Loading…
Species-specific distribution of two sympatric Maculinea butterflies across different meadow edges
An important consequence of habitat fragmentation is the increase of edge habitats. Environmental factors in the edges are different from those in the interiors, which causes changes in the distribution of plant and animal species. We aimed to study how edges affect the distribution of two butterfly...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of insect conservation 2009-04, Vol.13 (2), p.223-230 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-9dc67c2fd36fe4c37d54c4ff0d4bd7124ee3cd532f2c3db40eb9233d8e07a7a53 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-9dc67c2fd36fe4c37d54c4ff0d4bd7124ee3cd532f2c3db40eb9233d8e07a7a53 |
container_end_page | 230 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 223 |
container_title | Journal of insect conservation |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Batáry, Péter Kőrösi, Ádám Örvössy, Noémi Kövér, Szilvia Peregovits, László |
description | An important consequence of habitat fragmentation is the increase of edge habitats. Environmental factors in the edges are different from those in the interiors, which causes changes in the distribution of plant and animal species. We aimed to study how edges affect the distribution of two butterfly species within meadow fragments. We therefore investigated the effect of distance from edge and edge type (road edge versus tree edge) on two sympatric large blue species (Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous). Our results showed that edge type had contrasting effects on the two species. M. teleius favoured both interiors and road edges, while M. nausithous preferred the tree edges. In the case of the latter species a strong positive edge effect was also found. This kind of within-habitat niche segregation is probably related to the different microenvironmental conditions at the edges. Foodplant density did not seem to limit the distribution of these species. Our results suggest that interiors of meadows are important for M. teleius, while tree edges maintain the habitats of the regionally rarer butterfly, M. nausithous. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10841-008-9158-1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20598792</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20598792</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-9dc67c2fd36fe4c37d54c4ff0d4bd7124ee3cd532f2c3db40eb9233d8e07a7a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9rFTEQx4NYsL76B3gyePCWOkk2m81Rij8KFQ9twVvIJpNHyr7NM9ml9L9vnisIHjzNMHw-w8yXkLccLjmA_lg5DB1nAAMzXA2MvyDnXGnBjFbyZetl37NeDj9fkde1PgCAGdRwTsbbI_qEldVTjcnTkOpS0rguKc80R7o8ZlqfDkfXpp5-d36d0oyONmLBEqcmU-dLrrWpMWLBeaEHdCE_Ugx7rBfkLLqp4ps_dUfuv3y-u_rGbn58vb76dMO81LAwE3yvvYhB9hG7Nguq812MELoxaC46ROmDkiIKL8PYAY5GSBkGBO20U3JHPmx7jyX_WrEu9pCqx2lyM-a1WgHKDLo5O_L-H_Ahr2Vut1khFVfc9CeIb9Dv1wpGeyzp4MqT5WBPkdstctsit6fILW-O2Jza2HmP5e_i_0nvNim6bN2-pGrvbwVwCVwZY4SSz-_jj3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>235151962</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Species-specific distribution of two sympatric Maculinea butterflies across different meadow edges</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Batáry, Péter ; Kőrösi, Ádám ; Örvössy, Noémi ; Kövér, Szilvia ; Peregovits, László</creator><creatorcontrib>Batáry, Péter ; Kőrösi, Ádám ; Örvössy, Noémi ; Kövér, Szilvia ; Peregovits, László</creatorcontrib><description>An important consequence of habitat fragmentation is the increase of edge habitats. Environmental factors in the edges are different from those in the interiors, which causes changes in the distribution of plant and animal species. We aimed to study how edges affect the distribution of two butterfly species within meadow fragments. We therefore investigated the effect of distance from edge and edge type (road edge versus tree edge) on two sympatric large blue species (Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous). Our results showed that edge type had contrasting effects on the two species. M. teleius favoured both interiors and road edges, while M. nausithous preferred the tree edges. In the case of the latter species a strong positive edge effect was also found. This kind of within-habitat niche segregation is probably related to the different microenvironmental conditions at the edges. Foodplant density did not seem to limit the distribution of these species. Our results suggest that interiors of meadows are important for M. teleius, while tree edges maintain the habitats of the regionally rarer butterfly, M. nausithous.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-638X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9753</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10841-008-9158-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Animal Ecology ; Animal species ; Biodiversity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Butterflies & moths ; Conservation biology ; Conservation Biology/Ecology ; Edge effect ; Entomology ; Environmental factors ; Habitat fragmentation ; Habitats ; Life Sciences ; Maculinea ; Maculinea teleius ; Meadows ; Original Paper</subject><ispartof>Journal of insect conservation, 2009-04, Vol.13 (2), p.223-230</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-9dc67c2fd36fe4c37d54c4ff0d4bd7124ee3cd532f2c3db40eb9233d8e07a7a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-9dc67c2fd36fe4c37d54c4ff0d4bd7124ee3cd532f2c3db40eb9233d8e07a7a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Batáry, Péter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kőrösi, Ádám</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Örvössy, Noémi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kövér, Szilvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peregovits, László</creatorcontrib><title>Species-specific distribution of two sympatric Maculinea butterflies across different meadow edges</title><title>Journal of insect conservation</title><addtitle>J Insect Conserv</addtitle><description>An important consequence of habitat fragmentation is the increase of edge habitats. Environmental factors in the edges are different from those in the interiors, which causes changes in the distribution of plant and animal species. We aimed to study how edges affect the distribution of two butterfly species within meadow fragments. We therefore investigated the effect of distance from edge and edge type (road edge versus tree edge) on two sympatric large blue species (Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous). Our results showed that edge type had contrasting effects on the two species. M. teleius favoured both interiors and road edges, while M. nausithous preferred the tree edges. In the case of the latter species a strong positive edge effect was also found. This kind of within-habitat niche segregation is probably related to the different microenvironmental conditions at the edges. Foodplant density did not seem to limit the distribution of these species. Our results suggest that interiors of meadows are important for M. teleius, while tree edges maintain the habitats of the regionally rarer butterfly, M. nausithous.</description><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Animal species</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Butterflies & moths</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Conservation Biology/Ecology</subject><subject>Edge effect</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Habitat fragmentation</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Maculinea</subject><subject>Maculinea teleius</subject><subject>Meadows</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><issn>1366-638X</issn><issn>1572-9753</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9rFTEQx4NYsL76B3gyePCWOkk2m81Rij8KFQ9twVvIJpNHyr7NM9ml9L9vnisIHjzNMHw-w8yXkLccLjmA_lg5DB1nAAMzXA2MvyDnXGnBjFbyZetl37NeDj9fkde1PgCAGdRwTsbbI_qEldVTjcnTkOpS0rguKc80R7o8ZlqfDkfXpp5-d36d0oyONmLBEqcmU-dLrrWpMWLBeaEHdCE_Ugx7rBfkLLqp4ps_dUfuv3y-u_rGbn58vb76dMO81LAwE3yvvYhB9hG7Nguq812MELoxaC46ROmDkiIKL8PYAY5GSBkGBO20U3JHPmx7jyX_WrEu9pCqx2lyM-a1WgHKDLo5O_L-H_Ahr2Vut1khFVfc9CeIb9Dv1wpGeyzp4MqT5WBPkdstctsit6fILW-O2Jza2HmP5e_i_0nvNim6bN2-pGrvbwVwCVwZY4SSz-_jj3Q</recordid><startdate>20090401</startdate><enddate>20090401</enddate><creator>Batáry, Péter</creator><creator>Kőrösi, Ádám</creator><creator>Örvössy, Noémi</creator><creator>Kövér, Szilvia</creator><creator>Peregovits, László</creator><general>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090401</creationdate><title>Species-specific distribution of two sympatric Maculinea butterflies across different meadow edges</title><author>Batáry, Péter ; Kőrösi, Ádám ; Örvössy, Noémi ; Kövér, Szilvia ; Peregovits, László</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-9dc67c2fd36fe4c37d54c4ff0d4bd7124ee3cd532f2c3db40eb9233d8e07a7a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Animal species</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Butterflies & moths</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Conservation Biology/Ecology</topic><topic>Edge effect</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Habitat fragmentation</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Maculinea</topic><topic>Maculinea teleius</topic><topic>Meadows</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Batáry, Péter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kőrösi, Ádám</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Örvössy, Noémi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kövér, Szilvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peregovits, László</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture & Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Journal of insect conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Batáry, Péter</au><au>Kőrösi, Ádám</au><au>Örvössy, Noémi</au><au>Kövér, Szilvia</au><au>Peregovits, László</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Species-specific distribution of two sympatric Maculinea butterflies across different meadow edges</atitle><jtitle>Journal of insect conservation</jtitle><stitle>J Insect Conserv</stitle><date>2009-04-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>223</spage><epage>230</epage><pages>223-230</pages><issn>1366-638X</issn><eissn>1572-9753</eissn><abstract>An important consequence of habitat fragmentation is the increase of edge habitats. Environmental factors in the edges are different from those in the interiors, which causes changes in the distribution of plant and animal species. We aimed to study how edges affect the distribution of two butterfly species within meadow fragments. We therefore investigated the effect of distance from edge and edge type (road edge versus tree edge) on two sympatric large blue species (Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous). Our results showed that edge type had contrasting effects on the two species. M. teleius favoured both interiors and road edges, while M. nausithous preferred the tree edges. In the case of the latter species a strong positive edge effect was also found. This kind of within-habitat niche segregation is probably related to the different microenvironmental conditions at the edges. Foodplant density did not seem to limit the distribution of these species. Our results suggest that interiors of meadows are important for M. teleius, while tree edges maintain the habitats of the regionally rarer butterfly, M. nausithous.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10841-008-9158-1</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1366-638X |
ispartof | Journal of insect conservation, 2009-04, Vol.13 (2), p.223-230 |
issn | 1366-638X 1572-9753 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20598792 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Animal Ecology Animal species Biodiversity Biomedical and Life Sciences Butterflies & moths Conservation biology Conservation Biology/Ecology Edge effect Entomology Environmental factors Habitat fragmentation Habitats Life Sciences Maculinea Maculinea teleius Meadows Original Paper |
title | Species-specific distribution of two sympatric Maculinea butterflies across different meadow edges |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T15%3A09%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Species-specific%20distribution%20of%20two%20sympatric%20Maculinea%20butterflies%20across%20different%20meadow%20edges&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20insect%20conservation&rft.au=Bat%C3%A1ry,%20P%C3%A9ter&rft.date=2009-04-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=230&rft.pages=223-230&rft.issn=1366-638X&rft.eissn=1572-9753&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10841-008-9158-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20598792%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-9dc67c2fd36fe4c37d54c4ff0d4bd7124ee3cd532f2c3db40eb9233d8e07a7a53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=235151962&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |