Loading…
US Medical Information Websites Benchmarking: How Is the Industry Fairing in Usability?
Objectives: This study of 23 US-based biopharmaceutical medical information (MI) websites was conducted to assess usability and identify best practices and areas of potential improvement. Methods: In this systematic review, websites were evaluated from June 22–November 1, 2016, and awarded points ba...
Saved in:
Published in: | Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science 2019-05, Vol.53 (3), p.340-348 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-4229e2288c2fed83f7133f1edd4d1aa509ad23eaa6a1defdffee8dbbd9036d8d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-4229e2288c2fed83f7133f1edd4d1aa509ad23eaa6a1defdffee8dbbd9036d8d3 |
container_end_page | 348 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 340 |
container_title | Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Paquette-Lemieux, Etienne Hays, Steven Gaspo, Rania |
description | Objectives:
This study of 23 US-based biopharmaceutical medical information (MI) websites was conducted to assess usability and identify best practices and areas of potential improvement.
Methods:
In this systematic review, websites were evaluated from June 22–November 1, 2016, and awarded points based on content, functionality, and navigation (maximum score of 42). Low-, mid-, and high-range usability scores were ≤13, 14-27, ≥28, respectively.
Results:
Mean scores were 7 of 17, 4 of 10, and only 5 of 15 criteria for content, functionality, and navigation. The mean usability score across all websites was 15 of 42 criteria. Larger companies generally had a higher mean usability score. A minor trend was also observed with regard to usability score and industry size (r2 = 0.3). Only 2 websites scored high, whereas 13 scored in the mid- and 8 in the lower range of usability. Overall, websites scored low when pertaining to presence of novel content type, search engine optimization, presence of social media, and MI services offered. Overall site architecture, presence of self-certification, and mobile compatibility scored fairly well across the industry.
Conclusion:
The majority of websites scored in the low to midrange, which suggests an industry-wide opportunity for improvement. In order to meet the evolving needs of health care professionals, MI websites need to be optimized for content, navigation, and functionality. Ensuring MI websites are discoverable through search engines and improving the level of MI services offered was also deemed to be important features to incorporate into a given MI website optimization strategy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/2168479018786481 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2066475162</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_2168479018786481</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2229908468</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-4229e2288c2fed83f7133f1edd4d1aa509ad23eaa6a1defdffee8dbbd9036d8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMFLwzAUxoMoKtO7Jwl48VJN0ixJvYgO5wYTDzo8lrR50cyunUmL7L83Y1NhBzGXF_J-35f3PoROKLmgVMpLRoXiMiNUSSW4ojvocPWUcEX47vc99g_QcQgzEk-m-pKpfXTAskwKStghepk-4QcwrtQVHte28XPduqbGL1AE10LAt1CXb3Pt3139eoVHzSceB9y-QaRNF1q_xEPtfGxiV-Np0IWrXLu8PkJ7VlcBjje1h6bDu-fBKJk83o8HN5Ok5ES2CWcsA8aUKpkFo1IraZpaCsZwQ7Xuk0wbloLWQlMD1lgLoExRmIykwiiT9tD52nfhm48OQpvPXSihqnQNTRdyRoTgsk8Fi-jZFjprOl_H6XIWx8iI4kJFiqyp0jcheLD5wru4_zKnJF_lnm_nHiWnG-OumIP5EXynHAG6BsJilRT435__ME02Gv0K_-C_AEwqmMY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2229908468</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>US Medical Information Websites Benchmarking: How Is the Industry Fairing in Usability?</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Paquette-Lemieux, Etienne ; Hays, Steven ; Gaspo, Rania</creator><creatorcontrib>Paquette-Lemieux, Etienne ; Hays, Steven ; Gaspo, Rania</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives:
This study of 23 US-based biopharmaceutical medical information (MI) websites was conducted to assess usability and identify best practices and areas of potential improvement.
Methods:
In this systematic review, websites were evaluated from June 22–November 1, 2016, and awarded points based on content, functionality, and navigation (maximum score of 42). Low-, mid-, and high-range usability scores were ≤13, 14-27, ≥28, respectively.
Results:
Mean scores were 7 of 17, 4 of 10, and only 5 of 15 criteria for content, functionality, and navigation. The mean usability score across all websites was 15 of 42 criteria. Larger companies generally had a higher mean usability score. A minor trend was also observed with regard to usability score and industry size (r2 = 0.3). Only 2 websites scored high, whereas 13 scored in the mid- and 8 in the lower range of usability. Overall, websites scored low when pertaining to presence of novel content type, search engine optimization, presence of social media, and MI services offered. Overall site architecture, presence of self-certification, and mobile compatibility scored fairly well across the industry.
Conclusion:
The majority of websites scored in the low to midrange, which suggests an industry-wide opportunity for improvement. In order to meet the evolving needs of health care professionals, MI websites need to be optimized for content, navigation, and functionality. Ensuring MI websites are discoverable through search engines and improving the level of MI services offered was also deemed to be important features to incorporate into a given MI website optimization strategy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-4790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-4804</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2168479018786481</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29976102</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Benchmarking - methods ; Biopharmaceuticals ; Digital media ; Drug Industry ; Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance ; Guidelines as Topic ; Health care ; Humans ; Identification methods ; Marketing ; Medical Communications: Original Article ; Medical Informatics - methods ; Navigation ; Optimization ; Pharmacotherapy ; Pharmacy ; Search Engine ; Search engines ; Social Media ; Usability ; Websites</subject><ispartof>Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2019-05, Vol.53 (3), p.340-348</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><rights>Drug Information Association, Inc 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-4229e2288c2fed83f7133f1edd4d1aa509ad23eaa6a1defdffee8dbbd9036d8d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-4229e2288c2fed83f7133f1edd4d1aa509ad23eaa6a1defdffee8dbbd9036d8d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8243-603X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29976102$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paquette-Lemieux, Etienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hays, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaspo, Rania</creatorcontrib><title>US Medical Information Websites Benchmarking: How Is the Industry Fairing in Usability?</title><title>Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science</title><addtitle>Ther Innov Regul Sci</addtitle><addtitle>Ther Innov Regul Sci</addtitle><description>Objectives:
This study of 23 US-based biopharmaceutical medical information (MI) websites was conducted to assess usability and identify best practices and areas of potential improvement.
Methods:
In this systematic review, websites were evaluated from June 22–November 1, 2016, and awarded points based on content, functionality, and navigation (maximum score of 42). Low-, mid-, and high-range usability scores were ≤13, 14-27, ≥28, respectively.
Results:
Mean scores were 7 of 17, 4 of 10, and only 5 of 15 criteria for content, functionality, and navigation. The mean usability score across all websites was 15 of 42 criteria. Larger companies generally had a higher mean usability score. A minor trend was also observed with regard to usability score and industry size (r2 = 0.3). Only 2 websites scored high, whereas 13 scored in the mid- and 8 in the lower range of usability. Overall, websites scored low when pertaining to presence of novel content type, search engine optimization, presence of social media, and MI services offered. Overall site architecture, presence of self-certification, and mobile compatibility scored fairly well across the industry.
Conclusion:
The majority of websites scored in the low to midrange, which suggests an industry-wide opportunity for improvement. In order to meet the evolving needs of health care professionals, MI websites need to be optimized for content, navigation, and functionality. Ensuring MI websites are discoverable through search engines and improving the level of MI services offered was also deemed to be important features to incorporate into a given MI website optimization strategy.</description><subject>Benchmarking - methods</subject><subject>Biopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Digital media</subject><subject>Drug Industry</subject><subject>Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Identification methods</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Medical Communications: Original Article</subject><subject>Medical Informatics - methods</subject><subject>Navigation</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Pharmacotherapy</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Search Engine</subject><subject>Search engines</subject><subject>Social Media</subject><subject>Usability</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>2168-4790</issn><issn>2168-4804</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMFLwzAUxoMoKtO7Jwl48VJN0ixJvYgO5wYTDzo8lrR50cyunUmL7L83Y1NhBzGXF_J-35f3PoROKLmgVMpLRoXiMiNUSSW4ojvocPWUcEX47vc99g_QcQgzEk-m-pKpfXTAskwKStghepk-4QcwrtQVHte28XPduqbGL1AE10LAt1CXb3Pt3139eoVHzSceB9y-QaRNF1q_xEPtfGxiV-Np0IWrXLu8PkJ7VlcBjje1h6bDu-fBKJk83o8HN5Ok5ES2CWcsA8aUKpkFo1IraZpaCsZwQ7Xuk0wbloLWQlMD1lgLoExRmIykwiiT9tD52nfhm48OQpvPXSihqnQNTRdyRoTgsk8Fi-jZFjprOl_H6XIWx8iI4kJFiqyp0jcheLD5wru4_zKnJF_lnm_nHiWnG-OumIP5EXynHAG6BsJilRT435__ME02Gv0K_-C_AEwqmMY</recordid><startdate>20190501</startdate><enddate>20190501</enddate><creator>Paquette-Lemieux, Etienne</creator><creator>Hays, Steven</creator><creator>Gaspo, Rania</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8243-603X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190501</creationdate><title>US Medical Information Websites Benchmarking: How Is the Industry Fairing in Usability?</title><author>Paquette-Lemieux, Etienne ; Hays, Steven ; Gaspo, Rania</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-4229e2288c2fed83f7133f1edd4d1aa509ad23eaa6a1defdffee8dbbd9036d8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Benchmarking - methods</topic><topic>Biopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Digital media</topic><topic>Drug Industry</topic><topic>Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Identification methods</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Medical Communications: Original Article</topic><topic>Medical Informatics - methods</topic><topic>Navigation</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Pharmacotherapy</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Search Engine</topic><topic>Search engines</topic><topic>Social Media</topic><topic>Usability</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paquette-Lemieux, Etienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hays, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaspo, Rania</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paquette-Lemieux, Etienne</au><au>Hays, Steven</au><au>Gaspo, Rania</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>US Medical Information Websites Benchmarking: How Is the Industry Fairing in Usability?</atitle><jtitle>Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science</jtitle><stitle>Ther Innov Regul Sci</stitle><addtitle>Ther Innov Regul Sci</addtitle><date>2019-05-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>340</spage><epage>348</epage><pages>340-348</pages><issn>2168-4790</issn><eissn>2168-4804</eissn><abstract>Objectives:
This study of 23 US-based biopharmaceutical medical information (MI) websites was conducted to assess usability and identify best practices and areas of potential improvement.
Methods:
In this systematic review, websites were evaluated from June 22–November 1, 2016, and awarded points based on content, functionality, and navigation (maximum score of 42). Low-, mid-, and high-range usability scores were ≤13, 14-27, ≥28, respectively.
Results:
Mean scores were 7 of 17, 4 of 10, and only 5 of 15 criteria for content, functionality, and navigation. The mean usability score across all websites was 15 of 42 criteria. Larger companies generally had a higher mean usability score. A minor trend was also observed with regard to usability score and industry size (r2 = 0.3). Only 2 websites scored high, whereas 13 scored in the mid- and 8 in the lower range of usability. Overall, websites scored low when pertaining to presence of novel content type, search engine optimization, presence of social media, and MI services offered. Overall site architecture, presence of self-certification, and mobile compatibility scored fairly well across the industry.
Conclusion:
The majority of websites scored in the low to midrange, which suggests an industry-wide opportunity for improvement. In order to meet the evolving needs of health care professionals, MI websites need to be optimized for content, navigation, and functionality. Ensuring MI websites are discoverable through search engines and improving the level of MI services offered was also deemed to be important features to incorporate into a given MI website optimization strategy.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>29976102</pmid><doi>10.1177/2168479018786481</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8243-603X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2168-4790 |
ispartof | Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2019-05, Vol.53 (3), p.340-348 |
issn | 2168-4790 2168-4804 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2066475162 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Benchmarking - methods Biopharmaceuticals Digital media Drug Industry Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance Guidelines as Topic Health care Humans Identification methods Marketing Medical Communications: Original Article Medical Informatics - methods Navigation Optimization Pharmacotherapy Pharmacy Search Engine Search engines Social Media Usability Websites |
title | US Medical Information Websites Benchmarking: How Is the Industry Fairing in Usability? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T00%3A11%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=US%20Medical%20Information%20Websites%20Benchmarking:%20How%20Is%20the%20Industry%20Fairing%20in%20Usability?&rft.jtitle=Therapeutic%20innovation%20&%20regulatory%20science&rft.au=Paquette-Lemieux,%20Etienne&rft.date=2019-05-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=340&rft.epage=348&rft.pages=340-348&rft.issn=2168-4790&rft.eissn=2168-4804&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2168479018786481&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2229908468%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-4229e2288c2fed83f7133f1edd4d1aa509ad23eaa6a1defdffee8dbbd9036d8d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2229908468&rft_id=info:pmid/29976102&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2168479018786481&rfr_iscdi=true |