Loading…

Comparison of Two Methods for Implanting Passive Integrated Transponders in Rio Grande Silvery Minnow

Uniquely tagged animals provide an opportunity to study changes in population demographics and movement. Passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags are used to monitor growth, movement, and survival of fishes. Laboratory studies of tag retention and mortality in small‐bodied, warmwater cyprinids afte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:North American journal of fisheries management 2009-04, Vol.29 (2), p.346-351
Main Authors: Archdeacon, Thomas P., Remshardt, W. Jason, Knecht, Tammy L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3006-6a0b2ed6d61271ecddf9324d89c8654e5e48513877267c118619a99d87aee8393
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3006-6a0b2ed6d61271ecddf9324d89c8654e5e48513877267c118619a99d87aee8393
container_end_page 351
container_issue 2
container_start_page 346
container_title North American journal of fisheries management
container_volume 29
creator Archdeacon, Thomas P.
Remshardt, W. Jason
Knecht, Tammy L.
description Uniquely tagged animals provide an opportunity to study changes in population demographics and movement. Passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags are used to monitor growth, movement, and survival of fishes. Laboratory studies of tag retention and mortality in small‐bodied, warmwater cyprinids after insertion of PIT tags are rare. Mortality induced by two PIT tag implantation methods was compared, and tag retention after implantation was assessed. Relations between standard length and tag retention and between standard length and survival in Rio Grande silvery minnow Hybognathus amarus were examined. Fish were randomly selected and PIT‐tagged with 12.5‐mm tags via surgical incision or needle injection and were held in laboratory aquaria for 32 d. Mean (±SE) survival on day 32 was 99 ± 1% for control fish, 87 ± 6% for fish that received tags by incision, and 50 ± 5% for fish that received tags by injection. We also tagged 280 fish by incision and held them in aquaria for 49 d. On day 49, survival and tag retention were both 90%. Longer fish had higher survival, but tag retention was not related to fish length. Rio Grande silvery minnow can be reliably tagged with PIT tags if the fish are greater than 60 mm standard length. Treatment with antibiotics and holding of fish in captivity for a minimum of 6 d before release are recommended.
doi_str_mv 10.1577/M08-130.1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20665955</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20665955</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3006-6a0b2ed6d61271ecddf9324d89c8654e5e48513877267c118619a99d87aee8393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsH_0FOgoe1yWbzdSxFa6FV0Xpe4ma2RnaTNdm29N-7Uq8ehmGGhxfeB6FrSu4ol3KyIiqjbDhO0IjyQmVKSH6KRiSXPOO6kOfoIqUvQghXPB8hmIW2M9Gl4HGo8Xof8Ar6z2ATrkPEi7ZrjO-d3-AXk5LbAV74HjbR9GDxOhqfuuAtxISdx68u4Pnws4DfXLODeMAr533YX6Kz2jQJrv72GL0_3K9nj9nyeb6YTZdZxQgRmTDkIwcrrKC5pFBZW2uWF1bpSgleAIdCccqUlLmQFaVKUG20tkoaAMU0G6ObY24Xw_cWUl-2LlXQDB0gbFOZEyG45nwAb49gFUNKEeqyi6418VBSUv6KLAeR5SBymDGaHNm9a-DwP1g-TR9WhBWC_QCD6XPt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20665955</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Two Methods for Implanting Passive Integrated Transponders in Rio Grande Silvery Minnow</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Archdeacon, Thomas P. ; Remshardt, W. Jason ; Knecht, Tammy L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Archdeacon, Thomas P. ; Remshardt, W. Jason ; Knecht, Tammy L.</creatorcontrib><description>Uniquely tagged animals provide an opportunity to study changes in population demographics and movement. Passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags are used to monitor growth, movement, and survival of fishes. Laboratory studies of tag retention and mortality in small‐bodied, warmwater cyprinids after insertion of PIT tags are rare. Mortality induced by two PIT tag implantation methods was compared, and tag retention after implantation was assessed. Relations between standard length and tag retention and between standard length and survival in Rio Grande silvery minnow Hybognathus amarus were examined. Fish were randomly selected and PIT‐tagged with 12.5‐mm tags via surgical incision or needle injection and were held in laboratory aquaria for 32 d. Mean (±SE) survival on day 32 was 99 ± 1% for control fish, 87 ± 6% for fish that received tags by incision, and 50 ± 5% for fish that received tags by injection. We also tagged 280 fish by incision and held them in aquaria for 49 d. On day 49, survival and tag retention were both 90%. Longer fish had higher survival, but tag retention was not related to fish length. Rio Grande silvery minnow can be reliably tagged with PIT tags if the fish are greater than 60 mm standard length. Treatment with antibiotics and holding of fish in captivity for a minimum of 6 d before release are recommended.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0275-5947</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-8675</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1577/M08-130.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Freshwater ; Hybognathus amarus</subject><ispartof>North American journal of fisheries management, 2009-04, Vol.29 (2), p.346-351</ispartof><rights>2009 American Fisheries Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3006-6a0b2ed6d61271ecddf9324d89c8654e5e48513877267c118619a99d87aee8393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3006-6a0b2ed6d61271ecddf9324d89c8654e5e48513877267c118619a99d87aee8393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Archdeacon, Thomas P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remshardt, W. Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knecht, Tammy L.