Loading…

Sensory politics: The tug-of-war between potability and palatability in municipal water production

Sensory information signaled the acceptability of water for consumption for lay and professional people into the early twentieth century. Yet as the twentieth century progressed, professional efforts to standardize water-testing methods have increasingly excluded aesthetic information, preferring to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Social studies of science 2018-06, Vol.48 (3), p.350-371
Main Authors: Spackman, Christy, Burlingame, Gary A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-79496c84887fed0aa10f5c2f3fd6bea046d24e1e78e8ce63b28623bc8eb6f0843
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-79496c84887fed0aa10f5c2f3fd6bea046d24e1e78e8ce63b28623bc8eb6f0843
container_end_page 371
container_issue 3
container_start_page 350
container_title Social studies of science
container_volume 48
creator Spackman, Christy
Burlingame, Gary A
description Sensory information signaled the acceptability of water for consumption for lay and professional people into the early twentieth century. Yet as the twentieth century progressed, professional efforts to standardize water-testing methods have increasingly excluded aesthetic information, preferring to rely on the objectivity of analytic information. Despite some highly publicized exceptions, consumer complaints remain peripheral to the making and regulating of drinking water. This exclusion is often attributed to the unreliability of the human senses in detecting danger. However, technical discussions among water professionals during the twentieth century suggest that this exclusion is actually due to sensory politics, the institutional and regulatory practices of inclusion or exclusion of sensory knowledge from systems of action. Water workers developed and turned to standardized analytical methods for detecting chemical and microbiological contaminants, and more recently sensory contaminants, a process that attempted to mitigate the unevenness of human sensing. In so doing, they created regimes of perception that categorized consumer sensory knowledge as aesthetic. By siloing consumers’ sensory knowledge about water quality into the realm of the aesthetic instead of accommodating it in the analytic, the regimes of perception implemented during the twentieth century to preserve health have marginalized subjective experiences. Discounting the human experience with municipal water as irrelevant to its quality, control and regulation is out of touch with its intended use as an ingestible, and calls for new practices that engage consumers as valuable participants.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0306312718778358
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2049937455</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48569079</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0306312718778358</sage_id><sourcerecordid>48569079</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-79496c84887fed0aa10f5c2f3fd6bea046d24e1e78e8ce63b28623bc8eb6f0843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1Lw0AQxRdRbK2CRy-K4MVLdPZ79ijFLyh4UM8h2UwkJW3qbnLof29KaoUePM3h_d57w2PsgsMd59begwQjubAcrUWp8YCNuTKQSKPdIRtv5GSjj9hJjHMAsFabYzYSDo1A1GN2_k7L2IT19aqpq7by8ZQdlVkd6Wx7J-zz6fFj-pLM3p5fpw-zxEu0bWKdcsajQrQlFZBlHErtRSnLwuSUgTKFUMTJIqEnI3PRN8rcI-WmBFRywm6H3FVovjuKbbqooqe6zpbUdDEVoJyTVmndozd76LzpwrL_rqeMNQhK8J6CgfKhiTFQma5CtcjCOuWQbtZK99fqLVfb4C5fULEz_M7TA8kAxOyL_lr_Cbwc-Hlsm7DLU6iNA-vkDysieCg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2067680421</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sensory politics: The tug-of-war between potability and palatability in municipal water production</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Spackman, Christy ; Burlingame, Gary A</creator><creatorcontrib>Spackman, Christy ; Burlingame, Gary A</creatorcontrib><description>Sensory information signaled the acceptability of water for consumption for lay and professional people into the early twentieth century. Yet as the twentieth century progressed, professional efforts to standardize water-testing methods have increasingly excluded aesthetic information, preferring to rely on the objectivity of analytic information. Despite some highly publicized exceptions, consumer complaints remain peripheral to the making and regulating of drinking water. This exclusion is often attributed to the unreliability of the human senses in detecting danger. However, technical discussions among water professionals during the twentieth century suggest that this exclusion is actually due to sensory politics, the institutional and regulatory practices of inclusion or exclusion of sensory knowledge from systems of action. Water workers developed and turned to standardized analytical methods for detecting chemical and microbiological contaminants, and more recently sensory contaminants, a process that attempted to mitigate the unevenness of human sensing. In so doing, they created regimes of perception that categorized consumer sensory knowledge as aesthetic. By siloing consumers’ sensory knowledge about water quality into the realm of the aesthetic instead of accommodating it in the analytic, the regimes of perception implemented during the twentieth century