Loading…
Influence of natural amphipod (Victoriopisa australiensis) (Chilton, 1923) population densities on benthic metabolism, nutrient fluxes, denitrification and DNRA in sub-tropical estuarine sediment
The influence of natural populations of the sub-surface deposit-feeding amphipod Victoriopisa australiensis on sediment biogeochemistry was assessed by randomly collecting 21 sediment cores in a zone of Coombabah Lake, southern Moreton Bay, Australia, where the benthic infauna was dominated by this...
Saved in:
Published in: | Hydrobiologia 2009-07, Vol.628 (1), p.95-109 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-370b7010726b6c25944593fc1072c061ccf4f33204fbc501120bbeaa86f2f6063 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-370b7010726b6c25944593fc1072c061ccf4f33204fbc501120bbeaa86f2f6063 |
container_end_page | 109 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 95 |
container_title | Hydrobiologia |
container_volume | 628 |
creator | Dunn, Ryan J. K Welsh, David T Jordan, Mark A Teasdale, Peter R Lemckert, Charles J |
description | The influence of natural populations of the sub-surface deposit-feeding amphipod Victoriopisa australiensis on sediment biogeochemistry was assessed by randomly collecting 21 sediment cores in a zone of Coombabah Lake, southern Moreton Bay, Australia, where the benthic infauna was dominated by this species. Cores were incubated sequentially to determine sediment-water column fluxes of oxygen, dissolved inorganic carbon and inorganic N species, followed by incubations to determine rates of denitrification and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) using the isotope pairing technique. Finally, each core was sieved in order to determine the population and biomass of amphipods present. Whilst all measures of overall benthic metabolism (sediment oxygen demand, and effluxes of inorganic carbon and nitrogen) showed increased with amphipod density, with rates being stimulated 70-220% at the highest categorised density range of 2,500-3,500 ind m⁻², only the correlation with dissolved inorganic carbon was statistically significant. In contrast, there were no discernable trends between amphipod densities and any of the N-cycle processes with the slopes of all correlations being very close to zero. These results highlight the differences in mesocosm simulations of fauna effects, which primarily relate to shifts in rates of organic matter turnover, compared to natural sediments where fauna effects relate more to induced changes in rates of organic matter deposition. Therefore, while mesocosms represent a powerful tool to investigate the mechanisms by which fauna influences microbial metabolism in the sediment, only studies of natural sediments can determine to what extent these mechanisms function in situ. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10750-009-9748-2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20652451</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1892812791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-370b7010726b6c25944593fc1072c061ccf4f33204fbc501120bbeaa86f2f6063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2KFTEQhRtR8Dr6AK6MC2UGprWSdPpnOVz_BgYFddyGdG4yN0N30qYS0OfzxUzTg4ILVyFV3zlV1KmqpxReUYDuNVLoBNQAQz10TV-ze9WOio7XgtLufrUDoH3dU9E_rB4h3kLRDAx21a9Lb6dsvDYkWOJVylFNRM3L0S3hQE6_OZ1CdGFxqIjKmErbGY8Oz8jp_uimFPw5oQPjZ2QJS55UcsGTw4okZ5CUz2h8OjpNZpPUGCaH8znxOcXik0iZ_sPg-apwpWSd3hyUP5A3Hz9fEOcJ5rFOseygy24GU1bReUPQHNxcPB5XD6ya0Dy5e0-q63dvv-4_1Fef3l_uL65q3TQs1byDsYNyJ9aOrWZiaBoxcKvXioaWam0byzmDxo5aAKUMxtEo1beW2RZaflK93HyXGL7nsoecHWozTcqbkFEyaAVrBC3g83_A25CjL7vJfqCdaCkrDN0YHQNiNFYu0c0q_pQU5Bqp3CKVJVK5RipXzYs7X4XlFDYqrx3-ETLalsgFFI5tHJaWvzHx7_z_mT_bRFYFqW5iMb7-woByoC2nfAD-G6YxvKE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>89175612</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of natural amphipod (Victoriopisa australiensis) (Chilton, 1923) population densities on benthic metabolism, nutrient fluxes, denitrification and DNRA in sub-tropical estuarine sediment</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Dunn, Ryan J. K ; Welsh, David T ; Jordan, Mark A ; Teasdale, Peter R ; Lemckert, Charles J</creator><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Ryan J. K ; Welsh, David T ; Jordan, Mark A ; Teasdale, Peter R ; Lemckert, Charles J</creatorcontrib><description>The influence of natural populations of the sub-surface deposit-feeding amphipod Victoriopisa australiensis on sediment biogeochemistry was assessed by randomly collecting 21 sediment cores in a zone of Coombabah Lake, southern Moreton Bay, Australia, where the benthic infauna was dominated by this species. Cores were incubated sequentially to determine sediment-water column fluxes of oxygen, dissolved inorganic carbon and inorganic N species, followed by incubations to determine rates of denitrification and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) using the isotope pairing technique. Finally, each core was sieved in order to determine the population and biomass of amphipods present. Whilst all measures of overall benthic metabolism (sediment oxygen demand, and effluxes of inorganic carbon and nitrogen) showed increased with amphipod density, with rates being stimulated 70-220% at the highest categorised density range of 2,500-3,500 ind m⁻², only the correlation with dissolved inorganic carbon was statistically significant. In contrast, there were no discernable trends between amphipod densities and any of the N-cycle processes with the slopes of all correlations being very close to zero. These results highlight the differences in mesocosm simulations of fauna effects, which primarily relate to shifts in rates of organic matter turnover, compared to natural sediments where fauna effects relate more to induced changes in rates of organic matter deposition. Therefore, while mesocosms represent a powerful tool to investigate the mechanisms by which fauna influences microbial metabolism in the sediment, only studies of natural sediments can determine to what extent these mechanisms function in situ.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-8158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10750-009-9748-2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HYDRB8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Ammonium ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biogeochemistry ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Brackish ; Carbon ; Cores ; Crustacea ; Denitrification ; Dissolved inorganic carbon ; Ecology ; Estuaries ; Fauna ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Hydrology ; Invertebrates ; Life Sciences ; Marine ecology ; Metabolism ; Natural populations ; Nitrate reduction ; Organic matter ; Oxygen demand ; Population density ; Primary Research Paper ; Sediments ; Synecology ; Water column ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Hydrobiologia, 2009-07, Vol.628 (1), p.95-109</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-370b7010726b6c25944593fc1072c061ccf4f33204fbc501120bbeaa86f2f6063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-370b7010726b6c25944593fc1072c061ccf4f33204fbc501120bbeaa86f2f6063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21615750$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Ryan J. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welsh, David T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teasdale, Peter R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemckert, Charles J</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of natural amphipod (Victoriopisa australiensis) (Chilton, 1923) population densities on benthic metabolism, nutrient fluxes, denitrification and DNRA in sub-tropical estuarine sediment</title><title>Hydrobiologia</title><addtitle>Hydrobiologia</addtitle><description>The influence of natural populations of the sub-surface deposit-feeding amphipod Victoriopisa australiensis on sediment biogeochemistry was assessed by randomly collecting 21 sediment cores in a zone of Coombabah Lake, southern Moreton Bay, Australia, where the benthic infauna was dominated by this species. Cores were incubated sequentially to determine sediment-water column fluxes of oxygen, dissolved inorganic carbon and inorganic N species, followed by incubations to determine rates of denitrification and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) using the isotope pairing technique. Finally, each core was sieved in order to determine the population and biomass of amphipods present. Whilst all measures of overall benthic metabolism (sediment oxygen demand, and effluxes of inorganic carbon and nitrogen) showed increased with amphipod density, with rates being stimulated 70-220% at the highest categorised density range of 2,500-3,500 ind m⁻², only the correlation with dissolved inorganic carbon was statistically significant. In contrast, there were no discernable trends between amphipod densities and any of the N-cycle processes with the slopes of all correlations being very close to zero. These results highlight the differences in mesocosm simulations of fauna effects, which primarily relate to shifts in rates of organic matter turnover, compared to natural sediments where fauna effects relate more to induced changes in rates of organic matter deposition. Therefore, while mesocosms represent a powerful tool to investigate the mechanisms by which fauna influences microbial metabolism in the sediment, only studies of natural sediments can determine to what extent these mechanisms function in situ.</description><subject>Ammonium</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biogeochemistry</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Cores</subject><subject>Crustacea</subject><subject>Denitrification</subject><subject>Dissolved inorganic carbon</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Fauna</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine ecology</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Natural populations</subject><subject>Nitrate reduction</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Oxygen demand</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Primary Research Paper</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Water column</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0018-8158</issn><issn>1573-5117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc2KFTEQhRtR8Dr6AK6MC2UGprWSdPpnOVz_BgYFddyGdG4yN0N30qYS0OfzxUzTg4ILVyFV3zlV1KmqpxReUYDuNVLoBNQAQz10TV-ze9WOio7XgtLufrUDoH3dU9E_rB4h3kLRDAx21a9Lb6dsvDYkWOJVylFNRM3L0S3hQE6_OZ1CdGFxqIjKmErbGY8Oz8jp_uimFPw5oQPjZ2QJS55UcsGTw4okZ5CUz2h8OjpNZpPUGCaH8znxOcXik0iZ_sPg-apwpWSd3hyUP5A3Hz9fEOcJ5rFOseygy24GU1bReUPQHNxcPB5XD6ya0Dy5e0-q63dvv-4_1Fef3l_uL65q3TQs1byDsYNyJ9aOrWZiaBoxcKvXioaWam0byzmDxo5aAKUMxtEo1beW2RZaflK93HyXGL7nsoecHWozTcqbkFEyaAVrBC3g83_A25CjL7vJfqCdaCkrDN0YHQNiNFYu0c0q_pQU5Bqp3CKVJVK5RipXzYs7X4XlFDYqrx3-ETLalsgFFI5tHJaWvzHx7_z_mT_bRFYFqW5iMb7-woByoC2nfAD-G6YxvKE</recordid><startdate>20090701</startdate><enddate>20090701</enddate><creator>Dunn, Ryan J. K</creator><creator>Welsh, David T</creator><creator>Jordan, Mark A</creator><creator>Teasdale, Peter R</creator><creator>Lemckert, Charles J</creator><general>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>H96</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090701</creationdate><title>Influence of natural amphipod (Victoriopisa australiensis) (Chilton, 1923) population densities on benthic metabolism, nutrient fluxes, denitrification and DNRA in sub-tropical estuarine sediment</title><author>Dunn, Ryan J. K ; Welsh, David T ; Jordan, Mark A ; Teasdale, Peter R ; Lemckert, Charles J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-370b7010726b6c25944593fc1072c061ccf4f33204fbc501120bbeaa86f2f6063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Ammonium</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biogeochemistry</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Cores</topic><topic>Crustacea</topic><topic>Denitrification</topic><topic>Dissolved inorganic carbon</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Fauna</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine ecology</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Natural populations</topic><topic>Nitrate reduction</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Oxygen demand</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Primary Research Paper</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Water column</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Ryan J. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welsh, David T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teasdale, Peter R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemckert, Charles J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dunn, Ryan J. K</au><au>Welsh, David T</au><au>Jordan, Mark A</au><au>Teasdale, Peter R</au><au>Lemckert, Charles J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of natural amphipod (Victoriopisa australiensis) (Chilton, 1923) population densities on benthic metabolism, nutrient fluxes, denitrification and DNRA in sub-tropical estuarine sediment</atitle><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle><stitle>Hydrobiologia</stitle><date>2009-07-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>628</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>95</spage><epage>109</epage><pages>95-109</pages><issn>0018-8158</issn><eissn>1573-5117</eissn><coden>HYDRB8</coden><abstract>The influence of natural populations of the sub-surface deposit-feeding amphipod Victoriopisa australiensis on sediment biogeochemistry was assessed by randomly collecting 21 sediment cores in a zone of Coombabah Lake, southern Moreton Bay, Australia, where the benthic infauna was dominated by this species. Cores were incubated sequentially to determine sediment-water column fluxes of oxygen, dissolved inorganic carbon and inorganic N species, followed by incubations to determine rates of denitrification and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) using the isotope pairing technique. Finally, each core was sieved in order to determine the population and biomass of amphipods present. Whilst all measures of overall benthic metabolism (sediment oxygen demand, and effluxes of inorganic carbon and nitrogen) showed increased with amphipod density, with rates being stimulated 70-220% at the highest categorised density range of 2,500-3,500 ind m⁻², only the correlation with dissolved inorganic carbon was statistically significant. In contrast, there were no discernable trends between amphipod densities and any of the N-cycle processes with the slopes of all correlations being very close to zero. These results highlight the differences in mesocosm simulations of fauna effects, which primarily relate to shifts in rates of organic matter turnover, compared to natural sediments where fauna effects relate more to induced changes in rates of organic matter deposition. Therefore, while mesocosms represent a powerful tool to investigate the mechanisms by which fauna influences microbial metabolism in the sediment, only studies of natural sediments can determine to what extent these mechanisms function in situ.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10750-009-9748-2</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-8158 |
ispartof | Hydrobiologia, 2009-07, Vol.628 (1), p.95-109 |
issn | 0018-8158 1573-5117 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20652451 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Ammonium Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Biogeochemistry Biological and medical sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Brackish Carbon Cores Crustacea Denitrification Dissolved inorganic carbon Ecology Estuaries Fauna Freshwater & Marine Ecology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Hydrology Invertebrates Life Sciences Marine ecology Metabolism Natural populations Nitrate reduction Organic matter Oxygen demand Population density Primary Research Paper Sediments Synecology Water column Zoology |
title | Influence of natural amphipod (Victoriopisa australiensis) (Chilton, 1923) population densities on benthic metabolism, nutrient fluxes, denitrification and DNRA in sub-tropical estuarine sediment |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T22%3A22%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20natural%20amphipod%20(Victoriopisa%20australiensis)%20(Chilton,%201923)%20population%20densities%20on%20benthic%20metabolism,%20nutrient%20fluxes,%20denitrification%20and%20DNRA%20in%20sub-tropical%20estuarine%20sediment&rft.jtitle=Hydrobiologia&rft.au=Dunn,%20Ryan%20J.%20K&rft.date=2009-07-01&rft.volume=628&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=109&rft.pages=95-109&rft.issn=0018-8158&rft.eissn=1573-5117&rft.coden=HYDRB8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10750-009-9748-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1892812791%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-370b7010726b6c25944593fc1072c061ccf4f33204fbc501120bbeaa86f2f6063%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=89175612&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |