Loading…
Effects of the Harvest Method on the Infestation of Chestnuts (Castanea sativa) by Insects and Moulds
Chestnuts were collected either every 7 days from suspended nets used to intercept the fruits, every 2 days from the ground or every 7 days from the ground. Nuts were visually inspected after collection for the presence of exit holes of the chestnut weevil (Curculio elephas) and the chestnut moth (C...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of phytopathology 2007-08, Vol.155 (7-8), p.497-504 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4369-d335b69e222dd514f2db23e8351e76adf7552ed7ee985a093563c625f2030c243 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4369-d335b69e222dd514f2db23e8351e76adf7552ed7ee985a093563c625f2030c243 |
container_end_page | 504 |
container_issue | 7-8 |
container_start_page | 497 |
container_title | Journal of phytopathology |
container_volume | 155 |
creator | Sieber, T.N Jermini, M Conedera, M |
description | Chestnuts were collected either every 7 days from suspended nets used to intercept the fruits, every 2 days from the ground or every 7 days from the ground. Nuts were visually inspected after collection for the presence of exit holes of the chestnut weevil (Curculio elephas) and the chestnut moth (Cydia splendana), and 20 nuts per sampling and tree were bisected to assess fungal colonization. Apparently healthy nuts were incubated at 24°C and 70-80% relative humidity for 21 days. All nuts were bisected after incubation and examined for the presence of insects and moulds. The harvest method did not have a statistically significant effect on either moulding or insect infestation except on Amphiporthe castanea. This vertically transmitted fungal endophyte was less frequently isolated from fruits collected after 7 days from the ground. The black rot fungus Ciboria batschiana did not occur in chestnuts intercepted in nets, but the difference to chestnuts collected from the ground was statistically not significant. The frequency of nuts colonized by C. batschiana was low in general probably due to the hot and dry summer in 2003. Big, marketable fruits appeared to be less frequently colonized by insects and moulds right after collection. This difference disappeared after incubation except for the chestnut moth. The mother tree had the greatest effect on fungal and insect infestation, indicating the importance of the genetic disposition and/or the phytosanitary situation of each tree. The chestnut weevil preferred chestnuts of the variety 'Lüina' to those of the variety 'Torcion', whereas the fungi A. castanea, Trichothecium roseum, Clonostachys rosea and Penicillium spp. preferentially colonized chestnuts of the variety 'Torcion'. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2007.01269.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20508923</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20508923</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4369-d335b69e222dd514f2db23e8351e76adf7552ed7ee985a093563c625f2030c243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUU1v1DAQtRBILIXfgC8gOCT4I47jAwe0_UihBaRSIXGxvPGYzZImxc6W3X_PZFOVK77YM_Pem5lnQihnOcfzbpPzQpqMFbLIBWM6Z1yUJt89IouHwmOyYEbyjOtKPSXPUtowJphkbEHgJARoxkSHQMc10NrFO0gjvYRxPXg69IfseR8w6cYWYwQu1xj1W2S9WTrM9-Bowuqde0tXe0Sng6TrPb0ctp1Pz8mT4LoEL-7vI3J9evJtWWcXX87Olx8usqaQpcm8lGpVGhBCeK94EYRfCQmVVBx06XzQSgnwGsBUyuFKqpRNKVSYlmlEIY_I61n3Ng6_tzikvWlTA12HIw7bZAVTrDJCIrCagU0cUooQ7G1sb1zcW87s5Kvd2Mk-O9lnJ1_twVe7Q-qr-x4uNa4L0fVNm_7xKyPR5qnF-xn3p-1g_9_69uPXenohP5v5bRph98B38ZcttdTKfv98Zo8_nRZ1ffXDTru_nPHBDdb9jDjT9ZVgHL9ZGy4KLf8CnS-ilw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20508923</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of the Harvest Method on the Infestation of Chestnuts (Castanea sativa) by Insects and Moulds</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Sieber, T.N ; Jermini, M ; Conedera, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Sieber, T.N ; Jermini, M ; Conedera, M</creatorcontrib><description>Chestnuts were collected either every 7 days from suspended nets used to intercept the fruits, every 2 days from the ground or every 7 days from the ground. Nuts were visually inspected after collection for the presence of exit holes of the chestnut weevil (Curculio elephas) and the chestnut moth (Cydia splendana), and 20 nuts per sampling and tree were bisected to assess fungal colonization. Apparently healthy nuts were incubated at 24°C and 70-80% relative humidity for 21 days. All nuts were bisected after incubation and examined for the presence of insects and moulds. The harvest method did not have a statistically significant effect on either moulding or insect infestation except on Amphiporthe castanea. This vertically transmitted fungal endophyte was less frequently isolated from fruits collected after 7 days from the ground. The black rot fungus Ciboria batschiana did not occur in chestnuts intercepted in nets, but the difference to chestnuts collected from the ground was statistically not significant. The frequency of nuts colonized by C. batschiana was low in general probably due to the hot and dry summer in 2003. Big, marketable fruits appeared to be less frequently colonized by insects and moulds right after collection. This difference disappeared after incubation except for the chestnut moth. The mother tree had the greatest effect on fungal and insect infestation, indicating the importance of the genetic disposition and/or the phytosanitary situation of each tree. The chestnut weevil preferred chestnuts of the variety 'Lüina' to those of the variety 'Torcion', whereas the fungi A. castanea, Trichothecium roseum, Clonostachys rosea and Penicillium spp. preferentially colonized chestnuts of the variety 'Torcion'.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0931-1785</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0434</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2007.01269.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPHYEB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Castanea ; Castanea sativa ; chestnut moth (Cydia splendana) ; chestnut weevil (Curculio elephas) ; Ciboria batschiana ; Clonostachys rosea ; Curculio elephas ; Cydia ; fruit spoilage ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Fungal plant pathogens ; fungi ; Luina ; orchard ; Penicillium ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; phytosanitary measures ; vertical transmission of tree endophytes</subject><ispartof>Journal of phytopathology, 2007-08, Vol.155 (7-8), p.497-504</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4369-d335b69e222dd514f2db23e8351e76adf7552ed7ee985a093563c625f2030c243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4369-d335b69e222dd514f2db23e8351e76adf7552ed7ee985a093563c625f2030c243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18937853$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sieber, T.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jermini, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conedera, M</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of the Harvest Method on the Infestation of Chestnuts (Castanea sativa) by Insects and Moulds</title><title>Journal of phytopathology</title><description>Chestnuts were collected either every 7 days from suspended nets used to intercept the fruits, every 2 days from the ground or every 7 days from the ground. Nuts were visually inspected after collection for the presence of exit holes of the chestnut weevil (Curculio elephas) and the chestnut moth (Cydia splendana), and 20 nuts per sampling and tree were bisected to assess fungal colonization. Apparently healthy nuts were incubated at 24°C and 70-80% relative humidity for 21 days. All nuts were bisected after incubation and examined for the presence of insects and moulds. The harvest method did not have a statistically significant effect on either moulding or insect infestation except on Amphiporthe castanea. This vertically transmitted fungal endophyte was less frequently isolated from fruits collected after 7 days from the ground. The black rot fungus Ciboria batschiana did not occur in chestnuts intercepted in nets, but the difference to chestnuts collected from the ground was statistically not significant. The frequency of nuts colonized by C. batschiana was low in general probably due to the hot and dry summer in 2003. Big, marketable fruits appeared to be less frequently colonized by insects and moulds right after collection. This difference disappeared after incubation except for the chestnut moth. The mother tree had the greatest effect on fungal and insect infestation, indicating the importance of the genetic disposition and/or the phytosanitary situation of each tree. The chestnut weevil preferred chestnuts of the variety 'Lüina' to those of the variety 'Torcion', whereas the fungi A. castanea, Trichothecium roseum, Clonostachys rosea and Penicillium spp. preferentially colonized chestnuts of the variety 'Torcion'.</description><subject>biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Castanea</subject><subject>Castanea sativa</subject><subject>chestnut moth (Cydia splendana)</subject><subject>chestnut weevil (Curculio elephas)</subject><subject>Ciboria batschiana</subject><subject>Clonostachys rosea</subject><subject>Curculio elephas</subject><subject>Cydia</subject><subject>fruit spoilage</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Fungal plant pathogens</subject><subject>fungi</subject><subject>Luina</subject><subject>orchard</subject><subject>Penicillium</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>phytosanitary measures</subject><subject>vertical transmission of tree endophytes</subject><issn>0931-1785</issn><issn>1439-0434</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUU1v1DAQtRBILIXfgC8gOCT4I47jAwe0_UihBaRSIXGxvPGYzZImxc6W3X_PZFOVK77YM_Pem5lnQihnOcfzbpPzQpqMFbLIBWM6Z1yUJt89IouHwmOyYEbyjOtKPSXPUtowJphkbEHgJARoxkSHQMc10NrFO0gjvYRxPXg69IfseR8w6cYWYwQu1xj1W2S9WTrM9-Bowuqde0tXe0Sng6TrPb0ctp1Pz8mT4LoEL-7vI3J9evJtWWcXX87Olx8usqaQpcm8lGpVGhBCeK94EYRfCQmVVBx06XzQSgnwGsBUyuFKqpRNKVSYlmlEIY_I61n3Ng6_tzikvWlTA12HIw7bZAVTrDJCIrCagU0cUooQ7G1sb1zcW87s5Kvd2Mk-O9lnJ1_twVe7Q-qr-x4uNa4L0fVNm_7xKyPR5qnF-xn3p-1g_9_69uPXenohP5v5bRph98B38ZcttdTKfv98Zo8_nRZ1ffXDTru_nPHBDdb9jDjT9ZVgHL9ZGy4KLf8CnS-ilw</recordid><startdate>200708</startdate><enddate>200708</enddate><creator>Sieber, T.N</creator><creator>Jermini, M</creator><creator>Conedera, M</creator><general>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200708</creationdate><title>Effects