Loading…

Rapid Timing of Musical Aesthetic Judgments

In recent years, psychological models of perception have undergone reevaluation due to a broadening of focus toward understanding not only how observers perceive stimuli but also how they subjectively evaluate stimuli. Here, we investigated the time course of such aesthetic evaluations using a gatin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of experimental psychology. General 2018-10, Vol.147 (10), p.1531-1543
Main Authors: Belfi, Amy M, Kasdan, Anna, Rowland, Jess, Vessel, Edward A, Starr, G. Gabrielle, Poeppel, David
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a382t-247d16019946039e573fe7dde40f06366fa27587fc5a632d0ee86cfae13d2ee33
cites
container_end_page 1543
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1531
container_title Journal of experimental psychology. General
container_volume 147
creator Belfi, Amy M
Kasdan, Anna
Rowland, Jess
Vessel, Edward A
Starr, G. Gabrielle
Poeppel, David
description In recent years, psychological models of perception have undergone reevaluation due to a broadening of focus toward understanding not only how observers perceive stimuli but also how they subjectively evaluate stimuli. Here, we investigated the time course of such aesthetic evaluations using a gating paradigm. In a series of experiments, participants heard excerpts of classical, jazz, and electronica music. Excerpts were of different durations (250 ms, 500 ms, 750 ms, 1,000 ms, 2,000 ms, 10,000 ms) or note values (eighth note, quarter note, half note, dotted-half note, whole note, and entire 10,000 ms excerpt). After each excerpt, participants rated how much they liked the excerpt on a 9-point Likert scale. In Experiment 1, listeners made accurate aesthetic judgments within 750 ms for classical and jazz pieces, while electronic pieces were judged within 500 ms. When translated into note values (Experiment 2), electronica and jazz clips were judged more quickly than classical. In Experiment 3, we manipulated the familiarity of the musical excerpts. Unfamiliar clips were judged more quickly (500 ms) than familiar clips (750 ms), but there was overall higher accuracy for familiar pieces. Finally, we investigated listeners' aesthetic judgments continuously over the time course of more naturalistic (60 s) excerpts: Within 3 s, listeners' judgments differed between most- and least-liked pieces. We suggest that such rapid aesthetic judgments represent initial gut-level decisions that are made quickly, but that even these initial judgments are influenced by characteristics such as genre and familiarity.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/xge0000474
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2070799873</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2118385366</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a382t-247d16019946039e573fe7dde40f06366fa27587fc5a632d0ee86cfae13d2ee33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQQIMo7rp68QdIwYsoXZNOmqTHZfGTFUHWc4jtdK30y6QF99-buquCB-eSy5uX4RFyzOiUUZCXHyukfrjkO2TMEkjCyM8uGVOaiBA4j0fkwLm3AQIl9skIKB026ZhcPJm2yIJlURX1Kmjy4KF3RWrKYIaue8WuSIP7PltVWHfukOzlpnR4tH0n5Pn6ajm_DRePN3fz2SI0oKIujLjMmKAsSbigkGAsIUeZZchpTgUIkZtIxkrmaWwERBlFVCLNDTLIIkSACTnbeFvbvPf-Dl0VLsWyNDU2vdMRlVQmiZIDevoHfWt6W_vrdMSYAhX7__6lvEvFCjw7IecbKrWNcxZz3dqiMnatGdVDLv0b2sMnW2X_UmH2g36X9cB0A5jW6NatU2N9zBJd2lvraw4yzbj8ksfA4BMH6ITH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2070858318</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rapid Timing of Musical Aesthetic Judgments</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Belfi, Amy M ; Kasdan, Anna ; Rowland, Jess ; Vessel, Edward A ; Starr, G. Gabrielle ; Poeppel, David</creator><contributor>Cowan, Nelson</contributor><creatorcontrib>Belfi, Amy M ; Kasdan, Anna ; Rowland, Jess ; Vessel, Edward A ; Starr, G. Gabrielle ; Poeppel, David ; Cowan, Nelson</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years, psychological models of perception have undergone reevaluation due to a broadening of focus toward understanding not only how observers perceive stimuli but also how they subjectively evaluate stimuli. Here, we investigated the time course of such aesthetic evaluations using a gating paradigm. In a series of experiments, participants heard excerpts of classical, jazz, and electronica music. Excerpts were of different durations (250 ms, 500 ms, 750 ms, 1,000 ms, 2,000 ms, 10,000 ms) or note values (eighth note, quarter note, half note, dotted-half note, whole note, and entire 10,000 ms excerpt). After each excerpt, participants rated how much they liked the excerpt on a 9-point Likert scale. In Experiment 1, listeners made accurate aesthetic judgments within 750 ms for classical and jazz pieces, while electronic pieces were judged within 500 ms. When translated into note values (Experiment 2), electronica and jazz clips were judged more quickly than classical. In Experiment 3, we manipulated the familiarity of the musical excerpts. Unfamiliar clips were judged more quickly (500 ms) than familiar clips (750 ms), but there was overall higher accuracy for familiar pieces. Finally, we investigated listeners' aesthetic judgments continuously over the time course of more naturalistic (60 s) excerpts: Within 3 s, listeners' judgments differed between most- and least-liked pieces. We suggest that such rapid aesthetic judgments represent initial gut-level decisions that are made quickly, but that even these initial judgments are influenced by characteristics such as genre and familiarity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-3445</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2222</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/xge0000474</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30010370</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aesthetic Preferences ; Aesthetics ; Affect - physiology ; Auditory Perception - physiology ; Esthetics ; Familiarity ; Female ; Genre ; Human ; Humans ; Judgment ; Judgment - physiology ; Male ; Music ; Music Perception ; Recognition (Psychology) - physiology ; Social perception ; Test Construction ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2018-10, Vol.147 (10), p.1531-1543</ispartof><rights>2018 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2018, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Oct 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a382t-247d16019946039e573fe7dde40f06366fa27587fc5a632d0ee86cfae13d2ee33</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-1469-4117 ; 0000-0002-7063-8494</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30010370$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Cowan, Nelson</contributor><creatorcontrib>Belfi, Amy M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasdan, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowland, Jess</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vessel, Edward A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Starr, G. Gabrielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poeppel, David</creatorcontrib><title>Rapid Timing of Musical Aesthetic Judgments</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. General</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Gen</addtitle><description>In recent years, psychological models of perception have undergone reevaluation due to a broadening of focus toward understanding not only how observers perceive stimuli but also how they subjectively evaluate stimuli. Here, we investigated the time course of such aesthetic evaluations using a gating paradigm. In a series of experiments, participants heard excerpts of classical, jazz, and electronica music. Excerpts were of different durations (250 ms, 500 ms, 750 ms, 1,000 ms, 2,000 ms, 10,000 ms) or note values (eighth note, quarter note, half note, dotted-half note, whole note, and entire 10,000 ms excerpt). After each excerpt, participants rated how much they liked the excerpt on a 9-point Likert scale. In Experiment 1, listeners made accurate aesthetic judgments within 750 ms for classical and jazz pieces, while electronic pieces were judged within 500 ms. When translated into note values (Experiment 2), electronica and jazz clips were judged more quickly than classical. In Experiment 3, we manipulated the familiarity of the musical excerpts. Unfamiliar clips were judged more quickly (500 ms) than familiar clips (750 ms), but there was overall higher accuracy for familiar pieces. Finally, we investigated listeners' aesthetic judgments continuously over the time course of more naturalistic (60 s) excerpts: Within 3 s, listeners' judgments differed between most- and least-liked pieces. We suggest that such rapid aesthetic judgments represent initial gut-level decisions that are made quickly, but that even these initial judgments are influenced by characteristics such as genre and familiarity.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aesthetic Preferences</subject><subject>Aesthetics</subject><subject>Affect - physiology</subject><subject>Auditory Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Esthetics</subject><subject>Familiarity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genre</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Judgment - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Music</subject><subject>Music Perception</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology) - physiology</subject><subject>Social perception</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0096-3445</issn><issn>1939-2222</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQQIMo7rp68QdIwYsoXZNOmqTHZfGTFUHWc4jtdK30y6QF99-buquCB-eSy5uX4RFyzOiUUZCXHyukfrjkO2TMEkjCyM8uGVOaiBA4j0fkwLm3AQIl9skIKB026ZhcPJm2yIJlURX1Kmjy4KF3RWrKYIaue8WuSIP7PltVWHfukOzlpnR4tH0n5Pn6ajm_DRePN3fz2SI0oKIujLjMmKAsSbigkGAsIUeZZchpTgUIkZtIxkrmaWwERBlFVCLNDTLIIkSACTnbeFvbvPf-Dl0VLsWyNDU2vdMRlVQmiZIDevoHfWt6W_vrdMSYAhX7__6lvEvFCjw7IecbKrWNcxZz3dqiMnatGdVDLv0b2sMnW2X_UmH2g36X9cB0A5jW6NatU2N9zBJd2lvraw4yzbj8ksfA4BMH6ITH</recordid><startdate>201810</startdate><enddate>201810</enddate><creator>Belfi, Amy M</creator><creator>Kasdan, Anna</creator><creator>Rowland, Jess</creator><creator>Vessel, Edward A</creator><creator>Starr, G. Gabrielle</creator><creator>Poeppel, David</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1469-4117</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7063-8494</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201810</creationdate><title>Rapid