Loading…

The development and use of a spatially explicit model for river otters to evaluate environmental hazards: a case study on the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site

The Department of Energy’s (DOE) Savannah River Site (SRS) faces a legacy of radionuclide and metal contamination from industrial processes that occurred throughout the site. Northern river otters ( Lontra canadensis ) are appropriate receptors for studying the effects of long-term, low-level contam...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental monitoring and assessment 2018-07, Vol.190 (7), p.374-31, Article 374
Main Authors: McCallen, Emily B., Gaines, Karen F., Novak, James M., Ruyle, Leslie E., Stephens, Warren L., Lawrence Bryan, A., Blas, Susan A., Serfass, Thomas L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e0fd4279b7b40450640f1c4a833817604af6ca2ab66b6766bfeb914c930dac0e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e0fd4279b7b40450640f1c4a833817604af6ca2ab66b6766bfeb914c930dac0e3
container_end_page 31
container_issue 7
container_start_page 374
container_title Environmental monitoring and assessment
container_volume 190
creator McCallen, Emily B.
Gaines, Karen F.
Novak, James M.
Ruyle, Leslie E.
Stephens, Warren L.
Lawrence Bryan, A.
Blas, Susan A.
Serfass, Thomas L.
description The Department of Energy’s (DOE) Savannah River Site (SRS) faces a legacy of radionuclide and metal contamination from industrial processes that occurred throughout the site. Northern river otters ( Lontra canadensis ) are appropriate receptors for studying the effects of long-term, low-level contamination because they are long-lived, higher trophic level organisms susceptible to accumulating high levels of pollutants. The purpose of this study was to use latrine surveys to examine patterns of wetland latrine usage; explicitly model northern river otter resource selection on the landscape level; and utilize the model results within an ecological risk assessment (ERA) framework to assess potential effects of metals and radiocesium ( 137 Cs) on the population for the SRS as a case study. River drainages and associated wetlands were surveyed for latrine sites and scats were collected and analyzed for 137 Cs activity to validate model results. The spatially explicit resource model predicted otter drainage reach use and was used in an ERA to develop exposure models for nine heavy metals as well as 137 Cs on the SRS population of river otters. The evaluation predicted that the only contaminant occurring at high enough levels to cause population effects was mercury and that the observed concentrations were probably not high enough to cause significant impairment. However, multiple metals were above action level thresholds. The field validation process showed an unexpected preference for one man-made treatment wetland that was heavily contaminated, showing that the ERA process is complex and must be approached using multiple scales.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10661-018-6752-x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2049941594</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2049941594</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e0fd4279b7b40450640f1c4a833817604af6ca2ab66b6766bfeb914c930dac0e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAURi0EotPCA7BBltiwCdiOY8fsUH8AqRISLevoJrnppHLsYDujGVa8Bq_AY_EkeDoFJCQ214t77vksfYQ84-wVZ0y_jpwpxQvG60LpShTbB2TFK10WwlTmIVkxrnShSmWOyHGMt4wxo6V5TI6EqRWrlF6RH9drpD1u0Pp5QpcouJ4uEakfKNA4QxrB2h3F7WzHbkx08j1aOvhAw7jBQH1KGCJNnuIG7AIJKbrNGLzb68DSNXyF0Mc3WddBFse09DvqHU05-QxnCOkuOAeeOww3u5_fvkd6BRtwDtb0013K1ZjwCXk0gI349P49IZ8vzq9P3xeXH999OH17WXSlFqlANvRSaNPqVjJZMSXZwDsJdVnWXCsmYVAdCGiVapXOY8DWcNmZkvXQMSxPyMuDdw7-y4IxNdMYO7QWHPolNoJJYySvjMzoi3_QW78El3-3p-ra1KIUmeIHqgs-xoBDM4dxgrBrOGv2RTaHIptcZLMvstnmm-f35qWdsP9z8bu5DIgDEPPK3WD4G_1_6y8fAqzB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2048898232</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The development and use of a spatially explicit model for river otters to evaluate environmental hazards: a case study on the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>McCallen, Emily B. ; Gaines, Karen F. ; Novak, James M. ; Ruyle, Leslie E. ; Stephens, Warren L. ; Lawrence Bryan, A. ; Blas, Susan A. ; Serfass, Thomas L.</creator><creatorcontrib>McCallen, Emily B. ; Gaines, Karen F. ; Novak, James M. ; Ruyle, Leslie E. ; Stephens, Warren L. ; Lawrence Bryan, A. ; Blas, Susan A. ; Serfass, Thomas L.