Loading…
Responses to Riparian Restoration in the Spring Creek Watershed, Central Pennsylvania
Riparian treatments, consisting of 3- to 4-m buffer strips, stream bank stabilization, and rock-lined stream crossings, were installed in two streams with livestock grazing to reduce sediment loading and stream bank erosion. Cedar Run and Slab Cabin Run, the treatment streams, and Spring Creek, an a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Restoration ecology 2007-12, Vol.15 (4), p.731-742 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4325-a1e6934b59a232909eebacc6126550d4ab9cb58e69ba070438e8c38313d976153 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4325-a1e6934b59a232909eebacc6126550d4ab9cb58e69ba070438e8c38313d976153 |
container_end_page | 742 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 731 |
container_title | Restoration ecology |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Carline, Robert F Walsh, Mary C |
description | Riparian treatments, consisting of 3- to 4-m buffer strips, stream bank stabilization, and rock-lined stream crossings, were installed in two streams with livestock grazing to reduce sediment loading and stream bank erosion. Cedar Run and Slab Cabin Run, the treatment streams, and Spring Creek, an adjacent reference stream without riparian grazing, were monitored prior to (1991-1992) and 3-5 years after (2001-2003) riparian buffer installation to assess channel morphology, stream substrate composition, suspended sediments, and macroinvertebrate communities. Few changes were found in channel widths and depths, but channel-structuring flow events were rare in the drought period after restoration. Stream bank vegetation increased from 50% or less to 100% in nearly all formerly grazed riparian buffers. The proportion of fine sediments in stream substrates decreased in Cedar Run but not in Slab Cabin Run. After riparian treatments, suspended sediments during base flow and storm flow decreased 47-87% in both streams. Macroinvertebrate diversity did not improve after restoration in either treated stream. Relative to Spring Creek, macroinvertebrate densities increased in both treated streams by the end of the posttreatment sampling period. Despite drought conditions that may have altered physical and biological effects of riparian treatments, goals of the riparian restoration to minimize erosion and sedimentation were met. A relatively narrow grass buffer along 2.4 km of each stream was effective in improving water quality, stream substrates, and some biological metrics. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00285.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20463031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1396631241</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4325-a1e6934b59a232909eebacc6126550d4ab9cb58e69ba070438e8c38313d976153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMFu1DAQhi0EEmXhGbA4cCJhbMeJI3FBUSlVK1htWRVxGTnZ2dbb1NnaWdh9e7wE9cAJXzzyfJ818zPGBeQinfebXGhZZgLgey4BqhxAGp3vn7CTx8bTVEMpMllX4jl7EeMGQGhj1AlbLihuBx8p8nHgC7e1wVnP0-s4BDu6wXPn-XhL_GobnL_hTSC649d2pBBvafWON-THYHs-J-_jof9pvbMv2bO17SO9-nvP2PLT6bfmc3b59ey8-XiZdYWSOrOCyloVra6tVLKGmqi1XVcKWWoNq8K2dddqk6DWQgWFMmQ6ZZRQq7oqhVYz9nb6dxuGh12aGe9d7KjvradhF1FCUSpI_Iy9-QfcDLvg02wohTIFqATOmJmgLgwxBlpjWvnehgMKwGPYuMFjpnjMFI9h45-wcZ_UD5P6y_V0-G8PF6dNKpKeTbqLI-0fdRvusKxUpfH6yxlezPUPmM8rVIl_PfFrO6C9CS7i8kqCUABGlVUK9TdwdpyQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>213840346</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Responses to Riparian Restoration in the Spring Creek Watershed, Central Pennsylvania</title><source>Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Carline, Robert F ; Walsh, Mary C</creator><creatorcontrib>Carline, Robert F ; Walsh, Mary C</creatorcontrib><description>Riparian treatments, consisting of 3- to 4-m buffer strips, stream bank stabilization, and rock-lined stream crossings, were installed in two streams with livestock grazing to reduce sediment loading and stream bank erosion. Cedar Run and Slab Cabin Run, the treatment streams, and Spring Creek, an adjacent reference stream without riparian grazing, were monitored prior to (1991-1992) and 3-5 years after (2001-2003) riparian buffer installation to assess channel morphology, stream substrate composition, suspended sediments, and macroinvertebrate communities. Few changes were found in channel widths and depths, but channel-structuring flow events were rare in the drought period after restoration. Stream bank vegetation increased from 50% or less to 100% in nearly all formerly grazed riparian buffers. The proportion of fine sediments in stream substrates decreased in Cedar Run but not in Slab Cabin Run. After riparian treatments, suspended sediments during base flow and storm flow decreased 47-87% in both streams. Macroinvertebrate diversity did not improve after restoration in either treated stream. Relative to Spring Creek, macroinvertebrate densities increased in both treated streams by the end of the posttreatment sampling period. Despite drought conditions that may have altered physical and biological effects of riparian treatments, goals of the riparian restoration to minimize erosion and sedimentation were met. A relatively narrow grass buffer along 2.4 km of each stream was effective in improving water quality, stream substrates, and some biological metrics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1061-2971</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-100X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00285.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Malden, USA : Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Creeks & streams ; Environmental restoration ; Freshwater ; grazing ; macroinvertebrate communities ; restoration ; riparian ; Riparian ecology ; water quality</subject><ispartof>Restoration ecology, 2007-12, Vol.15 (4), p.731-742</ispartof><rights>2007 Society for Ecological Restoration International</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4325-a1e6934b59a232909eebacc6126550d4ab9cb58e69ba070438e8c38313d976153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4325-a1e6934b59a232909eebacc6126550d4ab9cb58e69ba070438e8c38313d976153</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carline, Robert F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Mary C</creatorcontrib><title>Responses to Riparian Restoration in the Spring Creek Watershed, Central Pennsylvania</title><title>Restoration ecology</title><description>Riparian treatments, consisting of 3- to 4-m buffer strips, stream bank stabilization, and rock-lined stream crossings, were installed in two streams with livestock grazing to reduce sediment loading and stream bank erosion. Cedar Run and Slab Cabin Run, the treatment streams, and Spring Creek, an adjacent reference stream without riparian grazing, were monitored prior to (1991-1992) and 3-5 years after (2001-2003) riparian buffer installation to assess channel morphology, stream substrate composition, suspended sediments, and macroinvertebrate communities. Few changes were found in channel widths and depths, but channel-structuring flow events were rare in the drought period after restoration. Stream bank vegetation increased from 50% or less to 100% in nearly all formerly grazed riparian buffers. The proportion of fine sediments in stream substrates decreased in Cedar Run but not in Slab Cabin Run. After riparian treatments, suspended sediments during base flow and storm flow decreased 47-87% in both streams. Macroinvertebrate diversity did not improve after restoration in either treated stream. Relative to Spring Creek, macroinvertebrate densities increased in both treated streams by the end of the posttreatment sampling period. Despite drought conditions that may have altered physical and biological effects of riparian treatments, goals of the riparian restoration to minimize erosion and sedimentation were met. A relatively narrow grass buffer along 2.4 km of each stream was effective in improving water quality, stream substrates, and some biological metrics.</description><subject>Creeks & streams</subject><subject>Environmental restoration</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>grazing</subject><subject>macroinvertebrate communities</subject><subject>restoration</subject><subject>riparian</subject><subject>Riparian ecology</subject><subject>water quality</subject><issn>1061-2971</issn><issn>1526-100X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMFu1DAQhi0EEmXhGbA4cCJhbMeJI3FBUSlVK1htWRVxGTnZ2dbb1NnaWdh9e7wE9cAJXzzyfJ818zPGBeQinfebXGhZZgLgey4BqhxAGp3vn7CTx8bTVEMpMllX4jl7EeMGQGhj1AlbLihuBx8p8nHgC7e1wVnP0-s4BDu6wXPn-XhL_GobnL_hTSC649d2pBBvafWON-THYHs-J-_jof9pvbMv2bO17SO9-nvP2PLT6bfmc3b59ey8-XiZdYWSOrOCyloVra6tVLKGmqi1XVcKWWoNq8K2dddqk6DWQgWFMmQ6ZZRQq7oqhVYz9nb6dxuGh12aGe9d7KjvradhF1FCUSpI_Iy9-QfcDLvg02wohTIFqATOmJmgLgwxBlpjWvnehgMKwGPYuMFjpnjMFI9h45-wcZ_UD5P6y_V0-G8PF6dNKpKeTbqLI-0fdRvusKxUpfH6yxlezPUPmM8rVIl_PfFrO6C9CS7i8kqCUABGlVUK9TdwdpyQ</recordid><startdate>200712</startdate><enddate>200712</enddate><creator>Carline, Robert