Safety of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concurrent rectopexy: peri-operative morbidity in a nationwide cohort

Introduction and hypothesis Rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy can be performed concurrently to treat rectal and vaginal prolapse. We hypothesized that concurrent procedures might be associated with more complications than rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy alone. Methods Patients undergoing laparoscopic sacroc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Urogynecology Journal 2019-03, Vol.30 (3), p.385-392
Main Authors: Weinberg, Daniel, Qeadan, Fares, McKee, Rohini, Rogers, Rebecca G., Komesu, Yuko M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Abdomen
Adult
Aged
Blood Transfusion
Colorectal surgery
Female
Females
Gynecology
Humans
Laparoscopy
Laparoscopy - adverse effects
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Morbidity
Mortality
Obstetrics
Operative Time
Original Article
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Quality
Rectal Prolapse - surgery
Rectum - surgery
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Sacrum - surgery
Studies
Surgical outcomes
Surgical Wound Infection - etiology
Urinary Tract Infections - etiology
Urology
Uterine Prolapse - surgery
Vagina - surgery
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction and hypothesis Rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy can be performed concurrently to treat rectal and vaginal prolapse. We hypothesized that concurrent procedures might be associated with more complications than rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy alone. Methods Patients undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or rectopexy, or concurrent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and rectopexy were identified in the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2013 to 2016. Preoperative characteristics, operative time, and 30-day post-operative complications were compared between groups. Complications were those defined by the ACS Risk Calculator. Descriptive tests and regression methods were utilized for group comparisons. Significance was set at p  
ISSN:0937-3462
1433-3023
DOI:10.1007/s00192-018-3699-y