to preserve health have marginalized subjective experiences. Discounting the human experience with municipal water as irrelevant to its quality, control and regulation is out of touch with its intended use as an ingestible, and calls for new practices that engage consumers as valuable participants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-3127</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-3659</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0306312718778358</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29862885</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Sage Publications, Ltd</publisher><subject>20th century ; Analytical methods ; Chemical pollution ; Cities ; Complaints ; Consumers ; Consumption ; Contaminants ; Discounting ; Drinking water ; Exceptions ; Hazards ; Knowledge ; Marginality ; Mathematical analysis ; Municipal water ; Objectivity ; Occupational health ; Organic chemistry ; Palatability ; Perception ; Politics ; Professionals ; Sensory properties ; Sensory systems ; Subjective experiences ; Test procedures ; Unevenness ; Water quality ; Water supply ; Workers</subject><ispartof>Social studies of science, 2018-06, Vol.48 (3), p.350-371</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-79496c84887fed0aa10f5c2f3fd6bea046d24e1e78e8ce63b28623bc8eb6f0843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-79496c84887fed0aa10f5c2f3fd6bea046d24e1e78e8ce63b28623bc8eb6f0843</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6603-7653</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48569079$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48569079$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,33222,33773,58237,58470,79135</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29862885$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spackman, Christy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burlingame, Gary A</creatorcontrib><title>Sensory politics: The tug-of-war between potability and palatability in municipal water production</title><title>Social studies of science</title><addtitle>Soc Stud Sci</addtitle><description>Sensory information signaled the acceptability of water for consumption for lay and professional people into the early twentieth century. Yet as the twentieth century progressed, professional efforts to standardize water-testing methods have increasingly excluded aesthetic information, preferring to rely on the objectivity of analytic information. Despite some highly publicized exceptions, consumer complaints remain peripheral to the making and regulating of drinking water. This exclusion is often attributed to the unreliability of the human senses in detecting danger. However, technical discussions among water professionals during the twentieth century suggest that this exclusion is actually due to sensory politics, the institutional and regulatory practices of inclusion or exclusion of sensory knowledge from systems of action. Water workers developed and turned to standardized analytical methods for detecting chemical and microbiological contaminants, and more recently sensory contaminants, a process that attempted to mitigate the unevenness of human sensing. In so doing, they created regimes of perception that categorized consumer sensory knowledge as aesthetic. By siloing consumers’ sensory knowledge about water quality into the realm of the aesthetic instead of accommodating it in the analytic, the regimes of perception implemented during the twentieth century to preserve health have marginalized subjective experiences. Discounting the human experience with municipal water as irrelevant to its quality, control and regulation is out of touch with its intended use as an ingestible, and calls for new practices that engage consumers as valuable participants.</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Analytical methods</subject><subject>Chemical pollution</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Complaints</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Discounting</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>Exceptions</subject><subject>Hazards</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Marginality</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Municipal water</subject><subject>Objectivity</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Palatability</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Sensory properties</subject><subject>Sensory systems</subject><subject>Subjective experiences</subject><subject>Test procedures</subject><subject>Unevenness</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>0306-3127</issn><issn>1460-3659</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1Lw0AQxRdRbK2CRy-K4MVLdPZ79ijFLyh4UM8h2UwkJW3qbnLof29KaoUePM3h_d57w2PsgsMd59begwQjubAcrUWp8YCNuTKQSKPdIRtv5GSjj9hJjHMAsFabYzYSDo1A1GN2_k7L2IT19aqpq7by8ZQdlVkd6Wx7J-zz6fFj-pLM3p5fpw-zxEu0bWKdcsajQrQlFZBlHErtRSnLwuSUgTKFUMTJIqEnI3PRN8rcI-WmBFRywm6H3FVovjuKbbqooqe6zpbUdDEVoJyTVmndozd76LzpwrL_rqeMNQhK8J6CgfKhiTFQma5CtcjCOuWQbtZK99fqLVfb4C5fULEz_M7TA8kAxOyL_lr_Cbwc-Hlsm7DLU6iNA-vkDysieCg</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Spackman, Christy</creator><creator>Burlingame, Gary A</creator><general>Sage