</creatorcontrib><description>The Department of Energy’s (DOE) Savannah River Site (SRS) faces a legacy of radionuclide and metal contamination from industrial processes that occurred throughout the site. Northern river otters ( Lontra canadensis ) are appropriate receptors for studying the effects of long-term, low-level contamination because they are long-lived, higher trophic level organisms susceptible to accumulating high levels of pollutants. The purpose of this study was to use latrine surveys to examine patterns of wetland latrine usage; explicitly model northern river otter resource selection on the landscape level; and utilize the model results within an ecological risk assessment (ERA) framework to assess potential effects of metals and radiocesium ( 137 Cs) on the population for the SRS as a case study. River drainages and associated wetlands were surveyed for latrine sites and scats were collected and analyzed for 137 Cs activity to validate model results. The spatially explicit resource model predicted otter drainage reach use and was used in an ERA to develop exposure models for nine heavy metals as well as 137 Cs on the SRS population of river otters. The evaluation predicted that the only contaminant occurring at high enough levels to cause population effects was mercury and that the observed concentrations were probably not high enough to cause significant impairment. However, multiple metals were above action level thresholds. The field validation process showed an unexpected preference for one man-made treatment wetland that was heavily contaminated, showing that the ERA process is complex and must be approached using multiple scales.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6369</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10661-018-6752-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29860567</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Animals ; Aquatic mammals ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Bioaccumulation ; Caesium 137 ; Case studies ; Cesium isotopes ; Cesium radioisotopes ; Cesium Radioisotopes - analysis ; Contaminants ; Contamination ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecological effects ; Ecological risk assessment ; Ecology ; Ecotoxicology ; Energy policy ; Environment ; Environmental hazards ; Environmental Management ; Environmental Monitoring ; Environmental science ; Evaluation ; Frameworks ; Freshwater mammals ; Government agencies ; Hazards ; Heavy metals ; Industrial pollution ; Lontra ; Lontra canadensis ; Mercury ; Mercury (metal) ; Mercury - analysis ; Metals ; Metals, Heavy - analysis ; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis ; Otters ; Otters - physiology ; Pollutants ; Pollution levels ; Radioisotopes ; Receptors ; Risk Assessment ; Rivers ; Savannahs ; Surveys ; Trophic levels ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2018-07, Vol.190 (7), p.374-31, Article 374</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Environmental Monitoring and Assessment is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e0fd4279b7b40450640f1c4a833817604af6ca2ab66b6766bfeb914c930dac0e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e0fd4279b7b40450640f1c4a833817604af6ca2ab66b6766bfeb914c930dac0e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2048898232/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2048898232?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,36061,44363,74895</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29860567$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCallen, Emily B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaines, Karen F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novak, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruyle, Leslie E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Warren L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence Bryan, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blas, Susan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serfass, Thomas L.</creatorcontrib><title>The development and use of a spatially explicit model for river otters to evaluate environmental hazards: a case study on the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site</title><title>Environmental monitoring and assessment</title><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><description>The Department of Energy’s (DOE) Savannah River Site (SRS) faces a legacy of radionuclide and metal contamination from industrial processes that occurred throughout the site. Northern river otters ( Lontra canadensis ) are appropriate receptors for studying the effects of long-term, low-level contamination because they are long-lived, higher trophic level organisms susceptible to accumulating high levels of pollutants. The purpose of this study was to use latrine surveys to examine patterns of wetland latrine usage; explicitly model northern river otter resource selection on the landscape level; and utilize the model results within an ecological risk assessment (ERA) framework to assess potential effects of metals and radiocesium ( 137 Cs) on the population for the SRS as a case study. River drainages and associated wetlands were surveyed for latrine sites and scats were collected and analyzed for 137 Cs activity to validate model results. The spatially explicit resource model predicted otter drainage reach use and was used in an ERA to develop exposure models for nine heavy metals as well as 137 Cs on the SRS population of river otters. The evaluation predicted that the only contaminant occurring at high enough levels to cause population effects was mercury and that the observed concentrations were probably not high enough to cause significant impairment. However, multiple metals were above action level thresholds. The field validation process showed an unexpected preference for one man-made treatment wetland that was heavily contaminated, showing that the ERA process is complex and must be approached using multiple scales.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquatic mammals</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Bioaccumulation</subject><subject>Caesium 137</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Cesium isotopes</subject><subject>Cesium radioisotopes</subject><subject>Cesium Radioisotopes - analysis</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecological risk assessment</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental hazards</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Frameworks</subject><subject>Freshwater mammals</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Hazards</subject><subject>Heavy metals</subject><subject>Industrial pollution</subject><subject>Lontra</subject><subject>Lontra canadensis</subject><subject>Mercury</subject><subject>Mercury (metal)</subject><subject>Mercury - analysis</subject><subject>Metals</subject><subject>Metals, Heavy - analysis</subject><subject>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</subject><subject>Otters</subject><subject>Otters - physiology</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Pollution levels</subject><subject>Radioisotopes</subject><subject>Receptors</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Savannahs</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Trophic levels</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0167-6369</issn><issn>1573-2959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAURi0EotPCA7BBltiwCdiOY8fsUH8AqRISLevoJrnppHLsYDujGVa8Bq_AY_EkeDoFJCQ214t77vksfYQ84-wVZ0y_jpwpxQvG60LpShTbB2TFK10WwlTmIVkxrnShSmWOyHGMt4wxo6V5TI6EqRWrlF6RH9drpD1u0Pp5QpcouJ4uEakfKNA4QxrB2h3F7WzHbkx08j1aOvhAw7jBQH1KGCJNnuIG7AIJKbrNGLzb68DSNXyF0Mc3WddBFse09DvqHU05-QxnCOkuOAeeOww3u5_fvkd6BRtwDtb0013K1ZjwCXk0gI349P49IZ8vzq9P3xeXH999OH17WXSlFqlANvRSaNPqVjJZMSXZwDsJdVnWXCsmYVAdCGiVapXOY8DWcNmZkvXQMSxPyMuDdw7-y4IxNdMYO7QWHPolNoJJYySvjMzoi3_QW78El3-3p-ra1KIUmeIHqgs-xoBDM4dxgrBrOGv2RTaHIptcZLMvstnmm-f35qWdsP9z8bu5DIgDEPPK3WD4G_1_6y8fAqzB</recordid><startdate>20180701</startdate><enddate>20180701</enddate><creator>McCallen, Emily B.</creator><creator>Gaines, Karen F.</creator><creator>Novak, James M.</creator><creator>Ruyle, Leslie E.</creator><creator>Stephens, Warren L.</creator><creator>Lawrence Bryan, A.</creator><creator>Blas, Susan A.</creator><creator>Serfass, Thomas L.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180701</creationdate><title>The development and use of a spatially explicit model for river otters to evaluate environmental hazards: a case study on the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site</title><author>McCallen, Emily B. ; Gaines, Karen F. ; Novak, James M. ; Ruyle, Leslie E. ; Stephens, Warren L. ; Lawrence Bryan, A. ; Blas, Susan A. ; Serfass, Thomas L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e0fd4279b7b40450640f1c4a833817604af6ca2ab66b6766bfeb914c930dac0e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquatic mammals</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Bioaccumulation</topic><topic>Caesium 137</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Cesium isotopes</topic><topic>Cesium radioisotopes</topic><topic>Cesium Radioisotopes - analysis</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecological risk assessment</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental hazards</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Frameworks</topic><topic>Freshwater mammals</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Hazards</topic><topic>Heavy metals</topic><topic>Industrial pollution</topic><topic>Lontra</topic><topic>Lontra canadensis</topic><topic>Mercury</topic><topic>Mercury (metal)</topic><topic>Mercury - analysis</topic><topic>Metals</topic><topic>Metals, Heavy - analysis</topic><topic>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</topic><topic>Otters</topic><topic>Otters - physiology</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Pollution levels</topic><topic>Radioisotopes</topic><topic>Receptors</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Savannahs</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Trophic levels</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCallen, Emily B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaines, Karen F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novak, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruyle, Leslie E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Warren L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence Bryan, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blas, Susan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serfass, Thomas L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCallen, Emily B.