Loading…
The development and use of a spatially explicit model for river otters to evaluate environmental hazards: a case study on the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site
The Department of Energy’s (DOE) Savannah River Site (SRS) faces a legacy of radionuclide and metal contamination from industrial processes that occurred throughout the site. Northern river otters ( Lontra canadensis ) are appropriate receptors for studying the effects of long-term, low-level contam...
Saved in:
Published in: | Environmental monitoring and assessment 2018-07, Vol.190 (7), p.374-31, Article 374 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e0fd4279b7b40450640f1c4a833817604af6ca2ab66b6766bfeb914c930dac0e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e0fd4279b7b40450640f1c4a833817604af6ca2ab66b6766bfeb914c930dac0e3 |
container_end_page | 31 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 374 |
container_title | Environmental monitoring and assessment |
container_volume | 190 |
creator | McCallen, Emily B. Gaines, Karen F. Novak, James M. Ruyle, Leslie E. Stephens, Warren L. Lawrence Bryan, A. Blas, Susan A. Serfass, Thomas L. |
description | The Department of Energy’s (DOE) Savannah River Site (SRS) faces a legacy of radionuclide and metal contamination from industrial processes that occurred throughout the site. Northern river otters (
Lontra canadensis
) are appropriate receptors for studying the effects of long-term, low-level contamination because they are long-lived, higher trophic level organisms susceptible to accumulating high levels of pollutants. The purpose of this study was to use latrine surveys to examine patterns of wetland latrine usage; explicitly model northern river otter resource selection on the landscape level; and utilize the model results within an ecological risk assessment (ERA) framework to assess potential effects of metals and radiocesium (
137
Cs) on the population for the SRS as a case study. River drainages and associated wetlands were surveyed for latrine sites and scats were collected and analyzed for
137
Cs activity to validate model results. The spatially explicit resource model predicted otter drainage reach use and was used in an ERA to develop exposure models for nine heavy metals as well as
137
Cs on the SRS population of river otters. The evaluation predicted that the only contaminant occurring at high enough levels to cause population effects was mercury and that the observed concentrations were probably not high enough to cause significant impairment. However, multiple metals were above action level thresholds. The field validation process showed an unexpected preference for one man-made treatment wetland that was heavily contaminated, showing that the ERA process is complex and must be approached using multiple scales. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10661-018-6752-x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2049941594</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2049941594</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e0fd4279b7b40450640f1c4a833817604af6ca2ab66b6766bfeb914c930dac0e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAURi0EotPCA7BBltiwCdiOY8fsUH8AqRISLevoJrnppHLsYDujGVa8Bq_AY_EkeDoFJCQ214t77vksfYQ84-wVZ0y_jpwpxQvG60LpShTbB2TFK10WwlTmIVkxrnShSmWOyHGMt4wxo6V5TI6EqRWrlF6RH9drpD1u0Pp5QpcouJ4uEakfKNA4QxrB2h3F7WzHbkx08j1aOvhAw7jBQH1KGCJNnuIG7AIJKbrNGLzb68DSNXyF0Mc3WddBFse09DvqHU05-QxnCOkuOAeeOww3u5_fvkd6BRtwDtb0013K1ZjwCXk0gI349P49IZ8vzq9P3xeXH999OH17WXSlFqlANvRSaNPqVjJZMSXZwDsJdVnWXCsmYVAdCGiVapXOY8DWcNmZkvXQMSxPyMuDdw7-y4IxNdMYO7QWHPolNoJJYySvjMzoi3_QW78El3-3p-ra1KIUmeIHqgs-xoBDM4dxgrBrOGv2RTaHIptcZLMvstnmm-f35qWdsP9z8bu5DIgDEPPK3WD4G_1_6y8fAqzB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2048898232</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The development and use of a spatially explicit model for river otters to evaluate environmental hazards: a case study on the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>McCallen, Emily B. ; Gaines, Karen F. ; Novak, James M. ; Ruyle, Leslie E. ; Stephens, Warren L. ; Lawrence Bryan, A. ; Blas, Susan A. ; Serfass, Thomas L.</creator><creatorcontrib>McCallen, Emily B. ; Gaines, Karen F. ; Novak, James M. ; Ruyle, Leslie E. ; Stephens, Warren L. ; Lawrence Bryan, A. ; Blas, Susan A. ; Serfass, Thomas L.</creatorcontrib><description>The Department of Energy’s (DOE) Savannah River Site (SRS) faces a legacy of radionuclide and metal contamination from industrial processes that occurred throughout the site. Northern river otters (
Lontra canadensis
) are appropriate receptors for studying the effects of long-term, low-level contamination because they are long-lived, higher trophic level organisms susceptible to accumulating high levels of pollutants. The purpose of this study was to use latrine surveys to examine patterns of wetland latrine usage; explicitly model northern river otter resource selection on the landscape level; and utilize the model results within an ecological risk assessment (ERA) framework to assess potential effects of metals and radiocesium (
137
Cs) on the population for the SRS as a case study. River drainages and associated wetlands were surveyed for latrine sites and scats were collected and analyzed for
137
Cs activity to validate model results. The spatially explicit resource model predicted otter drainage reach use and was used in an ERA to develop exposure models for nine heavy metals as well as
137
Cs on the SRS population of river otters. The evaluation predicted that the only contaminant occurring at high enough levels to cause population effects was mercury and that the observed concentrations were probably not high enough to cause significant impairment. However, multiple metals were above action level thresholds. The field validation process showed an unexpected preference for one man-made treatment wetland that was heavily contaminated, showing that the ERA process is complex and must be approached using multiple scales.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6369</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10661-018-6752-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29860567</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Animals ; Aquatic mammals ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Bioaccumulation ; Caesium 137 ; Case studies ; Cesium isotopes ; Cesium radioisotopes ; Cesium Radioisotopes - analysis ; Contaminants ; Contamination ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecological effects ; Ecological risk assessment ; Ecology ; Ecotoxicology ; Energy policy ; Environment ; Environmental hazards ; Environmental Management ; Environmental Monitoring ; Environmental science ; Evaluation ; Frameworks ; Freshwater mammals ; Government agencies ; Hazards ; Heavy metals ; Industrial pollution ; Lontra ; Lontra canadensis ; Mercury ; Mercury (metal) ; Mercury - analysis ; Metals ; Metals, Heavy - analysis ; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis ; Otters ; Otters - physiology ; Pollutants ; Pollution levels ; Radioisotopes ; Receptors ; Risk Assessment ; Rivers ; Savannahs ; Surveys ; Trophic levels ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2018-07, Vol.190 (7), p.374-31, Article 374</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Environmental Monitoring and Assessment is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e0fd4279b7b40450640f1c4a833817604af6ca2ab66b6766bfeb914c930dac0e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e0fd4279b7b40450640f1c4a833817604af6ca2ab66b6766bfeb914c930dac0e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2048898232/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2048898232?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,36061,44363,74895</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29860567$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCallen, Emily B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaines, Karen F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novak, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruyle, Leslie E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Warren L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence Bryan, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blas, Susan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serfass, Thomas L.</creatorcontrib><title>The development and use of a spatially explicit model for river otters to evaluate environmental hazards: a case study on the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site</title><title>Environmental monitoring and assessment</title><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><description>The Department of Energy’s (DOE) Savannah River Site (SRS) faces a legacy of radionuclide and metal contamination from industrial processes that occurred throughout the site. Northern river otters (
Lontra canadensis
) are appropriate receptors for studying the effects of long-term, low-level contamination because they are long-lived, higher trophic level organisms susceptible to accumulating high levels of pollutants. The purpose of this study was to use latrine surveys to examine patterns of wetland latrine usage; explicitly model northern river otter resource selection on the landscape level; and utilize the model results within an ecological risk assessment (ERA) framework to assess potential effects of metals and radiocesium (
137
Cs) on the population for the SRS as a case study. River drainages and associated wetlands were surveyed for latrine sites and scats were collected and analyzed for
137
Cs activity to validate model results. The spatially explicit resource model predicted otter drainage reach use and was used in an ERA to develop exposure models for nine heavy metals as well as
137
Cs on the SRS population of river otters. The evaluation predicted that the only contaminant occurring at high enough levels to cause population effects was mercury and that the observed concentrations were probably not high enough to cause significant impairment. However, multiple metals were above action level thresholds. The field validation process showed an unexpected preference for one man-made treatment wetland that was heavily contaminated, showing that the ERA process is complex and must be approached using multiple scales.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquatic mammals</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Bioaccumulation</subject><subject>Caesium 137</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Cesium isotopes</subject><subject>Cesium radioisotopes</subject><subject>Cesium Radioisotopes - analysis</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecological risk assessment</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental hazards</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Frameworks</subject><subject>Freshwater mammals</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Hazards</subject><subject>Heavy metals</subject><subject>Industrial pollution</subject><subject>Lontra</subject><subject>Lontra canadensis</subject><subject>Mercury</subject><subject>Mercury (metal)</subject><subject>Mercury - analysis</subject><subject>Metals</subject><subject>Metals, Heavy - analysis</subject><subject>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</subject><subject>Otters</subject><subject>Otters - physiology</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Pollution levels</subject><subject>Radioisotopes</subject><subject>Receptors</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Savannahs</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Trophic levels</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0167-6369</issn><issn>1573-2959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAURi0EotPCA7BBltiwCdiOY8fsUH8AqRISLevoJrnppHLsYDujGVa8Bq_AY_EkeDoFJCQ214t77vksfYQ84-wVZ0y_jpwpxQvG60LpShTbB2TFK10WwlTmIVkxrnShSmWOyHGMt4wxo6V5TI6EqRWrlF6RH9drpD1u0Pp5QpcouJ4uEakfKNA4QxrB2h3F7WzHbkx08j1aOvhAw7jBQH1KGCJNnuIG7AIJKbrNGLzb68DSNXyF0Mc3WddBFse09DvqHU05-QxnCOkuOAeeOww3u5_fvkd6BRtwDtb0013K1ZjwCXk0gI349P49IZ8vzq9P3xeXH999OH17WXSlFqlANvRSaNPqVjJZMSXZwDsJdVnWXCsmYVAdCGiVapXOY8DWcNmZkvXQMSxPyMuDdw7-y4IxNdMYO7QWHPolNoJJYySvjMzoi3_QW78El3-3p-ra1KIUmeIHqgs-xoBDM4dxgrBrOGv2RTaHIptcZLMvstnmm-f35qWdsP9z8bu5DIgDEPPK3WD4G_1_6y8fAqzB</recordid><startdate>20180701</startdate><enddate>20180701</enddate><creator>McCallen, Emily B.</creator><creator>Gaines, Karen F.</creator><creator>Novak, James M.</creator><creator>Ruyle, Leslie E.</creator><creator>Stephens, Warren L.</creator><creator>Lawrence Bryan, A.</creator><creator>Blas, Susan A.</creator><creator>Serfass, Thomas L.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180701</creationdate><title>The development and use of a spatially explicit model for river otters to evaluate environmental hazards: a case study on the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site</title><author>McCallen, Emily B. ; Gaines, Karen F. ; Novak, James M. ; Ruyle, Leslie E. ; Stephens, Warren L. ; Lawrence Bryan, A. ; Blas, Susan A. ; Serfass, Thomas L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e0fd4279b7b40450640f1c4a833817604af6ca2ab66b6766bfeb914c930dac0e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquatic mammals</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Bioaccumulation</topic><topic>Caesium 137</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Cesium isotopes</topic><topic>Cesium radioisotopes</topic><topic>Cesium Radioisotopes - analysis</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecological risk assessment</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental hazards</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Frameworks</topic><topic>Freshwater mammals</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Hazards</topic><topic>Heavy metals</topic><topic>Industrial pollution</topic><topic>Lontra</topic><topic>Lontra canadensis</topic><topic>Mercury</topic><topic>Mercury (metal)</topic><topic>Mercury - analysis</topic><topic>Metals</topic><topic>Metals, Heavy - analysis</topic><topic>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</topic><topic>Otters</topic><topic>Otters - physiology</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Pollution levels</topic><topic>Radioisotopes</topic><topic>Receptors</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Savannahs</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Trophic levels</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCallen, Emily B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaines, Karen F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novak, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruyle, Leslie E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Warren L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence Bryan, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blas, Susan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serfass, Thomas L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCallen, Emily B.</au><au>Gaines, Karen F.</au><au>Novak, James M.</au><au>Ruyle, Leslie E.</au><au>Stephens, Warren L.</au><au>Lawrence Bryan, A.</au><au>Blas, Susan A.</au><au>Serfass, Thomas L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The development and use of a spatially explicit model for river otters to evaluate environmental hazards: a case study on the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site</atitle><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle><stitle>Environ Monit Assess</stitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><date>2018-07-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>190</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>374</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>374-31</pages><artnum>374</artnum><issn>0167-6369</issn><eissn>1573-2959</eissn><abstract>The Department of Energy’s (DOE) Savannah River Site (SRS) faces a legacy of radionuclide and metal contamination from industrial processes that occurred throughout the site. Northern river otters (
Lontra canadensis
) are appropriate receptors for studying the effects of long-term, low-level contamination because they are long-lived, higher trophic level organisms susceptible to accumulating high levels of pollutants. The purpose of this study was to use latrine surveys to examine patterns of wetland latrine usage; explicitly model northern river otter resource selection on the landscape level; and utilize the model results within an ecological risk assessment (ERA) framework to assess potential effects of metals and radiocesium (
137
Cs) on the population for the SRS as a case study. River drainages and associated wetlands were surveyed for latrine sites and scats were collected and analyzed for
137
Cs activity to validate model results. The spatially explicit resource model predicted otter drainage reach use and was used in an ERA to develop exposure models for nine heavy metals as well as
137
Cs on the SRS population of river otters. The evaluation predicted that the only contaminant occurring at high enough levels to cause population effects was mercury and that the observed concentrations were probably not high enough to cause significant impairment. However, multiple metals were above action level thresholds. The field validation process showed an unexpected preference for one man-made treatment wetland that was heavily contaminated, showing that the ERA process is complex and must be approached using multiple scales.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>29860567</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10661-018-6752-x</doi><tpages>31</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-6369 |
ispartof | Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2018-07, Vol.190 (7), p.374-31, Article 374 |
issn | 0167-6369 1573-2959 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2049941594 |
source | ABI/INFORM global; Springer Nature |
subjects | Animals Aquatic mammals Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Bioaccumulation Caesium 137 Case studies Cesium isotopes Cesium radioisotopes Cesium Radioisotopes - analysis Contaminants Contamination Earth and Environmental Science Ecological effects Ecological risk assessment Ecology Ecotoxicology Energy policy Environment Environmental hazards Environmental Management Environmental Monitoring Environmental science Evaluation Frameworks Freshwater mammals Government agencies Hazards Heavy metals Industrial pollution Lontra Lontra canadensis Mercury Mercury (metal) Mercury - analysis Metals Metals, Heavy - analysis Monitoring/Environmental Analysis Otters Otters - physiology Pollutants Pollution levels Radioisotopes Receptors Risk Assessment Rivers Savannahs Surveys Trophic levels Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis Wetlands |
title | The development and use of a spatially explicit model for river otters to evaluate environmental hazards: a case study on the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T13%3A16%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20development%20and%20use%20of%20a%20spatially%20explicit%20model%20for%20river%20otters%20to%20evaluate%20environmental%20hazards:%20a%20case%20study%20on%20the%20Department%20of%20Energy%E2%80%99s%20Savannah%20River%20Site&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20monitoring%20and%20assessment&rft.au=McCallen,%20Emily%20B.&rft.date=2018-07-01&rft.volume=190&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=374&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=374-31&rft.artnum=374&rft.issn=0167-6369&rft.eissn=1573-2959&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10661-018-6752-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2049941594%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e0fd4279b7b40450640f1c4a833817604af6ca2ab66b6766bfeb914c930dac0e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2048898232&rft_id=info:pmid/29860567&rfr_iscdi=true |