Loading…

Effects of the Harvest Method on the Infestation of Chestnuts (Castanea sativa) by Insects and Moulds

Chestnuts were collected either every 7 days from suspended nets used to intercept the fruits, every 2 days from the ground or every 7 days from the ground. Nuts were visually inspected after collection for the presence of exit holes of the chestnut weevil (Curculio elephas) and the chestnut moth (C...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of phytopathology 2007-08, Vol.155 (7-8), p.497-504
Main Authors: Sieber, T.N, Jermini, M, Conedera, M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4369-d335b69e222dd514f2db23e8351e76adf7552ed7ee985a093563c625f2030c243
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4369-d335b69e222dd514f2db23e8351e76adf7552ed7ee985a093563c625f2030c243
container_end_page 504
container_issue 7-8
container_start_page 497
container_title Journal of phytopathology
container_volume 155
creator Sieber, T.N
Jermini, M
Conedera, M
description Chestnuts were collected either every 7 days from suspended nets used to intercept the fruits, every 2 days from the ground or every 7 days from the ground. Nuts were visually inspected after collection for the presence of exit holes of the chestnut weevil (Curculio elephas) and the chestnut moth (Cydia splendana), and 20 nuts per sampling and tree were bisected to assess fungal colonization. Apparently healthy nuts were incubated at 24°C and 70-80% relative humidity for 21 days. All nuts were bisected after incubation and examined for the presence of insects and moulds. The harvest method did not have a statistically significant effect on either moulding or insect infestation except on Amphiporthe castanea. This vertically transmitted fungal endophyte was less frequently isolated from fruits collected after 7 days from the ground. The black rot fungus Ciboria batschiana did not occur in chestnuts intercepted in nets, but the difference to chestnuts collected from the ground was statistically not significant. The frequency of nuts colonized by C. batschiana was low in general probably due to the hot and dry summer in 2003. Big, marketable fruits appeared to be less frequently colonized by insects and moulds right after collection. This difference disappeared after incubation except for the chestnut moth. The mother tree had the greatest effect on fungal and insect infestation, indicating the importance of the genetic disposition and/or the phytosanitary situation of each tree. The chestnut weevil preferred chestnuts of the variety 'Lüina' to those of the variety 'Torcion', whereas the fungi A. castanea, Trichothecium roseum, Clonostachys rosea and Penicillium spp. preferentially colonized chestnuts of the variety 'Torcion'.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2007.01269.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20508923</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20508923</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4369-d335b69e222dd514f2db23e8351e76adf7552ed7ee985a093563c625f2030c243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUU1v1DAQtRBILIXfgC8gOCT4I47jAwe0_UihBaRSIXGxvPGYzZImxc6W3X_PZFOVK77YM_Pem5lnQihnOcfzbpPzQpqMFbLIBWM6Z1yUJt89IouHwmOyYEbyjOtKPSXPUtowJphkbEHgJARoxkSHQMc10NrFO0gjvYRxPXg69IfseR8w6cYWYwQu1xj1W2S9WTrM9-Bowuqde0tXe0Sng6TrPb0ctp1Pz8mT4LoEL-7vI3J9evJtWWcXX87Olx8usqaQpcm8lGpVGhBCeK94EYRfCQmVVBx06XzQSgnwGsBUyuFKqpRNKVSYlmlEIY_I61n3Ng6_tzikvWlTA12HIw7bZAVTrDJCIrCagU0cUooQ7G1sb1zcW87s5Kvd2Mk-O9lnJ1_twVe7Q-qr-x4uNa4L0fVNm_7xKyPR5qnF-xn3p-1g_9_69uPXenohP5v5bRph98B38ZcttdTKfv98Zo8_nRZ1ffXDTru_nPHBDdb9jDjT9ZVgHL9ZGy4KLf8CnS-ilw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20508923</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of the Harvest Method on the Infestation of Chestnuts (Castanea sativa) by Insects and Moulds</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Sieber, T.N ; Jermini, M ; Conedera, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Sieber, T.N ; Jermini, M ; Conedera, M</creatorcontrib><description>Chestnuts were collected either every 7 days from suspended nets used to intercept the fruits, every 2 days from the ground or every 7 days from the ground. Nuts were visually inspected after collection for the presence of exit holes of the chestnut weevil (Curculio elephas) and the chestnut moth (Cydia splendana), and 20 nuts per sampling and tree were bisected to assess fungal colonization. Apparently healthy nuts were incubated at 24°C and 70-80% relative humidity for 21 days. All nuts were bisected after incubation and examined for the presence of insects and moulds. The harvest method did not have a statistically significant effect on either moulding or insect infestation except on Amphiporthe castanea. This vertically transmitted fungal endophyte was less frequently isolated from fruits collected after 7 days from the ground. The black rot fungus Ciboria batschiana did not occur in chestnuts intercepted in nets, but the difference to chestnuts collected from the ground was statistically not significant. The frequency of nuts colonized by C. batschiana was low in general probably due to the hot and dry summer in 2003. Big, marketable fruits appeared to be less frequently colonized by insects and moulds right after collection. This difference disappeared after incubation except for the chestnut moth. The mother tree had the greatest effect on fungal and insect infestation, indicating the importance of the genetic disposition and/or the phytosanitary situation of each tree. The chestnut weevil preferred chestnuts of the variety 'Lüina' to those of the variety 'Torcion', whereas the fungi A. castanea, Trichothecium roseum, Clonostachys rosea and Penicillium spp. preferentially colonized chestnuts of the variety 'Torcion'.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0931-1785</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0434</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2007.01269.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPHYEB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Castanea ; Castanea sativa ; chestnut moth (Cydia splendana) ; chestnut weevil (Curculio elephas) ; Ciboria batschiana ; Clonostachys rosea ; Curculio elephas ; Cydia ; fruit spoilage ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Fungal plant pathogens ; fungi ; Luina ; orchard ; Penicillium ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; phytosanitary measures ; vertical transmission of tree endophytes</subject><ispartof>Journal of phytopathology, 2007-08, Vol.155 (7-8), p.497-504</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4369-d335b69e222dd514f2db23e8351e76adf7552ed7ee985a093563c625f2030c243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4369-d335b69e222dd514f2db23e8351e76adf7552ed7ee985a093563c625f2030c243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18937853$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sieber, T.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jermini, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conedera, M</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of the Harvest Method on the Infestation of Chestnuts (Castanea sativa) by Insects and Moulds</title><title>Journal of phytopathology</title><description>Chestnuts were collected either every 7 days from suspended nets used to intercept the fruits, every 2 days from the ground or every 7 days from the ground. Nuts were visually inspected after collection for the presence of exit holes of the chestnut weevil (Curculio elephas) and the chestnut moth (Cydia splendana), and 20 nuts per sampling and tree were bisected to assess fungal colonization. Apparently healthy nuts were incubated at 24°C and 70-80% relative humidity for 21 days. All nuts were bisected after incubation and examined for the presence of insects and moulds. The harvest method did not have a statistically significant effect on either moulding or insect infestation except on Amphiporthe castanea. This vertically transmitted fungal endophyte was less frequently isolated from fruits collected after 7 days from the ground. The black rot fungus Ciboria batschiana did not occur in chestnuts intercepted in nets, but the difference to chestnuts collected from the ground was statistically not significant. The frequency of nuts colonized by C. batschiana was low in general probably due to the hot and dry summer in 2003. Big, marketable fruits appeared to be less frequently colonized by insects and moulds right after collection. This difference disappeared after incubation except for the chestnut moth. The mother tree had the greatest effect on fungal and insect infestation, indicating the importance of the genetic disposition and/or the phytosanitary situation of each tree. The chestnut weevil preferred chestnuts of the variety 'Lüina' to those of the variety 'Torcion', whereas the fungi A. castanea, Trichothecium roseum, Clonostachys rosea and Penicillium spp. preferentially colonized chestnuts of the variety 'Torcion'.</description><subject>biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Castanea</subject><subject>Castanea sativa</subject><subject>chestnut moth (Cydia splendana)</subject><subject>chestnut weevil (Curculio elephas)</subject><subject>Ciboria batschiana</subject><subject>Clonostachys rosea</subject><subject>Curculio elephas</subject><subject>Cydia</subject><subject>fruit spoilage</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Fungal plant pathogens</subject><subject>fungi</subject><subject>Luina</subject><subject>orchard</subject><subject>Penicillium</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>phytosanitary measures</subject><subject>vertical transmission of tree endophytes</subject><issn>0931-1785</issn><issn>1439-0434</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUU1v1DAQtRBILIXfgC8gOCT4I47jAwe0_UihBaRSIXGxvPGYzZImxc6W3X_PZFOVK77YM_Pem5lnQihnOcfzbpPzQpqMFbLIBWM6Z1yUJt89IouHwmOyYEbyjOtKPSXPUtowJphkbEHgJARoxkSHQMc10NrFO0gjvYRxPXg69IfseR8w6cYWYwQu1xj1W2S9WTrM9-Bowuqde0tXe0Sng6TrPb0ctp1Pz8mT4LoEL-7vI3J9evJtWWcXX87Olx8usqaQpcm8lGpVGhBCeK94EYRfCQmVVBx06XzQSgnwGsBUyuFKqpRNKVSYlmlEIY_I61n3Ng6_tzikvWlTA12HIw7bZAVTrDJCIrCagU0cUooQ7G1sb1zcW87s5Kvd2Mk-O9lnJ1_twVe7Q-qr-x4uNa4L0fVNm_7xKyPR5qnF-xn3p-1g_9_69uPXenohP5v5bRph98B38ZcttdTKfv98Zo8_nRZ1ffXDTru_nPHBDdb9jDjT9ZVgHL9ZGy4KLf8CnS-ilw</recordid><startdate>200708</startdate><enddate>200708</enddate><creator>Sieber, T.N</creator><creator>Jermini, M</creator><creator>Conedera, M</creator><general>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200708</creationdate><title>Effects of the Harvest Method on the Infestation of Chestnuts (Castanea sativa) by Insects and Moulds</title><author>Sieber, T.N ; Jermini, M ; Conedera, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4369-d335b69e222dd514f2db23e8351e76adf7552ed7ee985a093563c625f2030c243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Castanea</topic><topic>Castanea sativa</topic><topic>chestnut moth (Cydia splendana)</topic><topic>chestnut weevil (Curculio elephas)</topic><topic>Ciboria batschiana</topic><topic>Clonostachys rosea</topic><topic>Curculio elephas</topic><topic>Cydia</topic><topic>fruit spoilage</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Fungal plant pathogens</topic><topic>fungi</topic><topic>Luina</topic><topic>orchard</topic><topic>Penicillium</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>phytosanitary measures</topic><topic>vertical transmission of tree endophytes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sieber, T.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jermini, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conedera, M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of phytopathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sieber, T.N</au><au>Jermini, M</au><au>Conedera, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of the Harvest Method on the Infestation of Chestnuts (Castanea sativa) by Insects and Moulds</atitle><jtitle>Journal of phytopathology</jtitle><date>2007-08</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>155</volume><issue>7-8</issue><spage>497</spage><epage>504</epage><pages>497-504</pages><issn>0931-1785</issn><eissn>1439-0434</eissn><coden>JPHYEB</coden><abstract>Chestnuts were collected either every 7 days from suspended nets used to intercept the fruits, every 2 days from the ground or every 7 days from the ground. Nuts were visually inspected after collection for the presence of exit holes of the chestnut weevil (Curculio elephas) and the chestnut moth (Cydia splendana), and 20 nuts per sampling and tree were bisected to assess fungal colonization. Apparently healthy nuts were incubated at 24°C and 70-80% relative humidity for 21 days. All nuts were bisected after incubation and examined for the presence of insects and moulds. The harvest method did not have a statistically significant effect on either moulding or insect infestation except on Amphiporthe castanea. This vertically transmitted fungal endophyte was less frequently isolated from fruits collected after 7 days from the ground. The black rot fungus Ciboria batschiana did not occur in chestnuts intercepted in nets, but the difference to chestnuts collected from the ground was statistically not significant. The frequency of nuts colonized by C. batschiana was low in general probably due to the hot and dry summer in 2003. Big, marketable fruits appeared to be less frequently colonized by insects and moulds right after collection. This difference disappeared after incubation except for the chestnut moth. The mother tree had the greatest effect on fungal and insect infestation, indicating the importance of the genetic disposition and/or the phytosanitary situation of each tree. The chestnut weevil preferred chestnuts of the variety 'Lüina' to those of the variety 'Torcion', whereas the fungi A. castanea, Trichothecium roseum, Clonostachys rosea and Penicillium spp. preferentially colonized chestnuts of the variety 'Torcion'.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1439-0434.2007.01269.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0931-1785
ispartof Journal of phytopathology, 2007-08, Vol.155 (7-8), p.497-504
issn 0931-1785
1439-0434
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20508923
source Wiley
subjects biodiversity
Biological and medical sciences
Castanea
Castanea sativa
chestnut moth (Cydia splendana)
chestnut weevil (Curculio elephas)
Ciboria batschiana
Clonostachys rosea
Curculio elephas
Cydia
fruit spoilage
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Fungal plant pathogens
fungi
Luina
orchard
Penicillium
Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection
phytosanitary measures
vertical transmission of tree endophytes
title Effects of the Harvest Method on the Infestation of Chestnuts (Castanea sativa) by Insects and Moulds
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T09%3A39%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20the%20Harvest%20Method%20on%20the%20Infestation%20of%20Chestnuts%20(Castanea%20sativa)%20by%20Insects%20and%20Moulds&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20phytopathology&rft.au=Sieber,%20T.N&rft.date=2007-08&rft.volume=155&rft.issue=7-8&rft.spage=497&rft.epage=504&rft.pages=497-504&rft.issn=0931-1785&rft.eissn=1439-0434&rft.coden=JPHYEB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1439-0434.2007.01269.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20508923%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4369-d335b69e222dd514f2db23e8351e76adf7552ed7ee985a093563c625f2030c243%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20508923&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true