Loading…
Diabatic and Orographic Forcing of Northern Winter Stationary Waves and Storm Tracks
In this study, a dry global circulation model is used to examine the contributions made by orographic and diabatic forcings in shaping the zonal asymmetries in the earth’s Northern Hemisphere (NH) winter climate. By design, the model mean flow is forced to bear a close resemblance to the observed zo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of climate 2009-02, Vol.22 (3), p.670-688 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-faf4fa6691fb211ba6fb8ed229dcd461d76090d0dd7504a1c35aa67f7a7dbaa43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-faf4fa6691fb211ba6fb8ed229dcd461d76090d0dd7504a1c35aa67f7a7dbaa43 |
container_end_page | 688 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 670 |
container_title | Journal of climate |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Chang, Edmund K. M. |
description | In this study, a dry global circulation model is used to examine the contributions made by orographic and diabatic forcings in shaping the zonal asymmetries in the earth’s Northern Hemisphere (NH) winter climate. By design, the model mean flow is forced to bear a close resemblance to the observed zonal mean and stationary waves. The model also provides a decent simulation of the storm tracks. In particular, the maxima over the Pacific and Atlantic, and minima over Asia and North America, are fairly well simulated. The model also successfully simulates the observation that the Atlantic storm track is stronger than the Pacific storm track, despite stronger baroclinicity over the Pacific. Sensitivity experiments are performed by imposing and removing various parts of the total forcings.
In terms of the NH winter stationary waves in the upper troposphere, results of this study are largely consistent with previous studies. Diabatic forcings explain most of the modeled stationary waves, with orographic forcings playing only a secondary role, and feedbacks due to eddy fluxes probably play only minor roles in most cases. Nevertheless, results of this study suggest that eddy fluxes may be important in modifying the response to orographic forcings in the absence of zonal asymmetries in diabatic heating. On the other hand, unlike the conclusion reached by previous studies, it is argued that the convergence of eddy momentum fluxes is important in forcing the oceanic lows in the lower troposphere, in agreement with one’s synoptic intuition.
Regarding the NH winter storm-track distribution, results of this study suggest that NH extratropical heating is the most important forcing. Zonal asymmetries in NH extratropical heating act to force the Pacific storm track to shift equatorward and the Atlantic storm track to shift poleward, attain a southwest–northeast tilt, and intensify. It appears to be the main forcing responsible for explaining why the Atlantic storm track is stronger than the Pacific storm track. Tibet and the Rockies are also important, mainly in suppressing the storm tracks over the continents, forcing a clearer separation between the two storm tracks. In contrast, asymmetries in tropical heating appear to play only a minor role in forcing the model storm-track distribution. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1175/2008jcli2403.1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20675593</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26259664</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26259664</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-faf4fa6691fb211ba6fb8ed229dcd461d76090d0dd7504a1c35aa67f7a7dbaa43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkF1LwzAUhoMoOKe33glF0LvOkzRN2kuZ3wx3sYmX5TQf2tk1M-kE_72ZEwWvQsjznpz3IeSYwohSmV8wgGKh2oZxyEZ0hwxoziAFztkuGUBR8rSQeb5PDkJYAFAmAAZkftVgjX2jEux0MvXuxePqNV5vnFdN95I4mzw6378a3yXPTdcbn8z6GHAd-s_kGT9M-I7OeueXydyjeguHZM9iG8zRzzkkTzfX8_FdOpne3o8vJ6nKirxPLVpuUYiS2ppRWqOwdWE0Y6VWmguqpYASNGgtc-BIVZYjCmklSl0j8mxIzrdzV969r03oq2UTlGlb7Ixbh4qBiI3LLIKn_8CFW_su7lYxxgoZ1ZURGm0h5V0I3thq5ZtlbFlRqDaGq43hh_HkfmO4ojFw9jMVg8LWeuxUE35TsZJkTG5-P9lyixAl_b0LlpdC8OwL3fmFJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222872009</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diabatic and Orographic Forcing of Northern Winter Stationary Waves and Storm Tracks</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Chang, Edmund K. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chang, Edmund K. M.</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, a dry global circulation model is used to examine the contributions made by orographic and diabatic forcings in shaping the zonal asymmetries in the earth’s Northern Hemisphere (NH) winter climate. By design, the model mean flow is forced to bear a close resemblance to the observed zonal mean and stationary waves. The model also provides a decent simulation of the storm tracks. In particular, the maxima over the Pacific and Atlantic, and minima over Asia and North America, are fairly well simulated. The model also successfully simulates the observation that the Atlantic storm track is stronger than the Pacific storm track, despite stronger baroclinicity over the Pacific. Sensitivity experiments are performed by imposing and removing various parts of the total forcings.
In terms of the NH winter stationary waves in the upper troposphere, results of this study are largely consistent with previous studies. Diabatic forcings explain most of the modeled stationary waves, with orographic forcings playing only a secondary role, and feedbacks due to eddy fluxes probably play only minor roles in most cases. Nevertheless, results of this study suggest that eddy fluxes may be important in modifying the response to orographic forcings in the absence of zonal asymmetries in diabatic heating. On the other hand, unlike the conclusion reached by previous studies, it is argued that the convergence of eddy momentum fluxes is important in forcing the oceanic lows in the lower troposphere, in agreement with one’s synoptic intuition.
Regarding the NH winter storm-track distribution, results of this study suggest that NH extratropical heating is the most important forcing. Zonal asymmetries in NH extratropical heating act to force the Pacific storm track to shift equatorward and the Atlantic storm track to shift poleward, attain a southwest–northeast tilt, and intensify. It appears to be the main forcing responsible for explaining why the Atlantic storm track is stronger than the Pacific storm track. Tibet and the Rockies are also important, mainly in suppressing the storm tracks over the continents, forcing a clearer separation between the two storm tracks. In contrast, asymmetries in tropical heating appear to play only a minor role in forcing the model storm-track distribution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-8755</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0442</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/2008jcli2403.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Atmosphere ; Atmospheric models ; Climate models ; Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change ; Damping ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; General circulation. Atmospheric waves ; Geopotential height ; Marine ; Meteorology ; Modeling ; Mountains ; Orography ; Simulations ; Standard deviation ; Storms ; Temperature distribution ; Troposphere ; Waves</subject><ispartof>Journal of climate, 2009-02, Vol.22 (3), p.670-688</ispartof><rights>2009 American Meteorological Society</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Feb 1, 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-faf4fa6691fb211ba6fb8ed229dcd461d76090d0dd7504a1c35aa67f7a7dbaa43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-faf4fa6691fb211ba6fb8ed229dcd461d76090d0dd7504a1c35aa67f7a7dbaa43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26259664$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26259664$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21172273$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chang, Edmund K. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Diabatic and Orographic Forcing of Northern Winter Stationary Waves and Storm Tracks</title><title>Journal of climate</title><description>In this study, a dry global circulation model is used to examine the contributions made by orographic and diabatic forcings in shaping the zonal asymmetries in the earth’s Northern Hemisphere (NH) winter climate. By design, the model mean flow is forced to bear a close resemblance to the observed zonal mean and stationary waves. The model also provides a decent simulation of the storm tracks. In particular, the maxima over the Pacific and Atlantic, and minima over Asia and North America, are fairly well simulated. The model also successfully simulates the observation that the Atlantic storm track is stronger than the Pacific storm track, despite stronger baroclinicity over the Pacific. Sensitivity experiments are performed by imposing and removing various parts of the total forcings.
In terms of the NH winter stationary waves in the upper troposphere, results of this study are largely consistent with previous studies. Diabatic forcings explain most of the modeled stationary waves, with orographic forcings playing only a secondary role, and feedbacks due to eddy fluxes probably play only minor roles in most cases. Nevertheless, results of this study suggest that eddy fluxes may be important in modifying the response to orographic forcings in the absence of zonal asymmetries in diabatic heating. On the other hand, unlike the conclusion reached by previous studies, it is argued that the convergence of eddy momentum fluxes is important in forcing the oceanic lows in the lower troposphere, in agreement with one’s synoptic intuition.
