Loading…

The Effects of Field Mowing on Adult Butterfly Assemblages in Central New York State

We investigated the effects of mowing on butterfly counts in fields and woodland openings in upstate New York. We predicted that total counts of butterfly individuals would decrease immediately after mowing, but increase in the year following mowing at corresponding times in the growing season. To t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Natural areas journal 2008-04, Vol.28 (2), p.130-143
Main Authors: Weber, Peter G, Preston, Scott, Dlugos, Michael J, Nelson, Andrew P
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b398t-1fae363f6442920d1caac5477dadf6f86694ff275bb56cc50eff909d6ac7c9a53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b398t-1fae363f6442920d1caac5477dadf6f86694ff275bb56cc50eff909d6ac7c9a53
container_end_page 143
container_issue 2
container_start_page 130
container_title Natural areas journal
container_volume 28
creator Weber, Peter G
Preston, Scott
Dlugos, Michael J
Nelson, Andrew P
description We investigated the effects of mowing on butterfly counts in fields and woodland openings in upstate New York. We predicted that total counts of butterfly individuals would decrease immediately after mowing, but increase in the year following mowing at corresponding times in the growing season. To test these predictions, we used modified Pollard transects to obtain counts from three sampling sessions prior to and three sampling sessions after mowing. These counts were compared to those on similar dates in subsequent non-mowing years. The results show a significant decrease in counts of butterflies immediately following mowing, compared to the same periods in non-mowed years. The immediate decrease in counts following mowing may be due to the loss of nectaring sources, since nectaring and nectaring sources declined sharply following mowing, but recovered within a month following mowing. In the year following mowing, the rebound was significantly greater in fields (≥ 0.20 ha) than in woodland openings (≤ 0.19 ha). While species varied in their rebound, only two of 24 species (Pieris rapae and Danaus plexippus) declined significantly in the year following mowing.
doi_str_mv 10.3375/0885-8608(2008)28[130:TEOFMO]2.0.CO;2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20671658</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43914046</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43914046</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b398t-1fae363f6442920d1caac5477dadf6f86694ff275bb56cc50eff909d6ac7c9a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkM1O4zAUhS0EEuXnEZC8GjGLlBsndhxm1YlaQAK6oCwQQpbjXDNh0rhju0K8Paky4gFYncU597vSR0iSwjTLCn4BUvJECpDnDED-ZPI5zeByNV8u7pYvbArTavmL7ZEJSwVL8qws98nk6-aQHIXwBiAAOJ-Q1eoP0rm1aGKgztJFi11D79x7279S19NZs-0i_b2NEb3tPugsBFzXnX7FQNueVthHrzt6j-_0yfm_9CHqiCfkwOou4On_PCaPi_mquk5ul1c31ew2qbNSxiS1GjORWZHnrGTQpEZrw_OiaHRjhZVClLm1rOB1zYUxHNDaEspGaFOYUvPsmPwYuRvv_m0xRLVug8Gu0z26bVAMRJEKLofhfBwa70LwaNXGt2vtP1QKaudU7fyonR-1c6qYVINTNTpVTIGqhhg4ZyPnLUTnvyCD4zSHXAx9NfZ161yP3_zyCX5-i3M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20671658</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effects of Field Mowing on Adult Butterfly Assemblages in Central New York State</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Weber, Peter G ; Preston, Scott ; Dlugos, Michael J ; Nelson, Andrew P</creator><creatorcontrib>Weber, Peter G ; Preston, Scott ; Dlugos, Michael J ; Nelson, Andrew P</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated the effects of mowing on butterfly counts in fields and woodland openings in upstate New York. We predicted that total counts of butterfly individuals would decrease immediately after mowing, but increase in the year following mowing at corresponding times in the growing season. To test these predictions, we used modified Pollard transects to obtain counts from three sampling sessions prior to and three sampling sessions after mowing. These counts were compared to those on similar dates in subsequent non-mowing years. The results show a significant decrease in counts of butterflies immediately following mowing, compared to the same periods in non-mowed years. The immediate decrease in counts following mowing may be due to the loss of nectaring sources, since nectaring and nectaring sources declined sharply following mowing, but recovered within a month following mowing. In the year following mowing, the rebound was significantly greater in fields (≥ 0.20 ha) than in woodland openings (≤ 0.19 ha). While species varied in their rebound, only two of 24 species (Pieris rapae and Danaus plexippus) declined significantly in the year following mowing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-8608</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-4399</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3375/0885-8608(2008)28[130:TEOFMO]2.0.CO;2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Natural Areas Association</publisher><subject>Agricultural management ; Applied ecology ; Biodiversity conservation ; Butterflies ; Conservation biology ; Danaus ; Environmental conservation ; Habitat conservation ; habitat management ; Insect ecology ; Lepidoptera ; Mowing ; nectaring ; Pieris rapae ; RESEARCH ARTICLE ; transect sampling ; Woodlands</subject><ispartof>Natural areas journal, 2008-04, Vol.28 (2), p.130-143</ispartof><rights>Natural Areas Association</rights><rights>2008 Natural Areas Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b398t-1fae363f6442920d1caac5477dadf6f86694ff275bb56cc50eff909d6ac7c9a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b398t-1fae363f6442920d1caac5477dadf6f86694ff275bb56cc50eff909d6ac7c9a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43914046$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43914046$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,58237,58470</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weber, Peter G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preston, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dlugos, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Andrew P</creatorcontrib><title>The Effects of Field Mowing on Adult Butterfly Assemblages in Central New York State</title><title>Natural areas journal</title><description>We investigated the effects of mowing on butterfly counts in fields and woodland openings in upstate New York. We predicted that total counts of butterfly individuals would decrease immediately after mowing, but increase in the year following mowing at corresponding times in the growing season. To test these predictions, we used modified Pollard transects to obtain counts from three sampling sessions prior to and three sampling sessions after mowing. These counts were compared to those on similar dates in subsequent non-mowing years. The results show a significant decrease in counts of butterflies immediately following mowing, compared to the same periods in non-mowed years. The immediate decrease in counts following mowing may be due to the loss of nectaring sources, since nectaring and nectaring sources declined sharply following mowing, but recovered within a month following mowing. In the year following mowing, the rebound was significantly greater in fields (≥ 0.20 ha) than in woodland openings (≤ 0.19 ha). While species varied in their rebound, only two of 24 species (Pieris rapae and Danaus plexippus) declined significantly in the year following mowing.</description><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biodiversity conservation</subject><subject>Butterflies</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Danaus</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>habitat management</subject><subject>Insect ecology</subject><subject>Lepidoptera</subject><subject>Mowing</subject><subject>nectaring</subject><subject>Pieris rapae</subject><subject>RESEARCH ARTICLE</subject><subject>transect sampling</subject><subject>Woodlands</subject><issn>0885-8608</issn><issn>2162-4399</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdkM1O4zAUhS0EEuXnEZC8GjGLlBsndhxm1YlaQAK6oCwQQpbjXDNh0rhju0K8Paky4gFYncU597vSR0iSwjTLCn4BUvJECpDnDED-ZPI5zeByNV8u7pYvbArTavmL7ZEJSwVL8qws98nk6-aQHIXwBiAAOJ-Q1eoP0rm1aGKgztJFi11D79x7279S19NZs-0i_b2NEb3tPugsBFzXnX7FQNueVthHrzt6j-_0yfm_9CHqiCfkwOou4On_PCaPi_mquk5ul1c31ew2qbNSxiS1GjORWZHnrGTQpEZrw_OiaHRjhZVClLm1rOB1zYUxHNDaEspGaFOYUvPsmPwYuRvv_m0xRLVug8Gu0z26bVAMRJEKLofhfBwa70LwaNXGt2vtP1QKaudU7fyonR-1c6qYVINTNTpVTIGqhhg4ZyPnLUTnvyCD4zSHXAx9NfZ161yP3_zyCX5-i3M</recordid><startdate>200804</startdate><enddate>200804</enddate><creator>Weber, Peter G</creator><creator>Preston, Scott</creator><creator>Dlugos, Michael J</creator><creator>Nelson, Andrew P</creator><general>Natural Areas Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200804</creationdate><title>The Effects of Field Mowing on Adult Butterfly Assemblages in Central New York State</title><author>Weber, Peter G ; Preston, Scott ; Dlugos, Michael J ; Nelson, Andrew P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b398t-1fae363f6442920d1caac5477dadf6f86694ff275bb56cc50eff909d6ac7c9a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biodiversity conservation</topic><topic>Butterflies</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Danaus</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>habitat management</topic><topic>Insect ecology</topic><topic>Lepidoptera</topic><topic>Mowing</topic><topic>nectaring</topic><topic>Pieris rapae</topic><topic>RESEARCH ARTICLE</topic><topic>transect sampling</topic><topic>Woodlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weber, Peter G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preston, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dlugos, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Andrew P</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Natural areas journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weber, Peter G</au><au>Preston, Scott</au><au>Dlugos, Michael J</au><au>Nelson, Andrew P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effects of Field Mowing on Adult Butterfly Assemblages in Central New York State</atitle><jtitle>Natural areas journal</jtitle><date>2008-04</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>130</spage><epage>143</epage><pages>130-143</pages><issn>0885-8608</issn><eissn>2162-4399</eissn><abstract>We investigated the effects of mowing on butterfly counts in fields and woodland openings in upstate New York. We predicted that total counts of butterfly individuals would decrease immediately after mowing, but increase in the year following mowing at corresponding times in the growing season. To test these predictions, we used modified Pollard transects to obtain counts from three sampling sessions prior to and three sampling sessions after mowing. These counts were compared to those on similar dates in subsequent non-mowing years. The results show a significant decrease in counts of butterflies immediately following mowing, compared to the same periods in non-mowed years. The immediate decrease in counts following mowing may be due to the loss of nectaring sources, since nectaring and nectaring sources declined sharply following mowing, but recovered within a month following mowing. In the year following mowing, the rebound was significantly greater in fields (≥ 0.20 ha) than in woodland openings (≤ 0.19 ha). While species varied in their rebound, only two of 24 species (Pieris rapae and Danaus plexippus) declined significantly in the year following mowing.</abstract><pub>Natural Areas Association</pub><doi>10.3375/0885-8608(2008)28[130:TEOFMO]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-8608
ispartof Natural areas journal, 2008-04, Vol.28 (2), p.130-143
issn 0885-8608
2162-4399
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20671658
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Agricultural management
Applied ecology
Biodiversity conservation
Butterflies
Conservation biology
Danaus
Environmental conservation
Habitat conservation
habitat management
Insect ecology
Lepidoptera
Mowing
nectaring
Pieris rapae
RESEARCH ARTICLE
transect sampling
Woodlands
title The Effects of Field Mowing on Adult Butterfly Assemblages in Central New York State
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T16%3A00%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effects%20of%20Field%20Mowing%20on%20Adult%20Butterfly%20Assemblages%20in%20Central%20New%20York%20State&rft.jtitle=Natural%20areas%20journal&rft.au=Weber,%20Peter%20G&rft.date=2008-04&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=130&rft.epage=143&rft.pages=130-143&rft.issn=0885-8608&rft.eissn=2162-4399&rft_id=info:doi/10.3375/0885-8608(2008)28%5B130:TEOFMO%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43914046%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b398t-1fae363f6442920d1caac5477dadf6f86694ff275bb56cc50eff909d6ac7c9a53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20671658&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43914046&rfr_iscdi=true