Loading…

Emergence of increased division of labor as a function of group size

Empirical evidence suggests that division of labor in insect societies is positively related to group size both within and across taxa. Response threshold models (RTM) have been commonly used to analyze patterns of division of labor. However, these models have been explored empirically and theoretic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 2007-12, Vol.62 (2), p.289-298
Main Authors: Jeanson, Raphaël, Fewell, Jennifer H, Gorelick, Root, Bertram, Susan M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-2e737a5c289692cc399428c44452549487f79f8c3a938747b81c08b70c634cb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-2e737a5c289692cc399428c44452549487f79f8c3a938747b81c08b70c634cb3
container_end_page 298
container_issue 2
container_start_page 289
container_title Behavioral ecology and sociobiology
container_volume 62
creator Jeanson, Raphaël
Fewell, Jennifer H
Gorelick, Root
Bertram, Susan M
description Empirical evidence suggests that division of labor in insect societies is positively related to group size both within and across taxa. Response threshold models (RTM) have been commonly used to analyze patterns of division of labor. However, these models have been explored empirically and theoretically for only a limited number of tasks, and few studies have examined predictions of the model as colony size and work availability change. We theoretically examine how group size influences division of labor using a fixed response-threshold model. We simultaneously explore how expected by-products of increased colony size, including demand (total work need relative to total work force available) and task number, affect this relationship. Our results indicate that both low demand and high task number positively influence division of labor. We suggest that these changes parallel what is observed within social groups as their size increases, and that, in part, the commonly observed increased division of labor with increasing group size is emergent.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00265-007-0464-5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20656090</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25511695</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25511695</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-2e737a5c289692cc399428c44452549487f79f8c3a938747b81c08b70c634cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wIU4uHAXvXknS6n1AQUX1nXIpJkypZ3UZEbQX-8MU1y4uod7vnO5HIQuCdwRAHWfAagUuJcYuORYHKEJ4YxiUJIeowkwDlhwzk7RWc4bAJBE6wl6nO9CWofGhyJWRd34FFwOq2JVf9W5js2w3boypsLlwhVV1_j2sF6n2O2LXP-Ec3RSuW0OF4c5Rcun-XL2ghdvz6-zhwX2nIgW06CYcsJTbaSh3jNjONWecy6o4IZrVSlTac-cYVpxVWriQZcKvGTcl2yKbsez-xQ_u5Bbu6uzD9uta0LssqUghQQDPXjzD9zELjX9a1YSDtSAYT1ERsinmHMKld2neufStyVgh07t2Kkd5NCpFX3masxschvTX4AKQYg0g389-pWL1q1Tne3HOwXCADQVwCj7BfUMeag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614029093</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Emergence of increased division of labor as a function of group size</title><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Jeanson, Raphaël ; Fewell, Jennifer H ; Gorelick, Root ; Bertram, Susan M</creator><creatorcontrib>Jeanson, Raphaël ; Fewell, Jennifer H ; Gorelick, Root ; Bertram, Susan M</creatorcontrib><description>Empirical evidence suggests that division of labor in insect societies is positively related to group size both within and across taxa. Response threshold models (RTM) have been commonly used to analyze patterns of division of labor. However, these models have been explored empirically and theoretically for only a limited number of tasks, and few studies have examined predictions of the model as colony size and work availability change. We theoretically examine how group size influences division of labor using a fixed response-threshold model. We simultaneously explore how expected by-products of increased colony size, including demand (total work need relative to total work force available) and task number, affect this relationship. Our results indicate that both low demand and high task number positively influence division of labor. We suggest that these changes parallel what is observed within social groups as their size increases, and that, in part, the commonly observed increased division of labor with increasing group size is emergent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-5443</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00265-007-0464-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Ants ; Behavioral biology ; Colony size ; Division of labor ; Group size ; Honey bee colonies ; Insect behavior ; Insect castes ; Insect colonies ; Insects ; Labor demand ; Social insects ; Tasks number ; Threshold model ; Worker insects</subject><ispartof>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2007-12, Vol.62 (2), p.289-298</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-2e737a5c289692cc399428c44452549487f79f8c3a938747b81c08b70c634cb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-2e737a5c289692cc399428c44452549487f79f8c3a938747b81c08b70c634cb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/614029093/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/614029093?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21374,21375,27903,27904,33590,33591,34509,34510,43712,44094,58217,58450,73968,74386</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jeanson, Raphaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fewell, Jennifer H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorelick, Root</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertram, Susan M</creatorcontrib><title>Emergence of increased division of labor as a function of group size</title><title>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</title><description>Empirical evidence suggests that division of labor in insect societies is positively related to group size both within and across taxa. Response threshold models (RTM) have been commonly used to analyze patterns of division of labor. However, these models have been explored empirically and theoretically for only a limited number of tasks, and few studies have examined predictions of the model as colony size and work availability change. We theoretically examine how group size influences division of labor using a fixed response-threshold model. We simultaneously explore how expected by-products of increased colony size, including demand (total work need relative to total work force available) and task number, affect this relationship. Our results indicate that both low demand and high task number positively influence division of labor. We suggest that these changes parallel what is observed within social groups as their size increases, and that, in part, the commonly observed increased division of labor with increasing group size is emergent.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Ants</subject><subject>Behavioral biology</subject><subject>Colony size</subject><subject>Division of labor</subject><subject>Group size</subject><subject>Honey bee colonies</subject><subject>Insect behavior</subject><subject>Insect castes</subject><subject>Insect colonies</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Labor demand</subject><subject>Social insects</subject><subject>Tasks number</subject><subject>Threshold model</subject><subject>Worker insects</subject><issn>0340-5443</issn><issn>1432-0762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wIU4uHAXvXknS6n1AQUX1nXIpJkypZ3UZEbQX-8MU1y4uod7vnO5HIQuCdwRAHWfAagUuJcYuORYHKEJ4YxiUJIeowkwDlhwzk7RWc4bAJBE6wl6nO9CWofGhyJWRd34FFwOq2JVf9W5js2w3boypsLlwhVV1_j2sF6n2O2LXP-Ec3RSuW0OF4c5Rcun-XL2ghdvz6-zhwX2nIgW06CYcsJTbaSh3jNjONWecy6o4IZrVSlTac-cYVpxVWriQZcKvGTcl2yKbsez-xQ_u5Bbu6uzD9uta0LssqUghQQDPXjzD9zELjX9a1YSDtSAYT1ERsinmHMKld2neufStyVgh07t2Kkd5NCpFX3masxschvTX4AKQYg0g389-pWL1q1Tne3HOwXCADQVwCj7BfUMeag</recordid><startdate>20071201</startdate><enddate>20071201</enddate><creator>Jeanson, Raphaël</creator><creator>Fewell, Jennifer H</creator><creator>Gorelick, Root</creator><creator>Bertram, Susan M</creator><general>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071201</creationdate><title>Emergence of increased division of labor as a function of group size</title><author>Jeanson, Raphaël ; Fewell, Jennifer H ; Gorelick, Root ; Bertram, Susan M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-2e737a5c289692cc399428c44452549487f79f8c3a938747b81c08b70c634cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Ants</topic><topic>Behavioral biology</topic><topic>Colony size</topic><topic>Division of labor</topic><topic>Group size</topic><topic>Honey bee colonies</topic><topic>Insect behavior</topic><topic>Insect castes</topic><topic>Insect colonies</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Labor demand</topic><topic>Social insects</topic><topic>Tasks number</topic><topic>Threshold model</topic><topic>Worker insects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jeanson, Raphaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fewell, Jennifer H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorelick, Root</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertram, Susan M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health &amp; Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Journals</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jeanson, Raphaël</au><au>Fewell, Jennifer H</au><au>Gorelick, Root</au><au>Bertram, Susan M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Emergence of increased division of labor as a function of group size</atitle><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle><date>2007-12-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>289</spage><epage>298</epage><pages>289-298</pages><issn>0340-5443</issn><eissn>1432-0762</eissn><abstract>Empirical evidence suggests that division of labor in insect societies is positively related to group size both within and across taxa. Response threshold models (RTM) have been commonly used to analyze patterns of division of labor. However, these models have been explored empirically and theoretically for only a limited number of tasks, and few studies have examined predictions of the model as colony size and work availability change. We theoretically examine how group size influences division of labor using a fixed response-threshold model. We simultaneously explore how expected by-products of increased colony size, including demand (total work need relative to total work force available) and task number, affect this relationship. Our results indicate that both low demand and high task number positively influence division of labor. We suggest that these changes parallel what is observed within social groups as their size increases, and that, in part, the commonly observed increased division of labor with increasing group size is emergent.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s00265-007-0464-5</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0340-5443
ispartof Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2007-12, Vol.62 (2), p.289-298
issn 0340-5443
1432-0762
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20656090
source Springer Nature; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Sociology Collection; JSTOR
subjects Animal behavior
Ants
Behavioral biology
Colony size
Division of labor
Group size
Honey bee colonies
Insect behavior
Insect castes
Insect colonies
Insects
Labor demand
Social insects
Tasks number
Threshold model
Worker insects
title Emergence of increased division of labor as a function of group size
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T12%3A57%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Emergence%20of%20increased%20division%20of%20labor%20as%20a%20function%20of%20group%20size&rft.jtitle=Behavioral%20ecology%20and%20sociobiology&rft.au=Jeanson,%20Rapha%C3%ABl&rft.date=2007-12-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=289&rft.epage=298&rft.pages=289-298&rft.issn=0340-5443&rft.eissn=1432-0762&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00265-007-0464-5&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25511695%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-2e737a5c289692cc399428c44452549487f79f8c3a938747b81c08b70c634cb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614029093&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25511695&rfr_iscdi=true