Loading…
Is there a clinical application for tablet-based automated audiometry in children?
Recent research supports the clinical use of automated audiometry for pediatric hearing screenings. However, very few studies have tested whether tablet-based automated audiometry can offer a valid alternative to traditional manual audiometry for estimation of hearing thresholds in children. This st...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology 2018-07, Vol.110, p.87-92 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-eb54996f391ea468b7d6fec873a6ebc88129f12c2c853cd8c3c51778f9ccb8d63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-eb54996f391ea468b7d6fec873a6ebc88129f12c2c853cd8c3c51778f9ccb8d63 |
container_end_page | 92 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 87 |
container_title | International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology |
container_volume | 110 |
creator | Pereira, Olivia Pasko, Lauren E. Supinski, Jenna Hammond, Mackenzie Morlet, Thierry Nagao, Kyoko |
description | Recent research supports the clinical use of automated audiometry for pediatric hearing screenings. However, very few studies have tested whether tablet-based automated audiometry can offer a valid alternative to traditional manual audiometry for estimation of hearing thresholds in children. This study examined the validity and efficiency of automated audiometry in school-aged children.
Hearing thresholds for 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 kHz were collected in 32 children ages 6–12 years using standard audiometry and tablet-based automated audiometry in a soundproof booth. Test administration time, test preference, and medical history were also collected.
Results exhibited that the majority (67%) of threshold differences between automated and standard were within the clinically acceptable range (10 dB). The threshold difference between the two tests showed that automated audiometry thresholds were higher by 12 dB in 6-year-olds, 7 dB in 7- to 9-year-olds, and 3 dB in 10- to 12-year-olds. In addition, test administration times were similar, such that standard audiometry took an average of 12.3 min and automated audiometry took 11.9 min.
These results support the use of tablet-based automated audiometry in children from ages 7–12 years. However, the results suggest that the clinical use of at least some types of tablet-based automated audiometry may not be feasible in children 6 years of age. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.04.029 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2049938239</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165587618302027</els_id><sourcerecordid>2049938239</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-eb54996f391ea468b7d6fec873a6ebc88129f12c2c853cd8c3c51778f9ccb8d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFq3DAQhkVpaTZp36AEHXOxK8m2LF1aSmiTQKBQ2rOQR2OiRbYcSVvI20fpJjmWOcwcvn-G-Qj5xFnLGZef963fbzGFVjCuWta3TOg3ZMfVKBrVy_4t2VVsaAY1yhNymvOeMT6yYXhPToRWg661I79uMi13mJBaCsGvHmygdttCHYqPK51josVOAUsz2YyO2kOJiy3_JufjgiU9UL9SuPPBJVy_fiDvZhsyfnzuZ-TPj--_L6-b259XN5ffbhvopCgNTkOvtZw7zdH2Uk2jkzOCGjsrcQKluNAzFyBADR04BR0MfBzVrAEm5WR3Ri6Oe7cU7w-Yi1l8BgzBrhgP2QhW93dKdLqi_RGFFHNOOJst-cWmB8OZebJp9uZo0zzZNKw31WaNnT9fOEwLutfQi74KfDkCWP_86zGZDB5XQOcTQjEu-v9feAQs6oji</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2049938239</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is there a clinical application for tablet-based automated audiometry in children?</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Pereira, Olivia ; Pasko, Lauren E. ; Supinski, Jenna ; Hammond, Mackenzie ; Morlet, Thierry ; Nagao, Kyoko</creator><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Olivia ; Pasko, Lauren E. ; Supinski, Jenna ; Hammond, Mackenzie ; Morlet, Thierry ; Nagao, Kyoko</creatorcontrib><description>Recent research supports the clinical use of automated audiometry for pediatric hearing screenings. However, very few studies have tested whether tablet-based automated audiometry can offer a valid alternative to traditional manual audiometry for estimation of hearing thresholds in children. This study examined the validity and efficiency of automated audiometry in school-aged children.
