Loading…

Reliability of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy System in Patients With Spinal Pain: A Systematic Review

Study Design Systematic review. Background An updated summary of the evidence for the reliability of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT) System in patients with spinal pain is needed. Objective To investigate the evidence on the intra and inter-rater reliability of MDT system in patients with spi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy 2018-12, Vol.48 (12), p.1-933
Main Authors: Garcia, Alessandra Narciso, Costa, Lucíola da Cunha Menezes, de Souza, Fabrício Soares, de Almeida, Matheus Oliveira, Araujo, Amanda Costa, Hancock, Mark, Costa, Leonardo Oliveira Pena
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-b814ae68b90730b25a61cc78fbf6726a76d22ab0605b1c47d75442ee3f92510a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-b814ae68b90730b25a61cc78fbf6726a76d22ab0605b1c47d75442ee3f92510a3
container_end_page 933
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1
container_title The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy
container_volume 48
creator Garcia, Alessandra Narciso
Costa, Lucíola da Cunha Menezes
de Souza, Fabrício Soares
de Almeida, Matheus Oliveira
Araujo, Amanda Costa
Hancock, Mark
Costa, Leonardo Oliveira Pena
description Study Design Systematic review. Background An updated summary of the evidence for the reliability of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT) System in patients with spinal pain is needed. Objective To investigate the evidence on the intra and inter-rater reliability of MDT system in patients with spinal pain. Methods Search strategies on MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PEDro and Scopus were conducted. We included any study design as long as reliability of the MDT method was tested in patients with spinal pain. We collected data on the reliability of MDT to identify: main and sub-syndromes, directional preference, centralization phenomenon and lateral shift. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability and The Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies checklists. Results Twelve studies were included (eight studies on back pain, pooled n=2160 patients; three studies on neck pain, pooled n=45 patients; and three studies recruited mixed spinal conditions, pooled n=389 patients). Studies investigating back pain patients reported kappa estimates ranging from 0.26-1.0 (main and sub-syndromes); 0.27-0.90 (directional preference) and 0.11-0.70 (centralization phenomenon). Kappa estimates for studies investigating neck pain ranged from 0.47 to 0.84 (main and sub-syndromes) and 0.46 (directional preference). In mixed populations kappa estimates ranged from 0.56-0.96 (main and sub-syndromes). Conclusion The MDT system appears to have acceptable inter-rater reliability for classifying patients with back pain into main/sub-syndromes, when applied by therapists who have completed the credentialing examination, but unacceptable reliability in other therapists. We found conflicting evidence regarding the reliability of MDT system in patients with neck pain or mixed pain locations. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, Epub 22 Jun 2018. doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7876.
doi_str_mv 10.2519/jospt.2018.7876
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2058508441</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2058508441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-b814ae68b90730b25a61cc78fbf6726a76d22ab0605b1c47d75442ee3f92510a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kD1PwzAYhC0EoqUwsyGPLGltx4kdtopvqYiqLWKMbOcNcZU6IU5B-fektHDLLc_d8CB0ScmYRTSZrCtft2NGqBwLKeIjNKRJKAMacn6MhoQmJIgJpQN05v2a9OGEn6IBS5KQSUGHqFhAaZW2pW07XOX4BUyhnDWqxHdWfbjKW4-Vy_CqgEbVHV52voUNtg7PVWvBtR6_27bAy9q6fjRX1t3g6QHrCYMX8GXh-xyd5Kr0cHHoEXp7uF_dPgWz18fn2-ksMCwRbaAl5QpiqRMiQqJZpGJqjJC5zmPBYiXijDGlSUwiTQ0XmYg4ZwBhnvRCiApH6Hr_WzfV5xZ8m26sN1CWykG19SkjkYyI5Jz26GSPmqbyvoE8rRu7UU2XUpLu9Ka_etOd3nSnt19cHc63egPZP__nM_wByEd20w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2058508441</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy System in Patients With Spinal Pain: A Systematic Review</title><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)</source><source>SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><creator>Garcia, Alessandra Narciso ; Costa, Lucíola da Cunha Menezes ; de Souza, Fabrício Soares ; de Almeida, Matheus Oliveira ; Araujo, Amanda Costa ; Hancock, Mark ; Costa, Leonardo Oliveira Pena</creator><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Alessandra Narciso ; Costa, Lucíola da Cunha Menezes ; de Souza, Fabrício Soares ; de Almeida, Matheus Oliveira ; Araujo, Amanda Costa ; Hancock, Mark ; Costa, Leonardo Oliveira Pena</creatorcontrib><description>Study Design Systematic review. Background An updated summary of the evidence for the reliability of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT) System in patients with spinal pain is needed. Objective To investigate the evidence on the intra and inter-rater reliability of MDT system in patients with spinal pain. Methods Search strategies on MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PEDro and Scopus were conducted. We included any study design as long as reliability of the MDT method was tested in patients with spinal pain. We collected data on the reliability of MDT to identify: main and sub-syndromes, directional preference, centralization phenomenon and lateral shift. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability and The Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies checklists. Results Twelve studies were included (eight studies on back pain, pooled n=2160 patients; three studies on neck pain, pooled n=45 patients; and three studies recruited mixed spinal conditions, pooled n=389 patients). Studies investigating back pain patients reported kappa estimates ranging from 0.26-1.0 (main and sub-syndromes); 0.27-0.90 (directional preference) and 0.11-0.70 (centralization phenomenon). Kappa estimates for studies investigating neck pain ranged from 0.47 to 0.84 (main and sub-syndromes) and 0.46 (directional preference). In mixed populations kappa estimates ranged from 0.56-0.96 (main and sub-syndromes). Conclusion The MDT system appears to have acceptable inter-rater reliability for classifying patients with back pain into main/sub-syndromes, when applied by therapists who have completed the credentialing examination, but unacceptable reliability in other therapists. We found conflicting evidence regarding the reliability of MDT system in patients with neck pain or mixed pain locations. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, Epub 22 Jun 2018. doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7876.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-6011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-1344</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7876</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29932871</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy, 2018-12, Vol.48 (12), p.1-933</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-b814ae68b90730b25a61cc78fbf6726a76d22ab0605b1c47d75442ee3f92510a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-b814ae68b90730b25a61cc78fbf6726a76d22ab0605b1c47d75442ee3f92510a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29932871$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Alessandra Narciso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Lucíola da Cunha Menezes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Souza, Fabrício Soares</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Almeida, Matheus Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo, Amanda Costa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hancock, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Leonardo Oliveira Pena</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy System in Patients With Spinal Pain: A Systematic Review</title><title>The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy</title><addtitle>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther</addtitle><description>Study Design Systematic review. Background An updated summary of the evidence for the reliability of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT) System in patients with spinal pain is needed. Objective To investigate the evidence on the intra and inter-rater reliability of MDT system in patients with spinal pain. Methods Search strategies on MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PEDro and Scopus were conducted. We included any study design as long as reliability of the MDT method was tested in patients with spinal pain. We collected data on the reliability of MDT to identify: main and sub-syndromes, directional preference, centralization phenomenon and lateral shift. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability and The Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies checklists. Results Twelve studies were included (eight studies on back pain, pooled n=2160 patients; three studies on neck pain, pooled n=45 patients; and three studies recruited mixed spinal conditions, pooled n=389 patients). Studies investigating back pain patients reported kappa estimates ranging from 0.26-1.0 (main and sub-syndromes); 0.27-0.90 (directional preference) and 0.11-0.70 (centralization phenomenon). Kappa estimates for studies investigating neck pain ranged from 0.47 to 0.84 (main and sub-syndromes) and 0.46 (directional preference). In mixed populations kappa estimates ranged from 0.56-0.96 (main and sub-syndromes). Conclusion The MDT system appears to have acceptable inter-rater reliability for classifying patients with back pain into main/sub-syndromes, when applied by therapists who have completed the credentialing examination, but unacceptable reliability in other therapists. We found conflicting evidence regarding the reliability of MDT system in patients with neck pain or mixed pain locations. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, Epub 22 Jun 2018. doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7876.</description><issn>0190-6011</issn><issn>1938-1344</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kD1PwzAYhC0EoqUwsyGPLGltx4kdtopvqYiqLWKMbOcNcZU6IU5B-fektHDLLc_d8CB0ScmYRTSZrCtft2NGqBwLKeIjNKRJKAMacn6MhoQmJIgJpQN05v2a9OGEn6IBS5KQSUGHqFhAaZW2pW07XOX4BUyhnDWqxHdWfbjKW4-Vy_CqgEbVHV52voUNtg7PVWvBtR6_27bAy9q6fjRX1t3g6QHrCYMX8GXh-xyd5Kr0cHHoEXp7uF_dPgWz18fn2-ksMCwRbaAl5QpiqRMiQqJZpGJqjJC5zmPBYiXijDGlSUwiTQ0XmYg4ZwBhnvRCiApH6Hr_WzfV5xZ8m26sN1CWykG19SkjkYyI5Jz26GSPmqbyvoE8rRu7UU2XUpLu9Ka_etOd3nSnt19cHc63egPZP__nM_wByEd20w</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>Garcia, Alessandra Narciso</creator><creator>Costa, Lucíola da Cunha Menezes</creator><creator>de Souza, Fabrício Soares</creator><creator>de Almeida, Matheus Oliveira</creator><creator>Araujo, Amanda Costa</creator><creator>Hancock, Mark</creator><creator>Costa, Leonardo Oliveira Pena</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>Reliability of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy System in Patients With Spinal Pain: A Systematic Review</title><author>Garcia, Alessandra Narciso ; Costa, Lucíola da Cunha Menezes ; de Souza, Fabrício Soares ; de Almeida, Matheus Oliveira ; Araujo, Amanda Costa ; Hancock, Mark ; Costa, Leonardo Oliveira Pena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-b814ae68b90730b25a61cc78fbf6726a76d22ab0605b1c47d75442ee3f92510a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Alessandra Narciso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Lucíola da Cunha Menezes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Souza, Fabrício Soares</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Almeida, Matheus Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo, Amanda Costa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hancock, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Leonardo Oliveira Pena</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garcia, Alessandra Narciso</au><au>Costa, Lucíola da Cunha Menezes</au><au>de Souza, Fabrício Soares</au><au>de Almeida, Matheus Oliveira</au><au>Araujo, Amanda Costa</au><au>Hancock, Mark</au><au>Costa, Leonardo Oliveira Pena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy System in Patients With Spinal Pain: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther</addtitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>933</epage><pages>1-933</pages><issn>0190-6011</issn><eissn>1938-1344</eissn><abstract>Study Design Systematic review. Background An updated summary of the evidence for the reliability of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT) System in patients with spinal pain is needed. Objective To investigate the evidence on the intra and inter-rater reliability of MDT system in patients with spinal pain. Methods Search strategies on MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PEDro and Scopus were conducted. We included any study design as long as reliability of the MDT method was tested in patients with spinal pain. We collected data on the reliability of MDT to identify: main and sub-syndromes, directional preference, centralization phenomenon and lateral shift. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability and The Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies checklists. Results Twelve studies were included (eight studies on back pain, pooled n=2160 patients; three studies on neck pain, pooled n=45 patients; and three studies recruited mixed spinal conditions, pooled n=389 patients). Studies investigating back pain patients reported kappa estimates ranging from 0.26-1.0 (main and sub-syndromes); 0.27-0.90 (directional preference) and 0.11-0.70 (centralization phenomenon). Kappa estimates for studies investigating neck pain ranged from 0.47 to 0.84 (main and sub-syndromes) and 0.46 (directional preference). In mixed populations kappa estimates ranged from 0.56-0.96 (main and sub-syndromes). Conclusion The MDT system appears to have acceptable inter-rater reliability for classifying patients with back pain into main/sub-syndromes, when applied by therapists who have completed the credentialing examination, but unacceptable reliability in other therapists. We found conflicting evidence regarding the reliability of MDT system in patients with neck pain or mixed pain locations. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, Epub 22 Jun 2018. doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7876.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>29932871</pmid><doi>10.2519/jospt.2018.7876</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0190-6011
ispartof The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy, 2018-12, Vol.48 (12), p.1-933
issn 0190-6011
1938-1344
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2058508441
source Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ); SPORTDiscus with Full Text
title Reliability of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy System in Patients With Spinal Pain: A Systematic Review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A34%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20of%20Mechanical%20Diagnosis%20and%20Therapy%20System%20in%20Patients%20With%20Spinal%20Pain:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20and%20sports%20physical%20therapy&rft.au=Garcia,%20Alessandra%20Narciso&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=933&rft.pages=1-933&rft.issn=0190-6011&rft.eissn=1938-1344&rft_id=info:doi/10.2519/jospt.2018.7876&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2058508441%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-b814ae68b90730b25a61cc78fbf6726a76d22ab0605b1c47d75442ee3f92510a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2058508441&rft_id=info:pmid/29932871&rfr_iscdi=true