Regarding the NH winter storm-track distribution, results of this study suggest that NH extratropical heating is the most important forcing. Zonal asymmetries in NH extratropical heating act to force the Pacific storm track to shift equatorward and the Atlantic storm track to shift poleward, attain a southwest–northeast tilt, and intensify. It appears to be the main forcing responsible for explaining why the Atlantic storm track is stronger than the Pacific storm track. Tibet and the Rockies are also important, mainly in suppressing the storm tracks over the continents, forcing a clearer separation between the two storm tracks. In contrast, asymmetries in tropical heating appear to play only a minor role in forcing the model storm-track distribution.</description><subject>Atmosphere</subject><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change</subject><subject>Damping</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>General circulation. Atmospheric waves</subject><subject>Geopotential height</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Orography</subject><subject>Simulations</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Temperature distribution</subject><subject>Troposphere</subject><subject>Waves</subject><issn>0894-8755</issn><issn>1520-0442</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkF1LwzAUhoMoOKe33glF0LvOkzRN2kuZ3wx3sYmX5TQf2tk1M-kE_72ZEwWvQsjznpz3IeSYwohSmV8wgGKh2oZxyEZ0hwxoziAFztkuGUBR8rSQeb5PDkJYAFAmAAZkftVgjX2jEux0MvXuxePqNV5vnFdN95I4mzw6378a3yXPTdcbn8z6GHAd-s_kGT9M-I7OeueXydyjeguHZM9iG8zRzzkkTzfX8_FdOpne3o8vJ6nKirxPLVpuUYiS2ppRWqOwdWE0Y6VWmguqpYASNGgtc-BIVZYjCmklSl0j8mxIzrdzV969r03oq2UTlGlb7Ixbh4qBiI3LLIKn_8CFW_su7lYxxgoZ1ZURGm0h5V0I3thq5ZtlbFlRqDaGq43hh_HkfmO4ojFw9jMVg8LWeuxUE35TsZJkTG5-P9lyixAl_b0LlpdC8OwL3fmFJA</recordid><startdate>20090201</startdate><enddate>20090201</enddate><creator>Chang, Edmund K. M.</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7TN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090201</creationdate><title>Diabatic and Orographic Forcing of Northern Winter Stationary Waves and Storm Tracks</title><author>Chang, Edmund K. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-faf4fa6691fb211ba6fb8ed229dcd461d76090d0dd7504a1c35aa67f7a7dbaa43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Atmosphere</topic><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change</topic><topic>Damping</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>General circulation. Atmospheric waves</topic><topic>Geopotential height</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Orography</topic><topic>Simulations</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Temperature distribution</topic><topic>Troposphere</topic><topic>Waves</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chang, Edmund K. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of climate</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chang, Edmund K. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diabatic and Orographic Forcing of Northern Winter Stationary Waves and Storm Tracks</atitle><jtitle>Journal of climate</jtitle><date>2009-02-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>670</spage><epage>688</epage><pages>670-688</pages><issn>0894-8755</issn><eissn>1520-0442</eissn><abstract>In this study, a dry global circulation model is used to examine the contributions made by orographic and diabatic forcings in shaping the zonal asymmetries in the earth’s Northern Hemisphere (NH) winter climate. By design, the model mean flow is forced to bear a close resemblance to the observed zonal mean and stationary waves. The model also provides a decent simulation of the storm tracks. In particular, the maxima over the Pacific and Atlantic, and minima over Asia and North America, are fairly well simulated. The model also successfully simulates the observation that the Atlantic storm track is stronger than the Pacific storm track, despite stronger baroclinicity over the Pacific. Sensitivity experiments are performed by imposing and removing various parts of the total forcings.
In terms of the NH winter stationary waves in the upper troposphere, results of this study are largely consistent with previous studies. Diabatic forcings explain most of the modeled stationary waves, with orographic forcings playing only a secondary role, and feedbacks due to eddy fluxes probably play only minor roles in most cases. Nevertheless, results of this study suggest that eddy fluxes may be important in modifying the response to orographic forcings in the absence of zonal asymmetries in diabatic heating. On the other hand, unlike the conclusion reached by previous studies, it is argued that the convergence of eddy momentum fluxes is important in forcing the oceanic lows in the lower troposphere, in agreement with one’s synoptic intuition.
Regarding the NH winter storm-track distribution, results of this study suggest that NH extratropical heating is the most important forcing. Zonal asymmetries in NH extratropical heating act to force the Pacific storm track to shift equatorward and the Atlantic storm track to shift poleward, attain a southwest–northeast tilt, and intensify. It appears to be the main forcing responsible for explaining why the Atlantic storm track is stronger than the Pacific storm track. Tibet and the Rockies are also important, mainly in suppressing the storm tracks over the continents, forcing a clearer separation between the two storm tracks. In contrast, asymmetries in tropical heating appear to play only a minor role in forcing the model storm-track distribution.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/2008jcli2403.1</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0894-8755 |
ispartof | Journal of climate, 2009-02, Vol.22 (3), p.670-688 |
issn | 0894-8755 1520-0442 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20675593 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | Atmosphere Atmospheric models Climate models Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change Damping Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology External geophysics General circulation. Atmospheric waves Geopotential height Marine Meteorology Modeling Mountains Orography Simulations Standard deviation Storms Temperature distribution Troposphere Waves |
title | Diabatic and Orographic Forcing of Northern Winter Stationary Waves and Storm Tracks |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T04%3A16%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diabatic%20and%20Orographic%20Forcing%20of%20Northern%20Winter%20Stationary%20Waves%20and%20Storm%20Tracks&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20climate&rft.au=Chang,%20Edmund%20K.%20M.&rft.date=2009-02-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=670&rft.epage=688&rft.pages=670-688&rft.issn=0894-8755&rft.eissn=1520-0442&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/2008jcli2403.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26259664%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-faf4fa6691fb211ba6fb8ed229dcd461d76090d0dd7504a1c35aa67f7a7dbaa43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222872009&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26259664&rfr_iscdi=true |