Loading…
Browsed Betula pubescens trees are not carbon-limited
1. Slower growth after repetitive browsing of young trees has been attributed to a carbon (C) limitation, but data from long-term studies are lacking. To determine if repeated summer browsing causes a C (source) limitation in trees in the long-term, we analysed the non-structural carbohydrate (NSC)...
Saved in:
Published in: | Functional ecology 2008-10, Vol.22 (5), p.808-815 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4703-243708520ddc9e637be47e9e800fe593b0e447c88599fe4bc4f94254c59906ff3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4703-243708520ddc9e637be47e9e800fe593b0e447c88599fe4bc4f94254c59906ff3 |
container_end_page | 815 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 808 |
container_title | Functional ecology |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Palacio, S. Hester, A. J. Maestro, M. Millard, P. |
description | 1. Slower growth after repetitive browsing of young trees has been attributed to a carbon (C) limitation, but data from long-term studies are lacking. To determine if repeated summer browsing causes a C (source) limitation in trees in the long-term, we analysed the non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) and nitrogen (N) concentrations and pools of Betula pubescens saplings subjected to different clipping treatments (unclipped, 33% and 66% shoot removal) for 7 years. 2. The short-term effect of browsing on C allocation was assessed by clipping trees with different browsing histories and analyzing their C and N responses within the same growing season. 3. Long-term repetitive summer browsing significantly decreased sapling growth and soluble sugar (SS) concentrations in fine roots. However, trees subjected to different browsing histories did not change their C partitioning into starch. Although trees with a different browsing history showed differences in the NSC concentrations and pools of leaves, these differences were not maintained through time. 4. Simulated browsing had no significant short-term effect on root C and N pools of birch trees, but it decreased all C pools in leaves, 1-year and current-year stems and the starch and total NSC pools in main stems. 5. We conclude that although browsing may cause a temporary decrease in C pools, B. pubescens trees are able to compensate for such losses and hence are not C-limited in the long-term. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01433.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20460541</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20142874</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20142874</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4703-243708520ddc9e637be47e9e800fe593b0e447c88599fe4bc4f94254c59906ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtKxDAUhoMoOF4eQexGd62nubVZuHAGbyC4UNchzZxIh047Ji3jvL2pFXFpNkn4L-fwEZLkkOXxXK2ynEmRUs5ERgHKDHLOWPa5R2a_wj6ZAZUqLblkh-QohBUAKEHpjIi577YBl8kc-6ExyWaoMFhsQ9J7xJAYj0nb9Yk1vuratKnXdY_LE3LgTBPw9Oc-Jm93t6-Lh_Tp-f5xcfOUWl4AG2cXUAoKy6VVKFlRIS9QYQngUChWAXJe2LIUSjnkleVOcSq4jX-QzrFjcjn1bnz3MWDo9bqO2zWNabEbgqbAJQieR2M5Ga3vQvDo9MbXa-N3Ogc9ctIrPeLQIw49ctLfnPRnjF78zDDBmsZ509o6_OYpSMmEEtF3Pfm2dYO7f_fru9vF-Ir5sym_Cn3n__TnnJYFj_r5pDvTafPu4w5vL1FlkAumJKXsCzokjDo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20460541</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Browsed Betula pubescens trees are not carbon-limited</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Palacio, S. ; Hester, A. J. ; Maestro, M. ; Millard, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Palacio, S. ; Hester, A. J. ; Maestro, M. ; Millard, P.</creatorcontrib><description>1. Slower growth after repetitive browsing of young trees has been attributed to a carbon (C) limitation, but data from long-term studies are lacking. To determine if repeated summer browsing causes a C (source) limitation in trees in the long-term, we analysed the non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) and nitrogen (N) concentrations and pools of Betula pubescens saplings subjected to different clipping treatments (unclipped, 33% and 66% shoot removal) for 7 years. 2. The short-term effect of browsing on C allocation was assessed by clipping trees with different browsing histories and analyzing their C and N responses within the same growing season. 3. Long-term repetitive summer browsing significantly decreased sapling growth and soluble sugar (SS) concentrations in fine roots. However, trees subjected to different browsing histories did not change their C partitioning into starch. Although trees with a different browsing history showed differences in the NSC concentrations and pools of leaves, these differences were not maintained through time. 4. Simulated browsing had no significant short-term effect on root C and N pools of birch trees, but it decreased all C pools in leaves, 1-year and current-year stems and the starch and total NSC pools in main stems. 