Loading…

US Medical Information Websites Benchmarking: How Is the Industry Fairing in Usability?

Objectives: This study of 23 US-based biopharmaceutical medical information (MI) websites was conducted to assess usability and identify best practices and areas of potential improvement. Methods: In this systematic review, websites were evaluated from June 22–November 1, 2016, and awarded points ba...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science 2019-05, Vol.53 (3), p.340-348
Main Authors: Paquette-Lemieux, Etienne, Hays, Steven, Gaspo, Rania
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-4229e2288c2fed83f7133f1edd4d1aa509ad23eaa6a1defdffee8dbbd9036d8d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-4229e2288c2fed83f7133f1edd4d1aa509ad23eaa6a1defdffee8dbbd9036d8d3
container_end_page 348
container_issue 3
container_start_page 340
container_title Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
container_volume 53
creator Paquette-Lemieux, Etienne
Hays, Steven
Gaspo, Rania
description Objectives: This study of 23 US-based biopharmaceutical medical information (MI) websites was conducted to assess usability and identify best practices and areas of potential improvement. Methods: In this systematic review, websites were evaluated from June 22–November 1, 2016, and awarded points based on content, functionality, and navigation (maximum score of 42). Low-, mid-, and high-range usability scores were ≤13, 14-27, ≥28, respectively. Results: Mean scores were 7 of 17, 4 of 10, and only 5 of 15 criteria for content, functionality, and navigation. The mean usability score across all websites was 15 of 42 criteria. Larger companies generally had a higher mean usability score. A minor trend was also observed with regard to usability score and industry size (r2 = 0.3). Only 2 websites scored high, whereas 13 scored in the mid- and 8 in the lower range of usability. Overall, websites scored low when pertaining to presence of novel content type, search engine optimization, presence of social media, and MI services offered. Overall site architecture, presence of self-certification, and mobile compatibility scored fairly well across the industry. Conclusion: The majority of websites scored in the low to midrange, which suggests an industry-wide opportunity for improvement. In order to meet the evolving needs of health care professionals, MI websites need to be optimized for content, navigation, and functionality. Ensuring MI websites are discoverable through search engines and improving the level of MI services offered was also deemed to be important features to incorporate into a given MI website optimization strategy.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/2168479018786481
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2066475162</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_2168479018786481</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2229908468</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-4229e2288c2fed83f7133f1edd4d1aa509ad23eaa6a1defdffee8dbbd9036d8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMFLwzAUxoMoKtO7Jwl48VJN0ixJvYgO5wYTDzo8lrR50cyunUmL7L83Y1NhBzGXF_J-35f3PoROKLmgVMpLRoXiMiNUSSW4ojvocPWUcEX47vc99g_QcQgzEk-m-pKpfXTAskwKStghepk-4QcwrtQVHte28XPduqbGL1AE10LAt1CXb3Pt3139eoVHzSceB9y-QaRNF1q_xEPtfGxiV-Np0IWrXLu8PkJ7VlcBjje1h6bDu-fBKJk83o8HN5Ok5ES2CWcsA8aUKpkFo1IraZpaCsZwQ7Xuk0wbloLWQlMD1lgLoExRmIykwiiT9tD52nfhm48OQpvPXSihqnQNTRdyRoTgsk8Fi-jZFjprOl_H6XIWx8iI4kJFiqyp0jcheLD5wru4_zKnJF_lnm_nHiWnG-OumIP5EXynHAG6BsJilRT435__ME02Gv0K_-C_AEwqmMY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2229908468</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>US Medical Information Websites Benchmarking: How Is the Industry Fairing in Usability?</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Paquette-Lemieux, Etienne ; Hays, Steven ; Gaspo, Rania</creator><creatorcontrib>Paquette-Lemieux, Etienne ; Hays, Steven ; Gaspo, Rania</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: This study of 23 US-based biopharmaceutical medical information (MI) websites was conducted to assess usability and identify best practices and areas of potential improvement. Methods: In this systematic review, websites were evaluated from June 22–November 1, 2016, and awarded points based on content, functionality, and navigation (maximum score of 42). Low-, mid-, and high-range usability scores were ≤13, 14-27, ≥28, respectively. Results: Mean scores were 7 of 17, 4 of 10, and only 5 of 15 criteria for content, functionality, and navigation. The mean usability score across all websites was 15 of 42 criteria. Larger companies generally had a higher mean usability score. A minor trend was also observed with regard to usability score and industry size (r2 = 0.3). Only 2 websites scored high, whereas 13 scored in the mid- and 8 in the lower range of usability. Overall, websites scored low when pertaining to presence of novel content type, search engine optimization, presence of social media, and MI services offered. Overall site architecture, presence of self-certification, and mobile compatibility scored fairly well across the industry. Conclusion: The majority of websites scored in the low to midrange, which suggests an industry-wide opportunity for improvement. In