Loading…

Comparison of the O-Log and GOAT as measures of posttraumatic amnesia

Primary objective: To compare PTA severity and duration assessments made by Orientation Log (O-Log) and the Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test (GOAT) and the relationship of data yielded by these assessments to rehabilitation outcomes. Research design: Retrospective study. Methods and procedures...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Brain injury 2007-01, Vol.21 (5), p.513-520
Main Authors: Frey, Kimberly L., Rojas, Donald C., Anderson, C. Alan, Arciniegas, David B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Primary objective: To compare PTA severity and duration assessments made by Orientation Log (O-Log) and the Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test (GOAT) and the relationship of data yielded by these assessments to rehabilitation outcomes. Research design: Retrospective study. Methods and procedures: O-Log, GOAT, demographic, length of stay, and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) data among 83 inpatient subjects with recent TBI requiring inpatient care were reviewed. Main outcomes and results: PTA severity and duration as assessed by the O-Log and the GOAT are statistically similar and correlate similarly with rehabilitation LOS and discharge total FIM score. Simple linear regression models suggest that O-Log scores better predict rehabilitation outcomes than GOAT scores. Conclusions: Although the O-Log and GOAT perform similarly as measures of PTA severity and duration, PTA assessments using the O-Log offers better prediction of rehabilitation outcomes. Further study of the O-Log as an alternate assessment of PTA is warranted.
ISSN:0269-9052
1362-301X
DOI:10.1080/02699050701311026