Hearing thresholds for 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 kHz were collected in 32 children ages 6–12 years using standard audiometry and tablet-based automated audiometry in a soundproof booth. Test administration time, test preference, and medical history were also collected.
Results exhibited that the majority (67%) of threshold differences between automated and standard were within the clinically acceptable range (10 dB). The threshold difference between the two tests showed that automated audiometry thresholds were higher by 12 dB in 6-year-olds, 7 dB in 7- to 9-year-olds, and 3 dB in 10- to 12-year-olds. In addition, test administration times were similar, such that standard audiometry took an average of 12.3 min and automated audiometry took 11.9 min.
These results support the use of tablet-based automated audiometry in children from ages 7–12 years. However, the results suggest that the clinical use of at least some types of tablet-based automated audiometry may not be feasible in children 6 years of age.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-5876</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.04.029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29859595</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Audiometry, Pure-Tone - instrumentation ; Audiometry, Pure-Tone - methods ; Auditory Threshold ; Child ; Children ; Computers, Handheld ; Female ; Hearing ; Hearing Disorders - diagnosis ; Hearing loss ; Hearing screening ; Humans ; Male ; Mobile Applications ; Pure tone audiogram ; Tablet-based audiometry ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 2018-07, Vol.110, p.87-92</ispartof><rights>2018</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-eb54996f391ea468b7d6fec873a6ebc88129f12c2c853cd8c3c51778f9ccb8d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-eb54996f391ea468b7d6fec873a6ebc88129f12c2c853cd8c3c51778f9ccb8d63</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0917-6603</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29859595$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Olivia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasko, Lauren E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Supinski, Jenna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammond, Mackenzie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morlet, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagao, Kyoko</creatorcontrib><title>Is there a clinical application for tablet-based automated audiometry in children?</title><title>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology</title><addtitle>Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><description>Recent research supports the clinical use of automated audiometry for pediatric hearing screenings. However, very few studies have tested whether tablet-based automated audiometry can offer a valid alternative to traditional manual audiometry for estimation of hearing thresholds in children. This study examined the validity and efficiency of automated audiometry in school-aged children.
Hearing thresholds for 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 kHz were collected in 32 children ages 6–12 years using standard audiometry and tablet-based automated audiometry in a soundproof booth. Test administration time, test preference, and medical history were also collected.
Results exhibited that the majority (67%) of threshold differences between automated and standard were within the clinically acceptable range (10 dB). The threshold difference between the two tests showed that automated audiometry thresholds were higher by 12 dB in 6-year-olds, 7 dB in 7- to 9-year-olds, and 3 dB in 10- to 12-year-olds. In addition, test administration times were similar, such that standard audiometry took an average of 12.3 min and automated audiometry took 11.9 min.
These results support the use of tablet-based automated audiometry in children from ages 7–12 years. However, the results suggest that the clinical use of at least some types of tablet-based automated audiometry may not be feasible in children 6 years of age.</description><subject>Audiometry, Pure-Tone - instrumentation</subject><subject>Audiometry, Pure-Tone - methods</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Computers, Handheld</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Hearing Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hearing loss</subject><subject>Hearing screening</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mobile Applications</subject><subject>Pure tone audiogram</subject><subject>Tablet-based audiometry</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0165-5876</issn><issn>1872-8464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFq3DAQhkVpaTZp36AEHXOxK8m2LF1aSmiTQKBQ2rOQR2OiRbYcSVvI20fpJjmWOcwcvn-G-Qj5xFnLGZef963fbzGFVjCuWta3TOg3ZMfVKBrVy_4t2VVsaAY1yhNymvOeMT6yYXhPToRWg661I79uMi13mJBaCsGvHmygdttCHYqPK51josVOAUsz2YyO2kOJiy3_JufjgiU9UL9SuPPBJVy_fiDvZhsyfnzuZ-TPj--_L6-b259XN5ffbhvopCgNTkOvtZw7zdH2Uk2jkzOCGjsrcQKluNAzFyBADR04BR0MfBzVrAEm5WR3Ri6Oe7cU7w-Yi1l8BgzBrhgP2QhW93dKdLqi_RGFFHNOOJst-cWmB8OZebJp9uZo0zzZNKw31WaNnT9fOEwLutfQi74KfDkCWP_86zGZDB5XQOcTQjEu-v9feAQs6oji</recordid><startdate>201807</startdate><enddate>201807</enddate><creator>Pereira, Olivia</creator><creator>Pasko, Lauren E.