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Two Methods for Implanting Passive Integrated Transponders in Rio Grande Silvery Minnow</title><title>North American journal of fisheries management</title><description>Uniquely tagged animals provide an opportunity to study changes in population demographics and movement. Passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags are used to monitor growth, movement, and survival of fishes. Laboratory studies of tag retention and mortality in small‐bodied, warmwater cyprinids after insertion of PIT tags are rare. Mortality induced by two PIT tag implantation methods was compared, and tag retention after implantation was assessed. Relations between standard length and tag retention and between standard length and survival in Rio Grande silvery minnow Hybognathus amarus were examined. Fish were randomly selected and PIT‐tagged with 12.5‐mm tags via surgical incision or needle injection and were held in laboratory aquaria for 32 d. Mean (±SE) survival on day 32 was 99 ± 1% for control fish, 87 ± 6% for fish that received tags by incision, and 50 ± 5% for fish that received tags by injection. We also tagged 280 fish by incision and held them in aquaria for 49 d. On day 49, survival and tag retention were both 90%. Longer fish had higher survival, but tag retention was not related to fish length. Rio Grande silvery minnow can be reliably tagged with PIT tags if the fish are greater than 60 mm standard length. Treatment with antibiotics and holding of fish in captivity for a minimum of 6 d before release are recommended.</description><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Hybognathus amarus</subject><issn>0275-5947</issn><issn>1548-8675</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsH_0FOgoe1yWbzdSxFa6FV0Xpe4ma2RnaTNdm29N-7Uq8ehmGGhxfeB6FrSu4ol3KyIiqjbDhO0IjyQmVKSH6KRiSXPOO6kOfoIqUvQghXPB8hmIW2M9Gl4HGo8Xof8Ar6z2ATrkPEi7ZrjO-d3-AXk5LbAV74HjbR9GDxOhqfuuAtxISdx68u4Pnws4DfXLODeMAr533YX6Kz2jQJrv72GL0_3K9nj9nyeb6YTZdZxQgRmTDkIwcrrKC5pFBZW2uWF1bpSgleAIdCccqUlLmQFaVKUG20tkoaAMU0G6ObY24Xw_cWUl-2LlXQDB0gbFOZEyG45nwAb49gFUNKEeqyi6418VBSUv6KLAeR5SBymDGaHNm9a-DwP1g-TR9WhBWC_QCD6XPt</recordid><startdate>200904</startdate><enddate>200904</enddate><creator>Archdeacon, Thomas P.</creator><creator>Remshardt, W. Jason</creator><creator>Knecht, Tammy L.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200904</creationdate><title>Comparison of Two Methods for Implanting Passive Integrated Transponders in Rio Grande Silvery Minnow</title><author>Archdeacon, Thomas P. ; Remshardt, W. Jason ; Knecht, Tammy L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3006-6a0b2ed6d61271ecddf9324d89c8654e5e48513877267c118619a99d87aee8393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Hybognathus amarus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Archdeacon, Thomas P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remshardt, W. Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knecht, Tammy L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>North American journal of fisheries management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Archdeacon, Thomas P.</au><au>Remshardt, W. Jason</au><au>Knecht, Tammy L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Two Methods for Implanting Passive Integrated Transponders in Rio Grande Silvery Minnow</atitle><jtitle>North American journal of fisheries management</jtitle><date>2009-04</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>346</spage><epage>351</epage><pages>346-351</pages><issn>0275-5947</issn><eissn>1548-8675</eissn><abstract>Uniquely tagged animals provide an opportunity to study changes in population demographics and movement. Passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags are used to monitor growth, movement, and survival of fishes. Laboratory studies of tag retention and mortality in small‐bodied, warmwater cyprinids after insertion of PIT tags are rare. Mortality induced by two PIT tag implantation methods was compared, and tag retention after implantation was assessed. Relations between standard length and tag retention and between standard length and survival in Rio Grande silvery minnow Hybognathus amarus were examined. Fish were randomly selected and PIT‐tagged with 12.5‐mm tags via surgical incision or needle injection and were held in laboratory aquaria for 32 d. Mean (±SE) survival on day 32 was 99 ± 1% for control fish, 87 ± 6% for fish that received tags by incision, and 50 ± 5% for fish that received tags by injection. We also tagged 280 fish by incision and held them in aquaria for 49 d. On day 49, survival and tag retention were both 90%. Longer fish had higher survival, but tag retention was not related to fish length. Rio Grande silvery minnow can be reliably tagged with PIT tags if the fish are greater than 60 mm standard length. Treatment with antibiotics and holding of fish in captivity for a minimum of 6 d before release are recommended.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1577/M08-130.1</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0275-5947
ispartof North American journal of fisheries management, 2009-04, Vol.29 (2), p.346-351
issn 0275-5947
1548-8675
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20665955
source Wiley
subjects Freshwater
Hybognathus amarus
title Comparison of Two Methods for Implanting Passive Integrated Transponders in Rio Grande Silvery Minnow
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T17%3A15%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Two%20Methods%20for%20Implanting%20Passive%20Integrated%20Transponders%20in%20Rio%20Grande%20Silvery%20Minnow&rft.jtitle=North%20American%20journal%20of%20fisheries%20management&rft.au=Archdeacon,%20Thomas%20P.&rft.date=2009-04&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=346&rft.epage=351&rft.pages=346-351&rft.issn=0275-5947&rft.eissn=1548-8675&rft_id=info:doi/10.1577/M08-130.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20665955%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3006-6a0b2ed6d61271ecddf9324d89c8654e5e48513877267c118619a99d87aee8393%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20665955&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true