5. We conclude that although browsing may cause a temporary decrease in C pools, B. pubescens trees are able to compensate for such losses and hence are not C-limited in the long-term.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-8463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01433.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Autoecology ; Betula pubescens ; Biological and medical sciences ; Browsing ; clipping ; Defoliation ; downy birch ; Forest ecology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; herbivores ; herbivory ; Leaves ; nitrogen ; non-structural carbohydrates ; Plant roots ; Plant-Animal Interactions ; Plants ; Saplings ; Starches ; Stems ; storage ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Functional ecology, 2008-10, Vol.22 (5), p.808-815</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2008 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2008 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4703-243708520ddc9e637be47e9e800fe593b0e447c88599fe4bc4f94254c59906ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4703-243708520ddc9e637be47e9e800fe593b0e447c88599fe4bc4f94254c59906ff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20142874$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20142874$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,58219,58452</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20663595$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Palacio, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hester, A. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maestro, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millard, P.</creatorcontrib><title>Browsed Betula pubescens trees are not carbon-limited</title><title>Functional ecology</title><description>1. Slower growth after repetitive browsing of young trees has been attributed to a carbon (C) limitation, but data from long-term studies are lacking. To determine if repeated summer browsing causes a C (source) limitation in trees in the long-term, we analysed the non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) and nitrogen (N) concentrations and pools of Betula pubescens saplings subjected to different clipping treatments (unclipped, 33% and 66% shoot removal) for 7 years. 2. The short-term effect of browsing on C allocation was assessed by clipping trees with different browsing histories and analyzing their C and N responses within the same growing season. 3. Long-term repetitive summer browsing significantly decreased sapling growth and soluble sugar (SS) concentrations in fine roots. However, trees subjected to different browsing histories did not change their C partitioning into starch. Although trees with a different browsing history showed differences in the NSC concentrations and pools of leaves, these differences were not maintained through time. 4. Simulated browsing had no significant short-term effect on root C and N pools of birch trees, but it decreased all C pools in leaves, 1-year and current-year stems and the starch and total NSC pools in main stems. 5. We conclude that although browsing may cause a temporary decrease in C pools, B. pubescens trees are able to compensate for such losses and hence are not C-limited in the long-term.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Autoecology</subject><subject>Betula pubescens</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Browsing</subject><subject>clipping</subject><subject>Defoliation</subject><subject>downy birch</subject><subject>Forest ecology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>herbivores</subject><subject>herbivory</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>nitrogen</subject><subject>non-structural carbohydrates</subject><subject>Plant roots</subject><subject>Plant-Animal Interactions</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Saplings</subject><subject>Starches</subject><subject>Stems</subject><subject>storage</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0269-8463</issn><issn>1365-2435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMtKxDAUhoMoOF4eQexGd62nubVZuHAGbyC4UNchzZxIh047Ji3jvL2pFXFpNkn4L-fwEZLkkOXxXK2ynEmRUs5ERgHKDHLOWPa5R2a_wj6ZAZUqLblkh-QohBUAKEHpjIi577YBl8kc-6ExyWaoMFhsQ9J7xJAYj0nb9Yk1vuratKnXdY_LE3LgTBPw9Oc-Jm93t6-Lh_Tp-f5xcfOUWl4AG2cXUAoKy6VVKFlRIS9QYQngUChWAXJe2LIUSjnkleVOcSq4jX-QzrFjcjn1bnz3MWDo9bqO2zWNabEbgqbAJQieR2M5Ga3vQvDo9MbXa-N3Ogc9ctIrPeLQIw49ctLfnPRnjF78zDDBmsZ509o6_OYpSMmEEtF3Pfm2dYO7f_fru9vF-Ir5sym_Cn3n__TnnJYFj_r5pDvTafPu4w5vL1FlkAumJKXsCzokjDo</recordid><startdate>200810</startdate><enddate>200810</enddate><creator>Palacio, S.</creator><creator>Hester, A. J.</creator><creator>Maestro, M.