Loading…

Species-specific distribution of two sympatric Maculinea butterflies across different meadow edges

An important consequence of habitat fragmentation is the increase of edge habitats. Environmental factors in the edges are different from those in the interiors, which causes changes in the distribution of plant and animal species. We aimed to study how edges affect the distribution of two butterfly...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of insect conservation 2009-04, Vol.13 (2), p.223-230
Main Authors: Batáry, Péter, Kőrösi, Ádám, Örvössy, Noémi, Kövér, Szilvia, Peregovits, László
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-9dc67c2fd36fe4c37d54c4ff0d4bd7124ee3cd532f2c3db40eb9233d8e07a7a53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-9dc67c2fd36fe4c37d54c4ff0d4bd7124ee3cd532f2c3db40eb9233d8e07a7a53
container_end_page 230
container_issue 2
container_start_page 223
container_title Journal of insect conservation
container_volume 13
creator Batáry, Péter
Kőrösi, Ádám
Örvössy, Noémi
Kövér, Szilvia
Peregovits, László
description An important consequence of habitat fragmentation is the increase of edge habitats. Environmental factors in the edges are different from those in the interiors, which causes changes in the distribution of plant and animal species. We aimed to study how edges affect the distribution of two butterfly species within meadow fragments. We therefore investigated the effect of distance from edge and edge type (road edge versus tree edge) on two sympatric large blue species (Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous). Our results showed that edge type had contrasting effects on the two species. M. teleius favoured both interiors and road edges, while M. nausithous preferred the tree edges. In the case of the latter species a strong positive edge effect was also found. This kind of within-habitat niche segregation is probably related to the different microenvironmental conditions at the edges. Foodplant density did not seem to limit the distribution of these species. Our results suggest that interiors of meadows are important for M. teleius, while tree edges maintain the habitats of the regionally rarer butterfly, M. nausithous.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10841-008-9158-1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20598792</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20598792</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-9dc67c2fd36fe4c37d54c4ff0d4bd7124ee3cd532f2c3db40eb9233d8e07a7a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9rFTEQx4NYsL76B3gyePCWOkk2m81Rij8KFQ9twVvIJpNHyr7NM9ml9L9vnisIHjzNMHw-w8yXkLccLjmA_lg5DB1nAAMzXA2MvyDnXGnBjFbyZetl37NeDj9fkde1PgCAGdRwTsbbI_qEldVTjcnTkOpS0rguKc80R7o8ZlqfDkfXpp5-d36d0oyONmLBEqcmU-dLrrWpMWLBeaEHdCE_Ugx7rBfkLLqp4ps_dUfuv3y-u_rGbn58vb76dMO81LAwE3yvvYhB9hG7Nguq812MELoxaC46ROmDkiIKL8PYAY5GSBkGBO20U3JHPmx7jyX_WrEu9pCqx2lyM-a1WgHKDLo5O_L-H_Ahr2Vut1khFVfc9CeIb9Dv1wpGeyzp4MqT5WBPkdstctsit6fILW-O2Jza2HmP5e_i_0nvNim6bN2-pGrvbwVwCVwZY4SSz-_jj3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>235151962</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Species-specific distribution of two sympatric Maculinea butterflies across different meadow edges</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Batáry, Péter ; Kőrösi, Ádám ; Örvössy, Noémi ; Kövér, Szilvia ; Peregovits, László</creator><creatorcontrib>Batáry, Péter ; Kőrösi, Ádám ; Örvössy, Noémi ; Kövér, Szilvia ; Peregovits, László</creatorcontrib><description>An important consequence of habitat fragmentation is the increase of edge habitats. Environmental factors in the edges are different from those in the interiors, which causes changes in the distribution of plant and animal species. We aimed to study how edges affect the distribution of two butterfly species within meadow fragments. We therefore investigated the effect of distance from edge and edge type (road edge versus tree edge) on two sympatric large blue species (Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous). Our results showed that edge type had contrasting effects on the two species. M. teleius favoured both interiors and road edges, while M. nausithous preferred the tree edges. In the case of the latter species a strong positive edge effect was also found. This kind of within-habitat niche segregation is probably related to the different microenvironmental conditions at the edges. Foodplant density did not seem to limit the distribution of these species. Our results suggest that interiors of meadows are important for M. teleius, while tree edges maintain the habitats of the regionally rarer butterfly, M. nausithous.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-638X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9753</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10841-008-9158-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Animal Ecology ; Animal species ; Biodiversity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Butterflies &amp; moths ; Conservation biology ; Conservation Biology/Ecology ; Edge effect ; Entomology ; Environmental factors ; Habitat fragmentation ; Habitats ; Life Sciences ; Maculinea ; Maculinea teleius ; Meadows ; Original Paper</subject><ispartof>Journal of insect conservation, 2009-04, Vol.13 (2), p.223-230</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-9dc67c2fd36fe4c37d54c4ff0d4bd7124ee3cd532f2c3db40eb9233d8e07a7a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-9dc67c2fd36fe4c37d54c4ff0d4bd7124ee3cd532f2c3db40eb9233d8e07a7a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Batáry, Péter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kőrösi, Ádám</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Örvössy, Noémi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kövér, Szilvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peregovits, László</creatorcontrib><title>Species-specific distribution of two sympatric Maculinea butterflies across different meadow edges</title><title>Journal of insect conservation</title><addtitle>J Insect Conserv</addtitle><description>An important consequence of habitat fragmentation is the increase of edge habitats. Environmental factors in the edges are different from those in the interiors, which causes changes in the distribution of plant and animal species. We aimed to study how edges affect the distribution of two butterfly species within meadow fragments. We therefore investigated the effect of distance from edge and edge type (road edge versus tree edge) on two sympatric large blue species (Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous). Our results showed that edge type had contrasting effects on the two species. M. teleius favoured both interiors and road edges, while M. nausithous preferred the tree edges. In the case of the latter species a strong positive edge effect was also found. This kind of within-habitat niche segregation is probably related to the different microenvironmental conditions at the edges. Foodplant density did not seem to limit the distribution of these species. Our results suggest that interiors of meadows are important for M. teleius, while tree edges maintain the habitats of the regionally rarer butterfly, M. nausithous.</description><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Animal species</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Butterflies &amp; moths</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Conservation Biology/Ecology</subject><subject>Edge effect</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Habitat fragmentation</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Maculinea</subject><subject>Maculinea teleius</subject><subject>Meadows</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><issn>1366-638X</issn><issn>1572-9753</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9rFTEQx4NYsL76B3gyePCWOkk2m81Rij8KFQ9twVvIJpNHyr7NM9ml9L9vnisIHjzNMHw-w8yXkLccLjmA_lg5DB1nAAMzXA2MvyDnXGnBjFbyZetl37NeDj9fkde1PgCAGdRwTsbbI_qEldVTjcnTkOpS0rguKc80R7o8ZlqfDkfXpp5-d36d0oyONmLBEqcmU-dLrrWpMWLBeaEHdCE_Ugx7rBfkLLqp4ps_dUfuv3y-u_rGbn58vb76dMO81LAwE3yvvYhB9hG7Nguq812MELoxaC46ROmDkiIKL8PYAY5GSBkGBO20U3JHPmx7jyX_WrEu9pCqx2lyM-a1WgHKDLo5O_L-H_Ahr2Vut1khFVfc9CeIb9Dv1wpGeyzp4MqT5WBPkdstctsit6fILW-O2Jza2HmP5e_i_0nvNim6bN2-pGrvbwVwCVwZY4SSz-_jj3Q</recordid><startdate>20090401</startdate><enddate>20090401</enddate><creator>Batáry, Péter</creator><creator>Kőrösi, Ádám</creator><creator>Örvössy, Noémi</creator><creator>Kövér, Szilvia</creator><creator>Peregovits, László</creator><general>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090401</creationdate><title>Species-specific distribution of two sympatric Maculinea butterflies across different meadow edges</title><author>Batáry, Péter ; Kőrösi, Ádám ; Örvössy, Noémi ; Kövér, Szilvia ; Peregovits, László</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-9dc67c2fd36fe4c37d54c4ff0d4bd7124ee3cd532f2c3db40eb9233d8e07a7a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Animal species</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Butterflies &amp; moths</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Conservation Biology/Ecology</topic><topic>Edge effect</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Habitat fragmentation</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Maculinea</topic><topic>Maculinea teleius</topic><topic>Meadows</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Batáry, Péter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kőrösi, Ádám</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Örvössy, Noémi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kövér, Szilvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peregovits, László</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture &amp; Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Journal of insect conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Batáry, Péter</au><au>Kőrösi, Ádám</au><au>Örvössy, Noémi</au><au>Kövér, Szilvia</au><au>Peregovits, László</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Species-specific distribution of two sympatric Maculinea butterflies across different meadow edges</atitle><jtitle>Journal of insect conservation</jtitle><stitle>J Insect Conserv</stitle><date>2009-04-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>223</spage><epage>230</epage><pages>223-230</pages><issn>1366-638X</issn><eissn>1572-9753</eissn><abstract>An important consequence of habitat fragmentation is the increase of edge habitats. Environmental factors in the edges are different from those in the interiors, which causes changes in the distribution of plant and animal species. We aimed to study how edges affect the distribution of two butterfly species within meadow fragments. We therefore investigated the effect of distance from edge and edge type (road edge versus tree edge) on two sympatric large blue species (Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous). Our results showed that edge type had contrasting effects on the two species. M. teleius favoured both interiors and road edges, while M. nausithous preferred the tree edges. In the case of the latter species a strong positive edge effect was also found. This kind of within-habitat niche segregation is probably related to the different microenvironmental conditions at the edges. Foodplant density did not seem to limit the distribution of these species. Our results suggest that interiors of meadows are important for M. teleius, while tree edges maintain the habitats of the regionally rarer butterfly, M. nausithous.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10841-008-9158-1</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1366-638X
ispartof Journal of insect conservation, 2009-04, Vol.13 (2), p.223-230
issn 1366-638X
1572-9753
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20598792
source Springer Nature
subjects Animal Ecology
Animal species
Biodiversity
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Butterflies & moths
Conservation biology
Conservation Biology/Ecology
Edge effect
Entomology
Environmental factors
Habitat fragmentation
Habitats
Life Sciences
Maculinea
Maculinea teleius
Meadows
Original Paper
title Species-specific distribution of two sympatric Maculinea butterflies across different meadow edges
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T15%3A09%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Species-specific%20distribution%20of%20two%20sympatric%20Maculinea%20butterflies%20across%20different%20meadow%20edges&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20insect%20conservation&rft.au=Bat%C3%A1ry,%20P%C3%A9ter&rft.date=2009-04-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=230&rft.pages=223-230&rft.issn=1366-638X&rft.eissn=1572-9753&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10841-008-9158-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20598792%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-9dc67c2fd36fe4c37d54c4ff0d4bd7124ee3cd532f2c3db40eb9233d8e07a7a53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=235151962&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true