Morphological Responses of Sugarcane to Long-Term Flooding

Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) in south Florida is often subjected to flooding due to intense summer rainfall or tropical storms. While there has been considerable research on the response of sugarcane cultivars to high water tables, there is a lack of information on cultivar morphological adaptation to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Agronomy journal 2007-11, Vol.99 (6), p.1622-1628
Main Authors: Gilbert, R.A, Rainbolt, C.R, Morris, D.R, Bennett, A.C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
adventitious roots
aerenchyma
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Biological and medical sciences
cultivars
diameter
flooded conditions
flooding tolerance
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
genotype-environment interaction
germplasm
germplasm screening
leaves
plant adaptation
plant morphology
rain
roots
Saccharum
stems
Sugarcane
water table
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) in south Florida is often subjected to flooding due to intense summer rainfall or tropical storms. While there has been considerable research on the response of sugarcane cultivars to high water tables, there is a lack of information on cultivar morphological adaptation to long-term flooding. An experiment was established in Belle Glade, FL to examine: (i) effects of a July-September flood on the morphological characters of cv. CP 80-1743 and CP 72-2086 and (ii) significant flood x cultivar interactions that could be used to screen sugarcane germplasm. Sugarcane leaf, stem, primary root, adventitious root, and aerenchyma development were measured in the plant cane (2003) and second ratoon crops (2005). Morphological changes in response to flooding were similar in both years, with flooding leading to a 38% reduction in leaf weight, 4 to 15 times greater adventitious root development, 108% greater aerenchyma pipe extension, and 115% greater aerenchyma pipe diameter. Both cultivars responded to flooding by producing aboveground adventitious roots at the expense of belowground primary root biomass. A significant cultivar x flood interaction on aerenchyma extension and diameter was noted. Under nonflooded conditions, CP 72-2086 produced constitutive aerenchyma more than halfway up the stalk, whereas CP 80-1743 produced aerenchyma only 10% up the stalk. Aerenchyma development up the stalk may be a useful screening tool to identify flood-tolerance in sugarcane cultivars.
ISSN:0002-1962
1435-0645
DOI:10.2134/agronj2007.0085