Loading…
Sensory politics: The tug-of-war between potability and palatability in municipal water production
Sensory information signaled the acceptability of water for consumption for lay and professional people into the early twentieth century. Yet as the twentieth century progressed, professional efforts to standardize water-testing methods have increasingly excluded aesthetic information, preferring to...
Saved in:
Published in: | Social studies of science 2018-06, Vol.48 (3), p.350-371 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-79496c84887fed0aa10f5c2f3fd6bea046d24e1e78e8ce63b28623bc8eb6f0843 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-79496c84887fed0aa10f5c2f3fd6bea046d24e1e78e8ce63b28623bc8eb6f0843 |
container_end_page | 371 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 350 |
container_title | Social studies of science |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Spackman, Christy Burlingame, Gary A |
description | Sensory information signaled the acceptability of water for consumption for lay and professional people into the early twentieth century. Yet as the twentieth century progressed, professional efforts to standardize water-testing methods have increasingly excluded aesthetic information, preferring to rely on the objectivity of analytic information. Despite some highly publicized exceptions, consumer complaints remain peripheral to the making and regulating of drinking water. This exclusion is often attributed to the unreliability of the human senses in detecting danger. However, technical discussions among water professionals during the twentieth century suggest that this exclusion is actually due to sensory politics, the institutional and regulatory practices of inclusion or exclusion of sensory knowledge from systems of action. Water workers developed and turned to standardized analytical methods for detecting chemical and microbiological contaminants, and more recently sensory contaminants, a process that attempted to mitigate the unevenness of human sensing. In so doing, they created regimes of perception that categorized consumer sensory knowledge as aesthetic. By siloing consumers’ sensory knowledge about water quality into the realm of the aesthetic instead of accommodating it in the analytic, the regimes of perception implemented during the twentieth century to preserve health have marginalized subjective experiences. Discounting the human experience with municipal water as irrelevant to its quality, control and regulation is out of touch with its intended use as an ingestible, and calls for new practices that engage consumers as valuable participants. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0306312718778358 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2049937455</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48569079</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0306312718778358</sage_id><sourcerecordid>48569079</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-79496c84887fed0aa10f5c2f3fd6bea046d24e1e78e8ce63b28623bc8eb6f0843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1Lw0AQxRdRbK2CRy-K4MVLdPZ79ijFLyh4UM8h2UwkJW3qbnLof29KaoUePM3h_d57w2PsgsMd59begwQjubAcrUWp8YCNuTKQSKPdIRtv5GSjj9hJjHMAsFabYzYSDo1A1GN2_k7L2IT19aqpq7by8ZQdlVkd6Wx7J-zz6fFj-pLM3p5fpw-zxEu0bWKdcsajQrQlFZBlHErtRSnLwuSUgTKFUMTJIqEnI3PRN8rcI-WmBFRywm6H3FVovjuKbbqooqe6zpbUdDEVoJyTVmndozd76LzpwrL_rqeMNQhK8J6CgfKhiTFQma5CtcjCOuWQbtZK99fqLVfb4C5fULEz_M7TA8kAxOyL_lr_Cbwc-Hlsm7DLU6iNA-vkDysieCg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2067680421</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sensory politics: The tug-of-war between potability and palatability in municipal water production</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Spackman, Christy ; Burlingame, Gary A</creator><creatorcontrib>Spackman, Christy ; Burlingame, Gary A</creatorcontrib><description>Sensory information signaled the acceptability of water for consumption for lay and professional people into the early twentieth century. Yet as the twentieth century progressed, professional efforts to standardize water-testing methods have increasingly excluded aesthetic information, preferring to rely on the objectivity of analytic information. Despite some highly publicized exceptions, consumer complaints remain peripheral to the making and regulating of drinking water. This exclusion is often attributed to the unreliability of the human senses in detecting danger. However, technical discussions among water professionals during the twentieth century suggest that this exclusion is actually due to sensory politics, the institutional and regulatory practices of inclusion or exclusion of sensory knowledge from systems of action. Water workers developed and turned to standardized analytical methods for detecting chemical and microbiological contaminants, and more recently sensory contaminants, a process that attempted to mitigate the unevenness of human sensing. In so doing, they created regimes of perception that categorized consumer sensory knowledge as aesthetic. By siloing consumers’ sensory knowledge about water quality into the realm of the aesthetic instead of accommodating it in the analytic, the regimes of perception implemented during the twentieth century to preserve health have marginalized subjective experiences. Discounting the human experience with municipal water as irrelevant to its quality, control and regulation is out of touch with its intended use as an ingestible, and calls for new practices that engage consumers as valuable participants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-3127</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-3659</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0306312718778358</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29862885</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Sage Publications, Ltd</publisher><subject>20th century ; Analytical methods ; Chemical pollution ; Cities ; Complaints ; Consumers ; Consumption ; Contaminants ; Discounting ; Drinking water ; Exceptions ; Hazards ; Knowledge ; Marginality ; Mathematical analysis ; Municipal water ; Objectivity ; Occupational health ; Organic chemistry ; Palatability ; Perception ; Politics ; Professionals ; Sensory properties ; Sensory systems ; Subjective experiences ; Test procedures ; Unevenness ; Water quality ; Water supply ; Workers</subject><ispartof>Social studies of science, 2018-06, Vol.48 (3), p.350-371</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-79496c84887fed0aa10f5c2f3fd6bea046d24e1e78e8ce63b28623bc8eb6f0843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-79496c84887fed0aa10f5c2f3fd6bea046d24e1e78e8ce63b28623bc8eb6f0843</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6603-7653</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48569079$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48569079$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,33222,33773,58237,58470,79135</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29862885$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spackman, Christy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burlingame, Gary A</creatorcontrib><title>Sensory politics: The tug-of-war between potability and palatability in municipal water production</title><title>Social studies of science</title><addtitle>Soc Stud Sci</addtitle><description>Sensory information signaled the acceptability of water for consumption for lay and professional people into the early twentieth century. Yet as the twentieth century progressed, professional efforts to standardize water-testing methods have increasingly excluded aesthetic information, preferring to rely on the objectivity of analytic information. Despite some highly publicized exceptions, consumer complaints remain peripheral to the making and regulating of drinking water. This exclusion is often attributed to the unreliability of the human senses in detecting danger. However, technical discussions among water professionals during the twentieth century suggest that this exclusion is actually due to sensory politics, the institutional and regulatory practices of inclusion or exclusion of sensory knowledge from systems of action. Water workers developed and turned to standardized analytical methods for detecting chemical and microbiological contaminants, and more recently sensory contaminants, a process that attempted to mitigate the unevenness of human sensing. In so doing, they created regimes of perception that categorized consumer sensory knowledge as aesthetic. By siloing consumers’ sensory knowledge about water quality into the realm of the aesthetic instead of accommodating it in the analytic, the regimes of perception implemented during the twentieth century to preserve health have marginalized subjective experiences. Discounting the human experience with municipal water as irrelevant to its quality, control and regulation is out of touch with its intended use as an ingestible, and calls for new practices that engage consumers as valuable participants.</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Analytical methods</subject><subject>Chemical pollution</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Complaints</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Discounting</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>Exceptions</subject><subject>Hazards</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Marginality</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Municipal water</subject><subject>Objectivity</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Palatability</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Sensory properties</subject><subject>Sensory systems</subject><subject>Subjective experiences</subject><subject>Test procedures</subject><subject>Unevenness</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>0306-3127</issn><issn>1460-3659</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1Lw0AQxRdRbK2CRy-K4MVLdPZ79ijFLyh4UM8h2UwkJW3qbnLof29KaoUePM3h_d57w2PsgsMd59begwQjubAcrUWp8YCNuTKQSKPdIRtv5GSjj9hJjHMAsFabYzYSDo1A1GN2_k7L2IT19aqpq7by8ZQdlVkd6Wx7J-zz6fFj-pLM3p5fpw-zxEu0bWKdcsajQrQlFZBlHErtRSnLwuSUgTKFUMTJIqEnI3PRN8rcI-WmBFRywm6H3FVovjuKbbqooqe6zpbUdDEVoJyTVmndozd76LzpwrL_rqeMNQhK8J6CgfKhiTFQma5CtcjCOuWQbtZK99fqLVfb4C5fULEz_M7TA8kAxOyL_lr_Cbwc-Hlsm7DLU6iNA-vkDysieCg</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Spackman, Christy</creator><creator>Burlingame, Gary A</creator><general>Sage Publications, Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6603-7653</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Sensory politics</title><author>Spackman, Christy ; Burlingame, Gary A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-79496c84887fed0aa10f5c2f3fd6bea046d24e1e78e8ce63b28623bc8eb6f0843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Analytical methods</topic><topic>Chemical pollution</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Complaints</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Discounting</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>Exceptions</topic><topic>Hazards</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Marginality</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Municipal water</topic><topic>Objectivity</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Palatability</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Sensory properties</topic><topic>Sensory systems</topic><topic>Subjective experiences</topic><topic>Test procedures</topic><topic>Unevenness</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spackman, Christy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burlingame, Gary A</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Social studies of science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spackman, Christy</au><au>Burlingame, Gary A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sensory politics: The tug-of-war between potability and palatability in municipal water production</atitle><jtitle>Social studies of science</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Stud Sci</addtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>350</spage><epage>371</epage><pages>350-371</pages><issn>0306-3127</issn><eissn>1460-3659</eissn><abstract>Sensory information signaled the acceptability of water for consumption for lay and professional people into the early twentieth century. Yet as the twentieth century progressed, professional efforts to standardize water-testing methods have increasingly excluded aesthetic information, preferring to rely on the objectivity of analytic information. Despite some highly publicized exceptions, consumer complaints remain peripheral to the making and regulating of drinking water. This exclusion is often attributed to the unreliability of the human senses in detecting danger. However, technical discussions among water professionals during the twentieth century suggest that this exclusion is actually due to sensory politics, the institutional and regulatory practices of inclusion or exclusion of sensory knowledge from systems of action. Water workers developed and turned to standardized analytical methods for detecting chemical and microbiological contaminants, and more recently sensory contaminants, a process that attempted to mitigate the unevenness of human sensing. In so doing, they created regimes of perception that categorized consumer sensory knowledge as aesthetic. By siloing consumers’ sensory knowledge about water quality into the realm of the aesthetic instead of accommodating it in the analytic, the regimes of perception implemented during the twentieth century to preserve health have marginalized subjective experiences. Discounting the human experience with municipal water as irrelevant to its quality, control and regulation is out of touch with its intended use as an ingestible, and calls for new practices that engage consumers as valuable participants.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Sage Publications, Ltd</pub><pmid>29862885</pmid><doi>10.1177/0306312718778358</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6603-7653</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0306-3127 |
ispartof | Social studies of science, 2018-06, Vol.48 (3), p.350-371 |
issn | 0306-3127 1460-3659 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2049937455 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE |
subjects | 20th century Analytical methods Chemical pollution Cities Complaints Consumers Consumption Contaminants Discounting Drinking water Exceptions Hazards Knowledge Marginality Mathematical analysis Municipal water Objectivity Occupational health Organic chemistry Palatability Perception Politics Professionals Sensory properties Sensory systems Subjective experiences Test procedures Unevenness Water quality Water supply Workers |
title | Sensory politics: The tug-of-war between potability and palatability in municipal water production |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T19%3A10%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sensory%20politics:%20The%20tug-of-war%20between%20potability%20and%20palatability%20in%20municipal%20water%20production&rft.jtitle=Social%20studies%20of%20science&rft.au=Spackman,%20Christy&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=350&rft.epage=371&rft.pages=350-371&rft.issn=0306-3127&rft.eissn=1460-3659&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0306312718778358&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48569079%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-79496c84887fed0aa10f5c2f3fd6bea046d24e1e78e8ce63b28623bc8eb6f0843%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2067680421&rft_id=info:pmid/29862885&rft_jstor_id=48569079&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0306312718778358&rfr_iscdi=true |