Loading…

Is there a clinical application for tablet-based automated audiometry in children?

Recent research supports the clinical use of automated audiometry for pediatric hearing screenings. However, very few studies have tested whether tablet-based automated audiometry can offer a valid alternative to traditional manual audiometry for estimation of hearing thresholds in children. This st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology 2018-07, Vol.110, p.87-92
Main Authors: Pereira, Olivia, Pasko, Lauren E., Supinski, Jenna, Hammond, Mackenzie, Morlet, Thierry, Nagao, Kyoko
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-eb54996f391ea468b7d6fec873a6ebc88129f12c2c853cd8c3c51778f9ccb8d63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-eb54996f391ea468b7d6fec873a6ebc88129f12c2c853cd8c3c51778f9ccb8d63
container_end_page 92
container_issue
container_start_page 87
container_title International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology
container_volume 110
creator Pereira, Olivia
Pasko, Lauren E.
Supinski, Jenna
Hammond, Mackenzie
Morlet, Thierry
Nagao, Kyoko
description Recent research supports the clinical use of automated audiometry for pediatric hearing screenings. However, very few studies have tested whether tablet-based automated audiometry can offer a valid alternative to traditional manual audiometry for estimation of hearing thresholds in children. This study examined the validity and efficiency of automated audiometry in school-aged children. Hearing thresholds for 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 kHz were collected in 32 children ages 6–12 years using standard audiometry and tablet-based automated audiometry in a soundproof booth. Test administration time, test preference, and medical history were also collected. Results exhibited that the majority (67%) of threshold differences between automated and standard were within the clinically acceptable range (10 dB). The threshold difference between the two tests showed that automated audiometry thresholds were higher by 12 dB in 6-year-olds, 7 dB in 7- to 9-year-olds, and 3 dB in 10- to 12-year-olds. In addition, test administration times were similar, such that standard audiometry took an average of 12.3 min and automated audiometry took 11.9 min. These results support the use of tablet-based automated audiometry in children from ages 7–12 years. However, the results suggest that the clinical use of at least some types of tablet-based automated audiometry may not be feasible in children 6 years of age.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.04.029
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2049938239</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165587618302027</els_id><sourcerecordid>2049938239</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-eb54996f391ea468b7d6fec873a6ebc88129f12c2c853cd8c3c51778f9ccb8d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFq3DAQhkVpaTZp36AEHXOxK8m2LF1aSmiTQKBQ2rOQR2OiRbYcSVvI20fpJjmWOcwcvn-G-Qj5xFnLGZef963fbzGFVjCuWta3TOg3ZMfVKBrVy_4t2VVsaAY1yhNymvOeMT6yYXhPToRWg661I79uMi13mJBaCsGvHmygdttCHYqPK51josVOAUsz2YyO2kOJiy3_JufjgiU9UL9SuPPBJVy_fiDvZhsyfnzuZ-TPj--_L6-b259XN5ffbhvopCgNTkOvtZw7zdH2Uk2jkzOCGjsrcQKluNAzFyBADR04BR0MfBzVrAEm5WR3Ri6Oe7cU7w-Yi1l8BgzBrhgP2QhW93dKdLqi_RGFFHNOOJst-cWmB8OZebJp9uZo0zzZNKw31WaNnT9fOEwLutfQi74KfDkCWP_86zGZDB5XQOcTQjEu-v9feAQs6oji</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2049938239</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is there a clinical application for tablet-based automated audiometry in children?</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Pereira, Olivia ; Pasko, Lauren E. ; Supinski, Jenna ; Hammond, Mackenzie ; Morlet, Thierry ; Nagao, Kyoko</creator><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Olivia ; Pasko, Lauren E. ; Supinski, Jenna ; Hammond, Mackenzie ; Morlet, Thierry ; Nagao, Kyoko</creatorcontrib><description>Recent research supports the clinical use of automated audiometry for pediatric hearing screenings. However, very few studies have tested whether tablet-based automated audiometry can offer a valid alternative to traditional manual audiometry for estimation of hearing thresholds in children. This study examined the validity and efficiency of automated audiometry in school-aged children. Hearing thresholds for 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 kHz were collected in 32 children ages 6–12 years using standard audiometry and tablet-based automated audiometry in a soundproof booth. Test administration time, test preference, and medical history were also collected. Results exhibited that the majority (67%) of threshold differences between automated and standard were within the clinically acceptable range (10 dB). The threshold difference between the two tests showed that automated audiometry thresholds were higher by 12 dB in 6-year-olds, 7 dB in 7- to 9-year-olds, and 3 dB in 10- to 12-year-olds. In addition, test administration times were similar, such that standard audiometry took an average of 12.3 min and automated audiometry took 11.9 min. These results support the use of tablet-based automated audiometry in children from ages 7–12 years. However, the results suggest that the clinical use of at least some types of tablet-based automated audiometry may not be feasible in children 6 years of age.