Publications, Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6603-7653</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Sensory politics</title><author>Spackman, Christy ; Burlingame, Gary A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-79496c84887fed0aa10f5c2f3fd6bea046d24e1e78e8ce63b28623bc8eb6f0843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Analytical methods</topic><topic>Chemical pollution</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Complaints</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Discounting</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>Exceptions</topic><topic>Hazards</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Marginality</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Municipal water</topic><topic>Objectivity</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Palatability</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Sensory properties</topic><topic>Sensory systems</topic><topic>Subjective experiences</topic><topic>Test procedures</topic><topic>Unevenness</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spackman, Christy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burlingame, Gary A</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Social studies of science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spackman, Christy</au><au>Burlingame, Gary A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sensory politics: The tug-of-war between potability and palatability in municipal water production</atitle><jtitle>Social studies of science</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Stud Sci</addtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>350</spage><epage>371</epage><pages>350-371</pages><issn>0306-3127</issn><eissn>1460-3659</eissn><abstract>Sensory information signaled the acceptability of water for consumption for lay and professional people into the early twentieth century. Yet as the twentieth century progressed, professional efforts to standardize water-testing methods have increasingly excluded aesthetic information, preferring to rely on the objectivity of analytic information. Despite some highly publicized exceptions, consumer complaints remain peripheral to the making and regulating of drinking water. This exclusion is often attributed to the unreliability of the human senses in detecting danger. However, technical discussions among water professionals during the twentieth century suggest that this exclusion is actually due to sensory politics, the institutional and regulatory practices of inclusion or exclusion of sensory knowledge from systems of action. Water workers developed and turned to standardized analytical methods for detecting chemical and microbiological contaminants, and more recently sensory contaminants, a process that attempted to mitigate the unevenness of human sensing. In so doing, they created regimes of perception that categorized consumer sensory knowledge as aesthetic. By siloing consumers’ sensory knowledge about water quality into the realm of the aesthetic instead of accommodating it in the analytic, the regimes of perception implemented during the twentieth century to preserve health have marginalized subjective experiences. Discounting the human experience with municipal water as irrelevant to its quality, control and regulation is out of touch with its intended use as an ingestible, and calls for new practices that engage consumers as valuable participants.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Sage Publications, Ltd</pub><pmid>29862885</pmid><doi>10.1177/0306312718778358</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6603-7653</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0306-3127
ispartof Social studies of science, 2018-06, Vol.48 (3), p.350-371
issn 0306-3127
1460-3659
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2049937455
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE
subjects 20th century
Analytical methods
Chemical pollution
Cities
Complaints
Consumers
Consumption
Contaminants
Discounting
Drinking water
Exceptions
Hazards
Knowledge
Marginality
Mathematical analysis
Municipal water
Objectivity
Occupational health
Organic chemistry
Palatability
Perception
Politics
Professionals
Sensory properties
Sensory systems
Subjective experiences
Test procedures
Unevenness
Water quality
Water supply
Workers
title Sensory politics: The tug-of-war between potability and palatability in municipal water production
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T19%3A10%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sensory%20politics:%20The%20tug-of-war%20between%20potability%20and%20palatability%20in%20municipal%20water%20production&rft.jtitle=Social%20studies%20of%20science&rft.au=Spackman,%20Christy&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=350&rft.epage=371&rft.pages=350-371&rft.issn=0306-3127&rft.eissn=1460-3659&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0306312718778358&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48569079%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-79496c84887fed0aa10f5c2f3fd6bea046d24e1e78e8ce63b28623bc8eb6f0843%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2067680421&rft_id=info:pmid/29862885&rft_jstor_id=48569079&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0306312718778358&rfr_iscdi=true