Loading…
The Effects of Field Mowing on Adult Butterfly Assemblages in Central New York State
We investigated the effects of mowing on butterfly counts in fields and woodland openings in upstate New York. We predicted that total counts of butterfly individuals would decrease immediately after mowing, but increase in the year following mowing at corresponding times in the growing season. To t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Natural areas journal 2008-04, Vol.28 (2), p.130-143 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b398t-1fae363f6442920d1caac5477dadf6f86694ff275bb56cc50eff909d6ac7c9a53 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b398t-1fae363f6442920d1caac5477dadf6f86694ff275bb56cc50eff909d6ac7c9a53 |
container_end_page | 143 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 130 |
container_title | Natural areas journal |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Weber, Peter G Preston, Scott Dlugos, Michael J Nelson, Andrew P |
description | We investigated the effects of mowing on butterfly counts in fields and woodland openings in upstate New York. We predicted that total counts of butterfly individuals would decrease immediately after mowing, but increase in the year following mowing at corresponding times in the growing season. To test these predictions, we used modified Pollard transects to obtain counts from three sampling sessions prior to and three sampling sessions after mowing. These counts were compared to those on similar dates in subsequent non-mowing years. The results show a significant decrease in counts of butterflies immediately following mowing, compared to the same periods in non-mowed years. The immediate decrease in counts following mowing may be due to the loss of nectaring sources, since nectaring and nectaring sources declined sharply following mowing, but recovered within a month following mowing. In the year following mowing, the rebound was significantly greater in fields (≥ 0.20 ha) than in woodland openings (≤ 0.19 ha). While species varied in their rebound, only two of 24 species (Pieris rapae and Danaus plexippus) declined significantly in the year following mowing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3375/0885-8608(2008)28[130:TEOFMO]2.0.CO;2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20671658</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43914046</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43914046</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b398t-1fae363f6442920d1caac5477dadf6f86694ff275bb56cc50eff909d6ac7c9a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkM1O4zAUhS0EEuXnEZC8GjGLlBsndhxm1YlaQAK6oCwQQpbjXDNh0rhju0K8Paky4gFYncU597vSR0iSwjTLCn4BUvJECpDnDED-ZPI5zeByNV8u7pYvbArTavmL7ZEJSwVL8qws98nk6-aQHIXwBiAAOJ-Q1eoP0rm1aGKgztJFi11D79x7279S19NZs-0i_b2NEb3tPugsBFzXnX7FQNueVthHrzt6j-_0yfm_9CHqiCfkwOou4On_PCaPi_mquk5ul1c31ew2qbNSxiS1GjORWZHnrGTQpEZrw_OiaHRjhZVClLm1rOB1zYUxHNDaEspGaFOYUvPsmPwYuRvv_m0xRLVug8Gu0z26bVAMRJEKLofhfBwa70LwaNXGt2vtP1QKaudU7fyonR-1c6qYVINTNTpVTIGqhhg4ZyPnLUTnvyCD4zSHXAx9NfZ161yP3_zyCX5-i3M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20671658</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effects of Field Mowing on Adult Butterfly Assemblages in Central New York State</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Weber, Peter G ; Preston, Scott ; Dlugos, Michael J ; Nelson, Andrew P</creator><creatorcontrib>Weber, Peter G ; Preston, Scott ; Dlugos, Michael J ; Nelson, Andrew P</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated the effects of mowing on butterfly counts in fields and woodland openings in upstate New York. We predicted that total counts of butterfly individuals would decrease immediately after mowing, but increase in the year following mowing at corresponding times in the growing season. To test these predictions, we used modified Pollard transects to obtain counts from three sampling sessions prior to and three sampling sessions after mowing. These counts were compared to those on similar dates in subsequent non-mowing years. The results show a significant decrease in counts of butterflies immediately following mowing, compared to the same periods in non-mowed years. The immediate decrease in counts following mowing may be due to the loss of nectaring sources, since nectaring and nectaring sources declined sharply following mowing, but recovered within a month following mowing. In the year following mowing, the rebound was significantly greater in fields (≥ 0.20 ha) than in woodland openings (≤ 0.19 ha). While species varied in their rebound, only two of 24 species (Pieris rapae and Danaus plexippus) declined significantly in the year following mowing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-8608</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-4399</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3375/0885-8608(2008)28[130:TEOFMO]2.0.CO;2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Natural Areas Association</publisher><subject>Agricultural management ; Applied ecology ; Biodiversity conservation ; Butterflies ; Conservation biology ; Danaus ; Environmental conservation ; Habitat conservation ; habitat management ; Insect ecology ; Lepidoptera ; Mowing ; nectaring ; Pieris rapae ; RESEARCH ARTICLE ; transect sampling ; Woodlands</subject><ispartof>Natural areas journal, 2008-04, Vol.28 (2), p.130-143</ispartof><rights>Natural Areas Association</rights><rights>2008 Natural Areas Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b398t-1fae363f6442920d1caac5477dadf6f86694ff275bb56cc50eff909d6ac7c9a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b398t-1fae363f6442920d1caac5477dadf6f86694ff275bb56cc50eff909d6ac7c9a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43914046$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43914046$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,58237,58470</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weber, Peter G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preston, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dlugos, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Andrew P</creatorcontrib><title>The Effects of Field Mowing on Adult Butterfly Assemblages in Central New York State</title><title>Natural areas journal</title><description>We investigated the effects of mowing on butterfly counts in fields and woodland openings in upstate New York. We predicted that total counts of butterfly individuals would decrease immediately after mowing, but increase in the year following mowing at corresponding times in the growing season. To test these predictions, we used modified Pollard transects to obtain counts from three sampling sessions prior to and three sampling sessions after mowing. These counts were compared to those on similar dates in subsequent non-mowing years. The results show a significant decrease in counts of butterflies immediately following mowing, compared to the same periods in non-mowed years. The immediate decrease in counts following mowing may be due to the loss of nectaring sources, since nectaring and nectaring sources declined sharply following mowing, but recovered within a month following mowing. In the year following mowing, the rebound was significantly greater in fields (≥ 0.20 ha) than in woodland openings (≤ 0.19 ha). While species varied in their rebound, only two of 24 species (Pieris rapae and Danaus plexippus) declined significantly in the year following mowing.</description><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biodiversity conservation</subject><subject>Butterflies</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Danaus</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>habitat management</subject><subject>Insect ecology</subject><subject>Lepidoptera</subject><subject>Mowing</subject><subject>nectaring</subject><subject>Pieris rapae</subject><subject>RESEARCH ARTICLE</subject><subject>transect sampling</subject><subject>Woodlands</subject><issn>0885-8608</issn><issn>2162-4399</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdkM1O4zAUhS0EEuXnEZC8GjGLlBsndhxm1YlaQAK6oCwQQpbjXDNh0rhju0K8Paky4gFYncU597vSR0iSwjTLCn4BUvJECpDnDED-ZPI5zeByNV8u7pYvbArTavmL7ZEJSwVL8qws98nk6-aQHIXwBiAAOJ-Q1eoP0rm1aGKgztJFi11D79x7279S19NZs-0i_b2NEb3tPugsBFzXnX7FQNueVthHrzt6j-_0yfm_9CHqiCfkwOou4On_PCaPi_mquk5ul1c31ew2qbNSxiS1GjORWZHnrGTQpEZrw_OiaHRjhZVClLm1rOB1zYUxHNDaEspGaFOYUvPsmPwYuRvv_m0xRLVug8Gu0z26bVAMRJEKLofhfBwa70LwaNXGt2vtP1QKaudU7fyonR-1c6qYVINTNTpVTIGqhhg4ZyPnLUTnvyCD4zSHXAx9NfZ161yP3_zyCX5-i3M</recordid><startdate>200804</startdate><enddate>200804</enddate><creator>Weber, Peter G</creator><creator>Preston, Scott</creator><creator>Dlugos, Michael J</creator><creator>Nelson, Andrew P</creator><general>Natural Areas Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200804</creationdate><title>The Effects of Field Mowing on Adult Butterfly Assemblages in Central New York State</title><author>Weber, Peter G ; Preston, Scott ; Dlugos, Michael J ; Nelson, Andrew P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b398t-1fae363f6442920d1caac5477dadf6f86694ff275bb56cc50eff909d6ac7c9a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biodiversity conservation</topic><topic>Butterflies</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Danaus</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>habitat management</topic><topic>Insect ecology</topic><topic>Lepidoptera</topic><topic>Mowing</topic><topic>nectaring</topic><topic>Pieris rapae</topic><topic>RESEARCH ARTICLE</topic><topic>transect sampling</topic><topic>Woodlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weber, Peter G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preston, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dlugos, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Andrew P</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Natural areas journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weber, Peter G</au><au>Preston, Scott</au><au>Dlugos, Michael J</au><au>Nelson, Andrew P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effects of Field Mowing on Adult Butterfly Assemblages in Central New York State</atitle><jtitle>Natural areas journal</jtitle><date>2008-04</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>130</spage><epage>143</epage><pages>130-143</pages><issn>0885-8608</issn><eissn>2162-4399</eissn><abstract>We investigated the effects of mowing on butterfly counts in fields and woodland openings in upstate New York. We predicted that total counts of butterfly individuals would decrease immediately after mowing, but increase in the year following mowing at corresponding times in the growing season. To test these predictions, we used modified Pollard transects to obtain counts from three sampling sessions prior to and three sampling sessions after mowing. These counts were compared to those on similar dates in subsequent non-mowing years. The results show a significant decrease in counts of butterflies immediately following mowing, compared to the same periods in non-mowed years. The immediate decrease in counts following mowing may be due to the loss of nectaring sources, since nectaring and nectaring sources declined sharply following mowing, but recovered within a month following mowing. In the year following mowing, the rebound was significantly greater in fields (≥ 0.20 ha) than in woodland openings (≤ 0.19 ha). While species varied in their rebound, only two of 24 species (Pieris rapae and Danaus plexippus) declined significantly in the year following mowing.</abstract><pub>Natural Areas Association</pub><doi>10.3375/0885-8608(2008)28[130:TEOFMO]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0885-8608 |
ispartof | Natural areas journal, 2008-04, Vol.28 (2), p.130-143 |
issn | 0885-8608 2162-4399 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20671658 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | Agricultural management Applied ecology Biodiversity conservation Butterflies Conservation biology Danaus Environmental conservation Habitat conservation habitat management Insect ecology Lepidoptera Mowing nectaring Pieris rapae RESEARCH ARTICLE transect sampling Woodlands |
title | The Effects of Field Mowing on Adult Butterfly Assemblages in Central New York State |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T16%3A00%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effects%20of%20Field%20Mowing%20on%20Adult%20Butterfly%20Assemblages%20in%20Central%20New%20York%20State&rft.jtitle=Natural%20areas%20journal&rft.au=Weber,%20Peter%20G&rft.date=2008-04&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=130&rft.epage=143&rft.pages=130-143&rft.issn=0885-8608&rft.eissn=2162-4399&rft_id=info:doi/10.3375/0885-8608(2008)28%5B130:TEOFMO%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43914046%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b398t-1fae363f6442920d1caac5477dadf6f86694ff275bb56cc50eff909d6ac7c9a53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20671658&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43914046&rfr_iscdi=true |