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-5876</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.04.029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29859595</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Audiometry, Pure-Tone - instrumentation ; Audiometry, Pure-Tone - methods ; Auditory Threshold ; Child ; Children ; Computers, Handheld ; Female ; Hearing ; Hearing Disorders - diagnosis ; Hearing loss ; Hearing screening ; Humans ; Male ; Mobile Applications ; Pure tone audiogram ; Tablet-based audiometry ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 2018-07, Vol.110, p.87-92</ispartof><rights>2018</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-eb54996f391ea468b7d6fec873a6ebc88129f12c2c853cd8c3c51778f9ccb8d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-eb54996f391ea468b7d6fec873a6ebc88129f12c2c853cd8c3c51778f9ccb8d63</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0917-6603</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29859595$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Olivia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasko, Lauren E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Supinski, Jenna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammond, Mackenzie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morlet, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagao, Kyoko</creatorcontrib><title>Is there a clinical application for tablet-based automated audiometry in children?</title><title>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology</title><addtitle>Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><description>Recent research supports the clinical use of automated audiometry for pediatric hearing screenings. However, very few studies have tested whether tablet-based automated audiometry can offer a valid alternative to traditional manual audiometry for estimation of hearing thresholds in children. This study examined the validity and efficiency of automated audiometry in school-aged children. Hearing thresholds for 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 kHz were collected in 32 children ages 6–12 years using standard audiometry and tablet-based automated audiometry in a soundproof booth. Test administration time, test preference, and medical history were also collected. Results exhibited that the majority (67%) of threshold differences between automated and standard were within the clinically acceptable range (10 dB). The threshold difference between the two tests showed that automated audiometry thresholds were higher by 12 dB in 6-year-olds, 7 dB in 7- to 9-year-olds, and 3 dB in 10- to 12-year-olds. In addition, test administration times were similar, such that standard audiometry took an average of 12.3 min and automated audiometry took 11.9 min. These results support the use of tablet-based automated audiometry in children from ages 7–12 years. However, the results suggest that the clinical use of at least some types of tablet-based automated audiometry may not be feasible in children 6 years of age.</description><subject>Audiometry, Pure-Tone - instrumentation</subject><subject>Audiometry, Pure-Tone - methods</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Computers, Handheld</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Hearing Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hearing loss</subject><subject>Hearing screening</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mobile Applications</subject><subject>Pure tone audiogram</subject><subject>Tablet-based audiometry</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0165-5876</issn><issn>1872-8464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFq3DAQhkVpaTZp36AEHXOxK8m2LF1aSmiTQKBQ2rOQR2OiRbYcSVvI20fpJjmWOcwcvn-G-Qj5xFnLGZef963fbzGFVjCuWta3TOg3ZMfVKBrVy_4t2VVsaAY1yhNymvOeMT6yYXhPToRWg661I79uMi13mJBaCsGvHmygdttCHYqPK51josVOAUsz2YyO2kOJiy3_JufjgiU9UL9SuPPBJVy_fiDvZhsyfnzuZ-TPj--_L6-b259XN5ffbhvopCgNTkOvtZw7zdH2Uk2jkzOCGjsrcQKluNAzFyBADR04BR0MfBzVrAEm5WR3Ri6Oe7cU7w-Yi1l8BgzBrhgP2QhW93dKdLqi_RGFFHNOOJst-cWmB8OZebJp9uZo0zzZNKw31WaNnT9fOEwLutfQi74KfDkCWP_86zGZDB5XQOcTQjEu-v9feAQs6oji</recordid><startdate>201807</startdate><enddate>201807</enddate><creator>Pereira, Olivia</creator><creator>Pasko, Lauren E.</creator><creator>Supinski, Jenna</creator><creator>Hammond, Mackenzie</creator><creator>Morlet, Thierry</creator><creator>Nagao, Kyoko</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0917-6603</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201807</creationdate><title>Is there a clinical application for tablet-based automated audiometry in children?</title><author>Pereira, Olivia ; Pasko, Lauren E. ; Supinski, Jenna ; Hammond, Mackenzie ; Morlet, Thierry ; Nagao, Kyoko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-eb54996f391ea468b7d6fec873a6ebc88129f12c2c853cd8c3c51778f9ccb8d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Audiometry, Pure-Tone - instrumentation</topic><topic>Audiometry, Pure-Tone - methods</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Computers, Handheld</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Hearing Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hearing loss</topic><topic>Hearing screening</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mobile Applications</topic><topic>Pure tone audiogram</topic><topic>Tablet-based audiometry</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Olivia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasko, Lauren E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Supinski, Jenna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammond, Mackenzie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morlet, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagao, Kyoko</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pereira, Olivia</au><au>Pasko, Lauren E.</au><au>Supinski, Jenna</au><au>Hammond, Mackenzie</au><au>Morlet, Thierry</au><au>Nagao, Kyoko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is there a clinical application for tablet-based automated audiometry in children?</atitle><jtitle>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><date>2018-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>110</volume><spage>87</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>87-92</pages><issn>0165-5876</issn><eissn>1872-8464</eissn><abstract>Recent research supports the clinical use of automated audiometry for pediatric hearing screenings. However, very few studies have tested whether tablet-based automated audiometry can offer a valid alternative to traditional manual audiometry for estimation of hearing thresholds in children. This study examined the validity and efficiency of automated audiometry in school-aged children. Hearing thresholds for 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 kHz were collected in 32 children ages 6–12 years using standard audiometry and tablet-based automated audiometry in a soundproof booth. Test administration time, test preference, and medical history were also collected. Results exhibited that the majority (67%) of threshold differences between automated and standard were within the clinically acceptable range (10 dB). The threshold difference between the two tests showed that automated audiometry thresholds were higher by 12 dB in 6-year-olds, 7 dB in 7- to 9-year-olds, and 3 dB in 10- to 12-year-olds. In addition, test administration times were similar, such that standard audiometry took an average of 12.3 min and automated audiometry took 11.9 min. These results support the use of tablet-based automated audiometry in children from ages 7–12 years. However, the results suggest that the clinical use of at least some types of tablet-based automated audiometry may not be feasible in children 6 years of age.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>29859595</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.04.029</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0917-6603</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-5876
ispartof International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 2018-07, Vol.110, p.87-92
issn 0165-5876
1872-8464
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2049938239
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Audiometry, Pure-Tone - instrumentation
Audiometry, Pure-Tone - methods
Auditory Threshold
Child
Children
Computers, Handheld
Female
Hearing
Hearing Disorders - diagnosis
Hearing loss
Hearing screening
Humans
Male
Mobile Applications
Pure tone audiogram
Tablet-based audiometry
Time Factors
title Is there a clinical application for tablet-based automated audiometry in children?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T22%3A33%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20there%20a%20clinical%20application%20for%20tablet-based%20automated%20audiometry%20in%20children?&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20pediatric%20otorhinolaryngology&rft.au=Pereira,%20Olivia&rft.date=2018-07&rft.volume=110&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=87-92&rft.issn=0165-5876&rft.eissn=1872-8464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.04.029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2049938239%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-eb54996f391ea468b7d6fec873a6ebc88129f12c2c853cd8c3c51778f9ccb8d63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2049938239&rft_id=info:pmid/29859595&rfr_iscdi=true