</creator><creator>Millard, P.</creator><general>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>British Ecological Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200810</creationdate><title>Browsed Betula pubescens trees are not carbon-limited</title><author>Palacio, S. ; Hester, A. J. ; Maestro, M. ; Millard, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4703-243708520ddc9e637be47e9e800fe593b0e447c88599fe4bc4f94254c59906ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Autoecology</topic><topic>Betula pubescens</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Browsing</topic><topic>clipping</topic><topic>Defoliation</topic><topic>downy birch</topic><topic>Forest ecology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>herbivores</topic><topic>herbivory</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>nitrogen</topic><topic>non-structural carbohydrates</topic><topic>Plant roots</topic><topic>Plant-Animal Interactions</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Saplings</topic><topic>Starches</topic><topic>Stems</topic><topic>storage</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Palacio, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hester, A. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maestro, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millard, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Palacio, S.</au><au>Hester, A. J.</au><au>Maestro, M.</au><au>Millard, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Browsed Betula pubescens trees are not carbon-limited</atitle><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle><date>2008-10</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>808</spage><epage>815</epage><pages>808-815</pages><issn>0269-8463</issn><eissn>1365-2435</eissn><abstract>1. Slower growth after repetitive browsing of young trees has been attributed to a carbon (C) limitation, but data from long-term studies are lacking. To determine if repeated summer browsing causes a C (source) limitation in trees in the long-term, we analysed the non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) and nitrogen (N) concentrations and pools of Betula pubescens saplings subjected to different clipping treatments (unclipped, 33% and 66% shoot removal) for 7 years. 2. The short-term effect of browsing on C allocation was assessed by clipping trees with different browsing histories and analyzing their C and N responses within the same growing season. 3. Long-term repetitive summer browsing significantly decreased sapling growth and soluble sugar (SS) concentrations in fine roots. However, trees subjected to different browsing histories did not change their C partitioning into starch. Although trees with a different browsing history showed differences in the NSC concentrations and pools of leaves, these differences were not maintained through time. 4. Simulated browsing had no significant short-term effect on root C and N pools of birch trees, but it decreased all C pools in leaves, 1-year and current-year stems and the starch and total NSC pools in main stems. 5. We conclude that although browsing may cause a temporary decrease in C pools, B. pubescens trees are able to compensate for such losses and hence are not C-limited in the long-term.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01433.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-8463 |
ispartof | Functional ecology, 2008-10, Vol.22 (5), p.808-815 |
issn | 0269-8463 1365-2435 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20460541 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; JSTOR |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Autoecology Betula pubescens Biological and medical sciences Browsing clipping Defoliation downy birch Forest ecology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects herbivores herbivory Leaves nitrogen non-structural carbohydrates Plant roots Plant-Animal Interactions Plants Saplings Starches Stems storage Trees |
title | Browsed Betula pubescens trees are not carbon-limited |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T13%3A19%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Browsed%20Betula%20pubescens%20trees%20are%20not%20carbon-limited&rft.jtitle=Functional%20ecology&rft.au=Palacio,%20S.&rft.date=2008-10&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=808&rft.epage=815&rft.pages=808-815&rft.issn=0269-8463&rft.eissn=1365-2435&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01433.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20142874%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4703-243708520ddc9e637be47e9e800fe593b0e447c88599fe4bc4f94254c59906ff3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20460541&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=20142874&rfr_iscdi=true |