Timing of Musical Aesthetic Judgments</title><author>Belfi, Amy M ; Kasdan, Anna ; Rowland, Jess ; Vessel, Edward A ; Starr, G. Gabrielle ; Poeppel, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a382t-247d16019946039e573fe7dde40f06366fa27587fc5a632d0ee86cfae13d2ee33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aesthetic Preferences</topic><topic>Aesthetics</topic><topic>Affect - physiology</topic><topic>Auditory Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Esthetics</topic><topic>Familiarity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genre</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Judgment - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Music</topic><topic>Music Perception</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology) - physiology</topic><topic>Social perception</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Belfi, Amy M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasdan, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowland, Jess</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vessel, Edward A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Starr, G. Gabrielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poeppel, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. General</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Belfi, Amy M</au><au>Kasdan, Anna</au><au>Rowland, Jess</au><au>Vessel, Edward A</au><au>Starr, G. Gabrielle</au><au>Poeppel, David</au><au>Cowan, Nelson</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rapid Timing of Musical Aesthetic Judgments</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. General</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Gen</addtitle><date>2018-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>147</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1531</spage><epage>1543</epage><pages>1531-1543</pages><issn>0096-3445</issn><eissn>1939-2222</eissn><abstract>In recent years, psychological models of perception have undergone reevaluation due to a broadening of focus toward understanding not only how observers perceive stimuli but also how they subjectively evaluate stimuli. Here, we investigated the time course of such aesthetic evaluations using a gating paradigm. In a series of experiments, participants heard excerpts of classical, jazz, and electronica music. Excerpts were of different durations (250 ms, 500 ms, 750 ms, 1,000 ms, 2,000 ms, 10,000 ms) or note values (eighth note, quarter note, half note, dotted-half note, whole note, and entire 10,000 ms excerpt). After each excerpt, participants rated how much they liked the excerpt on a 9-point Likert scale. In Experiment 1, listeners made accurate aesthetic judgments within 750 ms for classical and jazz pieces, while electronic pieces were judged within 500 ms. When translated into note values (Experiment 2), electronica and jazz clips were judged more quickly than classical. In Experiment 3, we manipulated the familiarity of the musical excerpts. Unfamiliar clips were judged more quickly (500 ms) than familiar clips (750 ms), but there was overall higher accuracy for familiar pieces. Finally, we investigated listeners' aesthetic judgments continuously over the time course of more naturalistic (60 s) excerpts: Within 3 s, listeners' judgments differed between most- and least-liked pieces. We suggest that such rapid aesthetic judgments represent initial gut-level decisions that are made quickly, but that even these initial judgments are influenced by characteristics such as genre and familiarity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>30010370</pmid><doi>10.1037/xge0000474</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1469-4117</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7063-8494</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0096-3445
ispartof Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2018-10, Vol.147 (10), p.1531-1543
issn 0096-3445
1939-2222
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2070799873
source EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Adult
Aesthetic Preferences
Aesthetics
Affect - physiology
Auditory Perception - physiology
Esthetics
Familiarity
Female
Genre
Human
Humans
Judgment
Judgment - physiology
Male
Music
Music Perception
Recognition (Psychology) - physiology
Social perception
Test Construction
Young Adult
title Rapid Timing of Musical Aesthetic Judgments
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A52%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rapid%20Timing%20of%20Musical%20Aesthetic%20Judgments&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20General&rft.au=Belfi,%20Amy%20M&rft.date=2018-10&rft.volume=147&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1531&rft.epage=1543&rft.pages=1531-1543&rft.issn=0096-3445&rft.eissn=1939-2222&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/xge0000474&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2118385366%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a382t-247d16019946039e573fe7dde40f06366fa27587fc5a632d0ee86cfae13d2ee33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2070858318&rft_id=info:pmid/30010370&rfr_iscdi=true