</creator><creator>Supinski, Jenna</creator><creator>Hammond, Mackenzie</creator><creator>Morlet, Thierry</creator><creator>Nagao, Kyoko</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0917-6603</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201807</creationdate><title>Is there a clinical application for tablet-based automated audiometry in children?</title><author>Pereira, Olivia ; Pasko, Lauren E. ; Supinski, Jenna ; Hammond, Mackenzie ; Morlet, Thierry ; Nagao, Kyoko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-eb54996f391ea468b7d6fec873a6ebc88129f12c2c853cd8c3c51778f9ccb8d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Audiometry, Pure-Tone - instrumentation</topic><topic>Audiometry, Pure-Tone - methods</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Computers, Handheld</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Hearing Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hearing loss</topic><topic>Hearing screening</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mobile Applications</topic><topic>Pure tone audiogram</topic><topic>Tablet-based audiometry</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Olivia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasko, Lauren E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Supinski, Jenna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammond, Mackenzie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morlet, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagao, Kyoko</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pereira, Olivia</au><au>Pasko, Lauren E.</au><au>Supinski, Jenna</au><au>Hammond, Mackenzie</au><au>Morlet, Thierry</au><au>Nagao, Kyoko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is there a clinical application for tablet-based automated audiometry in children?</atitle><jtitle>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><date>2018-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>110</volume><spage>87</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>87-92</pages><issn>0165-5876</issn><eissn>1872-8464</eissn><abstract>Recent research supports the clinical use of automated audiometry for pediatric hearing screenings. However, very few studies have tested whether tablet-based automated audiometry can offer a valid alternative to traditional manual audiometry for estimation of hearing thresholds in children. This study examined the validity and efficiency of automated audiometry in school-aged children.
Hearing thresholds for 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 kHz were collected in 32 children ages 6–12 years using standard audiometry and tablet-based automated audiometry in a soundproof booth. Test administration time, test preference, and medical history were also collected.
Results exhibited that the majority (67%) of threshold differences between automated and standard were within the clinically acceptable range (10 dB). The threshold difference between the two tests showed that automated audiometry thresholds were higher by 12 dB in 6-year-olds, 7 dB in 7- to 9-year-olds, and 3 dB in 10- to 12-year-olds. In addition, test administration times were similar, such that standard audiometry took an average of 12.3 min and automated audiometry took 11.9 min.
These results support the use of tablet-based automated audiometry in children from ages 7–12 years. However, the results suggest that the clinical use of at least some types of tablet-based automated audiometry may not be feasible in children 6 years of age.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>29859595</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.04.029</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0917-6603</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-5876 |
ispartof | International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 2018-07, Vol.110, p.87-92 |
issn | 0165-5876 1872-8464 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2049938239 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Audiometry, Pure-Tone - instrumentation Audiometry, Pure-Tone - methods Auditory Threshold Child Children Computers, Handheld Female Hearing Hearing Disorders - diagnosis Hearing loss Hearing screening Humans Male Mobile Applications Pure tone audiogram Tablet-based audiometry Time Factors |
title | Is there a clinical application for tablet-based automated audiometry in children? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T22%3A33%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20there%20a%20clinical%20application%20for%20tablet-based%20automated%20audiometry%20in%20children?&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20pediatric%20otorhinolaryngology&rft.au=Pereira,%20Olivia&rft.date=2018-07&rft.volume=110&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=87-92&rft.issn=0165-5876&rft.eissn=1872-8464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.04.029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2049938239%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-eb54996f391ea468b7d6fec873a6ebc88129f12c2c853cd8c3c51778f9ccb8d63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2049938239&rft_id=info:pmid/29859595&rfr_iscdi=true |