Loading…

Predissociation of the B Σu−3 state of S2: A coupled-channel model

A coupled-channel Schrödinger equation model of predissociation in the B Σu−3 state of S2 is developed and optimized by comparison with recent photoabsorption spectra of the B Σu−3−X Σg−3(v,0) bands for 11 ≤ v ≤ 27, covering the energy range 35 800–41 500 cm−1. All bands in this range exhibit varyin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of chemical physics 2018-06, Vol.148 (24), p.244303-244303
Main Authors: Lewis, B. R., Gibson, S. T., Stark, G., Heays, A. N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A coupled-channel Schrödinger equation model of predissociation in the B Σu−3 state of S2 is developed and optimized by comparison with recent photoabsorption spectra of the B Σu−3−X Σg−3(v,0) bands for 11 ≤ v ≤ 27, covering the energy range 35 800–41 500 cm−1. All bands in this range exhibit varying degrees of diffuseness, with corresponding predissociation linewidths Γ ≈ 4–60 cm−1 full-width at half-maximum. Model comparisons with both low-temperature (T = 370 K) and high-temperature (T = 823 K) spectra indicate, for many bands, significant dependence of the linewidth on both the rotational quantum number J and the fine-structure component Fi. Just as in the analogous case of O2, the B(v)-state predissociation in S2 is caused principally by spin-orbit interaction with 3Πu, 1Πu, 5Πu, and Σu+3 states. The inner-limb crossing with B″3Πu is responsible for the predissociation of B(v = 11) and provides a significant slowly varying contribution for B(v ≥ 12). The outer crossings with the 1Πu, 5Πu, and 2 Σu+3 states are responsible for oscillatory contributions to the predissociation widths, with first peaks at v = 13, 20, and 24, respectively, and the 5Πu contribution dominant. Prior to the photodissociation imaging study of Frederix et al. [J. Phys. Chem. A 113, 14995 (2009)], which redefined the dissociation energy of S2, the prevailing paradigm was that only the 1Πu interaction was responsible for the B(v = 11–16) predissociation: this view is not supported by our model.
ISSN:0021-9606
1089-7690
DOI:10.1063/1.5029930