Loading…

Response of carbon uptake to abiotic and biotic drivers in an intensively managed Lei bamboo forest

Lei bamboo (Phyllostachys praecox) is widely distributed in southeastern China. We used eddy covariance to analyze carbon sequestration capacity of a Lei bamboo forest (2011–2013) and to identify the seasonal biotic and abiotic determinants of carbon fluxes. A machine learning algorithm called rando...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of environmental management 2018-10, Vol.223, p.713-722
Main Authors: Liu, Yuli, Zhou, Guomo, Du, Huaqiang, Berninger, Frank, Mao, Fangjie, Li, Xuejian, Chen, Liang, Cui, Lu, Li, Yangguang, Zhu, Di'en, Xu, Lin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-987d3710a9843b07850347ca7c282a91a423dd6f909fb4c03f7a28ec554e5b93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-987d3710a9843b07850347ca7c282a91a423dd6f909fb4c03f7a28ec554e5b93
container_end_page 722
container_issue
container_start_page 713
container_title Journal of environmental management
container_volume 223
creator Liu, Yuli
Zhou, Guomo
Du, Huaqiang
Berninger, Frank
Mao, Fangjie
Li, Xuejian
Chen, Liang
Cui, Lu
Li, Yangguang
Zhu, Di'en
Xu, Lin
description Lei bamboo (Phyllostachys praecox) is widely distributed in southeastern China. We used eddy covariance to analyze carbon sequestration capacity of a Lei bamboo forest (2011–2013) and to identify the seasonal biotic and abiotic determinants of carbon fluxes. A machine learning algorithm called random forest (RF) was used to identify factors that affected carbon fluxes. The RF model predicted well the gross ecosystem productivity (GEP), ecosystem respiration (RE) and net ecosystem exchange (NEE), and displayed variations in the drivers between different seasons. Mean annual NEE, RE, and GEP were −105.2 ± 23.1, 1264.5 ± 45.2, and 1369.6 ± 52.5 g C m−2, respectively. Climate warming increased RE more than GEP when water inputs were not limiting. Summer drought played little role in suppressing GEP, but low soil moisture contents suppressed RE and increased the carbon sink during drought in the summer. The most important drivers of NEE were soil temperature in spring, summer, and winter, and photosynthetically active radiation in autumn. Air and soil temperature were important drivers of GEP in all seasons. [Display omitted] •The managed Lei bamboo forest was a carbon sink annually and a weak carbon source in certain month.•Dynamics of carbon fluxes was closely associated with phenology of Lei bamboo.•Seasonal drivers of carbon fluxes were identified by random forest.•The results can provide a reference to simulate and optimize ecosystem carbon cycle.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.046
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2066473594</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479718306881</els_id><sourcerecordid>2066473594</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-987d3710a9843b07850347ca7c282a91a423dd6f909fb4c03f7a28ec554e5b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1rHDEMhk1pSLZpfkKLj73MVB5_jU-lhPQDFgohd-OxNcXbHXtrzy7k39dht732IgnxSq_0EPKOQc-AqY-7fofptLjUD8DGHlQPQr0iGwZGdqPi8JpsgAPrhDb6hrypdQcAfGD6mtwMxmg5GrMh_hHrIaeKNM_UuzLlRI-H1f1CumbqppjX6KlLgV7KUOIJS6UxtW6LK6baOvtn2m5xPzHQLUY6uWXKmc65YF3fkqvZ7SveXfItefry8HT_rdv--Pr9_vO281zJtTOjDlwzcGYUfAI9SuBCe6f9MA7OMCcGHoKaDZh5Eh74rN0wopdSoJwMvyUfzmsPJf8-Nl-7xOpxv3cJ87HaAZQSmksjmlSepb7kWgvO9lDi4sqzZWBf8NqdveC1L3gtKNvwtrn3F4vjtGD4N_WXZxN8Oguw_XmKWGz1EZPHEAv61YYc_2PxB9xtjrQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2066473594</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response of carbon uptake to abiotic and biotic drivers in an intensively managed Lei bamboo forest</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Liu, Yuli ; Zhou, Guomo ; Du, Huaqiang ; Berninger, Frank ; Mao, Fangjie ; Li, Xuejian ; Chen, Liang ; Cui, Lu ; Li, Yangguang ; Zhu, Di'en ; Xu, Lin</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yuli ; Zhou, Guomo ; Du, Huaqiang ; Berninger, Frank ; Mao, Fangjie ; Li, Xuejian ; Chen, Liang ; Cui, Lu ; Li, Yangguang ; Zhu, Di'en ; Xu, Lin</creatorcontrib><description>Lei bamboo (Phyllostachys praecox) is widely distributed in southeastern China. We used eddy covariance to analyze carbon sequestration capacity of a Lei bamboo forest (2011–2013) and to identify the seasonal biotic and abiotic determinants of carbon fluxes. A machine learning algorithm called random forest (RF) was used to identify factors that affected carbon fluxes. The RF model predicted well the gross ecosystem productivity (GEP), ecosystem respiration (RE) and net ecosystem exchange (NEE), and displayed variations in the drivers between different seasons. Mean annual NEE, RE, and GEP were −105.2 ± 23.1, 1264.5 ± 45.2, and 1369.6 ± 52.5 g C m−2, respectively. Climate warming increased RE more than GEP when water inputs were not limiting. Summer drought played little role in suppressing GEP, but low soil moisture contents suppressed RE and increased the carbon sink during drought in the summer. The most important drivers of NEE were soil temperature in spring, summer, and winter, and photosynthetically active radiation in autumn. Air and soil temperature were important drivers of GEP in all seasons. [Display omitted] •The managed Lei bamboo forest was a carbon sink annually and a weak carbon source in certain month.•Dynamics of carbon fluxes was closely associated with phenology of Lei bamboo.•Seasonal drivers of carbon fluxes were identified by random forest.•The results can provide a reference to simulate and optimize ecosystem carbon cycle.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.046</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29975899</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Ecosystem respiration ; Gross ecosystem productivity ; Net ecosystem exchange ; Phyllostachys praecox ; Random forest ; Seasonal variation</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2018-10, Vol.223, p.713-722</ispartof><rights>2018</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-987d3710a9843b07850347ca7c282a91a423dd6f909fb4c03f7a28ec554e5b93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-987d3710a9843b07850347ca7c282a91a423dd6f909fb4c03f7a28ec554e5b93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29975899$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yuli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Guomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Huaqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berninger, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mao, Fangjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xuejian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yangguang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Di'en</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Lin</creatorcontrib><title>Response of carbon uptake to abiotic and biotic drivers in an intensively managed Lei bamboo forest</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>Lei bamboo (Phyllostachys praecox) is widely distributed in southeastern China. We used eddy covariance to analyze carbon sequestration capacity of a Lei bamboo forest (2011–2013) and to identify the seasonal biotic and abiotic determinants of carbon fluxes. A machine learning algorithm called random forest (RF) was used to identify factors that affected carbon fluxes. The RF model predicted well the gross ecosystem productivity (GEP), ecosystem respiration (RE) and net ecosystem exchange (NEE), and displayed variations in the drivers between different seasons. Mean annual NEE, RE, and GEP were −105.2 ± 23.1, 1264.5 ± 45.2, and 1369.6 ± 52.5 g C m−2, respectively. Climate warming increased RE more than GEP when water inputs were not limiting. Summer drought played little role in suppressing GEP, but low soil moisture contents suppressed RE and increased the carbon sink during drought in the summer. The most important drivers of NEE were soil temperature in spring, summer, and winter, and photosynthetically active radiation in autumn. Air and soil temperature were important drivers of GEP in all seasons. [Display omitted] •The managed Lei bamboo forest was a carbon sink annually and a weak carbon source in certain month.•Dynamics of carbon fluxes was closely associated with phenology of Lei bamboo.•Seasonal drivers of carbon fluxes were identified by random forest.•The results can provide a reference to simulate and optimize ecosystem carbon cycle.</description><subject>Ecosystem respiration</subject><subject>Gross ecosystem productivity</subject><subject>Net ecosystem exchange</subject><subject>Phyllostachys praecox</subject><subject>Random forest</subject><subject>Seasonal variation</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1rHDEMhk1pSLZpfkKLj73MVB5_jU-lhPQDFgohd-OxNcXbHXtrzy7k39dht732IgnxSq_0EPKOQc-AqY-7fofptLjUD8DGHlQPQr0iGwZGdqPi8JpsgAPrhDb6hrypdQcAfGD6mtwMxmg5GrMh_hHrIaeKNM_UuzLlRI-H1f1CumbqppjX6KlLgV7KUOIJS6UxtW6LK6baOvtn2m5xPzHQLUY6uWXKmc65YF3fkqvZ7SveXfItefry8HT_rdv--Pr9_vO281zJtTOjDlwzcGYUfAI9SuBCe6f9MA7OMCcGHoKaDZh5Eh74rN0wopdSoJwMvyUfzmsPJf8-Nl-7xOpxv3cJ87HaAZQSmksjmlSepb7kWgvO9lDi4sqzZWBf8NqdveC1L3gtKNvwtrn3F4vjtGD4N_WXZxN8Oguw_XmKWGz1EZPHEAv61YYc_2PxB9xtjrQ</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>Liu, Yuli</creator><creator>Zhou, Guomo</creator><creator>Du, Huaqiang</creator><creator>Berninger, Frank</creator><creator>Mao, Fangjie</creator><creator>Li, Xuejian</creator><creator>Chen, Liang</creator><creator>Cui, Lu</creator><creator>Li, Yangguang</creator><creator>Zhu, Di'en</creator><creator>Xu, Lin</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>Response of carbon uptake to abiotic and biotic drivers in an intensively managed Lei bamboo forest</title><author>Liu, Yuli ; Zhou, Guomo ; Du, Huaqiang ; Berninger, Frank ; Mao, Fangjie ; Li, Xuejian ; Chen, Liang ; Cui, Lu ; Li, Yangguang ; Zhu, Di'en ; Xu, Lin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-987d3710a9843b07850347ca7c282a91a423dd6f909fb4c03f7a28ec554e5b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Ecosystem respiration</topic><topic>Gross ecosystem productivity</topic><topic>Net ecosystem exchange</topic><topic>Phyllostachys praecox</topic><topic>Random forest</topic><topic>Seasonal variation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yuli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Guomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Huaqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berninger, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mao, Fangjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xuejian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yangguang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Di'en</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Lin</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Yuli</au><au>Zhou, Guomo</au><au>Du, Huaqiang</au><au>Berninger, Frank</au><au>Mao, Fangjie</au><au>Li, Xuejian</au><au>Chen, Liang</au><au>Cui, Lu</au><au>Li, Yangguang</au><au>Zhu, Di'en</au><au>Xu, Lin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response of carbon uptake to abiotic and biotic drivers in an intensively managed Lei bamboo forest</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>223</volume><spage>713</spage><epage>722</epage><pages>713-722</pages><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><abstract>Lei bamboo (Phyllostachys praecox) is widely distributed in southeastern China. We used eddy covariance to analyze carbon sequestration capacity of a Lei bamboo forest (2011–2013) and to identify the seasonal biotic and abiotic determinants of carbon fluxes. A machine learning algorithm called random forest (RF) was used to identify factors that affected carbon fluxes. The RF model predicted well the gross ecosystem productivity (GEP), ecosystem respiration (RE) and net ecosystem exchange (NEE), and displayed variations in the drivers between different seasons. Mean annual NEE, RE, and GEP were −105.2 ± 23.1, 1264.5 ± 45.2, and 1369.6 ± 52.5 g C m−2, respectively. Climate warming increased RE more than GEP when water inputs were not limiting. Summer drought played little role in suppressing GEP, but low soil moisture contents suppressed RE and increased the carbon sink during drought in the summer. The most important drivers of NEE were soil temperature in spring, summer, and winter, and photosynthetically active radiation in autumn. Air and soil temperature were important drivers of GEP in all seasons. [Display omitted] •The managed Lei bamboo forest was a carbon sink annually and a weak carbon source in certain month.•Dynamics of carbon fluxes was closely associated with phenology of Lei bamboo.•Seasonal drivers of carbon fluxes were identified by random forest.•The results can provide a reference to simulate and optimize ecosystem carbon cycle.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29975899</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.046</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4797
ispartof Journal of environmental management, 2018-10, Vol.223, p.713-722
issn 0301-4797
1095-8630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2066473594
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Ecosystem respiration
Gross ecosystem productivity
Net ecosystem exchange
Phyllostachys praecox
Random forest
Seasonal variation
title Response of carbon uptake to abiotic and biotic drivers in an intensively managed Lei bamboo forest
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T01%3A35%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20of%20carbon%20uptake%20to%20abiotic%20and%20biotic%20drivers%20in%20an%20intensively%20managed%20Lei%20bamboo%20forest&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Liu,%20Yuli&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=223&rft.spage=713&rft.epage=722&rft.pages=713-722&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.046&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2066473594%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-987d3710a9843b07850347ca7c282a91a423dd6f909fb4c03f7a28ec554e5b93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2066473594&rft_id=info:pmid/29975899&rfr_iscdi=true