Loading…

Sense of agency for movements

•We provide a graphical representation of the development of the comparator model for SoA.•We propose that a motor signal-model of SoA may be able to explain narrow SoA.•We show that standard experimental paradigms study only broad SoA.•We present results from two experiments, where we have failed t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Consciousness and cognition 2018-10, Vol.65, p.27-47
Main Authors: Christensen, Mark Schram, Grünbaum, Thor
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•We provide a graphical representation of the development of the comparator model for SoA.•We propose that a motor signal-model of SoA may be able to explain narrow SoA.•We show that standard experimental paradigms study only broad SoA.•We present results from two experiments, where we have failed to induce illusory narrow SoA in healthy participants. In this paper, we argue that the comparator model is not a satisfactory model of sense of agency (SoA). We present a theoretical argument and experimental studies. We show (1) most studies of SoA neglect a distinction between SoA associated with movements (narrow SoA) and SoA associated with environmental events (broad SoA); (2) the comparator model emerges from experimental studies of sensory consequences narrowly associated with movements; (3) narrow SoA can be explained by a comparator model, but a motor signal model is simpler and explain narrow SoA equally well; and (4) standard experimental paradigms study only broad SoA. Finally, we present results from two experiments, where we have failed to induce illusory narrow SoA in healthy participants. We believe our experimental approaches should have led to illusory SoA, if the comparator model of SoA was correct. The results challenge proponents of the comparator model of narrow SoA.
ISSN:1053-8100
1090-2376
DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2018.07.002