order to meet the evolving needs of health care professionals, MI websites need to be optimized for content, navigation, and functionality. Ensuring MI websites are discoverable through search engines and improving the level of MI services offered was also deemed to be important features to incorporate into a given MI website optimization strategy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-4790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-4804</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2168479018786481</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29976102</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Benchmarking - methods ; Biopharmaceuticals ; Digital media ; Drug Industry ; Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance ; Guidelines as Topic ; Health care ; Humans ; Identification methods ; Marketing ; Medical Communications: Original Article ; Medical Informatics - methods ; Navigation ; Optimization ; Pharmacotherapy ; Pharmacy ; Search Engine ; Search engines ; Social Media ; Usability ; Websites</subject><ispartof>Therapeutic innovation &amp; regulatory science, 2019-05, Vol.53 (3), p.340-348</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><rights>Drug Information Association, Inc 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-4229e2288c2fed83f7133f1edd4d1aa509ad23eaa6a1defdffee8dbbd9036d8d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-4229e2288c2fed83f7133f1edd4d1aa509ad23eaa6a1defdffee8dbbd9036d8d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8243-603X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29976102$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paquette-Lemieux, Etienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hays, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaspo, Rania</creatorcontrib><title>US Medical Information Websites Benchmarking: How Is the Industry Fairing in Usability?</title><title>Therapeutic innovation &amp; regulatory science</title><addtitle>Ther Innov Regul Sci</addtitle><addtitle>Ther Innov Regul Sci</addtitle><description>Objectives: This study of 23 US-based biopharmaceutical medical information (MI) websites was conducted to assess usability and identify best practices and areas of potential improvement. Methods: In this systematic review, websites were evaluated from June 22–November 1, 2016, and awarded points based on content, functionality, and navigation (maximum score of 42). Low-, mid-, and high-range usability scores were ≤13, 14-27, ≥28, respectively. Results: Mean scores were 7 of 17, 4 of 10, and only 5 of 15 criteria for content, functionality, and navigation. The mean usability score across all websites was 15 of 42 criteria. Larger companies generally had a higher mean usability score. A minor trend was also observed with regard to usability score and industry size (r2 = 0.3). Only 2 websites scored high, whereas 13 scored in the mid- and 8 in the lower range of usability. Overall, websites scored low when pertaining to presence of novel content type, search engine optimization, presence of social media, and MI services offered. Overall site architecture, presence of self-certification, and mobile compatibility scored fairly well across the industry. Conclusion: The majority of websites scored in the low to midrange, which suggests an industry-wide opportunity for improvement. In order to meet the evolving needs of health care professionals, MI websites need to be optimized for content, navigation, and functionality. Ensuring MI websites are discoverable through search engines and improving the level of MI services offered was also deemed to be important features to incorporate into a given MI website optimization strategy.</description><subject>Benchmarking - methods</subject><subject>Biopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Digital media</subject><subject>Drug Industry</subject><subject>Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Identification methods</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Medical Communications: Original Article</subject><subject>Medical Informatics - methods</subject><subject>Navigation</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Pharmacotherapy</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Search Engine</subject><subject>Search engines</subject><subject>Social Media</subject><subject>Usability</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>2168-4790</issn><issn>2168-4804</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMFLwzAUxoMoKtO7Jwl48VJN0ixJvYgO5wYTDzo8lrR50cyunUmL7L83Y1NhBzGXF_J-35f3PoROKLmgVMpLRoXiMiNUSSW4ojvocPWUcEX47vc99g_QcQgzEk-m-pKpfXTAskwKStghepk-4QcwrtQVHte28XPduqbGL1AE10LAt1CXb3Pt3139eoVHzSceB9y-QaRNF1q_xEPtfGxiV-Np0IWrXLu8PkJ7VlcBjje1h6bDu-fBKJk83o8HN5Ok5ES2CWcsA8aUKpkFo1IraZpaCsZwQ7Xuk0wbloLWQlMD1lgLoExRmIykwiiT9tD52nfhm48OQpvPXSihqnQNTRdyRoTgsk8Fi-jZFjprOl_H6XIWx8iI4kJFiqyp0jcheLD5wru4_zKnJF_lnm_nHiWnG-OumIP5EXynHAG6BsJilRT435__ME02Gv0K_-C_AEwqmMY</recordid><startdate>20190501</startdate><enddate>20190501</enddate><creator>Paquette-Lemieux, Etienne</creator><creator>Hays, Steven</creator><creator>Gaspo, Rania</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8243-603X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190501</creationdate><title>US Medical Information Websites Benchmarking: How Is the Industry Fairing in Usability?