of the Harvest Method on the Infestation of Chestnuts (Castanea sativa) by Insects and Moulds</title><author>Sieber, T.N ; Jermini, M ; Conedera, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4369-d335b69e222dd514f2db23e8351e76adf7552ed7ee985a093563c625f2030c243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Castanea</topic><topic>Castanea sativa</topic><topic>chestnut moth (Cydia splendana)</topic><topic>chestnut weevil (Curculio elephas)</topic><topic>Ciboria batschiana</topic><topic>Clonostachys rosea</topic><topic>Curculio elephas</topic><topic>Cydia</topic><topic>fruit spoilage</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Fungal plant pathogens</topic><topic>fungi</topic><topic>Luina</topic><topic>orchard</topic><topic>Penicillium</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>phytosanitary measures</topic><topic>vertical transmission of tree endophytes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sieber, T.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jermini, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conedera, M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of phytopathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sieber, T.N</au><au>Jermini, M</au><au>Conedera, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of the Harvest Method on the Infestation of Chestnuts (Castanea sativa) by Insects and Moulds</atitle><jtitle>Journal of phytopathology</jtitle><date>2007-08</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>155</volume><issue>7-8</issue><spage>497</spage><epage>504</epage><pages>497-504</pages><issn>0931-1785</issn><eissn>1439-0434</eissn><coden>JPHYEB</coden><abstract>Chestnuts were collected either every 7 days from suspended nets used to intercept the fruits, every 2 days from the ground or every 7 days from the ground. Nuts were visually inspected after collection for the presence of exit holes of the chestnut weevil (Curculio elephas) and the chestnut moth (Cydia splendana), and 20 nuts per sampling and tree were bisected to assess fungal colonization. Apparently healthy nuts were incubated at 24°C and 70-80% relative humidity for 21 days. All nuts were bisected after incubation and examined for the presence of insects and moulds. The harvest method did not have a statistically significant effect on either moulding or insect infestation except on Amphiporthe castanea. This vertically transmitted fungal endophyte was less frequently isolated from fruits collected after 7 days from the ground. The black rot fungus Ciboria batschiana did not occur in chestnuts intercepted in nets, but the difference to chestnuts collected from the ground was statistically not significant. The frequency of nuts colonized by C. batschiana was low in general probably due to the hot and dry summer in 2003. Big, marketable fruits appeared to be less frequently colonized by insects and moulds right after collection. This difference disappeared after incubation except for the chestnut moth. The mother tree had the greatest effect on fungal and insect infestation, indicating the importance of the genetic disposition and/or the phytosanitary situation of each tree. The chestnut weevil preferred chestnuts of the variety 'Lüina' to those of the variety 'Torcion', whereas the fungi A. castanea, Trichothecium roseum, Clonostachys rosea and Penicillium spp. preferentially colonized chestnuts of the variety 'Torcion'.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1439-0434.2007.01269.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0931-1785 |
ispartof | Journal of phytopathology, 2007-08, Vol.155 (7-8), p.497-504 |
issn | 0931-1785 1439-0434 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20508923 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | biodiversity Biological and medical sciences Castanea Castanea sativa chestnut moth (Cydia splendana) chestnut weevil (Curculio elephas) Ciboria batschiana Clonostachys rosea Curculio elephas Cydia fruit spoilage Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Fungal plant pathogens fungi Luina orchard Penicillium Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection phytosanitary measures vertical transmission of tree endophytes |
title | Effects of the Harvest Method on the Infestation of Chestnuts (Castanea sativa) by Insects and Moulds |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T09%3A39%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20the%20Harvest%20Method%20on%20the%20Infestation%20of%20Chestnuts%20(Castanea%20sativa)%20by%20Insects%20and%20Moulds&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20phytopathology&rft.au=Sieber,%20T.N&rft.date=2007-08&rft.volume=155&rft.issue=7-8&rft.spage=497&rft.epage=504&rft.pages=497-504&rft.issn=0931-1785&rft.eissn=1439-0434&rft.coden=JPHYEB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1439-0434.2007.01269.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20508923%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4369-d335b69e222dd514f2db23e8351e76adf7552ed7ee985a093563c625f2030c243%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20508923&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |