Loading…

DNA damage responses and their many interactions with the replication fork

The cellular response to DNA damage is composed of cell cycle checkpoint and DNA repair mechanisms that serve to ensure proper replication of the genome prior to cell division. The function of the DNA damage response during DNA replication in S-phase is critical to this process. Recent evidence has...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Carcinogenesis (New York) 2006-05, Vol.27 (5), p.883-892
Main Authors: Andreassen, Paul R., Ho, Gary P.H., D'Andrea, Alan D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-d2e07559d3b90c90493a24bde19fb889a9ff3fed0a731f130d158847e68bf34d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-d2e07559d3b90c90493a24bde19fb889a9ff3fed0a731f130d158847e68bf34d3
container_end_page 892
container_issue 5
container_start_page 883
container_title Carcinogenesis (New York)
container_volume 27
creator Andreassen, Paul R.
Ho, Gary P.H.
D'Andrea, Alan D.
description The cellular response to DNA damage is composed of cell cycle checkpoint and DNA repair mechanisms that serve to ensure proper replication of the genome prior to cell division. The function of the DNA damage response during DNA replication in S-phase is critical to this process. Recent evidence has suggested a number of interrelationships of DNA replication and cellular DNA damage responses. These include S-phase checkpoints which suppress replication initiation or elongation in response to DNA damage. Also, many components of the DNA damage response are required either for the stabilization of, or for restarting, stalled replication forks. Further, translesion synthesis permits DNA replication to proceed in the presence of DNA damage and can be coordinated with subsequent repair by homologous recombination (HR). Finally, cohesion of sister chromatids is established coincident with DNA replication and is required for subsequent DNA repair by homologous recombination. Here we review these processes, all of which occur at, or are related to, the advancing replication fork. We speculate that these multiple interdependencies of DNA replication and DNA damage responses integrate the many steps necessary to ensure accurate duplication of the genome.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/carcin/bgi319
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20636458</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1496890589</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-d2e07559d3b90c90493a24bde19fb889a9ff3fed0a731f130d158847e68bf34d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90c9rFDEUB_Agil2rR68yCBUvY5N5mZm8Y2nVqrUKKi5ewpv8aNPOjzWZRfvfm2UXFzx4CuT74YW8L2NPBX8lOMKxoWjCeNxdBRB4jy2EbHhZCcXvswUXEkoAkAfsUUo3nIsGanzIDkQjkbeAC_b-7PKksDTQlSuiS6tpTC4VNNpivnYhFgONd0UYZxfJzCGnxa8wX2_CzFd9MLS5LfwUbx-zB5765J7szkP27c3rr6fn5cWnt-9OTy5KIxXOpa0cb-saLXTIDXKJQJXsrBPoO6WQ0HvwznJqQXgB3IpaKdm6RnUepIVD9mI7dxWnn2uXZj2EZFzf0-imddIVb6CRtcrw5X-hkNgo5LXCTJ__Q2-mdRzzN3QlEDjKWmRUbpGJU0rReb2KYaB4pwXXmzL0tgy9LSP7Z7uh625wdq9328_gaAcoGep9pNGEtHdt3k7VtPuHQ5rd7785xVud07bW58sf-vOXD9-Xy7OP-hL-AAaMomQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219309451</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>DNA damage responses and their many interactions with the replication fork</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Andreassen, Paul R. ; Ho, Gary P.H. ; D'Andrea, Alan D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Andreassen, Paul R. ; Ho, Gary P.H. ; D'Andrea, Alan D.</creatorcontrib><description>The cellular response to DNA damage is composed of cell cycle checkpoint and DNA repair mechanisms that serve to ensure proper replication of the genome prior to cell division. The function of the DNA damage response during DNA replication in S-phase is critical to this process. Recent evidence has suggested a number of interrelationships of DNA replication and cellular DNA damage responses. These include S-phase checkpoints which suppress replication initiation or elongation in response to DNA damage. Also, many components of the DNA damage response are required either for the stabilization of, or for restarting, stalled replication forks. Further, translesion synthesis permits DNA replication to proceed in the presence of DNA damage and can be coordinated with subsequent repair by homologous recombination (HR). Finally, cohesion of sister chromatids is established coincident with DNA replication and is required for subsequent DNA repair by homologous recombination. Here we review these processes, all of which occur at, or are related to, the advancing replication fork. We speculate that these multiple interdependencies of DNA replication and DNA damage responses integrate the many steps necessary to ensure accurate duplication of the genome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-3334</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2180</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgi319</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16490739</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CRNGDP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; ataxia telangiectasia mutated ; ATM ; ATM and Rad3-related ; ATR ; Biological and medical sciences ; BLM ; Bloom syndrome ; BRCA1 and 2 ; BReast CAncer genes/proteins 1 and 2 ; Carcinogenesis, carcinogens and anticarcinogens ; DNA Damage ; DNA Repair ; DNA Replication ; double-strand DNA breaks ; DSBs ; FANCD1 and FANCD2 ; Fanconi anemia proteins D1 and D2 ; homologous recombination ; Humans ; ionizing radiation ; Medical sciences ; Models, Biological ; Models, Genetic ; NBS ; Nijmegen breakage syndrome ; Recombination, Genetic ; S Phase ; Sister Chromatid Exchange ; SMC ; structural maintenance of chromosomes ; TLS ; translesion synthesis ; Tumors ; ultraviolet irradiation ; UVC</subject><ispartof>Carcinogenesis (New York), 2006-05, Vol.27 (5), p.883-892</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) May 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-d2e07559d3b90c90493a24bde19fb889a9ff3fed0a731f130d158847e68bf34d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-d2e07559d3b90c90493a24bde19fb889a9ff3fed0a731f130d158847e68bf34d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17904267$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16490739$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andreassen, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Gary P.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Andrea, Alan D.</creatorcontrib><title>DNA damage responses and their many interactions with the replication fork</title><title>Carcinogenesis (New York)</title><addtitle>Carcinogenesis</addtitle><description>The cellular response to DNA damage is composed of cell cycle checkpoint and DNA repair mechanisms that serve to ensure proper replication of the genome prior to cell division. The function of the DNA damage response during DNA replication in S-phase is critical to this process. Recent evidence has suggested a number of interrelationships of DNA replication and cellular DNA damage responses. These include S-phase checkpoints which suppress replication initiation or elongation in response to DNA damage. Also, many components of the DNA damage response are required either for the stabilization of, or for restarting, stalled replication forks. Further, translesion synthesis permits DNA replication to proceed in the presence of DNA damage and can be coordinated with subsequent repair by homologous recombination (HR). Finally, cohesion of sister chromatids is established coincident with DNA replication and is required for subsequent DNA repair by homologous recombination. Here we review these processes, all of which occur at, or are related to, the advancing replication fork. We speculate that these multiple interdependencies of DNA replication and DNA damage responses integrate the many steps necessary to ensure accurate duplication of the genome.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>ataxia telangiectasia mutated</subject><subject>ATM</subject><subject>ATM and Rad3-related</subject><subject>ATR</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>BLM</subject><subject>Bloom syndrome</subject><subject>BRCA1 and 2</subject><subject>BReast CAncer genes/proteins 1 and 2</subject><subject>Carcinogenesis, carcinogens and anticarcinogens</subject><subject>DNA Damage</subject><subject>DNA Repair</subject><subject>DNA Replication</subject><subject>double-strand DNA breaks</subject><subject>DSBs</subject><subject>FANCD1 and FANCD2</subject><subject>Fanconi anemia proteins D1 and D2</subject><subject>homologous recombination</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>ionizing radiation</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Models, Genetic</subject><subject>NBS</subject><subject>Nijmegen breakage syndrome</subject><subject>Recombination, Genetic</subject><subject>S Phase</subject><subject>Sister Chromatid Exchange</subject><subject>SMC</subject><subject>structural maintenance of chromosomes</subject><subject>TLS</subject><subject>translesion synthesis</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>ultraviolet irradiation</subject><subject>UVC</subject><issn>0143-3334</issn><issn>1460-2180</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90c9rFDEUB_Agil2rR68yCBUvY5N5mZm8Y2nVqrUKKi5ewpv8aNPOjzWZRfvfm2UXFzx4CuT74YW8L2NPBX8lOMKxoWjCeNxdBRB4jy2EbHhZCcXvswUXEkoAkAfsUUo3nIsGanzIDkQjkbeAC_b-7PKksDTQlSuiS6tpTC4VNNpivnYhFgONd0UYZxfJzCGnxa8wX2_CzFd9MLS5LfwUbx-zB5765J7szkP27c3rr6fn5cWnt-9OTy5KIxXOpa0cb-saLXTIDXKJQJXsrBPoO6WQ0HvwznJqQXgB3IpaKdm6RnUepIVD9mI7dxWnn2uXZj2EZFzf0-imddIVb6CRtcrw5X-hkNgo5LXCTJ__Q2-mdRzzN3QlEDjKWmRUbpGJU0rReb2KYaB4pwXXmzL0tgy9LSP7Z7uh625wdq9328_gaAcoGep9pNGEtHdt3k7VtPuHQ5rd7785xVud07bW58sf-vOXD9-Xy7OP-hL-AAaMomQ</recordid><startdate>20060501</startdate><enddate>20060501</enddate><creator>Andreassen, Paul R.</creator><creator>Ho, Gary P.H.</creator><creator>D'Andrea, Alan D.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060501</creationdate><title>DNA damage responses and their many interactions with the replication fork</title><author>Andreassen, Paul R. ; Ho, Gary P.H. ; D'Andrea, Alan D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-d2e07559d3b90c90493a24bde19fb889a9ff3fed0a731f130d158847e68bf34d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>ataxia telangiectasia mutated</topic><topic>ATM</topic><topic>ATM and Rad3-related</topic><topic>ATR</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>BLM</topic><topic>Bloom syndrome</topic><topic>BRCA1 and 2</topic><topic>BReast CAncer genes/proteins 1 and 2</topic><topic>Carcinogenesis, carcinogens and anticarcinogens</topic><topic>DNA Damage</topic><topic>DNA Repair</topic><topic>DNA Replication</topic><topic>double-strand DNA breaks</topic><topic>DSBs</topic><topic>FANCD1 and FANCD2</topic><topic>Fanconi anemia proteins D1 and D2</topic><topic>homologous recombination</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>ionizing radiation</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Models, Genetic</topic><topic>NBS</topic><topic>Nijmegen breakage syndrome</topic><topic>Recombination, Genetic</topic><topic>S Phase</topic><topic>Sister Chromatid Exchange</topic><topic>SMC</topic><topic>structural maintenance of chromosomes</topic><topic>TLS</topic><topic>translesion synthesis</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>ultraviolet irradiation</topic><topic>UVC</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andreassen, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Gary P.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Andrea, Alan D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Carcinogenesis (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andreassen, Paul R.</au><au>Ho, Gary P.H.</au><au>D'Andrea, Alan D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DNA damage responses and their many interactions with the replication fork</atitle><jtitle>Carcinogenesis (New York)</jtitle><addtitle>Carcinogenesis</addtitle><date>2006-05-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>883</spage><epage>892</epage><pages>883-892</pages><issn>0143-3334</issn><eissn>1460-2180</eissn><coden>CRNGDP</coden><abstract>The cellular response to DNA damage is composed of cell cycle checkpoint and DNA repair mechanisms that serve to ensure proper replication of the genome prior to cell division. The function of the DNA damage response during DNA replication in S-phase is critical to this process. Recent evidence has suggested a number of interrelationships of DNA replication and cellular DNA damage responses. These include S-phase checkpoints which suppress replication initiation or elongation in response to DNA damage. Also, many components of the DNA damage response are required either for the stabilization of, or for restarting, stalled replication forks. Further, translesion synthesis permits DNA replication to proceed in the presence of DNA damage and can be coordinated with subsequent repair by homologous recombination (HR). Finally, cohesion of sister chromatids is established coincident with DNA replication and is required for subsequent DNA repair by homologous recombination. Here we review these processes, all of which occur at, or are related to, the advancing replication fork. We speculate that these multiple interdependencies of DNA replication and DNA damage responses integrate the many steps necessary to ensure accurate duplication of the genome.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>16490739</pmid><doi>10.1093/carcin/bgi319</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0143-3334
ispartof Carcinogenesis (New York), 2006-05, Vol.27 (5), p.883-892
issn 0143-3334
1460-2180
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20636458
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Animals
ataxia telangiectasia mutated
ATM
ATM and Rad3-related
ATR
Biological and medical sciences
BLM
Bloom syndrome
BRCA1 and 2
BReast CAncer genes/proteins 1 and 2
Carcinogenesis, carcinogens and anticarcinogens
DNA Damage
DNA Repair
DNA Replication
double-strand DNA breaks
DSBs
FANCD1 and FANCD2
Fanconi anemia proteins D1 and D2
homologous recombination
Humans
ionizing radiation
Medical sciences
Models, Biological
Models, Genetic
NBS
Nijmegen breakage syndrome
Recombination, Genetic
S Phase
Sister Chromatid Exchange
SMC
structural maintenance of chromosomes
TLS
translesion synthesis
Tumors
ultraviolet irradiation
UVC
title DNA damage responses and their many interactions with the replication fork
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T15%3A13%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DNA%20damage%20responses%20and%20their%20many%20interactions%20with%20the%20replication%20fork&rft.jtitle=Carcinogenesis%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Andreassen,%20Paul%20R.&rft.date=2006-05-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=883&rft.epage=892&rft.pages=883-892&rft.issn=0143-3334&rft.eissn=1460-2180&rft.coden=CRNGDP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/carcin/bgi319&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1496890589%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-d2e07559d3b90c90493a24bde19fb889a9ff3fed0a731f130d158847e68bf34d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219309451&rft_id=info:pmid/16490739&rfr_iscdi=true