F</creator><creator>Walsh, Mary C</creator><general>Malden, USA : Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>H95</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200712</creationdate><title>Responses to Riparian Restoration in the Spring Creek Watershed, Central Pennsylvania</title><author>Carline, Robert F ; Walsh, Mary C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4325-a1e6934b59a232909eebacc6126550d4ab9cb58e69ba070438e8c38313d976153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Creeks & streams</topic><topic>Environmental restoration</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>grazing</topic><topic>macroinvertebrate communities</topic><topic>restoration</topic><topic>riparian</topic><topic>Riparian ecology</topic><topic>water quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carline, Robert F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Mary C</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><jtitle>Restoration ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carline, Robert F</au><au>Walsh, Mary C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Responses to Riparian Restoration in the Spring Creek Watershed, Central Pennsylvania</atitle><jtitle>Restoration ecology</jtitle><date>2007-12</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>731</spage><epage>742</epage><pages>731-742</pages><issn>1061-2971</issn><eissn>1526-100X</eissn><abstract>Riparian treatments, consisting of 3- to 4-m buffer strips, stream bank stabilization, and rock-lined stream crossings, were installed in two streams with livestock grazing to reduce sediment loading and stream bank erosion. Cedar Run and Slab Cabin Run, the treatment streams, and Spring Creek, an adjacent reference stream without riparian grazing, were monitored prior to (1991-1992) and 3-5 years after (2001-2003) riparian buffer installation to assess channel morphology, stream substrate composition, suspended sediments, and macroinvertebrate communities. Few changes were found in channel widths and depths, but channel-structuring flow events were rare in the drought period after restoration. Stream bank vegetation increased from 50% or less to 100% in nearly all formerly grazed riparian buffers. The proportion of fine sediments in stream substrates decreased in Cedar Run but not in Slab Cabin Run. After riparian treatments, suspended sediments during base flow and storm flow decreased 47-87% in both streams. Macroinvertebrate diversity did not improve after restoration in either treated stream. Relative to Spring Creek, macroinvertebrate densities increased in both treated streams by the end of the posttreatment sampling period. Despite drought conditions that may have altered physical and biological effects of riparian treatments, goals of the riparian restoration to minimize erosion and sedimentation were met. A relatively narrow grass buffer along 2.4 km of each stream was effective in improving water quality, stream substrates, and some biological metrics.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Malden, USA : Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00285.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1061-2971 |
ispartof | Restoration ecology, 2007-12, Vol.15 (4), p.731-742 |
issn | 1061-2971 1526-100X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20463031 |
source | Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list) |
subjects | Creeks & streams Environmental restoration Freshwater grazing macroinvertebrate communities restoration riparian Riparian ecology water quality |
title | Responses to Riparian Restoration in the Spring Creek Watershed, Central Pennsylvania |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T23%3A42%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Responses%20to%20Riparian%20Restoration%20in%20the%20Spring%20Creek%20Watershed,%20Central%20Pennsylvania&rft.jtitle=Restoration%20ecology&rft.au=Carline,%20Robert%20F&rft.date=2007-12&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=731&rft.epage=742&rft.pages=731-742&rft.issn=1061-2971&rft.eissn=1526-100X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00285.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1396631241%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4325-a1e6934b59a232909eebacc6126550d4ab9cb58e69ba070438e8c38313d976153%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=213840346&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |