational study. Subjects were enrolled after having been stung by a stingray. A trained researcher obtained the following information: age, sex, health conditions and medications, and wound description. The efficacy of hot water immersion on pain was recorded. Patients were contacted on postinjury days 3, 7, and 14 for follow up.
Twenty-two subjects were included. No obvious foreign bodies were observed in wounds. Ten subjects were treated with hot water immersion and povidone-iodine, 12 with hot water immersion alone. Ongoing symptoms or complications were noted at the 3-day follow-up in 6 of 22 subjects (27.3%). One subject was diagnosed with cellulitis on post-sting day 8 and was treated with antibiotics. Ongoing symptoms or complications were reported more commonly in patients treated with hot water and povidone-iodine compared with those treated with hot water alone (p = 0.056). There was a significant difference in wound size between those with and without ongoing symptoms at the 3-day follow-up (p = 0.0102). No wounds <1 cm developed any complications. Average duration of water immersion was 73.6 min (range 35–145 min). The mean pain score pretreatment was 7.36 and posttreatment was 2.18, with an average decrease of 5.18 (95% confidence interval 4.22–6.15).
Stingray injuries responded well to hot water immersion for pain control. Skin and soft tissue infection was diagnosed in 1 of 22 patients (4.55%).</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bites and Stings - complications</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hot Temperature</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>marine envenomation</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Pain Management - methods</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Skates (Fish)</subject><subject>stingray</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Venoms - adverse effects</subject><subject>Water - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Water - pharmacology</subject><issn>0736-4679</issn><issn>2352-5029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtrwzAQhEVpadK0fyH42Ivd1cuPW0JIHxBIoe1ZqNK6yMR2KtkB__s6JDn3tAs7s8N8hMwpJBRo-lQlFdboa7QJA5onIBLg8opMGZcslsCKazKFjKexSLNiQu5CqABoBjm9JRNW5MBTzqdksYzefRv2aDp3wOij6-0QteW4uObH6yF6a6reD5FubLRuDti0te5c20TbvjNtjeGe3JR6F_DhPGfk63n9uXqNN9uXt9VyExuRsy7Wecmk5dyC5iVlOWgjMhTAjQTKCiskpKAzLgyUlhZC5qhzhoWREsuMAp-Rx9PfvW9_ewydql0wuNvpBts-KAYiBVowdpSmJ6kZmwWPpdp7V2s_KArqSE9V6kJPHekpEGqkNxrn54z--3i72C64RsHiJMCx6cGhV8E4bAxa50eCyrbuv4w_bKKC8w</recordid><startdate>201808</startdate><enddate>201808</enddate><creator>Myatt, Toby</creator><creator>Nguyen, Brian J.</creator><creator>Clark, Richard F.</creator><creator>Coffey, Christanne H.</creator><creator>O'Connell, Charles W.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2772-8232</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201808</creationdate><title>A Prospective Study of Stingray Injury and Envenomation Outcomes</title><author>Myatt, Toby ; Nguyen, Brian J. ; Clark, Richard F. ; Coffey, Christanne H. ; O'Connell, Charles W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-a8f25d33d0a3f1280ac47e403c50129d45060a734c0fd19458ea82e9c55ef7103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bites and Stings - complications</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hot Temperature</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>marine envenomation</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Pain Management - methods</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Skates (Fish)</topic><topic>stingray</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Venoms - adverse effects</topic><topic>Water - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Water - pharmacology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Myatt, Toby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Brian J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Richard F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coffey, Christanne H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connell, Charles W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Myatt, Toby</au><au>Nguyen, Brian J.</au><au>Clark, Richard F.</au><au>Coffey, Christanne H.</au><au>O'Connell, Charles W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Prospective Study of Stingray Injury and Envenomation Outcomes</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2018-08</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>213</spage><epage>217</epage><pages>213-217</pages><issn>0736-4679</issn><eissn>2352-5029</eissn><abstract>Stingray injuries result in thousands of emergency department visits annually.
This study aimed to assess the complication rate and outcome of field treatment with hot water immersion.
This was an on-site, prospective, observational study. Subjects were enrolled after having been stung by a stingray. A trained researcher obtained the following information: age, sex, health conditions and medications, and wound description. The efficacy of hot water immersion on pain was recorded. Patients were contacted on postinjury days 3, 7, and 14 for follow up.
Twenty-two subjects were included. No obvious foreign bodies were observed in wounds. Ten subjects were treated with hot water immersion and povidone-iodine, 12 with hot water immersion alone. Ongoing symptoms or complications were noted at the 3-day follow-up in 6 of 22 subjects (27.3%). One subject was diagnosed with cellulitis on post-sting day 8 and was treated with antibiotics. Ongoing symptoms or complications were reported more commonly in patients treated with hot water and povidone-iodine compared with those treated with hot water alone (p = 0.056). There was a significant difference in wound size between those with and without ongoing symptoms at the 3-day follow-up (p = 0.0102). No wounds <1 cm developed any complications. Average duration of water immersion was 73.6 min (range 35–145 min). The mean pain score pretreatment was 7.36 and posttreatment was 2.18, with an average decrease of 5.18 (95% confidence interval 4.22–6.15).
Stingray injuries responded well to hot water immersion for pain control. Skin and soft tissue infection was diagnosed in 1 of 22 patients (4.55%).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29803633</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.04.035</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2772-8232</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0736-4679 |
ispartof | The Journal of emergency medicine, 2018-08, Vol.55 (2), p.213-217 |
issn | 0736-4679 2352-5029 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2046019220 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Animals Bites and Stings - complications Female Hot Temperature Humans Male marine envenomation Middle Aged Pain - etiology Pain Management - methods Prospective Studies Skates (Fish) stingray Treatment Outcome Venoms - adverse effects Water - administration & dosage Water - pharmacology |
title | A Prospective Study of Stingray Injury and Envenomation Outcomes |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T09%3A37%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Prospective%20Study%20of%20Stingray%20Injury%20and%20Envenomation%20Outcomes&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Myatt,%20Toby&rft.date=2018-08&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=213&rft.epage=217&rft.pages=213-217&rft.issn=0736-4679&rft.eissn=2352-5029&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.04.035&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2046019220%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-a8f25d33d0a3f1280ac47e403c50129d45060a734c0fd19458ea82e9c55ef7103%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2046019220&rft_id=info:pmid/29803633&rfr_iscdi=true |