</title><author>Paquette-Lemieux, Etienne ; Hays, Steven ; Gaspo, Rania</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-4229e2288c2fed83f7133f1edd4d1aa509ad23eaa6a1defdffee8dbbd9036d8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Benchmarking - methods</topic><topic>Biopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Digital media</topic><topic>Drug Industry</topic><topic>Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Identification methods</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Medical Communications: Original Article</topic><topic>Medical Informatics - methods</topic><topic>Navigation</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Pharmacotherapy</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Search Engine</topic><topic>Search engines</topic><topic>Social Media</topic><topic>Usability</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paquette-Lemieux, Etienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hays, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaspo, Rania</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Therapeutic innovation &amp; regulatory science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paquette-Lemieux, Etienne</au><au>Hays, Steven</au><au>Gaspo, Rania</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>US Medical Information Websites Benchmarking: How Is the Industry Fairing in Usability?</atitle><jtitle>Therapeutic innovation &amp; regulatory science</jtitle><stitle>Ther Innov Regul Sci</stitle><addtitle>Ther Innov Regul Sci</addtitle><date>2019-05-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>340</spage><epage>348</epage><pages>340-348</pages><issn>2168-4790</issn><eissn>2168-4804</eissn><abstract>Objectives: This study of 23 US-based biopharmaceutical medical information (MI) websites was conducted to assess usability and identify best practices and areas of potential improvement. Methods: In this systematic review, websites were evaluated from June 22–November 1, 2016, and awarded points based on content, functionality, and navigation (maximum score of 42). Low-, mid-, and high-range usability scores were ≤13, 14-27, ≥28, respectively. Results: Mean scores were 7 of 17, 4 of 10, and only 5 of 15 criteria for content, functionality, and navigation. The mean usability score across all websites was 15 of 42 criteria. Larger companies generally had a higher mean usability score. A minor trend was also observed with regard to usability score and industry size (r2 = 0.3). Only 2 websites scored high, whereas 13 scored in the mid- and 8 in the lower range of usability. Overall, websites scored low when pertaining to presence of novel content type, search engine optimization, presence of social media, and MI services offered. Overall site architecture, presence of self-certification, and mobile compatibility scored fairly well across the industry. Conclusion: The majority of websites scored in the low to midrange, which suggests an industry-wide opportunity for improvement. In order to meet the evolving needs of health care professionals, MI websites need to be optimized for content, navigation, and functionality. Ensuring MI websites are discoverable through search engines and improving the level of MI services offered was also deemed to be important features to incorporate into a given MI website optimization strategy.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>29976102</pmid><doi>10.1177/2168479018786481</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8243-603X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-4790
ispartof Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2019-05, Vol.53 (3), p.340-348
issn 2168-4790
2168-4804
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2066475162
source Springer Nature
subjects Benchmarking - methods
Biopharmaceuticals
Digital media
Drug Industry
Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance
Guidelines as Topic
Health care
Humans
Identification methods
Marketing
Medical Communications: Original Article
Medical Informatics - methods
Navigation
Optimization
Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacy
Search Engine
Search engines
Social Media
Usability
Websites
title US Medical Information Websites Benchmarking: How Is the Industry Fairing in Usability?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T00%3A11%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=US%20Medical%20Information%20Websites%20Benchmarking:%20How%20Is%20the%20Industry%20Fairing%20in%20Usability?&rft.jtitle=Therapeutic%20innovation%20&%20regulatory%20science&rft.au=Paquette-Lemieux,%20Etienne&rft.date=2019-05-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=340&rft.epage=348&rft.pages=340-348&rft.issn=2168-4790&rft.eissn=2168-4804&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2168479018786481&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2229908468%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-4229e2288c2fed83f7133f1edd4d1aa509ad23eaa6a1defdffee8dbbd9036d8d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2229908468&rft_id=info:pmid/29976102&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2168479018786481&rfr_iscdi=true