Loading…

Responses to Riparian Restoration in the Spring Creek Watershed, Central Pennsylvania

Riparian treatments, consisting of 3- to 4-m buffer strips, stream bank stabilization, and rock-lined stream crossings, were installed in two streams with livestock grazing to reduce sediment loading and stream bank erosion. Cedar Run and Slab Cabin Run, the treatment streams, and Spring Creek, an a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Restoration ecology 2007-12, Vol.15 (4), p.731-742
Main Authors: Carline, Robert F, Walsh, Mary C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4325-a1e6934b59a232909eebacc6126550d4ab9cb58e69ba070438e8c38313d976153
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4325-a1e6934b59a232909eebacc6126550d4ab9cb58e69ba070438e8c38313d976153
container_end_page 742
container_issue 4
container_start_page 731
container_title Restoration ecology
container_volume 15
creator Carline, Robert F
Walsh, Mary C
description Riparian treatments, consisting of 3- to 4-m buffer strips, stream bank stabilization, and rock-lined stream crossings, were installed in two streams with livestock grazing to reduce sediment loading and stream bank erosion. Cedar Run and Slab Cabin Run, the treatment streams, and Spring Creek, an adjacent reference stream without riparian grazing, were monitored prior to (1991-1992) and 3-5 years after (2001-2003) riparian buffer installation to assess channel morphology, stream substrate composition, suspended sediments, and macroinvertebrate communities. Few changes were found in channel widths and depths, but channel-structuring flow events were rare in the drought period after restoration. Stream bank vegetation increased from 50% or less to 100% in nearly all formerly grazed riparian buffers. The proportion of fine sediments in stream substrates decreased in Cedar Run but not in Slab Cabin Run. After riparian treatments, suspended sediments during base flow and storm flow decreased 47-87% in both streams. Macroinvertebrate diversity did not improve after restoration in either treated stream. Relative to Spring Creek, macroinvertebrate densities increased in both treated streams by the end of the posttreatment sampling period. Despite drought conditions that may have altered physical and biological effects of riparian treatments, goals of the riparian restoration to minimize erosion and sedimentation were met. A relatively narrow grass buffer along 2.4 km of each stream was effective in improving water quality, stream substrates, and some biological metrics.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00285.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20463031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1396631241</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4325-a1e6934b59a232909eebacc6126550d4ab9cb58e69ba070438e8c38313d976153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMFu1DAQhi0EEmXhGbA4cCJhbMeJI3FBUSlVK1htWRVxGTnZ2dbb1NnaWdh9e7wE9cAJXzzyfJ818zPGBeQinfebXGhZZgLgey4BqhxAGp3vn7CTx8bTVEMpMllX4jl7EeMGQGhj1AlbLihuBx8p8nHgC7e1wVnP0-s4BDu6wXPn-XhL_GobnL_hTSC649d2pBBvafWON-THYHs-J-_jof9pvbMv2bO17SO9-nvP2PLT6bfmc3b59ey8-XiZdYWSOrOCyloVra6tVLKGmqi1XVcKWWoNq8K2dddqk6DWQgWFMmQ6ZZRQq7oqhVYz9nb6dxuGh12aGe9d7KjvradhF1FCUSpI_Iy9-QfcDLvg02wohTIFqATOmJmgLgwxBlpjWvnehgMKwGPYuMFjpnjMFI9h45-wcZ_UD5P6y_V0-G8PF6dNKpKeTbqLI-0fdRvusKxUpfH6yxlezPUPmM8rVIl_PfFrO6C9CS7i8kqCUABGlVUK9TdwdpyQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>213840346</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Responses to Riparian Restoration in the Spring Creek Watershed, Central Pennsylvania</title><source>Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Carline, Robert F ; Walsh, Mary C</creator><creatorcontrib>Carline, Robert F ; Walsh, Mary C</creatorcontrib><description>Riparian treatments, consisting of 3- to 4-m buffer strips, stream bank stabilization, and rock-lined stream crossings, were installed in two streams with livestock grazing to reduce sediment loading and stream bank erosion. Cedar Run and Slab Cabin Run, the treatment streams, and Spring Creek, an adjacent reference stream without riparian grazing, were monitored prior to (1991-1992) and 3-5 years after (2001-2003) riparian buffer installation to assess channel morphology, stream substrate composition, suspended sediments, and macroinvertebrate communities. Few changes were found in channel widths and depths, but channel-structuring flow events were rare in the drought period after restoration. Stream bank vegetation increased from 50% or less to 100% in nearly all formerly grazed riparian buffers. The proportion of fine sediments in stream substrates decreased in Cedar Run but not in Slab Cabin Run. After riparian treatments, suspended sediments during base flow and storm flow decreased 47-87% in both streams. Macroinvertebrate diversity did not improve after restoration in either treated stream. Relative to Spring Creek, macroinvertebrate densities increased in both treated streams by the end of the posttreatment sampling period. Despite drought conditions that may have altered physical and biological effects of riparian treatments, goals of the riparian restoration to minimize erosion and sedimentation were met. A relatively narrow grass buffer along 2.4 km of each stream was effective in improving water quality, stream substrates, and some biological metrics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1061-2971</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-100X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00285.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Malden, USA : Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Creeks &amp; streams ; Environmental restoration ; Freshwater ; grazing ; macroinvertebrate communities ; restoration ; riparian ; Riparian ecology ; water quality</subject><ispartof>Restoration ecology, 2007-12, Vol.15 (4), p.731-742</ispartof><rights>2007 Society for Ecological Restoration International</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4325-a1e6934b59a232909eebacc6126550d4ab9cb58e69ba070438e8c38313d976153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4325-a1e6934b59a232909eebacc6126550d4ab9cb58e69ba070438e8c38313d976153</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carline, Robert F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Mary C</creatorcontrib><title>Responses to Riparian Restoration in the Spring Creek Watershed, Central Pennsylvania</title><title>Restoration ecology</title><description>Riparian treatments, consisting of 3- to 4-m buffer strips, stream bank stabilization, and rock-lined stream crossings, were installed in two streams with livestock grazing to reduce sediment loading and stream bank erosion. Cedar Run and Slab Cabin Run, the treatment streams, and Spring Creek, an adjacent reference stream without riparian grazing, were monitored prior to (1991-1992) and 3-5 years after (2001-2003) riparian buffer installation to assess channel morphology, stream substrate composition, suspended sediments, and macroinvertebrate communities. Few changes were found in channel widths and depths, but channel-structuring flow events were rare in the drought period after restoration. Stream bank vegetation increased from 50% or less to 100% in nearly all formerly grazed riparian buffers. The proportion of fine sediments in stream substrates decreased in Cedar Run but not in Slab Cabin Run. After riparian treatments, suspended sediments during base flow and storm flow decreased 47-87% in both streams. Macroinvertebrate diversity did not improve after restoration in either treated stream. Relative to Spring Creek, macroinvertebrate densities increased in both treated streams by the end of the posttreatment sampling period. Despite drought conditions that may have altered physical and biological effects of riparian treatments, goals of the riparian restoration to minimize erosion and sedimentation were met. A relatively narrow grass buffer along 2.4 km of each stream was effective in improving water quality, stream substrates, and some biological metrics.</description><subject>Creeks &amp; streams</subject><subject>Environmental restoration</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>grazing</subject><subject>macroinvertebrate communities</subject><subject>restoration</subject><subject>riparian</subject><subject>Riparian ecology</subject><subject>water quality</subject><issn>1061-2971</issn><issn>1526-100X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMFu1DAQhi0EEmXhGbA4cCJhbMeJI3FBUSlVK1htWRVxGTnZ2dbb1NnaWdh9e7wE9cAJXzzyfJ818zPGBeQinfebXGhZZgLgey4BqhxAGp3vn7CTx8bTVEMpMllX4jl7EeMGQGhj1AlbLihuBx8p8nHgC7e1wVnP0-s4BDu6wXPn-XhL_GobnL_hTSC649d2pBBvafWON-THYHs-J-_jof9pvbMv2bO17SO9-nvP2PLT6bfmc3b59ey8-XiZdYWSOrOCyloVra6tVLKGmqi1XVcKWWoNq8K2dddqk6DWQgWFMmQ6ZZRQq7oqhVYz9nb6dxuGh12aGe9d7KjvradhF1FCUSpI_Iy9-QfcDLvg02wohTIFqATOmJmgLgwxBlpjWvnehgMKwGPYuMFjpnjMFI9h45-wcZ_UD5P6y_V0-G8PF6dNKpKeTbqLI-0fdRvusKxUpfH6yxlezPUPmM8rVIl_PfFrO6C9CS7i8kqCUABGlVUK9TdwdpyQ</recordid><startdate>200712</startdate><enddate>200712</enddate><creator>Carline, Robert F</creator><creator>Walsh, Mary C</creator><general>Malden, USA : Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>H95</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200712</creationdate><title>Responses to Riparian Restoration in the Spring Creek Watershed, Central Pennsylvania</title><author>Carline, Robert F ; Walsh, Mary C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4325-a1e6934b59a232909eebacc6126550d4ab9cb58e69ba070438e8c38313d976153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Creeks &amp; streams</topic><topic>Environmental restoration</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>grazing</topic><topic>macroinvertebrate communities</topic><topic>restoration</topic><topic>riparian</topic><topic>Riparian ecology</topic><topic>water quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carline, Robert F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Mary C</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><jtitle>Restoration ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carline, Robert F</au><au>Walsh, Mary C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Responses to Riparian Restoration in the Spring Creek Watershed, Central Pennsylvania</atitle><jtitle>Restoration ecology</jtitle><date>2007-12</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>731</spage><epage>742</epage><pages>731-742</pages><issn>1061-2971</issn><eissn>1526-100X</eissn><abstract>Riparian treatments, consisting of 3- to 4-m buffer strips, stream bank stabilization, and rock-lined stream crossings, were installed in two streams with livestock grazing to reduce sediment loading and stream bank erosion. Cedar Run and Slab Cabin Run, the treatment streams, and Spring Creek, an adjacent reference stream without riparian grazing, were monitored prior to (1991-1992) and 3-5 years after (2001-2003) riparian buffer installation to assess channel morphology, stream substrate composition, suspended sediments, and macroinvertebrate communities. Few changes were found in channel widths and depths, but channel-structuring flow events were rare in the drought period after restoration. Stream bank vegetation increased from 50% or less to 100% in nearly all formerly grazed riparian buffers. The proportion of fine sediments in stream substrates decreased in Cedar Run but not in Slab Cabin Run. After riparian treatments, suspended sediments during base flow and storm flow decreased 47-87% in both streams. Macroinvertebrate diversity did not improve after restoration in either treated stream. Relative to Spring Creek, macroinvertebrate densities increased in both treated streams by the end of the posttreatment sampling period. Despite drought conditions that may have altered physical and biological effects of riparian treatments, goals of the riparian restoration to minimize erosion and sedimentation were met. A relatively narrow grass buffer along 2.4 km of each stream was effective in improving water quality, stream substrates, and some biological metrics.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Malden, USA : Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00285.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1061-2971
ispartof Restoration ecology, 2007-12, Vol.15 (4), p.731-742
issn 1061-2971
1526-100X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20463031
source Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)
subjects Creeks & streams
Environmental restoration
Freshwater
grazing
macroinvertebrate communities
restoration
riparian
Riparian ecology
water quality
title Responses to Riparian Restoration in the Spring Creek Watershed, Central Pennsylvania
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T23%3A42%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Responses%20to%20Riparian%20Restoration%20in%20the%20Spring%20Creek%20Watershed,%20Central%20Pennsylvania&rft.jtitle=Restoration%20ecology&rft.au=Carline,%20Robert%20F&rft.date=2007-12&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=731&rft.epage=742&rft.pages=731-742&rft.issn=1061-2971&rft.eissn=1526-100X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00285.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1396631241%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4325-a1e6934b59a232909eebacc6126550d4ab9cb58e69ba070438e8c38313d976153%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=213840346&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true