</au><au>Gaines, Karen F.</au><au>Novak, James M.</au><au>Ruyle, Leslie E.</au><au>Stephens, Warren L.</au><au>Lawrence Bryan, A.</au><au>Blas, Susan A.</au><au>Serfass, Thomas L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The development and use of a spatially explicit model for river otters to evaluate environmental hazards: a case study on the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site</atitle><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle><stitle>Environ Monit Assess</stitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><date>2018-07-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>190</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>374</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>374-31</pages><artnum>374</artnum><issn>0167-6369</issn><eissn>1573-2959</eissn><abstract>The Department of Energy’s (DOE) Savannah River Site (SRS) faces a legacy of radionuclide and metal contamination from industrial processes that occurred throughout the site. Northern river otters ( Lontra canadensis ) are appropriate receptors for studying the effects of long-term, low-level contamination because they are long-lived, higher trophic level organisms susceptible to accumulating high levels of pollutants. The purpose of this study was to use latrine surveys to examine patterns of wetland latrine usage; explicitly model northern river otter resource selection on the landscape level; and utilize the model results within an ecological risk assessment (ERA) framework to assess potential effects of metals and radiocesium ( 137 Cs) on the population for the SRS as a case study. River drainages and associated wetlands were surveyed for latrine sites and scats were collected and analyzed for 137 Cs activity to validate model results. The spatially explicit resource model predicted otter drainage reach use and was used in an ERA to develop exposure models for nine heavy metals as well as 137 Cs on the SRS population of river otters. The evaluation predicted that the only contaminant occurring at high enough levels to cause population effects was mercury and that the observed concentrations were probably not high enough to cause significant impairment. However, multiple metals were above action level thresholds. The field validation process showed an unexpected preference for one man-made treatment wetland that was heavily contaminated, showing that the ERA process is complex and must be approached using multiple scales.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>29860567</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10661-018-6752-x</doi><tpages>31</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-6369
ispartof Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2018-07, Vol.190 (7), p.374-31, Article 374
issn 0167-6369
1573-2959
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2049941594
source ABI/INFORM global; Springer Nature
subjects Animals
Aquatic mammals
Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution
Bioaccumulation
Caesium 137
Case studies
Cesium isotopes
Cesium radioisotopes
Cesium Radioisotopes - analysis
Contaminants
Contamination
Earth and Environmental Science
Ecological effects
Ecological risk assessment
Ecology
Ecotoxicology
Energy policy
Environment
Environmental hazards
Environmental Management
Environmental Monitoring
Environmental science
Evaluation
Frameworks
Freshwater mammals
Government agencies
Hazards
Heavy metals
Industrial pollution
Lontra
Lontra canadensis
Mercury
Mercury (metal)
Mercury - analysis
Metals
Metals, Heavy - analysis
Monitoring/Environmental Analysis
Otters
Otters - physiology
Pollutants
Pollution levels
Radioisotopes
Receptors
Risk Assessment
Rivers
Savannahs
Surveys
Trophic levels
Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis
Wetlands
title The development and use of a spatially explicit model for river otters to evaluate environmental hazards: a case study on the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T13%3A16%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20development%20and%20use%20of%20a%20spatially%20explicit%20model%20for%20river%20otters%20to%20evaluate%20environmental%20hazards:%20a%20case%20study%20on%20the%20Department%20of%20Energy%E2%80%99s%20Savannah%20River%20Site&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20monitoring%20and%20assessment&rft.au=McCallen,%20Emily%20B.&rft.date=2018-07-01&rft.volume=190&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=374&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=374-31&rft.artnum=374&rft.issn=0167-6369&rft.eissn=1573-2959&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10661-018-6752-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2049941594%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e0fd4279b7b40450640f1c4a833817604af6ca2ab66b6766bfeb914c930dac0e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2048898232&rft_id=info:pmid/29860567&rfr_iscdi=true